# data[].attributes.body
I don't think it's enough because the journalists still run the risk of having bounties on their heads.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think freedom Act is enough to protect a journalist because no matter what people are gonna do what they want to do and people may see this as a way to act out rather than protect

# data[].attributes.body
n i think that the daniel freedom act is enought because they can still be hurt in many ways just because they say the truth or sometimes there is people who say it i different perspective and others dont like and can get hurt just because it is on a paper it dont mean they will all be safe

# data[].attributes.body
I really don't think that by sending a message to other countries, will protect the journalist. They might be in bigger danger now. since it looks like the government only knows about the deaths of journalist but don't know how to act or do about it.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think Daniel Freedom Act is enough to protect a journalist, because if it can there's shouldn't be any news or report that a journalist has been killed or harm.

# data[].attributes.headline
No, the Daniel Freedom act is not enough to protect them because it may be a message to the public but people won't listen and can do harm no matter what. 

# data[].attributes.subject
No, the Daniel Freedom act is not enough to protect them because it may be a message to the public but people won't listen and can do harm no matter what. 

# data[].attributes.body
Cynthia Umana

# data[].attributes.body
Though its become a press act, it would not necessary help any journalist because of that current event. harm would still be done and justice would only be served. thought they quoted that they're "watching" it STILL wouldnt resolve anything or help anyone in that matter. so no, this isnt enough to protect journalist.

# data[].attributes.body
Journalists arent fully protected from the Freedom of the Press act because they can still be in harm from the people since they might disagree with their opinion and harm them. They can be hurt physically if they go to a foreign country who does not agree with the journalists opinion and there will be no one to protect the journalists there so the protection of this act is minimal.

# data[].attributes.body
Nobody is going to be safe because it is written on a paper. What happened after the 18th amendment, more crime started happening. It's inevitable, me telling you to not do something isn't going to stop someone from wanting and possibly completing that something.

# data[].attributes.body
i don´t think this enough to protect journalist because at the end of the day countries are still going to do what they want. basically the U.S. just said ¨we are watching¨ and that´s it won´t the solve the problem it might just make countries even more clever killing journalists

# data[].attributes.headline
Even the president signed this act, i don't think that they would care and instead for them to feel protected, they are becoming targets. His enactment calls upon the Secretary of State to significantly extend its assessment of the situation with opportunity of the press worldwide in the Express Division's Yearly Nation Reports on Common liberties Practices. In particular, the enactment requires the State Division to recognize nations in which there were infringement of press opportunity; decide if the public authority specialists of those nations partake in, work with, or approve the infringement; and report the moves such legislatures have made to protect the wellbeing and autonomy of the media and guarantee the indictment of people who assault or murder journalist.

# data[].attributes.subject
Even the president signed this act, i don't think that they would care and instead for them to feel protected, they are becoming targets. His enactment calls upon the Secretary of State to significantly extend its assessment of the situation with opportunity of the press worldwide in the Express Division's Yearly Nation Reports on Common liberties Practices. In particular, the enactment requires the State Division to recognize nations in which there were infringement of press opportunity; decide if the public authority specialists of those nations partake in, work with, or approve the infringement; and report the moves such legislatures have made to protect the wellbeing and autonomy of the media and guarantee the indictment of people who assault or murder journalist.

# data[].attributes.headline
i think that even with them communicating with other may not get them the protection they need or want.

# data[].attributes.subject
i think that even with them communicating with other may not get them the protection they need or want.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think it is enough to protect them because the public around them can disagree with what they may be reporting and the people may tend to get aggressive and may hurt them physically. But this act is only letting them report in any country but isn't protecting them from any type of physical violence.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yeny G       well I think the Daniel Pearl Press Freedom Act requires the US State Department to broaden its scrutiny of media intimidation and freedom of the press. the fact that freedom of the press is protected by the First Amendment is fundamental to a democracy in which the government is accountable to the people.

# data[].attributes.subject
Yeny G       well I think the Daniel Pearl Press Freedom Act requires the US State Department to broaden its scrutiny of media intimidation and freedom of the press. the fact that freedom of the press is protected by the First Amendment is fundamental to a democracy in which the government is accountable to the people.

# data[].attributes.body
i don't think it protects them from any actual physical harm form others and can simply just get away from it . the entire act is just written out its not gonna stop others from harming them. plus most people dont like their business out there so they might retaliate physically

# data[].attributes.body
No because of the fact that they can still get hurt physically for what they may say but they be able to tell anything they pretty much want and their voice is more protected than their well being.

# data[].attributes.body
I don´t think its enough to protect journalists because people still could disagree with what they´re reporting and people usually get violent when they don´t agree. This act only gives them the right to report whatever in any country. It doesn´t protect them from people who plan to hurt them.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because the act tells other countries that the us government is paying attention to how other governments are operating when it comes to the press.I think that is enough to stop people from harming journalists because they know that the us government wont allow it.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because it doesn't protect them from physical harm but it does protect their voice and their opinion in another country.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because even if they sent a message, that doesn't mean that they will be protected because they can still get hurt and killed.