# data[].attributes.body
해석: (사전적 의미 또는 비유적/관용적 의미)
맥락: (해당 단어/구절이 언급된 기사 문장과 여기에서의 정확한 맥락)
Fuel costs hurt, but there are ways oil supply can be boosted to help meet demand.
* 메모지의 색은 흰색으로 통일
* 익명으로 작성하지 않음
(반드시 학교 구글계정으로 로그인)
* 메모지 한 개 당 단어/구절 하나씩
* 메모지의 순서를 바꿀 수 있으니 기사문에서의 단어 순으로 정렬

# data[].attributes.body
해석: Roe와 Wade 간의 재판
맥락: 낙태가 합법이라고 결정된 미국 대법원의 판례
Roe vs. Wade is no overturned, which will soon effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 위태롭게 하다
맥락: If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~로 누설되다
맥락: 정치가들에게 누설된
That decision, a draft of which was leaked to Politico in Mah and was released in its final form Friday, affects a woman's likeihood to work at all, what type of job she takes, how much education she receives, how much money she makes, and even the hopes and dreams she has for herself.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 차례차례
맥락: 차례차례, 결국,
In turn, her career affects nearly all other aspects of her life, from her likelihood to live in poverty to her view of herself.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 계속되는 영향
맥락: 계속되는 영향
그리고 그러한 결정을 만드는 능력을 빼앗는 것은 사회에서 여성의 자리가 계속되는 영향을 받는 노동에서 여성이 만들어 온 진척을 10년을 거꾸로 한다(약 10년 전의 여성의 지위)<-여성의 지위 낮음
And taking away the ability to make that decision stands to upend decades of progress women have made in the workforce, which has cascading effects on women's place in society.

# data[].attributes.headline
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

# data[].attributes.subject
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

# data[].attributes.body
해석: Dobbs vs Jackson 의 여성 보건 기구
맥락: Dobbs와 Jackson Women's Health Organization 사이의 재판. 이 재판에서 Roe v. Wade 재판에서 결정된 낙태 합법화가 뒤집힘
outlined in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Mississippi cas that's responsible for upending Roe v. Wade.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is an amazing time in the history of the United States. All together, the prolife side filed 80 briefs in support of the Mississippi law banning late term abortion, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Many of those briefs asked for the complete and total reversal of Roe v.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 로 대 웨이드 재판 (임신 중절 권리를 인정한 미국 최고 재판소의 판례)

맥락:A 1996 study by Joshua Angrist and William Evans looked at states that liberalized abortion laws before Roe V. Wade and found abortion access leads to higher education rates and labor-market outcomes.

Joshua Angrist 와 William Evans의 1996년 연구는 로 대 웨이드 재판 이전에 낙태법을 자유화 해야 한다고 보았고 낙태 접근은 더 높은 교육율과 더 높은 노동 시장 성과로 이어진다는 것을 발견했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:교육률
맥락:Education rates are foundational for career prospects and pay.

교육률은 직업 전망과 급여의 기초가 된다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:교육성취도
맥락:American University economics professor Kelly Jones used state abortion regulation data to determine that legal abortion access for young women who became pregnant increased their educational attainment by nearly a year and their likelihood of finishing college by about 20 percentage points.

