# data[].attributes.body
SOME ASPECTS OF REALITY ARE DELAYED, FOR EXAMPLE, THE SUN. IF WE EXPERIENCE SOME THINGS LATER THAN THEY ARE IN REALITY, THAN THEY CANNOT BE EXPERIENCED IMMEDIATELY, AS IT SAYS IN DIRECT REALISM. THIS ATTACKS THE IMMEDIACY OF DIRECT REALISM.

# data[].attributes.body
IN REALITY, THERE ARE SOMETIMES ILLUSIONS WHERE WE SEE THINGS HOW THEY AREN'T IN REAL LIFE. ILLUSIONS ARE NOT SUBJECTIVELY INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM VERIDICAL PERSEPTIONS, MEANING THAT WHAT WE SEE, COULD ALL BE AN ILLUSION (SCEPTICISM) OR WE EXPERIENCE SENSE DATA, NOT THINGS DIRECTLY. THIS ATTACKS THE NECESSITY OF AN OBJECTIVE REALITY TO DIRECT REALISM AS WE CAN EXPERIENCE THINGS THAT AREN'T IN REALITY.

# data[].attributes.body
REALITY IS EXPERIENCED DIRECTLY AND IMMEDIATELY.

# data[].attributes.body
HALLUCINATIONS ARE SOLELY MIND DEPENDENT. IN HALLUCINATIONS, WE DONT PERCEIVE PHYSICAL OBJECTS AT ALL, MEANING WE MUST EXPERIENCE SENSE DATA, NOT THINGS DIRECTLY. THIS ATTACKS THE NECESSITY OF AN OBJECTIVE REAILITY TO DIRECT REALISM AS THE REALITY CAN BE CHANGED OR DISTORTED AND WE CAN EXPERIENCE THINGS THAT AREN'T IN REALITY.

# data[].attributes.body
SENSE DATA MEANS THAT THINGS ARE NIOT EXPERIENCED DIRECTLY, HOWEVER, HOW IS A PERSON MEANT TO KNOW WHETHER WHAT EVERYONE PERCEIVES IS THE EXACT SAME THING. THIS ATTACKS THE EXPERIENCE OF REALITY DIRECTLY FROM DIRECT REALISM.(BERTRAND RUSSEL'S TABLE)

# data[].attributes.body
SENSE DATA IS WHAT AN OBJECT GIVES OUT AND WHAT WE PERCEIVE. THIS GOES AGAINST DIRECT REALISM AS IT ARGUES THAT WE DON'T EXPERIENCE REALITY DIRECTLY. OBJECTS THEMSELVES ARE MIND INDEPENDENT WHERE AS SENSE DATA IS MIND DEPENDENT.

# data[].attributes.body
WE EXPERIENCE THINGS INDIRECTLY AND NOT IMMEDIATELY.

# data[].attributes.body
WE PERCEIVE THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE IN NORMAL CONDITIONS, ONCE THE CONDITIONS CHANGE, THOUGH OUR PERCEPTION MAY CHANGE, THE OBJECT DOES NOT. WE EXPERIENCE THINGS DIRECTLY AND IMMEDIATELY, IN NORMAL CONDITIONS.

# data[].attributes.body
OBJECTS ARE MIND INDEPENDENT, PERCEPTION IS MIND DEPENDENT. SHAPES BECOME ANOTHER SHAPE ONLY IN PERCEPTION, WHAT YOU SEE IS DOWN TO YOU SEEING IT. RELATIONAL PROPERTIES ARE PROPERTIES EXPERIENCED IN PERCEPTION MIND DEPENDENTLY, NOT IN OBJECTS 9MIND INDEPENDENTLY0. THEREFORE VARIATIONS ACCOUNT FOR CHANGES IN PERCEPTIONS, NOT VHANGES IN OBJECTS

# data[].attributes.body
ILLUSIONS
DREAMS
DECEITFUL DEMON
IF WE'VE BEEN TRICKED IN THE PAST, YOU CANNOT KNOW THAT YOU ARE BEING TRICKED NOW.

# data[].attributes.body
ILLUSIONS ARE NOT SUBJECTIVELT INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM VERIDAL PERCEPTIONS, AS IF YOU CANNOT TELL THE DIFFERENCE FROM VERIDICAL PERCEPTIONS, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHEN THINGS ARE ACTUAL VERIDICAL PERCEPTIONS AND REAL.

# data[].attributes.body
YOU CANNOT TELL WHEN YOU ARE NOT DREAMING, YOU CANNOT BE CERTAIN THAT ALL OF PERCEPTION AROUND YOU IS NOT A DREAM

# data[].attributes.body
ALL OF THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST DIECT REALISM (TAMELAG ETC) SUPPORT INDIRECT REALISM AND THE ROLE OF SENSE DATA

# data[].attributes.body
PRIMARY: MIND INDEPENDENT, BELONG TO THE OBJECT(EG MOTION, SOLIDITY & FIGURE, EXTENSION)
SECONDAY:MIND DEPENDENT (EG SOUND, TASTE & COLOUR)
GRAIN OF WHEAT
SUPPORTS SENSE DATA BUT MIND INDEPENDENT OBJECTS

# data[].attributes.body
IF WE HAVE BEEN TRICKED IN THE PAST, HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT'S REAL?

