# data[].attributes.body
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees individuals' rights to free speech and expression (U.S. Const. amend. I). This includes:

Protects individuals' rights to freely express themselves, which includes seeking and sharing information about one's mental health.

This includes students’ rights to seek and receive information related to mental health, including suicide prevention resources.

Legally, it impacts school policies should not restrict students' access to mental health information or resources related to suicide prevention.

Link to Full Text: U.S. Constitution - First Amendment

# data[].attributes.body
As a future school counselor, my primary role will be to support the mental and emotional well-being of all students. My focus is on creating a safe space where every student feels safe to be vulnerable and open up. However, in moments where students express suicidal ideation, it is crucial to handle these situations with utmost care and responsibility. School counselors should be aware and understand the limitations in accurately assessing suicide risk so that students receive the best support they need.

# data[].attributes.body
This guide is aimed at school counselors, administrators, and nurses who might be involved in the process when school counselors have to conduct suicide risk assessments. Each of these roles plays a critical part in ensuring student safety and well-being, making it essential for them to understand the limitations and ethical considerations surrounding suicide assessments.

# data[].attributes.body
The topic of this guide focuses on the challenges and ethical implications of suicide risk assessments in schools (Stone, 2021). Research indicates that these assessments are often inaccurate and unreliable, placing a significant legal and ethical burden on school counselors who are not equipped to handle them alone. By highlighting the limitations of suicide assessments and the importance of involving qualified mental health professionals, this guide aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how to navigate these critical situations effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose this topic because it presents an arguably unknown but highly challenging and ethically complex issue faced by school counselors today. The expectation to accurately assess suicide risk not only puts counselors in a difficult position but also has serious implications for student safety. By exploring this topic, I hope to shed light on the importance of adhering to ethical standards and legal responsibilities while ensuring that students receive the appropriate care and support they need.

# data[].attributes.body
U.S. Department of Education: The U.S. Department of Education (2015) is the federal governing agency that provides guidance and resources for schools to develop comprehensive suicide prevention programs. They recommend a multifaceted approach to suicide prevention, which includes protocols for helping students at risk and suicide screening. This underscores the importance of having clear procedures and training to identify and support students exhibiting early warning signs of suicidal ideation. This agency's guidelines ensure that schools across the nation have a consistent and proactive approach to preventing student suicides.

# data[].attributes.body
Texas Education Agency (TEA): At the state level, the TEA is responsible for ensuring that Texas schools comply with state laws and regulations regarding suicide prevention (Texas Education Agency [TEA], 2020). Senate Bill 11 mandates that schools have protocols in place for notifying parents/guardians and providing referrals when students are identified with warning signs of suicide (TEA, 2020). This legislation suggests that schools have to document instances when a student shows signs of suicidal ideation and take immediate action to support the student. By ensuring compliance with these regulations, the TEA helps create a safe and supportive environment for students by mandating timely intervention and parental involvement in suicide prevention efforts.

# data[].attributes.body
I've come to learn that the federal and state governing bodies play a big role in setting and enforcing policies related to suicide prevention in schools. The U.S. Department of Education (2015) offers overarching guidelines and resources to ensure a nationwide standard for addressing student mental health issues. On the other hand, state agencies like the TEA (2020) adapt these guidelines to meet specific state needs and legal requirements, ensuring that schools implement effective and legally compliant procedures. These governing bodies hold schools accountable for maintaining safe environments for students by having established protocols and providing proper training and documentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Article 1, Section 8 of the Texas Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech and press. (Tex. Const. art. I, § 8). This section:

Guarantees the right to freely speak and publish opinions, supporting access to information about mental health and suicide prevention.

This ensures that individuals, such as students, have the freedom to seek and receive information related to mental health, including suicide prevention resources, without undue restrictions.

It supports school policies that promote the use of suicide assessments to access critical information regarding students' mental health.

Link to Full Text: Texas Constitution - Article 1 Bill of Rights

# data[].attributes.body
The United States Code Title 42, Section 290bb-36a directs schools to provide timely assessment, treatment, or referral for youth at risk of suicide (42 U.S. Code § 290bb–36a). This includes:

Mandating that schools assess, treat, or refer students at risk of suicide promptly.

