# data[].attributes.headline
 Washington Football Team (formerly the Redskins)

# data[].attributes.subject
 Washington Football Team (formerly the Redskins)

# data[].attributes.body
1) The team decided to change its name from the "Redskins" after years of people saying it was offensive to Native Americans.

2) It matters because the name hurt a lot of people, especially Native Americans. Fans, sponsors, and the team itself were all involved in the decision.

3) Some people felt the name was racist and needed to go. Others thought it was part of the team's history and didn’t want it changed.

4) Native Americans felt heard and respected. Fans had mixed reactions—some were proud of the change, others were upset. Sponsors pushed for the change to stand for what's right.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the ethical decisions was to launch sweet chews during the pandemic.

It mattered to the seller because it could have gone big or it could have failed because of the pandemic.

One side of the argument is to not put up the product and the other side was to launch it during the pandemic

This impacted the seller because it was during the pandemic and the decision could have failed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How SmartSweets launched Sweet Chews during the COVID-19 pandemic

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In April, the brand introduced Sweet Chews, its first innovation outside of the gummy category. While fans had been asking for a fruit chew product, the timing wasn’t ideal, with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

# data[].attributes.body
1 - What is the Controversy/Ethical Decision?

The ethical decision Patagonia chose to make was to place an ad in New York times on Black Friday which pushed people not to buy their products to benefit the planet.

2 - Why does it matter?  Who does it matter to?

It matters to the earth and the future generations of the world. If we cannot continue to preserve our planets health then climate change and pollution will only become worse.

3 - Explain both sides of the argument/discussion.

Patagonia decided to do this because of a few reasons. They know that especially during Black Friday, tons of people are looking for products on a big discount and everything is at high demand. So they put this ad out on this day specifically so people are motivated not to. It was a risk putting it out there because they could either lose tons of sales, or no one listens and they put the ad out for no reason.

4 - Who has this controversy/decision impacted, how, and why?

This controversy has impacted patagonia itself, since if people follow their instructions then their sales will decrease. The earth's health is impacted by the following of these customers because if the sales decrease then it supports maintaning our earths health.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Why run an ad in The New York Times on Black Friday telling people, "Don't Buy This Jacket"?

It's time for us as a company to address the issue of consumerism and do it head on.

The most challenging, and important, element of the Common Threads Initiative is this: to lighten our environmental footprint, everyone needs to consume less. Businesses need to make fewer things but of higher quality. Customers need to think twice before they buy. [Editor's note: The Common Threads Initiative has evolved and expanded into Our Footprint.]

Why? Everything we make takes something from the planet we can't give back. Each piece of Patagonia clothing, whether or not it's organic or uses recycled materials, emits several times its weight in greenhouse gases, generates at least another half garment's worth of scrap, and draws down copious amounts of freshwater now growing scarce everywhere on the planet.

We're placing the ad in the Times because it's the most important national newspaper and considered the "paper of record." We're running the ad on Black Friday, which launches the retail holiday season. We should be the only retailer in the country asking people to buy less on Black Friday.
But we're in business to make and sell products. Everyone's paycheck relies on that. Moreover, we are a growing business, opening new stores and mailing more catalogs. What do we tell customers who accuse us of hypocrisy?
It's part of our purpose to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis. [Editor's note: In 2018, we changed the company's purpose to: We're in business to save our home planet.]

It would be hypocritical for us to work for environmental change without encouraging customers to think before they buy. To reduce environmental damage, we all have to reduce consumption as well as make products in more environmentally sensitive, less harmful ways. It's not hypocrisy for us to address the need to reduce consumption. On the other hand, it's folly to assume that a healthy economy can be based on buying and selling more and more things people don't need-and it's time for people who believe that's folly to say so.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Don't Buy This Jacket, Black Friday and the New York Times - Patagonia

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Why run an ad in The New York Times on Black Friday telling people, "Don't Buy This Jacket"? It's time for us as a company to address the issue of consumerism and do it head on. The most challenging, and important, element of the Common Threads Initiative is this: to lighten our environmental footprint, everyone needs to consume less.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Large chocolate companies like mars and nestle and Cadbury have very poor working conditions for people harvesting the chocolate

2. This matters because it is ethical for companies to provide their workers with a safe workspace and treat them fairly

3. Some may argue that with all of these jobs in poor areas, it allows people to get work they may not have been able to get, but others argue that it doesn't matter how many jobs there are if they are unsafe and unethical.

