# data[].attributes.body
#1 - it counts only numbers, not if they learned or engaged their curiosity.

also #2 - it implies that the family enjoyed themselves, but not if children learned anything

# data[].attributes.body
1 and 2 do not address curiosity and learning. 3 through the engagment speaks to both of those.

# data[].attributes.body
Completing the program does not mean that they learned new things or engaged their curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
The first, because it does not say anything about children (which is the outcome) or whether the children have learned or engaged. #3 goes to the engaged part.

# data[].attributes.body
#2 doesn't reveal how much is learned

# data[].attributes.body
2 - measures satisfaction with the program

# data[].attributes.body
2. This measures enjoyment of the program, not the learning outcome for the participants

# data[].attributes.body
1. Complete does not equal an indication of learning or curiosity

# data[].attributes.body
2 because they could be recommending it because they are having fun not because they are learning

# data[].attributes.body
#2 - Just because they would recommend the program doesn't mean they learned new things or engaged their curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
1 & 2 don't connect to learning new things or engaging curiosity

# data[].attributes.body
#2 doesn't have to do with the attendees' own engagement or curiosity. It's more about if they "liked" it enough to recommend

# data[].attributes.body
1. completion - lack of complete participation does not relate directly to value extracted

# data[].attributes.body
1 just because they completed doesn't mean they learned new things or engaged their curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
#2 Percentage of families who would recommend summer series.

This doesn't showcase children learning new things or engaging their curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
3. no telling if this is related to the summer of learning experience or not.

# data[].attributes.body
#1. Compliance does not equal learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Too many external factors affect #1 to make it super valuable at measuring such a specific outcome.

# data[].attributes.body
1 completion isn't descriptive of "learn new things and engage curiousity"

# data[].attributes.body
#1 - it doesn't consider learning or engagement. #2 at least indicates enough engagement to warrant a recommendation.

# data[].attributes.body
#2 - since it doesn't speak to why they are recommending the program.

# data[].attributes.body
2: Doesn't have to do with the child's outcome, but if they've spread the information or not.

# data[].attributes.body
2 doesn't demonstrate learning or curiosity

# data[].attributes.body
2 - not connected to learning or enagement.

# data[].attributes.body
#2, because recommendations don't reflect the actual internal impact of the event

# data[].attributes.body
1 may be least relevant. It's not measuring the impact on the child. Only the persistence of the adult.

# data[].attributes.body
#1 - completion does not equal engagement

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
1

# data[].attributes.body
2, because popularity doesn't measure learning or curiosity engagement

# data[].attributes.body
1 doesn't consider the "learn new things" or "engage their curiosity" components

# data[].attributes.body
1 and 2

1 is completion rates which doesn't relate to the outcome

2 has nothing to do with learning

# data[].attributes.body
#1 - Completion rate does not necessarily relate to how engaged the child is.