# data[].attributes.body
66 % - if I have to score only a ‘grip’ part of your project

-          very good standard project

-          very good analysis, simple idea

-          nice presented images how you doing all the stuff

# data[].attributes.body
Ideas where were clearly presented.
Very coherent throughout with little to no errors.
Presentation was at a top standard and seemed thoroughly researched.

# data[].attributes.body
Information clustered together, separate the different major components of the model into separate slides; very informative though.

# data[].attributes.body
I'd appreciate more reference (back image of the gun as well as side). Also the parts deserve a page each, some details are missing. For example, it would be nice to see how the student wanted so deal with those N-gon's since he created quite a lot of those on different places. Also it might be a good idea to create just half of the round shape and then mirror it - less issues to solve by hand - time saver.

# data[].attributes.body
very well.

# data[].attributes.body
kappa

# data[].attributes.body
Very clear and understandable with the use of wire frame images, slightly clustered, idea overall seems to be the weakest factor

# data[].attributes.body
The explanation about how you would make the grip and chamber is well shown and detailed, but you haven't shown how you might create the other parts of the model like the trigger and teapot aspects.

# data[].attributes.headline
Perhaps add other angled images to simplyfy the process 

# data[].attributes.subject
Perhaps add other angled images to simplyfy the process 

# data[].attributes.body
The layout was very clean and easy to understand, a lot of detail has been displayed through simple yet effective labeling.

However not all of the model has been shown so there is no real representation of how the remainder of the object will be created. as well as this i would have liked to see other perspectives of the model itself.

# data[].attributes.body
Good design but missing big parts of gun and the whole teapot. Maybe split different components into different slides. Would have benefitted from slightly more clear information and maybe a few reference images ad diferent angles.

# data[].attributes.body
60-69%
Very good level of critical analysis and evaluation.
The only question now is, how did you made this presentation?

# data[].attributes.body
The ideas

# data[].attributes.body
For a start the presentation layout really caught my eye, such as with the highlighting of the part of the picture reference that was being worked on.
The creativity of the designing stage of how the model would work and how relating to how they would need to fix the N-gons really shown the coherent understanding on how the user understands the Maya software.
The PowerPoint level of detail provided were definitely critical and shown significant reference to show where they were focusing this part of the presentation on.
Overall a very good presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
The clarity of the gun modelling was clear and precise, it displayed creativity and a great knowledge of the tools available to the user.

However, many other features have been left out and unexplained, including the teapot section of the model.

# data[].attributes.body
Looks really nice.

# data[].attributes.body
Mention different ways of approaching a piece of the model

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation was to a very high standard, might have broken the model into more parts and spread it over a few more slides just so its not so much writing on one slide.

# data[].attributes.headline
70-75% well thought out and demonstrated 

# data[].attributes.subject
70-75% well thought out and demonstrated 

# data[].attributes.body
(for what is provided)

# data[].attributes.body
60-69%:
Information clustered together, separate the different major components of the model into separate slides; very informative though.

# data[].attributes.body
shows great analysis of tools and methods used to create the model showing exactly how it would be performed with analysis of spacing of polygons and edge flow

# data[].attributes.body
80%

I thought that the presentation was good because it explained in detail how the model was made and step by step.

The techniques used were also explained in big detail too.

# data[].attributes.body
very detailed and informative, good use of visual aids, interesting layout for presenting.
Could have included another angel of the handle or maybe some more write detail

# data[].attributes.body
70-79% Very detailed missed a few bits

# data[].attributes.body
-The layout of the Presentation is easy to understand although, more detail could be added for the other parts.
-Extensive knowledge of the model structure was shown which displayed an ability to understand the task.
-No errors that I could see.
-The design was creative and showed an opportunity to make unique model

# data[].attributes.body
The presentation of how the chamber and handle would be made was very well set out and it explained which processes would be used with relevant and technical detail.

To improve, there should be evidence of research and inspiration.

# data[].attributes.body
Without explanation of the process along side the power point it may be hard to follow and fully understand the process.

Minimal reference, only one image. No alternative angles of the reference forcing you to model from the breakdown of one image.