# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina because killing an animal is like killing a person.  Animals have the same life as humans.  Even if they claim to do it because they need money to save the park, I think paying a lot of money to kill animals is not right anyway.  If you want to use the money to save the park  You can find it in other ways, such as donations.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina that hunting is fun for rich people. Although they have to pay money for permit for killing animals. But  it’s still cruel. and we don’t know where this money actually goes. so we should find another way to protect wildlife without hunting them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
ปรียาพัชร แสงอรุณทวี

# data[].attributes.headline
Sec 16 Preeyapat Sangaruntawee No.42 (633080711-8)

# data[].attributes.subject
Sec 16 Preeyapat Sangaruntawee No.42 (633080711-8)

# data[].attributes.body
I choose to side with martina. I disagree with killing animals for fun and money. Even if the money can be used to benefit, it is not worth having to kill many animals. causing loss of natural balance and causing extinction of animals  We should deal with hunters and poachers strictly.

# data[].attributes.headline
26. นายภสุ ศิริพงศาว

# data[].attributes.body
26. นายภสุ ศิริพงศาวลี 633080379-0 section 16

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina because animal are also a living creature like us they have a feeling we should not kill them even if we are in pinch situation. And I think the bullet isn’t in the key of the way to escape. We should use an electric gun to make them stop moving around then we can escape from the situation that can cause the hunter die or living

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Finn because the bodies of the animals that have been hunted are usually given back to the local people for food.

# data[].attributes.body
Agree wiht tony because we have other ways to protect and conserue animals without the need to play this game. we can compaign online. Allocate the area as a tourist attraction to earn money to protect the animals. or broaden the restricted area.

# data[].attributes.headline
Kamonphun Kanjanaphun        No.05  633220123-7

# data[].attributes.subject
Kamonphun Kanjanaphun        No.05  633220123-7

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mr. Finn because without  this money , The park and the breeding program will come to an end.  and many more animals will be killed by poachers.  That's why the World Wildlife Fund says it's not against hunting big game if it supports conservation.

Kamonphun Kanjanaphun

# data[].attributes.headline
24 พลอยประภา

# data[].attributes.subject
24 พลอยประภา

# data[].attributes.headline
เลขที่ 19 ขวัญณพร นา

# data[].attributes.body
เลขที่ 19 ขวัญณพร นามมนตรี 633220217-8

# data[].attributes.body
even more animals would be killed by poachers. That's why the World Wildlife Fund has said that it is not opposed to big game hunting if it supports conservation.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina because hunting should only take place, hunting just for meat.  should not hunt for money  and bring the hunted animals to the villagers. They could feed them self for a long time have you ever ask them what them what they would prefer? I think it’s the big game hunting is basically fun for rich people .

# data[].attributes.body
พีรพล เพชรดี 583040242-6

I agree with hunter because they had to pay a lot of money to kill that animal. And then that money was spent on preserving them and everything was under control.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mr. Finn because without  this money ,The park and the breeding program will come to an end.  and many more animals will be killed by poachers. That's why the World Wildlife Fund says it's not against hunting big game if it supports conservation.
kamonphun05

# data[].attributes.body
I agree beacause hunting so scared Sometimes it seems too harsh and cruel. But it was done because of the hunter's instinct. And I feel sorry for the victims.
(นายวิทวัส ทิพย์สุทธิ์ เลขที่26 633220228-3)

# data[].attributes.headline
Nakarin Chotkosaikanon 603220217-5 sec.5 no.4

# data[].attributes.subject
Nakarin Chotkosaikanon 603220217-5 sec.5 no.4

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with martina because i think it hunting is encroachment.

# data[].attributes.body
Nu

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Marina because the big game hunting is basically fun for rich people even he said the bodies of the animals that had been hunted were usually given back to the local people for food but I think they might prefer the money and I still think the best way to protect these animals is not killing them

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina because it's too cruel to hunt animals for fun. And hunting animals it's not the best way to protect them from poachers.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mr. Finn because if we not allowed the hunter to hunt, many hunter will losing they job and many more animals will be killed by poachers.

# data[].attributes.body
Sec 16 No.31 รณกฤต วัฒนะกุล

# data[].attributes.headline
ปวีณา อภิวันท์ลือชา sec16 no.19

# data[].attributes.subject
ปวีณา อภิวันท์ลือชา sec16 no.19

# data[].attributes.body
Hunting support because the tourists who go into hunting is a legal hunting. The agency will use that money to care for breeding of more animals, for example if killing 1 girraffe may get many more girrafes because of the money is very high. In addition, it may lead to community development reduce the illegal sluaghter of animals. This is to create a career for villagers to be guides or people who take care of animals so they don’t smuggle. It is a way to bring income into the country in some countries and some conservation organizations with hundreds of funds have earned income from here to develop.

# data[].attributes.body
Sec16 No.04 Ratchanon Aueanklang 633080106-5

# data[].attributes.body
633080390-2 sec 16  ศิณีออล ใจวงษ์

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Finn's point of view, even if we think that it is harsh, but keep in mind that it is also a part of the food chain. Animals who are hunted have spent their lives in the wild, and they deserve to spend their time in the world rather than in a cage. So I believe it is now fair for them. Finn hunted and the money went to conservation, but if the poachers hunted, just they benefited.They had not received a large sum of money for the news that one of the conservations assumed. It is, in my opinion, a part of political ways.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Finn because he supported national governments and national parks. Unlike the poacher, the bodies of hunted animals are frequently returned to the local people for food. To save the species from extinction, however, harsh hunting rules need to be implemented.