4. This controversy has impacted the chocolate companies because many people find this unethical and are not buying from them anymore, it has also negatively impacted the workers as they have to work in such a dangerous job.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
‘Brands to avoid’: Mars and Cadbury among chocolate firms criticised in ethics report

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Only 17 out of 82 companies investigated were found to use suppliers that paid cocoa farmers enough to live on

# data[].attributes.body
1.McDonald's meals have become increasingly expensive over the years, and many people feel that the cost no longer reflects the value. A simple burger, fries, and drink combo can cost as much as a full meal at a local diner or even a healthier, more nutritious option from a grocery store. With rising prices on ingredients and labor, McDonald's has had to raise prices, but customers often question whether the increase is justified, especially when compared to other fast-food chains offering similar items at lower prices. Additionally, many feel that for the quality and portion size, they are not getting enough bang for their buck, particularly when the ingredients in some menu items may not be the most fresh or premium. For the convenience, it may still be worth it for some, but for others, McDonald's meals often feel overpriced for what they offer.

2.This matters because rising food prices impact people’s budgets, especially for families and individuals who rely on fast food for convenience or affordability. As the cost of meals at places like McDonald's continues to increase, it can force customers to reconsider their dining choices, often opting for cheaper, less convenient alternatives. This can affect the overall customer experience and satisfaction, especially when people feel they’re not getting their money’s worth. It also highlights broader concerns about inflation, supply chain issues, and the growing disparity between fast food prices and wages. When fast food becomes less affordable, it disproportionately affects lower-income communities, who may have fewer options for affordable meals.

3.On the product side, the rising prices of McDonald's meals can be attributed to a variety of factors, but it often leads to a perceived decline in value. As ingredients and raw materials become more expensive, McDonald's may sacrifice quality or portion size to maintain profit margins, which customers notice. For example, customers may see smaller servings of fries or less premium ingredients in certain menu items, and that can make the price increase feel unjustified. Additionally, innovations like new menu items, limited-time offers, or healthier options often come with a premium price tag, which can further push the overall cost of meals up. While McDonald's might argue that these changes are necessary to keep up with industry trends and consumer preferences, the result is often a disconnect between the perceived value and the actual price being paid by customers. This can lead to dissatisfaction and, over time, customer loyalty may diminish if they feel the product doesn't justify the rising cost.

4.This controversy has impacted both McDonald's reputation and its customer base. As prices rise, many customers feel frustrated, especially when they perceive that the value of the product no longer matches the cost. For long-time patrons, the affordability of McDonald's used to be one of its biggest selling points, and when that is compromised, it can lead to a loss of trust. People start questioning whether the brand still aligns with the values of convenience and affordability that it once championed.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
McDonald’s executives admit diners think prices are too high, say they’re working to create value

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
McDonald’s executives acknowledged that the company’s prices have been high and they are taking a “forensic approach” to evaluating offerings.

# data[].attributes.body
1. the controversial decision here is kellogg's cereal using food dye in their products.

2. this matters because many parents put trust in this well known brand, and they might not be aware of the health issues that may follow due to the brand choice of how they make their products.

3. on the brands side of the argument, using food dye in their breakfast cereals can make it more eye catching, and more appealing to people, making them want to buy it. but on the consumers standpoint, this can be seen as a health issue.

4. this controversy has impacted many, and not just the people consuming these products. it has caused huge candles for their PR teams, reporters, and advocacy groups.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kellogg’s Food Dye Controversy: A PR Misstep with Lasting Consequences

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In an age where transparency and trust are crucial to brand loyalty, Kellogg’s recent food dye crisis has left a sour taste in the mouths of consumers.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Chipotle recently reached a $7.75 million settlement with New Jersey to address years of child labor law violations. The settlement is the result of a 2020 state audit that uncovered over 30,000 alleged violations from 2017 to 2020, at 85 locations across the state. this is also why they make the portions smaller

2 this matters because we are paying a large amount for a short amount of food and if they keep on lowering the size your going to lose customers

3 I think the reason this is happening is because of the amount of supply portion Control: While Chipotle does offer large portions, they tend to be more controlled in the sense that they try to provide a balanced meal without excessive waste. The actual amount of food can depend on your specific order or the person making your burrito/bowl.