Ensuring that schools implement effective suicide prevention measures to avoid legal penalties.

Holding institutions accountable with legal consequences for failing to meet these requirements.

Link to Full Text: 42 USC 290bb-36a: Suicide Prevention for Youth

# data[].attributes.body
Texas Administrative Code § 748.125 outlines the requirements for suicide risk assessment and screening in schools (Tex. Admin. Code § 748.125). This includes:

Setting standards for evaluating and intervening with students at risk of suicide.

Requiring schools to follow specific procedures for conducting assessments and screenings.

Imposing legal repercussions and sanctions on educational institutions that fail to adhere to these regulations.

Ensuring compliance to avoid penalties and maintain proper oversight.

Link to Full Text: Texas Administrative Code § 748.125

# data[].attributes.headline
Case Law: Rogers v. Christina School District 

# data[].attributes.subject
Case Law: Rogers v. Christina School District 

# data[].attributes.body
In the case of Rogers v. Christina School District, the tragic suicide of Roger Ellerbe, Jr. led his family to sue the school district. They claimed that the district was responsible for Roger’s death because they failed to prevent it (Rogers v. Christina School District, 2012). This case:

Shows the serious risks of misjudging a student's suicide risk as low or nonexistent without a thorough assessment and proper training.

Underlines the importance of using evidence-based methods and thorough assessments to accurately identify and support students at risk of suicide.

Stresses the need for school counselors to follow established procedures and avoid making unfounded judgments.

Although this case is from Delaware, Texas courts would follow binding precedents from Texas. As there are no similar precedents available regarding the impact of suicide assessments, they would then consider the relevance and timing of a case from another state (Cornell Law School, n.d.).

Link to Full Text: Rogers v. Christina School District

# data[].attributes.headline
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015

# data[].attributes.subject
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015

# data[].attributes.body
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015 is a key piece of federal legislation that supports comprehensive education, including the mental health needs of students (20 U.S.C. § 6301). It sets standards for creating supportive school environments and integrating mental health services into the educational framework. The ESSA:

Requires states and school districts to provide a well-rounded education, which includes mental health support and services.

Highlights the need for comprehensive school counseling programs that address students' mental health needs, including suicide prevention.

Enforces schools to establish and follow protocols for suicide prevention and intervention.

Helps school counselors advocate for and implement strategies that support mental health, ensuring students receive the necessary interventions to address and prevent suicidal ideation.

Link to Full Text: Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015

# data[].attributes.headline
Frisco ISD Local Policy on Counseling and Mental Health

# data[].attributes.subject
Frisco ISD Local Policy on Counseling and Mental Health

# data[].attributes.body
Frisco Independent School District (ISD) has established a comprehensive local policy to address counseling and mental health, including specific measures for suicide prevention (2023). This policy highlights the district’s commitment to creating a supportive and safe environment for students. The policy:

Outlines a comprehensive procedure for suicide prevention within Frisco ISD.

Mandates a structured approach for promptly notifying parents or guardians when a student is identified as at risk of suicide to ensure timely intervention and support.

Requires the use of standardized suicide assessments and screening tools to evaluate students for suicidal ideation, behavior, and risk factors.

Emphasizes the importance of using evidence-based assessments to safeguard student well-being and uphold the district’s commitment to student safety.

Link to Full Text: Frisco ISD Counseling and Mental Health Policy

# data[].attributes.headline
Risk Management Steps for Suicide Assessments

# data[].attributes.subject
Risk Management Steps for Suicide Assessments

# data[].attributes.body
Effective risk management strategies for suicide assessments are crucial to ensuring thorough and responsible support for at-risk students. Risk Management Steps for Suicide Assessments include (Stone, 2021):

Acknowledging Limitations: School counselors should recognize and communicate their limitations in conducting suicide assessments, clarifying that their role does not include diagnosing or clinically assessing suicide risk. This transparency helps manage expectations and ensures that parents understand the need for specialized mental health professionals.

Implementing a Referral Process: Regardless of the perceived risk level, school counselors must refer students to trained mental health professionals. This step ensures that students receive appropriate, comprehensive care from trained experts, even if the immediate risk appears low, to ensure their long-term well-being.

