# data[].attributes.body
I support the government, because this law will greatly increase development, and industrialization in our country, which is very much needed since we are still a developing country, and we need to catch up with the rest of the world. This will also help provide more jobs in Indonesia, which is useful because around 10% of the population lives below the poverty line. Foreign investors will also be more inclined to invest in Indonesia, which will help the growth of the country. Overall growth from these factors will possibly contribute to the improvement of living and work conditions in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
I support the position of the government of Indonesia because this law is created to help the economic issues and to help Indonesia during the Covid pandemic, the government also wants to increase the social funds and because of the pandemic, there is an economic recession and and the law is made to help during the recession and create jobs.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the government, because the law would compromise environmental protection or harm workers. The law was crucial to attract investment to ultimately create jobs.  Especially in this pandemic.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the government because with better economy, the country will be well developed. A well developed country with a good economy will open up more job opportunity for the citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
I think  I disagree with it, even though for example by extending the contract there will be more foreign investors in Indonesia but it will give challenges and bad impacts to the workers. And about the AMDAL, how the involvement of people is limited now and because they no longer involve experts. Because experts already have experience and already worked for a long time.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally do not support the law, although it will possibly help advance Indonesia’s economy, it will most likely only strengthen the oligarchy and weaken the working-class. I see no point of having an established economy while having most workers' wellbeing at stake. The Omnibus Law was created to provide protection and facilities to investors rather than protection to workers. Yet most people are workers and not investors meaning more people would be harmed (..right?). Not to mention that there will also be little to no environmental protection which will only result in more harm towards the community.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that I disagree with the omnibus law. I think that it should be more important to prioritize the well-being of the people. The law I think gives more advantages to companies. It is unfair, the law could harm workers as the company can make them work overtime.

# data[].attributes.body
I am against it. While it is designed to make it easier for entrepreneurs to invest in our country, the bill undermines the rights of workers. The law puts employers at a powerful position, and the "easy hiring easy firing" principle is more justifiable. The job, social, and income security of workers is disregarded for the sake of economic growth. There is too much elbow room for employers who might exploit the law to their own advantage.

# data[].attributes.body
I support the government because they help the people’s economical issues. The government purpose is also to increase the development in the country during the pandemic. There is a lot of people that loses their job during the pandemic, so the government can help them in order to support the people.

# data[].attributes.body
I support the government because our nations is kinda struggle with the economic recession and need to grow and because private company easier to employ the workers there could be more job availability for the society. If the trickle down effects works then the society will get the positive side too. Because by the growth of the economy in Indonesia that means more social funds that could also help our people. The problems of the rules is only in several chapters from all of the pages that maybe could help the workers itself. However from the environments prespective is still bad for the environment because the lack of participations of the specialist and because it only consist of the people that got the impact directly. But for the more wider benefits I will still support the governments.

# data[].attributes.body
After seeing some of the points made with the Omnibus Law, I would say that I mostly disagree as an Indonesian citizen. Take the example from the AMDAL situation. Minimizing the expert's insights in the context of the environmental situations might cloud further decisions or even allow an error in judgment. Moreover, the experts might also receive a negative impact financially, as they can't contribute as much as they did as they could in the past. Additionally, the impact of environmental damage does not only concern the upstream side of the exploitation source or activity operation but also downstream which will have an impact on the wider community.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the omnibus law as it ignores the wellbeing and safety of many workers as well as the people. We could see this in the way the government decided to exclude experts and activists in their discussion with AMDAL regarding manufacturers effect on the environment. Although it is undeniable that it'll invite more foreign investors by implementing these rules. I can't help but find it ignorant that the government does not prioritize the wellbeing of the people that is currently at stake. If what we are aiming for is the improvement of Indonesia's economy, how are we going to flourish when the workers are exploited and the environment is polluted.

# data[].attributes.body
I support the government because blablabla