4.Perceived Value for Money: One common complaint is that the portion sizes don't feel like they match the price, especially with rising food costs. Some customers feel that Chipotle's bowls are too small for the money they're spending, leading to frustration. This can especially feel true if people are hungry and expecting a larger portion for what they paid.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
An analyst ordered 75 Chipotle burrito bowls to test portion sizes | CNN Business

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Leave it to a Wells Fargo restaurant analyst to decisively settle the Chipotle burrito "weight debate."

# data[].attributes.body
the ethical decision is to raise all the food prices at Chipotle by 2% to keep with the expensive society

this matters because Chipotle makes very good food and it matters to the customers buying Chipotle

one side of the argrument says Chipotle is in the right for raising prices because they need to keep up with the expensive society and the other side says they are in the wrong because they are already expensive enough

This has impacted people that buy Chipotle a lot because over time the money will add up.

This has impacted

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This is the chain’s first nationwide price increase since 2023 and will help offset low single-digit food cost inflation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. In September 2015, Volkswagen cars that were sold in America a “defeat device” in their diesel engines that could know when they were being tested. This meant that they were changing their performance to have better results.

2. They found “irregularities” in the tests that measure carbon dioxide emission levels. This would affect around 800,000 cars in Europe; including petrol cars. When the cars “pass” the carbon dioxide test using the software they created, the engines emitted nitrogen pollutants up more than 40 times above what’s allowed in the US.

3. Volkswagen boss Michael Horn admitted that “they screwed up completely” while the chief executive Martin Winterkorn said that his company had “broken the trust of our customers and the public”. Winterkorn resigned as soon as the scandal broke out. There were no sides to this because the company knew exactly what they did and admitted to it.

4. This scandal not only affected the Volkswagen company, but also the diesel market. Over the past decade, car makers have spent a fortune on the production of diesel engines. In the US, the diesel car market is around 1% of all new car sales and it would take a miracle for this to increase in the short term.

# data[].attributes.body
the controversy behind this topic is how in the last few years, chipotle has made their portion sizes significantly smaller.

this matters because if paying customers are paying for these things and they were lowering portion sizes and keeping sizes the same, you aren't getting what your paying for

from another standpoint, I can understand why portion sizes have to go down because lack of supply. but on the other hand, customers should not be paying these full prices if they are not getting the correct portion sizes for the listed pricing.

this has impacted not only paying customers, but the business itself. it is effecting chipotle as a business because people are beginning to get frustrated with this issue, therefore causing less people to come in.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
CHIPOTLE'S top boss has spoken out on its portion sizes, promising change following a high volume of customer pushback.

Scott Boatwright, Chipotle's new CEO as of last fall, has promised to deliver generous portion sizes as a new tech initiative is set to roll out by this summer.

Chipotle has come under fire recently for its serving sizes, with customers complaining about meager portions.

"When Chipotle first opened they really made great bowls! Now they skimp on serving," one fan bashed on TikTok.

"Seriously fix this guys come on, it's happened to me like 5x already and I haven't gone back since because I don't feel like I'm getting my money's worth," complained another.

At the Chipotle fourth quarter earnings call on Tuesday, Chipotle's CEO vowed to improve the fast food giant's customer experience through several changes.

As the chain works to modernize its back-of-house, one of the ways Chipotle will do so is through its produce slicer tool.

"Fresh shop produce in our restaurants each day is key to maintaining our high culinary standards. But it's also one of the most time-consuming tasks," said Boatwright.

The new tool chops onions, jalapeños, and fajita vegetables, improving the speed and simplicity of food preparation.

It improves the team member experience by reducing the time to chop produce and improves the customer experience by ensuring consistent cut sizes, according to Boatwright.

"Some of the efficiencies from the produce slicer will help offset the investment we made last year, ensuring generous portion sizes," he said.

As more restaurants complete prep according to schedule, customers can also expect quicker service during peak periods.