미국 대학 경제학 교수인 Kelly Jones 주(미국의 도시) 낙태 규제 데이터를 사용하여 임신한 젊은 여성들의 위한 합법적인 낙태 접근법이 젊은 여성들의 교육 성취도를 거의 1년 정도 증가 시키고 대학을 졸업할 가능성을 약20% 증가 시켰다는 것을 증명하였다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~에 대한 노출, 폭로, (언론을 통해) 알려짐/다뤄짐
맥락: Jones와 Mayra Pineda-Torres의 다른 연구에서는 낙태 제공자에 대한 대상 제한 또는 TRAP 법률에 대한 단순한 노출이 10대의 젊은 흑인들의 대학 진학 또는 졸업 가능성을 감소 시키는 것으로 나타났습니다.
Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers’ likelihood of attending or completing college.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~에 대한 제약/제한
맥락: Jones와 Mayra Pineda-Torres의 다른 연구에서는 낙태 제공자에 대한 대상 제한 또는 TRAP 법률에 대한 단순한 노출이 10대의 젊은 흑인들의 대학 진학 또는 졸업 가능성을 감소 시키는 것으로 나타났습니다.
Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers’ likelihood of attending or completing college.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider의 줄임말로 낙태 제공자를 제한하기 위해 특별하게 만든 법률이다.
맥락: Jones와 Mayra Pineda-Torres의 다른 연구에서는 낙태 제공자에 대한 대상 제한 또는 TRAP 법률에 대한 단순한 노출이 10대의 젊은 흑인들의 대학 진학 또는 졸업 가능성을 감소 시키는 것으로 나타났습니다.
Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers’ likelihood of attending or completing college.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 낙태 제공자 (보건안전법 245장에 따라 허가를 받은 시설 또는 보건안전법 243장에 따라 허가를 받은 외래 수술 센터를 의미하며, 12개월 동안 50건 이상의 낙태를 시행하는데 사용된다. 또는 낙태를 수행하는 의사를 의미한다.)
맥락: Jones와 Mayra Pineda-Torres의 다른 연구에서는 낙태 제공자에 대한 대상 제한 또는 TRAP 법률에 대한 단순한 노출이 10대의 젊은 흑인들의 대학 진학 또는 졸업 가능성을 감소 시키는 것으로 나타났습니다.
Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers’ likelihood of attending or completing college.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~에 적임인, 자격을 갖춘
맥락: 차례로, 낮은 수준의 교육은 여성에게 적임인 직업에 영향을 미칩니다.
In turn, lower education affects which jobs women are qualified for.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 몰아가다, 조종하다, (특정 방향으로) 움직이다
맥락: 자녀를 갖는 것은 여성이 얻는 직업의 유형에 상당한 영향을 미치며 종종 여성을 시간제 일 또는 저임금을 받는 직업으로 몰아갑니다.
Having children significantly affects the types of jobs women get, often steering them to part-time work or lower-paying occupations.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 광범위한
맥락: 낙태를 법으로 제정하기를 원하는 모든 주에서 더 광범위한 낙태 금지가 가능하지만, 많은 각각의 주들은 이미 낙태를 더 어렵게 만드는 TRAP 법을 제정했다.
While broader abortion bans are now possible in any state that whishes to enact one, plenty of individual states have already enacted TRAP laws that make getting an abortion more difficult.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~할 가능성이 낮다
맥락: 이 법률은 또한 비영리 연구기관인 Washington Center for Equitable Growth (워싱턴 평등 성장 센터)의 수석 경제학자 Kate Bahn과 같은 연구자들에게 자연스러운 실험을 제공했는데, 그들은 이 주들에서 여성들이 고임금 직업으로 이직할 가능성이 낮다는 것을 발견했다.
This legislation has also provided a natural experiment for researchers like Kate Bahn, chief economist at research nonprofit Washington Center for Equitable Growth, who found women in these states were less likely to move into higher-paid occupations.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~로 이동하다
맥락: move into 뒤의 고임금 직업을 뜻하는 higher-paid occupation을 보아 ~로 이직하다 라고 해석할 수 있다.

