# data[].attributes.body
1) How do you analyse the SLS results​?

2) What are the steps involved?​

3) How do you ensure teachers utilise the analysis to improve classroom delivery?

4) How do you monitor and evaluate the progress?

# data[].attributes.body
1) Identify student individual performance; to group them into need help, progressing, surplus level.

2) Clean Data: Identify weakest items.

3) Find the common data (share with teachers)

4) Think of strategies to be used in class.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Gather with subject teachers and HOD

2. Cleaning Data

3. Find the weakest topic

4. Find solution for the problem

a. reteach the topic

b. reinforcement

c. Drilling practice

5. Monitoring the progress by checklist, give timeline. Clear goal and target

# data[].attributes.body
Question 1 & 2.

Identify overall performance thru total marks, Identify weakest items, Group according to commonalities

Question 3.

Adopting suitable teaching strategies/approaches/lesson content

Question 4.

Observations, lesson materials, students work

# data[].attributes.body
identify what information you can get from the data, i.e. overall passes or failures, number of students in the red, yellow, or green categories, and what are the weakest or strongest topics or areas

Analyze and extract the data according to the identified focus area

# data[].attributes.body
1) Check the Lesson Planning

2) Observe the Lesson through LO and LW

3) Discussion with the teachers

4) Through SBA marks and TPA grade of teachers

# data[].attributes.body
1. Identify overall performance - total marks per student

2. Group students based on their overall performance - Tier1,2,3

3. Clean up the data - highlight 0, 1 using different colors to easily see areas need to improve/focus

4. Group skills/competencies in the SLS questions according to level of difficulty/priority

5. Discuss with teachers on areas where there needs focus, based on common competencies/skills

6. Monitor - learning walk, lesson observations, triangulate approaches used to results of assessments

# data[].attributes.body
Q1 &2: Identify the overall performance through total marks. Identify the weakest items and group according to commonalities.

Q3. Adopting suitable teaching and learning strategies/approaches content.

Q4. Observation, lesson materials and students work.

# data[].attributes.body
a. Look at the items score the lowest and the highest.

b. Identify the weakest items.

c. Find out the possible contributions.

d. Do an action plan to tackle the weakest items.

e. Monitor and evaluate the process.

f. Do termly report of exiting students from the LRP.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Overall, students writing is below average, this data was gathered using learning objectives and informative assessment such as book look.

2. Similarly, to writing children are underperforming in grammar out of 15 children only few are able to use capital letters, full stop, correct tense, correct personal pronouns and use of adjectives consistently which means only 40% are at expected or higher.

3. Analyse of the data:

Writing/Grammar:

Even though children are very confident speakers, their writing is below average.

All children do not use full stops and capital letters consistently or in the right place. You will find capital letter in the middle of sentences and full stops before a sentence has even ended or no full stops at all.

•The sentence structure is also poor, they will miss out prepositions and articles and use the wrong tense in their writing.

# data[].attributes.body
1. analyse the SLS result by looking at the 0 and 1.

2. looking at the result and find the weakest topic by looking how many students have 0's

3. by reteaching the topic

4. observation and work scrutiny

# data[].attributes.body
1) Clean the data

2) Calculate 1, 0 for total number of passess and failures

3) Tabulate into visual data e.g. graphs etc

4) Identify the weakest items or subject areas by listing them from 1 to 10 or 1 to 5

# data[].attributes.headline
3) How do you ensure teachers utilise the data to improve teaching?

# data[].attributes.subject
3) How do you ensure teachers utilise the data to improve teaching?

# data[].attributes.body
1) Share the data with teachers

2) Discuss and create an action plan or way forward—a program or intervention, Ganntt Chart

# data[].attributes.body
SLS Analysis

Identify student individual performance and group them according to commonalities Tier 1, 2

& 3

Identify and analyze weakest items and think suitable strategies to be used

Checking lesson planning, lesson observation and work scrutiny

Discussion with teachers on areas or competencies that need to be focused

# data[].attributes.body
To analyse results, we must first understand what type of raw data we have gathered. What kind of data have we gathered? What type of data analysis is most suitable? What kind of data can be extracted and analysed from this data set?