Chipotle is currently rolling out the produce slicers to all its restaurants, with the change expected to be complete by this summer.

SAVVY SERVINGS

The produce slicer isn't the only innovative tool Chipotle is using to improve its back-of-house operations.

Over the last several months, Chipotle began testing the produce slicer, dual-sided plancha, three pan rice cooker, and dual VAT in a handful of restaurants to assess the impact of having all four tools available together.

The dual-sided plancha cooks chicken and steak in less than half the time it takes on the traditional plancha, providing the same sear but with "better consistency and juiciness."

The upgraded rice cooker eliminates the large rice pots, cooking the rice on the pan that customers see on the line and creating "more consistent quality."

The last tool - the dual-backed fryer - reduces cook time by doubling the capacity for frying Chipotle's chips, resulting in "better quality" and ensuring consistent availability.

Chipotle has seen favorable results with the four pieces of equipment, deciding to roll out the tools to new locations later this year and potentially to existing restaurants as it collects more data.

The tools are being tested alongside Chipotle's Autocado robot and Augmented Digital Makeline test, which are currentlyin a stage-gate process.

"The end goal is to improve the experience for our teams by making tasks easier to execute, more efficient, faster and more consistent while maintaining our high culinary standards," said Boatwright, noting that this directly translates to a better guest experience.

"Exceptional in-restaurant and digital experiences coupled with our powerful marketing strategy make the brand more visible, more relevant, and more loved," he said.

"This builds the brand momentum and results in year after year of transaction growth."

Other popular food chains have big changes underway.

A McDonald's employee revealed its iconic green shake is returning to all locations in days - and there are new sizes.

Plus, Starbucks fans are starting to see three major changes roll out in cafes as the CEO brings back an old-school refill policy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Chipotle CEO speaks out on portion size drama following backlash for 'skimping'

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
CHIPOTLE'S top boss has spoken out on its portion sizes, promising change following a high volume of customer pushback. Scott Boatwright, Chipotle's new CEO as of last fall, has promise...

# data[].attributes.body
1. John Deere has made significant strides toward reducing its environmental footprint. The company focuses on sustainable farming practices by providing farmers with tools and machinery designed to increase efficiency, reduce waste, and minimize environmental impact.

2. It's important for the environment because it will help keep is sustainable for the future

3. There is no argument because John Deer is an ethical company following ethical policies and making sure their workplace is safe, and good for the environment

4. Impacts the environment and workers

# data[].attributes.body
1 - What is the Controversy/Ethical Decision?

The ethical decision Patagonia chose to make was to place an ad in New York times on Black Friday which pushed people not to buy their products to benefit the planet.

2 - Why does it matter?  Who does it matter to?

It matters to the earth and the future generations of the world. If we cannot continue to preserve our planets health then climate change and pollution will only become worse.

3 - Explain both sides of the argument/discussion.

Patagonia decided to do this because of a few reasons. They know that especially during Black Friday, tons of people are looking for products on a big discount and everything is at high demand. So they put this ad out on this day specifically so people are motivated not to. It was a risk putting it out there because they could either lose tons of sales, or no one listens and they put the ad out for no reason.

4 - Who has this controversy/decision impacted, how, and why?

This controversy has impacted patagonia itself, since if people follow their instructions then their sales will decrease. The earth's health is impacted by the following of these customers because if the sales decrease then it supports maintaning our earths health.

# data[].attributes.body
1.

In 2024, Nestle's Buitoni frozen pizza line was linked to a contamination incident, leading to health concerns among consumers. The company faced criticism for its handling of the situation, including the recall process and communication with the public. This incident raised questions about Nestle's commitment to food safety and consumers well being.

2.

This controversy is significant because it directly impacts consumer health and safety. It matters to consumers who trust food companies to provide safe products. It also affects Nestlé's reputation and financial performance.

3.

Nestle acted promptly to recall the affected products, demonstrating a commitment to consumer safety. The company communicated openly with the public and regulatory bodies, adhering to industry standards.

The recall process was slow, potentially exposing consumers to health risks. Nestle's communication was insufficient, leading to confusion and mistrust among consumers.

4.

Individuals who purchased the affected Buitoni pizzas were at risk of health issues, leading to a loss of trust in the brand.

