# data[].attributes.body
1. How is your approach and or thinking about the problem different than your partners?
2. What did you learn from your revision partner?What revisions did you make to your work today and why?What do you now understand about the problem that you didn’t understand before?What are you still confused about?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.headline
I understand that I have to revise and improve my grade. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I understand that I have to revise and improve my grade. 

# data[].attributes.body
We will work to revise and improve our quarter 4 final. We will work together with others in order to get it done

# data[].attributes.headline
I do not have any questions. I understand that we are going to revise our work that we submitted last module because it is now going to be graded on the content, not just if we tuned it in. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I do not have any questions. I understand that we are going to revise our work that we submitted last module because it is now going to be graded on the content, not just if we tuned it in. 

# data[].attributes.body
I understand that we'll compare our previous work with examples to help us revise and turn in our work.

# data[].attributes.body
I understand that this Mini-module will be revisions for the summative we did last module

# data[].attributes.body
will our first draft summative be graded if we dont submit something for the revision

# data[].attributes.body
So if after revising and working on our final draft, we STILL don't get the grade we want, can we revise again?

# data[].attributes.body
I have to raise my grade as much as possible

# data[].attributes.headline
i understand I have to make revisions to get the grade i want or to raise my grade

# data[].attributes.subject
i understand I have to make revisions to get the grade i want or to raise my grade

# data[].attributes.body
this example is very specific and explains the answer thoroughly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that something that makes this a model solution is the graph, since the waves are well shown, has the two pink lines in the right spot and the number

# data[].attributes.body
It has claim, evidence and reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
includes mathematical vocabulary to describe what is what.

# data[].attributes.body
It includes good explanation with the numbers and details about the waves and the frequency

# data[].attributes.body
they explain all of their steps and show all of the numbers they got leading up to the answer.

# data[].attributes.headline
has a good explanation and it gives a a lot of info.

# data[].attributes.subject
has a good explanation and it gives a a lot of info.

# data[].attributes.body
The solution is well explained and can be clearly understood. Their knowledge is conveyed through their work.

# data[].attributes.body
a lot of writing, not just a math problem, it explains what the math means

# data[].attributes.body
the lines on the graph are really close together and it's hard to tell which part the person is talking about.

# data[].attributes.headline
This looks like something I would write..

# data[].attributes.subject
This looks like something I would write..

# data[].attributes.body
I guess the student should describe  their thought process and the work they did in order to get the information. They could also include definitions for the terms they're using, and why or how they use an equation to get the answer they provided.

# data[].attributes.body
doesn't give fundamental frequency of the sound

# data[].attributes.headline
shows numbers but doesn't give enough information.

# data[].attributes.subject
shows numbers but doesn't give enough information.

# data[].attributes.body
They could give a bit more information about the specific wave function.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like me and my partner have a very similar approach to our thinking. We both are very straightforward with our answers. There are places in my work that need lengthier explanations however I have always understand the work. The only issue I face is making sure my answers are very specific and answer the entire question.

# data[].attributes.body
I thik my partner and I did like what the questions were asking and didn't necessarily choose to add more to our responses than what was asked for. I learned from my partner to find a way to make my graph better

# data[].attributes.body
I understand that we need to revise our work and turn it in for an AK grade.

# data[].attributes.body
It has a really detailed explanation with specific units, a claim, evidence, and reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
This answer gives a description of what the graph shows. However, it doesn't explain what the numbers, periods, or frequencies mean in the context of the problem (overall less detailed response).

# data[].attributes.headline
Here are two exemplar responses to question #3 on the summative assessment

# data[].attributes.subject
Here are two exemplar responses to question #3 on the summative assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Please use the rubric to grade both and explain your thought process while grading. Then compare/contrast the two responses with each other below

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
This is difficult because neither of them show evidence from the original waves, so I can't tell if they're accurate or not. However they both provide an equation so they both got at least a 2.

# data[].attributes.body
There is no original wave in both of their answers, only the replicated wave in Desmos. However the second one does only show half of the graph so I wouldn't give these very high scores, definitely not a 4. The second one does show the students thought process in a clearer way though.

# data[].attributes.body
the second one doesnt have the period

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
Try grading yourself!

# data[].attributes.headline
My trigonometric formula first draft was not correct, and my partner helped me see this. They were able to help me correct my formula by showing me the correct "cookie cutter" formula

# data[].attributes.subject
My trigonometric formula first draft was not correct, and my partner helped me see this. They were able to help me correct my formula by showing me the correct "cookie cutter" formula

# data[].attributes.headline
They don't show the original wave, only their second Desmos wave. The process is shown,  but only one of the Desmos graph can be clearly seen, while the one all the way at the bottom is cut off. I would not give this a high score because of the screenshot being cut off.

# data[].attributes.subject
They don't show the original wave, only their second Desmos wave. The process is shown,  but only one of the Desmos graph can be clearly seen, while the one all the way at the bottom is cut off. I would not give this a high score because of the screenshot being cut off.

# data[].attributes.body
Both answers have no mention of reference to the original soundwave. The second option has a more detailed response and would get the higher grade.