이 법률은 또한 비영리 연구기관인 Washington Center for Equitable Growth (워싱턴 평등 성장 센터)의 수석 경제학자 Kate Bahn과 같은 연구자들에게 자연스러운 실험을 제공했는데, 그들은 이 주들에서 여성들이 고임금 직업으로 이직할 가능성이 낮다는 것을 발견했다.
This legislation has also provided a natural experiment for researchers like Kate Bahn, chief economist at research nonprofit Washington Center for Equitable Growth, who found women in these states were less likely to move into higher-paid occupations.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 피임약
맥락: Bahn은 Recode(Vox에 있는 한 채널 중 하나)에 "70년대에 피임약과 낙태의 초기 확장에 대한 이전 연구에서 여성이 가족 계획에 대해 조금 더 확신을 가지게 된다면 다른 선택을 한다는 것을 알 수 있습니다." 라고 말했습니다.
"We know a lot from previous research on the initial expansion of birth control pills and abortion care in the '70s that, when women have a little more certainty over their family planning, they just make choices differently," Bahn told Recode.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 성별 직종분리(=차별)
맥락: This could lead to more occupational segregation.
이것은 더 많은 성별 직종분리를 초래 할 수 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 과잉 대표성
맥락:This could lead to more occupational segregation-women's overrepresentation in certain fields like health care and teaching, for example- which reduces wages in those fields, even when accounting for education, experience, and location.
이것은 성별 직종 분리를 초래 할 수 있다- 예를 들어 의료 및 교육과 같은 특정직업군에서 여성의 과잉 대표성은 교육, 경험 및 위치를 고려하더라도 해당 분야의 임금을 감소 시킵니다.

# data[].attributes.body
entering.들어오고있다
professional occupation.전문직종
Jones's research found that legal abortion access for pregnant young women increased their likelihook of entering a professional occupation by 35 percentage points.
법적으로 낙태를 한 임신한젊은 여성이  전문직종을 가질수있는 가능성 35%p만큼 높아졌다라는 뜻으로 쓰였다.

# data[].attributes.body
시간당임금

One paper by economist Ali Abboud that looked at states where abortion was legal before Roev.Wade found that young women who got an abortion to delay an unplanned pregnancy for just one year had an 11 percent increase in hourly wages compared to the mean.
낙태를 한 젊은 여성은 평균에 비해 시급이 11퍼센트나 인상되었다는 뜻으로쓰였다

# data[].attributes.body
Restrictions

해석:(법률,규칙을 통한)제한[규제]

맥락:IWPR(미국여성정책연구소)는 기존에 존재하는 낙태 제한이 사라진다면 미국 전역의 여성들은 평균적으로 $1,600달러 이상을 벌 것이라고 추정한다.

The IWPR estimates that if existing abortion restrictions went away,women across the US would make $1,600more a year on average.

# data[].attributes.body
Existing children

해석:원치않은 임신한 여성들의 현재 자녀들(직역:현존아이들)

맥락:결국에는 소득이 원치 않은 임신을 해야하는 여성들뿐만이 아니라그들의 현재 존재하는 아이들의 빈곤율에도 영향을 미친다.

Income,in turn, affects poverty rates of not only the women who have to go through unwanted pregnancy,but also their existing children.

# data[].attributes.body
5) 두번째문장
해석: "~를 토대로" 라는 의미이다.
맥락: Building on her team's research in the Turnawat Study
Turnawat Study 에서 그녀의 팀의 연구에 따르면
이 글의 문맥에서는 "Turnaway 연구팀에서 그녀의 팀의 조사, 연구를 토대로" 라는 의미이다

# data[].attributes.body
5) 세번째줄
해석: 원하는 낙태
맥락: women who were unable to get a desired abortion
원하는 낙태를 받을 수 없는 여성
이 문장에서 낙태를 원하지만 낙태를 받을 수 없는 여성들을 의미한다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 한 해 목표 (일년동안의 목표로 한 해의 첫날에 시작해서 마지막날에 끝내는 목표를 뜻함)
맥락: less likely to have one-year goals related to employment
고용과 관련된 한 해 목표를 덜 가지려고 한다
이 부분에서 고용과 관련된 한 해 목표를 덜 가지려고 한다 라는 의미이다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 출세지향적인
맥락: They were also less likely to have one-year or five-year aspirational goals in general.
그들은 열정적인 한 해 목표나 다섯 해 목표 를 덜 가지려고 하였다.
이 문장에서는 출세지향적이라는 의미 대신 "열정적인 한 해 혹은 다섯 해 목표" 라고 해석이 되고 이 단어는 문맥상 "열정적인, 열망적인" 이라고 해석되었다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석:
1) 부서지기 쉬운
2) 취약한
맥락: Myers의 말은 "미국 최동남부 지역과 미국 중서부의 넓은 구역에 있는 가장 가난하고, 가장 취약하고, 가장 재정적으로 취약한 여성들"
- in Myers's word, "the poorest, the most vulnerable,the most financially fragile women in a wide swath of the Deep South and the Miswest"