The company faced damage and potential financial losses due to the incident.

Health and safety agencies were involved in the investigation and recall process

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Emmanuel Macron denies covering up mineral water health risks

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The French president is accused of ignoring officials who warned that Nestlé was using illegal decontamination methods which exposed consumers to viruses

# data[].attributes.body
1. CVS becomes the first drug store to stop selling tobacco products.

2. It matters because it re branded their business in focusing more on their customers health, it matters to CVS health customers and workers.

3. One side of the argument is that it is better for their customers health, and supports the meaning of their business better. Another side of the argument is that it is an inconvenience for the people who regularly went to CVS for their tobacco products.

4. This has impacted customers of CVS because they can no longer go to CVS for their tobacco products which they feel is an inconvenience to them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CVS Stops Selling Tobacco Products, Changes Name

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
As the second-largest drugstore chain sharpens its focus on customer health, CVS has kicked its tobacco habit.

# data[].attributes.body
1- The controversy here is that Chipotle is giving out too small of portion sizes.

2- This matters because consumers are not getting enough food for how much they are paying for it. It matters to the consumers and the workers because Chipotle could eventually lose customers.

3- Although Chipotle is saving product and saving more money, the consumers have really started to notice and have brought it to social media so unless Chipotle is more fair, there is going to be less customers are Chipotle.

4- This Controversy has impacted customers because they are paying more for less money but also for less quality food.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Chipotle faces lawsuit for serving 'inconsistent' portion sizes

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Mexican fast-food chain has a significant legal challenge on its hands.

# data[].attributes.body
-They pay up to 25,000 in tuition assistance to employees

-Chick-fil-A says that 90% of those that got the tuition assistance said they will keep working for the company. 60% of the recipients could not have attended college without the help.

-The positive side is that they have seen tremendous growth compared to there closest competitors including burger King and Wendy's.

It has impacted the community and employees, by giving them a chance to get an education.

-

# data[].attributes.body
Amazon is accused of not meeting federal safety regulations for their workers

Their workers have reported getting injured while working

The warehouses have been designed for speed and not safety of workers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
US Labor Department accuses Amazon of failing to keep warehouse workers safe | CNN Business

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Amazon has been accused by federal safety regulators of failing to keep warehouse workers safe from workplace hazards at three US facilities, in the latest example of government officials scrutinizing the e-commerce giant's labor practices.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the ethical decisions was to launch sweet chews during the pandemic.

It mattered to the seller could have gone big or it could have failed because of the pandemic.

One side of the argument is to not put up the product and the other side was to launch it during pandemic.

This impacted the seller because it was during the pandemic and it could have failed

# data[].attributes.body
There are unsuitable working conditions and hours for their workers with 75 hour work weeks with little time off, which violates Shein's Supplier Code of Conduct and Chinese labor laws (where the factories are located) and a lack of emergency exits while the workers are also being underpaid

It matters because it violates labor laws and the workers are being exploited

Some may say Shein is treating the problem with indifference and the conditions haven't gotten better while some may say it's gotten better and Shein has taken action after releasing a statement that they'll investigate the working conditions at these factories

The non stop work has made Shein able to produce clothing fast and at cheap prices, making it a popular clothing brand, but information released about the conditions impacted Shein's popularity and caused not as many people to support the brand

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shein's Massive Popularity Comes at a Huge Cost to Us All

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shein was 2022's most popular fashion brand. It's also a nightmare for workers' rights and the environment.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
86% of the products in our line are made in a Fair Trade Certified™ factory.

75,000+ workers benefit from Patagonia's participation in the Fair Trade program.

2,000+ farmers are part of our Regenerative Organic Certified® cotton program.

Why

Apparel workers are among the lowest-paid employees in the world. Much of the clothing industry has lax social standards that can lead to unsafe working conditions, long hours, low pay, and job discrimination for the workers who are predominantly women. The continual demand for fast fashion exacerbates this problem every day.

But this is not the case across the board. Over the years, Patagonia has built a robust social-responsibility program that analyzes and manages the impacts our business has on the workers and communities in our supply chain. Our goal is to not only minimize harm, but also create a positive benefit for the lives that we touch through our business.

