# data[].attributes.body
Names: Julian, Leo, Ben and Finn

1. Was the final scene necessary?
We all think that the final scene was in fact necessary, especially considering the time that this film was released. The scene also helps to build expectations and give a false sense of security which is quickly shattered in the next scene. We also agree with the point brought up in the video, to explain that he wasn't in fact transvestite.

2. How was the audience supposed to know all about Norman's past without this scene.
The audience wouldn't know. They'd just have to guess, but the final scene serves to confirm or deny the audience's guesses. We think it's important to take into account how this film was likely made in a time with a lot less awareness about mental health, and in a time with less information than we have now.

# data[].attributes.body
Names:Deren,Tolga and Lachlan

1. Was this final scene necessary? Did the audience need an explanation about what really happened, how it happened and why? As this scene may not have been the best it probably was for the better as it helps the audience understand what has happened and what is going on with norman, as the whole him dressing up as a women might of been confusing

2. How was the audience supposed to know all about Norman’s past without this scene? I don't think the audience would really know what is going on without this sense because the psychiatrist had to explain a lot for everything to make sence.

# data[].attributes.body
Names: ella & jassy

1. Was this final scene necessary? Did the audience need an explanation about what really happened, how it happened and why?
I think it was because the end was really unexpected and I wouldn't have guessed that Norman was playing both parts of being himself and his mother.

2.  How was the audience supposed to know all about Norman's past without this scene?
they would've just had to guess because there wasn't a lot of evidence of him turning out to be the mother as well besides the sheriff saying that his mother was dead. there could have been another woman in the house or either in the grave.

# data[].attributes.body
Names: Charlotte & Zara
Was this final scene necessary? Did the audience need an explanation about what really happened, how it happened and why?
i think that the final scene was necessary as it helped to clear the air and explain what happened and what was going on in bates mind as the film came out in a time where people weren't aware of things regarding phycology . it helped to explain the reasoning behind why he was the way he was and why he was dressed like his mother to the audience.

\How was the audience supposed to know all about Norman's past without this scene?
they werent supposed to know because he lied about having a mum so everyone just thought that the women was his mum and not him, even tho people suspected something was off because his mu was dead

# data[].attributes.body
Names:
Rahzel - I believe the final scene was necessary because it explains why Norman was dressed like his mother and the reason why he murdered many people. This helps the audience comprehend why these certain aspects happened.
The audience was supposed to assume from the fact that his mother was dead and he was dressed like her.

Matilda-  I don't think it was necessary. I think it would have been okay at least in this day in age if we only got the scene with Norman in the cell and the psychologist scene was cut. It would make us think and leave the audience intrigued with questions unanswered .

farah - personally i found the scene with the psychiatrist kind of boring. it felt like the psychiatrist was just repeating and saying the words I was already thinking. I think that it was smart way to divert the audiences thoughts and speculations of the film but a huge part of film is that it leaves you questioning and reflecting, that scene didnt allow the audience to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
Names: Jack and Tom

1. Was this final scene necessary? Did the audience need an explanation about what really happened, how it happened and why?

We believe that the final scene was not completely necessary and could have left the audience to interpret it rather then having it spoon-fed to them. However, it was important that the audience understand Norman's state of mind and the events in his past that caused it.

2. How was the audience supposed to know all about Norman's past without this scene?

Instead of having it explained to them, the audience could have pieced the clues together and make their own interpretation about it.