# data[].attributes.body
Zero tolerance is necessary against deliberate fraud ，but counterproductive if applied indiscriminately. Policies must balance integrity with fairness and flexibility

# data[].attributes.body
I think A graded or restorative justice system might be more effective, we should analyze specific problems:

Minor Offenses: Education, warnings, or remediation.

Severe/Repeated Misconduct: Escalating penalties .

Contextual Evaluation: Consider intent, precedent, and mitigating factors.

# data[].attributes.body
No，i think college should give us a chance to go on our study，because no one can be a perfect

person，the process we grow up is just like this，and a chance can also give us a opportunity to make up for our mistake by conducting in a good way.

# data[].attributes.body
yes，zero tolerance for academic misconduct is necessary to maintain trust and integrity in academic institutions.

# data[].attributes.body
No. First, academic misconduct is detrimental to students’ learning; second, it is a loss for authors; third, once academic misconduct is allowed, more people will imitate it.

# data[].attributes.body
No,zero-tolerance policies are often too rigid for the complex situations of academic misconduct.The goal is not to punish,but to cultivate an environment of academic integrity so that students can get further promoted. Blind uniformity can undermine that mission.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think academic misconduct should be zero-toleranted,BEACUSE only rigorous policy can prevent from cheating or other misconducts. Once you do the wrong behavior you must be punished,but the penalty could begin with milder ones.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it depends on the type and extent of misconduct. If the student is a first-time offender and the circumstance has less impact, the academic misconduct could be handled with discretion. If the misconduct undermines academic fairness，the student should be punished following zero-tolerance policies.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I think zero-tolerance policies are often too strict. Although academic misconduct should be taken seriously, the strict zero-tolerance approach does not take into account factors such as background, intention or severity. Students need to be allowed to keep learning and growing. For instance, unintentional plagiarism may require criticism and education rather than strict punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
No, Chinese students like us are accustomed to the academic integrity rules in the previous school. But the types of acdemic misconduct are specific, we are still not familiar with these rules. We need some time to understand them better.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I believe a zero-tolerance policy should be implemented, because it will encourage new ideas and original research instead of merely repeating others' work.

# data[].attributes.body
There should be zero tolerance for academic misconduct. Because cheating gives some students an unfair advantage over others who work honestly. Allowing cheating sends the wrong message.

# data[].attributes.body
No, i don't think zero-tolerance policies should be implemented for all forms of academic misconduct. Here are my reasons.It's obvious that there are different kinds of acadmic misconduct and we can't use the same penalty standard for all of them cauz different misconduct have different results, and these results can be evaluated, for exmaple, 1-10, and we should apply different policies for different level.

# data[].attributes.body
my answer is yes ,cause it could help confirm the fairness of academic activities,including scientific research,exams and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think they should be punished severely and not be tolerated. Because academic integrity has been emphasized many times. Students who know that but break the rules need to be punished to understand the seriousness of the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
It's hard to say, but i think developing a zero-tolerance policy is not the best choice. Since there are various kinds of academic misconduct, the policies should be various too. We should have different types of penalties to cope different forms of academic misconduct.

# data[].attributes.body
Whether to support this zero-tolerance policies depends on the punishment of it. If you are founded plagiarism in first time, then university dismiss you. I think it's unreasonable. So maybe university can cancel you grade if it's the first time. But the next time, no chance.

# data[].attributes.body
No.I think the degree of different misconducts are different .For example, using fake statistics in paper is worse than cheating in an exam .Because fake statistics may influence more people.So,we should make various standards among the eight misconduct.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. If plagiarism becomes at the beginning, it will grow up heavily in an uncontrolled way, which is threaten to the education and scholars. For example,

# data[].attributes.body
Yes,I think we should make zero-tolerance policies for academic misconduct. Because cheating only once and countless times. We should eliminate deception.

# data[].attributes.body
A nuanced approach is better. First-time minor infractions could receive remedial education, while severe violations warrant strict penalties. This balanced policy promotes learning while still protecting academic standards.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, implementing zero-tolerance policies ensures fairness and maintains academic integrity. In competitive higher education, clear consequences deter misconduct and prepare students for professional environments where ethical behavior is non-negotiable.

# data[].attributes.body
No, zero-tolerance policies fail to consider cultural differences in academic practices, especially relevant in Hong Kong's international education environment. Some students may need education rather than punishment to understand Western academic standards.