Where We Are

Like most clothing companies, we don't make our own products or own any of the factories that do. We partner with other companies across the globe and work closely with them to mitigate the harm we collectively create through the manufacturing of clothes. We hold our suppliers (and ourselves) to the highest environmental and social standards in the industry. We lean on industry tools and standards to manage this process, and when rigorous enough standards don't exist, we create them.

Over the years, we have developed several programs to investigate our impact across our business, from our farms to our stores.

How We Work with Factories, Farms and Mills

Responsible Purchasing Practices

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Corporate Social Responsibility - Patagonia

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Beyond minimizing harm, the goal of our social responsibility program is to create a positive benefit for the lives that we touch through our business.

# data[].attributes.headline
Shein's gives workers unfit labor conditions 

# data[].attributes.subject
Shein's gives workers unfit labor conditions 

# data[].attributes.body
1. Being aware of how bad the conditions are at these Chinese factories handled by SHEIN matters because it gives us a reason to stop buying from these companies ruining our economy and hurting people.

2. Although some people may say that they don't have other options but to shop on SHEIN because they can buy more for less it is important to note that each piece of clothes gives the company fuel to run their horrible factories harming innocent lives.

3. Not only does this impact Chinese workers SHEIN is well known for emitting a trail of 6.3 billion tons of carbon dioxide leading to environmental issues so in conclusion this affects everyone.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shein's Massive Popularity Comes at a Huge Cost to Us All

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shein was 2022's most popular fashion brand. It's also a nightmare for workers' rights and the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Ben & Jerry's doesn't want to sell their ice cream to Israeli occupied territories.

This matters because they are choosing to take a side in the war.

One side is saying that Ben & Jerry's should be boycotted, while the other side says that boycotting only encourages the violence.

This is impacting the company because they aren't making as much profit and the Israeli occupied territories because it causes people to not support them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Evolve - Groundbreaking Jewish Conversations

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Who, If Anyone, Should be Boycotted? The Ben and Jerry’s Controversy - Evolve

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
So much has been written about the decision by Ben & Jerry’s corporate board last spring to stop selling ice cream in the West Bank that one might think there’s nothing more worth saying about it. As the dust settles, I think there are some important things that the controversy has revealed about the way

# data[].attributes.body
they don't want to sell product to the Israeli occupied territories.

This matters because they are choosing to take a side in the war.

One side is saying that Ben and Jerry's should be boycotted while the other side that boycotting only encourages the violence.

The company because they are not making as much profit without them. It would also cause the world to not support them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Evolve - Groundbreaking Jewish Conversations

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Who, If Anyone, Should be Boycotted? The Ben and Jerry’s Controversy - Evolve

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
So much has been written about the decision by Ben & Jerry’s corporate board last spring to stop selling ice cream in the West Bank that one might think there’s nothing more worth saying about it. As the dust settles, I think there are some important things that the controversy has revealed about the way

# data[].attributes.body
There is less waste and more plastic is getting recycled

Most companies do not reuse plastic and have a lot of waste. Using Adidas shoes is better for the environment

It impacts everyone one way or another because it affects us even in small ways

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In 2018 adidas produced more than five million pairs of shoes containing recycled plastic waste. The company now plans to more than double that figure this year. As outcome of a cooperation between the sporting goods manufacturer and the environmental organization and global collaboration network Parley for the Oceans, plastic waste is intercepted on beaches, such as the Maldives, before it can reach the oceans. That upcycled plastic waste is made into a yarn becoming a key component of the upper material of adidas footwear. In addition to footwear, the company also produces apparel from the recycled material, such as the Champions League jersey for FC Bayern Munich and Alexander Zverev's outfit for the Australian Open.

"Sustainability at adidas goes far beyond recycled plastic," added Executive Board member Gil Steyaert, responsible for Global Operations. "We also continue to improve our environmental performance during the manufacturing of our products. This includes the use of sustainable materials, the reduction of CO2 emissions and waste prevention. In 2018 alone, we saved more than 40 tons of plastic waste in our offices, retail stores, warehouses and distribution centers worldwide and replaced it with more sustainable solutions."