# data[].attributes.body
해석:
1) 한 번 낫질한 자취
2) 베어나간 넓이
맥락: a wide swath를 같이 해석하여 넓은 구역으로 해석.
- in Myers's word, "the poorest, the most vulnerable,the most financially fragile womenin a wide swath of the Deep South and the Miswest"
Myers의 말은 "미국 최동남부 지역과 미국 중서부의 넓은 구역에 있는 가장 가난하고, 가장 취약하고, 가장 재정적으로 취약한 여성들"

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 부분적으로는
맥락: As US faces an ongoing labor shortage  - one led in part by women who have left the workforce to care for children and elders during the pandemic - the Supreme Court's expected decision will exacerbate the situation and potentially change women's experience in the workforce for years to come.
미국이 노동력 부족 증가를 직면함에 따라 - 코로나 기간 동안 어린이와 노인을 돌보기 위해 직장을 떠난 여성들이 부분적으로는 노동력 부족을 이끈 것 - 대법원의 기대한 결정은 상황을 악화시킬 것이고 잠재적으로 직장에 있는 여성의 경험은 바뀔 것이다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 끌어올리다
맥락: 낙태 접근은 여성의 노동력 참가를 끌어올리는 주요한 힘이다.
Abortion access is a major force that has driven up women's labor force participation.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 좌절 시키다 (=frustrate)
맥락: 낙태 금지는 이러한 몇몇의 이득을 좌절 시키거나 또는 뒤바꿀 수 있다.
Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~면에서
맥락: (시간과 돈) 면에서
아이를 가져보았거나 진지하게 아이를 가지는 것에 대해 고민하는 사람들은 아이를 가지는 것이 시간과 돈의 면에서 엄청난 비용이 든다는 것을 안다.
Anyone who has had kids or seriously thought about having kids knows it’s super costly in terms of time and money.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 뒤집다
- Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains
맥락 : 낙태 금지는 몇몇의 이익들을 좌절시키거나 심지어 뒤집을 수 있다 .

# data[].attributes.body
생식권
Limiting women’s autonomy over their reproductive rights reinforces the unequal status of women in ways that are both concrete and ephemeral.
여성의 생식권에 대한 여성의 자치권(자주성)을 제한하는 것은 여성의 불공평한 지위를구체적이고 덧없는(일시적인)방법으로 강화(중강)한다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 규제
맥락: 규제=낙태의 불법화
그래서 물론 사람들이 아이를 가질 때 시간을 보내기 더 어렵게 만드는 규제(낙태의 불법화) 또는, 사람들이 가진 아이의 수가 증가하는 것은 그들의 직업과 경제적 상황에 심각한 영향을 미칠 것이다.
So of course restrictions that make it harder for people to time when they have kids or which increases the number of children that they have is going to have serious impacts on their careers and their economic circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
대법원
The Supreme Court is making it so.
대법원이 그렇게만들고 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 고용 가능성
a gap that could affect their employment prospects even further into the future
그 차이는 더 먼 미래에서도 그들의 고용 가능성에 영향을 끼칠 수 있다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~의 수
맥락: (아이들)의 수
그래서 물론 사람들이 아이를 가질 때 시간을 보내기 더 어렵게 만드는 규제(낙태의 불법화) 또는, 사람들이 가진 아이의 수가 증가하는 것은 그들의 직업과 경제적 상황에 심각한 영향을 미칠 것이다.
So of course restrictions that make it harder for people to time when they have kids or which increases the number of children that they have is going to have serious impacts on their careers and their economic circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 낙태 반대 상태
맥락: 주 낙태 반대
Even in the absence of a national ban, state anti-abortion measures have been a huge burden on women and society at large.
국제적인 금지의 금지일 지라도, 주의 반 낙태 조치는 여성과 사회에게 큰 부담이 되어 왔다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 측정하다
맥락: 해결 방안
Even in the absence of a national ban, state anti-abortion measures have been a huge burden on women and society at large.