# data[].attributes.body
BERKELEY CAUSES ISSUE WITH THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE QUALITIES. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY QUALITIES ARE INSEPERABLE AS YOU CANNOT HAVE A COLOURLESS OF SHAPELESS OBJECT. THIS MEANS THAT BOTH ARE MIND DEPENDENT.

# data[].attributes.body
THERE IS NO OBJECTIVE REALITY, ALL THAT EXISTS, ARE MINDS. OUR MIND AND GOD'S MIND.

# data[].attributes.headline
WHETHER GOD CAN BE USED TO PLAY THE ROLE HE DOES

# data[].attributes.subject
WHETHER GOD CAN BE USED TO PLAY THE ROLE HE DOES

# data[].attributes.body
GOD ISN'T EFFECTIVELY INTERGRATED INTO THE THEORY. IT'S NOT JUSTIFIED. THE EXISTANCE OF GOD IS AN INFERRANCE.
BERKELEY RESPONDS BY APPEALING TO THE ATTRIBUTES OF GOD, AS HE CANNOT TRY TO COMPREHEND A BEING AS COMPLEX AS GOD. THIS IS NOT A VERY VALID ARGUMENT AS THE USE OF GOD ISN'T ADEQUATE TO EXPLAIN A THEORY, THIS POINT IS NOT AS COMPLEX AS HIS OTHERS.

# data[].attributes.body
TO BE PERCEIVED IS ONE THING, BUT TO EXIST IS ANOTHER. TO BE UNPERCEIVED IS TO CEASE TO EXIST.
BERKELEY RESPONDS THAT GOD IS THE ULTIMATE PERCEIVER. HOWEVER IF GOD WERE TO THINK OF SOMETHING, HE WOULD BE CONCEIVING OF IT INSTEAD OF PERCEIVING IT.

# data[].attributes.body
ONLY ONE MIND EXISTS. IT'S IDEALISM WITHOUT GOD. OUR OWN EXPERIENCE TELLS US ABOUT REALITY . ONLY PERCEPTIONS IN YOUR MIND EXIST.
BERKELEY RESPONDS BY ACCEPTING THAT HE HAS NO IDEA OF GOD'S MIND. HE CAN ONLY BE SURE OF HIS OWN MIND. THIS SHOWS THE THREAT OF SOLPSISM IS STRONG.

# data[].attributes.headline
IDEALISM CANNOT SECURE OBJECTIVE SPACE AND TIME

# data[].attributes.subject
IDEALISM CANNOT SECURE OBJECTIVE SPACE AND TIME

# data[].attributes.body
NO TWO PEOPLE CAN EVER SEE THE SAME THING. YOU CANNOT GUARENTEE WE ALL SEE THE SAME THING- INTERPERSONAL VARIATION.
BERKELEY RESPONDS THAT OBJECTS/IDEAS POSSES THE SAME QUALITIES. YOU EXPERIENCE YOUR SENSE DATA, I EXPERIENCE MINE.
THIS IS INEEFECTIVE AS A RESPONSE. IT SHOULD HAVE AN EXACT REPRESENTATION OF THIS. WE CAN LOOK AT THE SAME OBJECT BECAUSE THERE IS AN OBJECT. PERCEIVE A COPY OF AN IDEA IN GOD'S MIND, ROLE OF GOD.

# data[].attributes.body
WE DON'T SEE REALITY AS IT IS, WE SEE IT AS IT'S PERCEIVED- THE PRODUCT OF ATOMS, NOT ATOMS.THE FACT THAT SCIENCE EXISTS MEANS THAT THERE MUST BE MATTER.
BERKELEY RESPONDS WITH THAT WE SEE BUNDLES OF IDEAS. WE SEE A SENSORY VIEW OF REALITY, NOT SCIENTIFIC. WE USE LANGUAGE TO EXPLAIN BUNDLES OF IDEAS TO LINK EVERYTHINBG. ACCOUNTS OF HOW PERCEPTIONS ARE LINKED. THIS IS AN IVALID RESPONSE AS YOU SHOULD MAKE A MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF LANGUAGE, IT'S HOW WE COMMUNICATE, BOTH NEED TO UNDERSTAND IT.

# data[].attributes.headline
IDEALISM DOES NOT GIVE AN ADEQUATE ACCOUNT OF ILLUSIONS AND HALLUCINATIONS

# data[].attributes.subject
IDEALISM DOES NOT GIVE AN ADEQUATE ACCOUNT OF ILLUSIONS AND HALLUCINATIONS