Recently, adidas signed the Climate Protection Charter for the Fashion Industry at the UN Climate Change Conference in Katowice, Poland, and agreed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by 2030. In addition, adidas is committed to using only recycled polyester in every product and on every application where a solution exists by 2024. As a founding member of the Better Cotton Initiative, adidas meanwhile sources only sustainably produced cotton. Since 2016, adidas stores no longer use plastic bags.

Where the use of plastics - for example in transport packaging - is still unavoidable, adidas is relying on counterbalancing measures and promoting sustainable alternatives. The company is currently supporting the global innovation platform Fashion for Good with a donation of €1.5 million which equates to the company's environmental impact of plastic packaging. The foundation is driving the development of innovative, durable and reusable materials for the fashion industry. adidas has been a partner of the foundation since the beginning of 2018.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
adidas to produce more shoes using recycled plastic waste in 2019 - adidas Group

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
From five million pairs of shoes containing recycled plastic in 2018 to eleven million pairs in 2019

# data[].attributes.body
Chipotle is raising there prices to become more expensive while also lowering the portions so they can gain more money as inflation increases

This matters because Chipotle is very yummy and they could actually lose some customers by doing what they are doing. It affects the people that want to eat yummy food

One side says that Chipotle is in the right because they need to make money in a time where everything is getting more expensive. The other side is that Chipotle shouldn't be increasing prices as it is supposed to be affordable fast food

This has impacted people such as me and Bryson who really enjoy Chipotle but don't want to be scammed by them

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Chipotle is considering raising prices due to the rising cost of avocados, queso, and sour cream.

New CFO Adam Rymer aims to keep menu items affordable despite cost pressures, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Chipotle's sales rose 6% last quarter, showing resilience amid fast food price hikes.

Chipotle's new chief finance officer is eager to keep menu items affordable for cash-strapped customers, but has warned that prices could rise as the cost of raw materials keeps going up.

Executives at the Mexican grill chain are contemplating raising prices further as costs have risen for avocados, queso, and sour cream, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

Chipotle has not yet decided when any price increase might kick in, or how significant the rise would be, the Journal reported.

Adam Rymer started as finance chief at Chipotle in October. In his 15 years at the company, he has held various roles, including vice president of finance and compensation analyst.

Rymer was initially due to become CFO in January but instead took the position three months early after previous Chipotle boss Brian Niccol exited in August to become CEO of Starbucks. Niccol was replaced in the interim by Scott Boatwright, who served as chief operating officer beforehand.

Despite the potential for higher menu prices, Chipotle remains a better value option for customers than similar alternatives, Rymer said, per the Journal.

Inflation has not been kind to fast food prices.

, , KFC, In-N-Out, and Olive Garden are among the chains that have increased prices due to the soaring cost of labor and commodities.

Unlike some fast food firms, whose sales have taken a tumble as customers have cut back, Chipotle has shown resilience.

In its most recent quarter, the company's same-store sales rose 6% compared to the same period last year. Revenue grew 13% to $2.8 billion year over year.

Chipotle did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, made outside regular working hours.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Avocados, queso, and sour cream have all become more expensive, and this could push Chipotle to increase prices.

# data[].attributes.body
-Having good flavored soda that's good for you and high in fiber

-Because most sodas if not all are unhealthy so people trying to become healthier would switch to olipop

-One would say they'd just drink regular soda because it tastes better, the other side would be that even though this soda isn't as good in taste it makes up for it being healthier than other brands

-It's impacted people who were slightly overweight and help them become healthier

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Wellness Soda? How Olipop’s Academic Research Studies Cement Their Position As The True Functional Pop

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
From digestion-minded intermittent fasting to gut health as a determiner of youthful skin, digestive health and function have taken center stage in the wellness conversation. Now, functional soda OLIPOP has cemented their place as a wellness product through academic research.

# data[].attributes.body
The chairman and founder believes that keeping the price at 99 cents is "A way of giving back". His claim is “We make it faster. We ship it better. We ship it closer. The cans are thinner.” that's how they are able to keep it so cheap. This is good for people who are struggling to provide for their family. Arizona Tea has not changed their price in their 32 years of existence. This is very ethical because it is probably the most affordable drink out, even cheaper than a bottle of water. This has impacted the whole country because everyone knows that Arizona is the cheapest most reliable drink.