# data[].attributes.headline
A 승빈 서현 주현  정민<

# data[].attributes.body
A 승빈 서현 주현  정민
B 요한 채빈 은비 현정
C 지훈 미정 성윤 지호
D 가흔 우주 현담 지후

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.vox.com/recode/23074696/abortion-illegal-supereme-court-women-work

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This story is part of a group of stories called

Uncovering and explaining how our digital world is changing - and changing us.

Roe vs. Wade is all but certain to be overturned, which could effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states. If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

That decision, a draft of which was leaked to Politico earlier this month, affects a woman's likelihood to work at all, what type of job she takes, how much education she receives, how much money she makes, and even the hopes and dreams she has for herself. In turn, her career affects nearly all other aspects of her life, from her likelihood to live in poverty to her view of herself.

And taking away the ability to make that decision stands to upend decades of progress women have made in the workforce, which has cascading effects on women's place in society.

As Caitlin Myers, a professor of economics at Middlebury College, put it, "Childbearing is the single most economically important decision most women make."

We know all this because of decades of research on how abortion bans hurt women - research that Myers, along with more than 150 other economists, outlined in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Mississippi case that's likely to upend Roe v. Wade. In addition to long-term studies specifically looking at outcomes of women who were unable to get an abortion versus those who did, there's even more robust data around the negative causal effects of having children on women in general. It's also just common sense, according to Jason Lindo, a professor of economics at Texas A&M University.

"Anyone who has had kids or seriously thought about having kids knows it's super costly in terms of time and money," Lindo said. "So of course restrictions that make it harder for people to time when they have kids or which increase the number of children that they have is going to have serious impacts on their careers and their economic circumstances."

Even in the absence of a national ban, state anti-abortion measures have been a huge burden on women and society at large. The Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) estimated that state-level restrictions have cost those economies $105 billion a year in reduced labor force participation, reduced earnings, increased turnover, and time off among prime working-age women.

An abortion ban won't affect all women equally, either. Myers says that in regions of the country where abortion is banned and where travel distances will increase for women to be able to get an abortion, about three-quarters of women seeking abortions will still do so. That means roughly a quarter of women there - in Myers's words, "the poorest, the most vulnerable, the most financially fragile women in a wide swath of the Deep South and the Midwest" - will not receive their health care services.

As the US faces an ongoing labor shortage - one led in part by women who have left the workforce to care for children and elders during the pandemic - the Supreme Court's expected decision will exacerbate the situation and potentially change women's experience in the workforce for years to come.

1) Women's labor force participation could go down

Abortion access is a major force that has driven up women's labor force participation. Nationally, women's labor force participation rates went from around 40 percent before Roe v. Wade was passed in 1973 to nearly 60 percent before the pandemic (men's participation was nearly 70 percent at that time). Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.

Using data from the Turnaway Study, landmark research that compares outcomes over time for women across the country who received or were denied abortions, University of California San Francisco professor Diana Greene Foster and fellow researchers found that six months after they were denied an abortion, women were less likely to be employed full-time than those who received an abortion. That difference remained significant for four years after these women were denied abortions, a gap that could affect their employment prospects even further into the future.