Training and Professional Development: Providing ongoing training for school counselors is crucial for keeping them updated on recognizing signs of suicidal ideation and understanding proper protocols for communication and referrals. Regular professional development helps maintain high standards of care and ensures counselors are equipped to handle complex situations effectively while understanding their limitations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Ethical Standards for Suicide Assessments

# data[].attributes.subject
Ethical Standards for Suicide Assessments

# data[].attributes.body
The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) Ethical Standards play a critical role in guiding school counselors, especially when it comes to suicide assessments (American School Counselor Association [ASCA], 2022). Two important standards related to suicide assessments include:

Standard A.9.a.: This standard emphasizes that school counselors must take immediate action if a student is at risk of harming themselves or others. It requires counselors to follow established protocols and report any concerns quickly and responsibly to both parents and school administration to ensure the student's safety.

Standard A.9.b.: Understanding the difficulty in precisely measuring suicide risk, this standard advises counselors to use their best judgment when assessing suicide risk. It also emphasizes the importance of being transparent with parents about the limitations of these assessments. This helps avoid legal issues and ensures that any concerns are promptly communicated to parents for immediate action, even if the assessed risk level appears low.

These ethical standards highlight the necessity for school counselors to act quickly and responsibly by prioritizing the safety and well-being of students at risk of suicide.

Link to Full Test: ASCA Ethical Standards

# data[].attributes.headline
Personal Connection to the Legal and Ethical Standards

# data[].attributes.subject
Personal Connection to the Legal and Ethical Standards

# data[].attributes.body
Overview:

Working closely with counselors, I have come to understand the limitations of suicide assessments. Throughout my educational journey, the emphasis has always been on suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention on a broader scale, but the complexities of assessing suicide risk were new to me. This context has deepened my appreciation for the legal and ethical responsibilities that school counselors carry in these critical situations.

Feelings and Education Goals:

Learning about the limitations of suicide assessments has made me more empathetic toward the challenges that school counselors face, reinforcing my commitment to thorough and continuous learning.

Understanding the legal and ethical standards has highlighted the importance of clear communication and transparency with parents and guardians, shaping my goal to develop strong, trusting relationships with parents.

This knowledge has emphasized the importance of advocating for better training and resources for school counselors, as they often put themselves in vulnerable positions where thorough knowledge and preparation are essential.

# data[].attributes.headline
Recommendations and Best Practices for Suicide Assessments

# data[].attributes.subject
Recommendations and Best Practices for Suicide Assessments

# data[].attributes.body
Here are seven recommendations to follow when ensuring a comprehensive and ethical approach to assessing students at risk of suicide while maintaining compliance with legal and ethical standards:

Adhere to Assessment Protocols: School counselors should use standardized assessments and screening tools to evaluate suicide risk, but they must avoid dismissing any level of risk without thorough consideration (ASCA, 2020). It is crucial to recognize that students may sometimes present themselves in ways they think will avoid deeper scrutiny, so assessments must be used diligently.

Ensure Parent/Guardian Notification: School counselors must adhere to the policy of always notifying parents or guardians about any potential suicide risks identified through assessments or screenings. Keeping parents informed is essential for ensuring they can take appropriate steps to protect their child and support their well-being (Stone, 2022).

Guardian Notification of Adult Student: Regardless of the student’s age, school counselors have an ethical duty to notify parents or guardians about any identified suicidal ideation (Stone, 2017; 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99).

Document All Actions: Keep detailed records of the assessment process, interactions with the student, and communications with parents or guardians (Stone, 2021). Proper documentation is crucial for legal compliance and effective follow-up.

Continuous Protocol Review: Regularly review and update school policies on suicide assessments and parental notification to ensure they remain aligned with current legal and ethical standards (ASCA, 2020).

Follow-Up With Parents: After the initial notification of the suicide assessment, follow up with parents to ensure they have reached out to mental health professionals or connected with resources to actively work on addressing their child’s needs (Stone, 2021).

Continuous Training: Engage in regular training and professional development on suicide risk assessment and crisis intervention. Staying informed about best practices ensures counselors are equipped to handle these situations effectively.