We know that ‘1’ means correct, ‘0’ means wrong. We also know that the students collectively sat for 5 different sets of questions.

Then, we can extract simple frequencies such as: the number of attempts for each question, and the number of successful/unsuccessful attempts for each question.

Based on the dummy data set, while there are many questions, there is only a small representation of students for each item. The next step could perhaps be to re-organise the questions based on the themes or topics such as: spelling, comprehension, vocabulary, etc.

Then, we can analyse based on overall attempts for each topic. For example, there are 5 questions relating to spelling. The data set shows that there are 27 attempts across these 5 questions. Out of these 27 attempts, there are 22 successful attempts (equivalent to 81%), and 5 unsuccessful attempts (19%). This suggests that spelling is one of their group’s strengths.

Repeat this process, until all topics are covered. Then, rank the topics based on % of unsuccessful attempts to identify the students’ weakest areas.  These can then be presented as a graph to show a visual representation.

# data[].attributes.body
The data analysis should be shared with subject teachers.

Then, the teachers can discuss and create an action plan based on the students’ group (need support, progressing, surpass). Plan out any interventions, implement learning strategies and set targets for students.

Progress can be monitored and evaluated through learning walks/lesson observations, triangulating students’ progress through various mediums (classwork, assessments, etc).

# data[].attributes.body
Q1 & 2;

Step 1: GKA analyse each student data by identify individual student tier for EMS

Step 2: Academic team will share the data with all EMS teachers

Step 3 : EMS teachers will identify the weakest competencies and discuss the cause and how to tackle it with the use of DUI template.

Step 4: Academic team will make a overall summary by transforming the data in graphs form and compared with last year overall achievements in SLS.

Q3&Q4:

1) School leader will go through each subject report that upload in school sharepoint.

2) English and maths teachers will include as part of their SIP

3) School leader will have dialogue session with each subject team to check the progress

# data[].attributes.body
Q1. How do you analyse the SLS results?

SLS raw data was shared to the respective team and teachers.

SLS data was analysed in terms of :

i. Identify number of students (based on tiers for each year level / focus subject).

ii. Regroup the competencies into similar focus area.

iii. Weakest and highest competencies.

# data[].attributes.headline
Q2. What are the steps involved? The steps involved:  The steps are as follows:

# data[].attributes.subject
Q2. What are the steps involved? The steps involved:  The steps are as follows:

# data[].attributes.headline
Q3. How do you ensure teachers utilize the analysis to improve classroom delivery?  Teachers plan for the intervention (in class) based on the SLS data analysis.

# data[].attributes.subject
Q3. How do you ensure teachers utilize the analysis to improve classroom delivery?  Teachers plan for the intervention (in class) based on the SLS data analysis.

# data[].attributes.body
This is monitored thru their LP. Each EMS team makes use of the PLC to discuss and share best practice / intervention to tackle each weakest competency which needs immediate intervention.

# data[].attributes.body
SL role - work scrutiny, learning walk, and discuss with the academic for further review.

Academic team role - produce an overall report on SLS and share it to the teachers.

Data triangulation is done from time to time. This includes SBA (AT marks), and lexile score results (for literacy).

# data[].attributes.body
Qn 1 and 2.

Share the SLS data with academic team. Team will identify individual performance and group them to Tier 1. 2 or 3. Team will identify the weakest items. Find out the possible contributions to the weakest factor.

Qn 3 and 4

Teachers must use data to plan their lessons. Clear goals / targets. SLs to check the plan. Discuss with teachers on implementing the plan. Taking pictures and giving feedback. Implement instructional strategies. Always refer to the Data Use Instruction Template.

# data[].attributes.body
QS 1 & 2

1. Raw data analyzed according to Tiers.

2. Categorize Learning Objectives/items accordance to their scores.

3. Focus on the 10 weakest scores & unattempted ones. Group them by common topics (commonalities)

4. Share with teachers via HoDs the items to focus during lessons / intervention programs.

Q3 & 4

1. Include the commonalities as part of their intervention in class/ programs. Focus on the basic concepts.

2. Work review with teachers. Discuss with subject teachers.

3. Conduct focused Lesson Observation / discuss with HoDs.