2) Lower educational attainment

Education rates are foundational for career prospects and pay. A 1996 study by Joshua Angrist and William Evans looked at states that liberalized abortion laws before Roe v. Wade andfound abortion access leads to higher education rates and labor-market outcomes. American University economics professor Kelly Jones used state abortion regulation data to determine that legal abortion access for young women who became pregnant increased their educational attainment by nearly a year and their likelihood of finishing college by about 20 percentage points. The evidence is largely driven by the impacts on young Black women.

Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers' likelihood of attending or completing college. In turn, lower education affects which jobs women are qualified for.

3) The types of jobs women get will be more restricted

Having children significantly affects the types of jobs women get, often steering them to part-time work or lower-paying occupations. While a broader abortion ban is on the horizon, plenty of individual states have already enacted TRAP laws that make getting an abortion more difficult. This legislation has also provided a natural experiment for researchers like Kate Bahn, chief economist at research nonprofit Washington Center for Equitable Growth, who found women in these states were less likely to move into higher-paid occupations.

"We know a lot from previous research on the initial expansion of birth control pills and abortion care in the '70s that, when women have a little more certainty over their family planning, they just make choices differently," Bahn told Recode.

This could lead to more occupational segregation - women's overrepresentation in certain fields like health care and teaching, for example - which reduces wages in those fields, even when accounting for education, experience, and location.

4) All of the above negatively affect income

Curtailing which jobs women get, taking time out of the workforce, receiving less education - all of these hurt women's pay, which is already lower on average than men's.

One paper by economist Ali Abboud that looked at states where abortion was legal before Roe v. Wade found that young women who got an abortion to delay an unplanned pregnancy for just one year had an 11 percent increase in hourly wages compared to the mean. Jones's research found that legal abortion access for pregnant young women increased their likelihood of entering a professional occupation by 35 percentage points.

The IWPR estimates that if existing abortion restrictions went away, women across the US would make $1,600 more a year on average. Lost income doesn't just affect women who have unwanted pregnancies, but also their families and their existing children. Income, in turn, affects poverty rates of not only the women who have to go through unwanted pregnancy, but also their existing children.

5) Lack of abortion access limits women's career aspirations

Perhaps most insidiously, lack of abortion access seriously restricts women's hopes for their own careers. Building on her team's research in the Turnaway Study, Foster found that women who were unable to get a desired abortion were significantly less likely to have one-year goals related to employment than those who did, likely because those goals would be much harder to achieve while taking care of a newborn. They were also less likely to have one-year or five-year aspirational goals in general.

Limiting women's autonomy over their reproductive rights reinforces the unequal status of women in ways that are both concrete and ephemeral, C. Nicole Mason, president and CEO of IWPR, told Recode.

"That's a very psychic, emotional, psychological feeling - to feel and understand that my equality, my rights, are less than my male counterparts," she said. "The law is making it so. The Supreme Court is making it so."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
5 ways abortion bans could hurt women in the workforce

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Uncovering and explaining how our digital world is changing - and changing us. Roe vs. Wade is all but certain to be overturned, which could effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states. If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

# data[].attributes.headline
이번 주 안으로 할 일

# data[].attributes.subject
이번 주 안으로 할 일

# data[].attributes.body
- ClassCard: Food Crisis, Abortion 단어 학습하고 시험 치기
- Abortion 기사 전체 복습해두기
- 말하기 수행평가 주제 올리기
- Padlet 노락딱지 붙은 사람 수정해두기

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 같은 상태의 규제
맥락: 주 수준의
The Institute for Women's Policy Research(IWPR) estimated that state-level restrictions have cost those economies $105 billion a year in reduced labor force participation, reduced earnings, increased turnover, and time off among prime working-age women.
여성 정책 연구 기관은 그 주 수준의 규제가 노동인구의 절약, 줄어든 소득, 매출 증가, 일하기 좋은 여성의 활동 중단에서 1년에 1050억 달러의 경제 비용을 들였다고 추정했다.