# data[].attributes.body
Wildlife documentary experts agree that a film crew should not interfere with the natural course of events. But interfering or not is a decision based on what you're seeing at the time, as the key point is that your presence does not influence the outcome.

# data[].attributes.body
The crew of David attenboroughs latest BBC series was widely controversial because some see it as a violation of wildlife documentary ethics while others believe that the action taken did not at all cause danger for both the crew and the penguins.

# data[].attributes.body
The veteran wildlife cameraman Doug Allen believes that the convention of not interfering is a cardinal rule, however, it is always the film crews choice on their course of action.

# data[].attributes.body
Philip Hoare, author and film-maker, believed that whichever way you respond meaning whether taking action or not are essentially bound to upset someone. And that the notion of purity of an encounter between a human and another species is absolutely ridiculous. There is no possibility of that.

# data[].attributes.body
Allan said he saw no problem about the crew's intervention. All they did was create an escape route for them.

# data[].attributes.body
Mike Gunton defended the crew's decision to help the penguins because normally you don't interfere, you can't interfere or you wouldn't interfere because of all sorts of consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
The incident has sparked a debate within the wildlife filmmaking community about when intervention is justified in capturing the nature on film.

# data[].attributes.body
To wildlife documentaries it is a major red flag to intervene with the natural course of events.

# data[].attributes.body
There may be certain times when observers are obliged to get involved with situations one example is in Syria when journalists assisted in evacuating injured people and were providing aid.

# data[].attributes.body
Investigative journalist Rubens Valante exposed the injustice and corruption of the Brazilian judicial system by getting involved with the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
Journalists should protect the confidentiality and safety of their sources especially in cases where revealing the sources identity could result in harm or retaliation but you're not legally obliged to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
If a journalist witnesses a situation where someone's life or safety is in immediate danger they may have an obligation to intervene or seek help similar to any other bystander witnessing the event.

# data[].attributes.body
Journalists have a responsibility to report truthfully and ethically which may require intervention to prevent the spread of misinformation or unethical reporting practices.

# data[].attributes.body
In cases where journalists uncover the wrongdoing or threates to public interest they may have an obligation to intervene by reporting the issue and raising awareness even if doing so involves personal risk or challenges powerful interests.

# data[].attributes.body
Journalists may encounter situations where vulnerable individuals such as victims of abuse or marginalized communities are in need of assistance.

# data[].attributes.body
Overall while journalists must maintain a degree of independence and impartiality in their reporting there are circumstances where their ethical responsibilities may require them to take action to protect sources, prevent harm, uphold journalistic standards and serve the public interest.