# data[].attributes.body
Priorities will be moved here once input starts coming in.

# data[].attributes.body
Priorities will be moved here once input starts coming in.

# data[].attributes.body
A strong national priority meets the following criteria:

Identifies a problem that is present in the national discourse among education leaders, policymakers, and/or funders

Offers open resources or practices as a compelling solution that cannot be achieved through closed approaches

Supports a strategy and specific goals that are achievable within three years

Has existing groundwork or interest underway within the open education field

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of this board is to maintain a list of potential national priorities for open education. Potential priorities are based on challenges in education that are on the minds of leaders and policymakers, where open education can be a solution but isn't yet a large enough part of the conversation.

This board will be updated weekly throughout the fall as new ideas are submitted through listening sessions. Check back to see how the list evolves and continue to weigh in.

For more information on the Open Education National Priorities Process visit the Open Education Association website.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Enrollment is declining and public confidence in the value of a degree is falling with it, driven partly by the rising cost of tuition and course materials. Students and families are asking whether the return is worth the price.

Why Open: Open education lets institutions answer with curriculum built around their own students instead of a generic textbook, customized and localized in ways that show care in the design rather than just cutting cost. AAC&U recently named OER a high-impact practice, giving institutions peer-reviewed evidence this belongs in their student success strategy.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: How institutions procure course materials is changing rapidly, as automatic billing programs replace campus-based purchasing and bundle materials costs into student fees. The result is a procurement environment that favors established vendor relationships over open alternatives, regardless of cost or quality.

Why Open: Textbook procurement could be moving closer to departments and libraries that have an interest in managing content sustainably and openly, rather than being outsourced to vendors with an interest in preserving the status quo.

# data[].attributes.headline
Open Infrastructure to Address Educational Enclosure

# data[].attributes.subject
Open Infrastructure to Address Educational Enclosure

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Assessment platforms, LMS, and other classroom infrastructure increasingly hold student content and data in formats institutions don't own and can't move. AI is the fastest-moving instance of a pattern that started decades ago, and the decisions being locked in now get harder to reverse the longer they stand.

Why Open: Open content, open data standards, and open infrastructure let institutions build and govern their own systems instead of renting access to someone else's.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Pell Grant eligibility was restored for incarcerated students in 2023, creating real demand for prison education programs, but the commercial course materials model is architecturally incompatible with carceral settings — no internet access, no account management, no per-copy licensing.

Why Open: Open materials can be preloaded on devices, printed, and reproduced without login requirements or licensing fees, making them the only course materials model that actually works in this environment.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Federal law now requires institutions to demonstrate graduate outcomes or risk losing financial aid eligibility, but the data infrastructure to make that case is fragmented across state systems, proprietary platforms, and a federal research apparatus being defunded.

Why Open: Open data infrastructure and shared standards let institutions collectively build and access the evidence base that accountability requirements demand, rather than ceding that infrastructure to proprietary systems.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Coursework often asks students to demonstrate understanding through assignments that can feel abstracted from any real purpose: essays with no reader but the instructor, problems disconnected from how a field actually works. Generative AI didn't create this problem, it just made the disconnect impossible to ignore.

Why Open: Open content and open pedagogy make coursework tied to real audiences and real practice possible at scale, turning authentic assessment into shared infrastructure instead of something each faculty member invents alone.

# data[].attributes.body
Complete this Form

Note that your submission may be edited to fit our format before posting. If we decide not to post your submission, we will provide a note in the public spreadsheet.

Since this is an open board with no way to enforce duplicate responses, upvotes and downvotes will be used to guide the ranking of priorities.

# data[].attributes.headline
Open Microcredentials for Workforce Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Open Microcredentials for Workforce Education

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Employers need workers with specific, verifiable skills and institutions need to produce them faster than traditional programs allow, but the emerging microcredential ecosystem is consolidating around commercial platforms whose credentials only travel within their own ecosystems.

Why Open: Open microcredentials combining shared curriculum with open recognition standards can be adopted, adapted, and issued by any institution without platform fees, making quality credentialing accessible at scale.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: Millions of high school students taking college courses have no access to the financial aid systems that make proprietary course materials workable for traditional college students. There is no FAFSA buffer, no institutional aid, and some billing programs result in high school students getting locked out.

Why Open: Open materials eliminate course material costs entirely for a population that has no other mechanism to absorb them, and they require none of the institutional infrastructure that dual enrollment programs rarely have.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: AI literacy has become a national workforce priority backed by federal mandates and state legislation, but the curriculum being built to meet that mandate is proprietary, rapidly outdated, and often produced by the same vendors whose tools are being taught.

Why Open: Open AI literacy curriculum can be updated by the community as the technology evolves, adapted for specific institutional contexts, and developed without vendor influence over what gets taught.

# data[].attributes.headline
OER for Nursing and Allied Health Workforce Education

# data[].attributes.subject
OER for Nursing and Allied Health Workforce Education

# data[].attributes.body
Problem: The U.S. cannot train healthcare workers fast enough to meet demand. Cost and access to course materials is one bottleneck slowing program expansion, particularly at community colleges and regional institutions that run most of these programs.

Why Open: Open clinical and course materials can be shared across programs and updated on a research timeline, allowing more institutions to launch or expand programs without building curriculum from scratch.