# data[].attributes.body
Sec 16 No.44
มนัชญา แก้วจันทร์
633080813-4

# data[].attributes.body
Sec16 weerapat nomnat no.35

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina because I disagree with the big game hunting. I think that is just a game for the rich people.  Even if some people pay to hunt but I still think it's cruel And I don’t know where this money actually goes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sec 16 No.11 ณัฐนันท์ มาตสีหา

# data[].attributes.subject
Sec 16 No.11 ณัฐนันท์ มาตสีหา

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion I agree with Martina
Hunting is bad dream for many animals. We lost many animal because hunting. Many people pay money for big game shutting. But they don’t realize about result of it. Do you know about biology food chains. It mean if have some species of animal die and decrease. It affect to another species of animal in food chains too.Such as if eager die and decrease. what is happen. It mean sneak will increase.It eat frog and frog will decrease. What is going on Don’t have frog to eat grasshopper and it’s effects to farmers. because rice fruit or crop will get damage by grasshopper. This is reason why every animal importance in biology food chains. And No animals should be hunted by fun.

# data[].attributes.body
633040531-4

# data[].attributes.body
Sadudee phuangsri 633080391-0 sec.16 no.37

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree about hunting. If we change position human to be animal. And animal to be human. If we are shunted by their animal. We will fell about cruel of them. Therefore don’t have animal should killed by fun and money because it’s can speak “I don’t wanna die”

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Fin because If the park doesn't have money, the breeding program is unable to continue, which will cause a lot more damage.

# data[].attributes.body
Supakan matawong  633040010-2 sec26 no.9

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I think fin is right even though killing an animal for fun is immoral but the money that they get from the hunting sport can help lots of villagers and expand the park. And that brings advantages to all animals in the park Even though it's a sad story for a dead animal.  But from fin's words, if there is no hunting sport The park would have to be closed and the poacher would be easier to smuggle and kill the animals. It may have a really bad impact to the ecosystem

# data[].attributes.headline
sec 26 No.13 ณัฐชนน จันทฤทธิ์

# data[].attributes.subject
sec 26 No.13 ณัฐชนน จันทฤทธิ์

# data[].attributes.body
Sec 26
No.26 Natthapat Poonsub 633040529-1

# data[].attributes.body
I don’t agree with Fin, I think that the safari where the hunter come to hunt for the trophy. It isn’t the solution of animal poaching. We should fix the problem of poachers, not animal. The animal did nothing wrong. Yeah this is my comment about it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mr. Finn. without this money, the parks and breeding programmes would come to an end, and even more animals would be killed by poachers. poachers are a much more serious threat to wildlife.

# data[].attributes.headline
พงศกร อาจปรุ เลขที่20 sec.16

# data[].attributes.subject
พงศกร อาจปรุ เลขที่20 sec.16

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Mr.Finn because hunted animals come back useful in many ways. for example Using the money raised from hunting to develop zoos and help endangered species. Hunting game is like sacrificing a minority for the majority of the animal population. Saying something like this might sound cruel, but in reality we can't judge it wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Matina because i think value of our life and value of animal life is the same.
We should make a stable ecological balance because that's to be treaded with respect.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina. Because in my opinion a big game hunting is like funny game for rich people and it is cruel to the animals. Although the big game hunting supports wildlife conservation but there is money problem with corruption. So the animals hardly benefitted at all.

# data[].attributes.body
Sec26 No.34 ธัญญาวรรณ์ แสนรังค์

# data[].attributes.headline
Sec.26 No.32 จักรพรรดิ  จันทร์เท

# data[].attributes.subject
Sec.26 No.32 จักรพรรดิ  จันทร์เท

# data[].attributes.headline
Sec 26 No 40 Chonnakarn Nanthaveesit 633040765-8 

# data[].attributes.subject
Sec 26 No 40 Chonnakarn Nanthaveesit 633040765-8 

# data[].attributes.body
Sec.26 No.23 Natodsathon Chompoobut

# data[].attributes.headline
sec26 No.22 วรรธนสุทธ ทองเทียม

# data[].attributes.subject
sec26 No.22 วรรธนสุทธ ทองเทียม

# data[].attributes.body
I think martina is right.It's like telling them to shoot animals but dont have any benefit to animal conservation and causing the rapid extinction of animals.And I think there are many other ways to raise money to help animals without killing them.because killing animals is cruel.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion I agree with Finn. Because all of thing he talk about that game and ans Martina almost make sens and this Game hunter is  fun for the rich people but if that game everyone can join the game i think the Hunting is  become hobby or leisure activities for many people more than now.Thank you

# data[].attributes.body
Sec.26 chettaporn katawee 633040001-3 no.1

# data[].attributes.headline
ธนพร โคกสว่าง No.04 

# data[].attributes.body
ธนพร โคกสว่าง No.04 633040004-7 Sec.26
I agree with the presenter

Because I think that returning the hunting proceeds to the government and the parks  It is not necessary and unrelated.  The government should have a comprehensive management of each part of the money.  I think it's irrelevant if we're going to use those animals to our advantage.  And I think there might be a better solution than hunting them.  to raise money or to meet human needs.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina Because the competition to pay for hunting was too intense.  It's like we only pay for our shoulders, but we lose a lot.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sec 17 No. 39 น.ส.วัชราภรณ์ กำเนิดขอนแก่น

# data[].attributes.subject
Sec 17 No. 39 น.ส.วัชราภรณ์ กำเนิดขอนแก่น

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina  because killing animals is too cruel  Unlike humans, all animals love life. There are many other ways to preserve animals.  not destroying animal life.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Martina Because animal conservation comes from creating awareness, but if we still allow it and see it as normal. It's probably more of a destructive one. Animals don't have a good reason to be hunted in the game, if you don't hunt them, they will survive and multiply.