# data[].attributes.body
Respectfully remind group mate who is sharing that breach in privacy/confidentially might occur and if he/she is personally ok to continue sharing, he/she can do so since it is personal experiences.

# data[].attributes.body
Pause the discussion and check with the classmate if he/she is comfortable to continue sharing. Remind he/she to relate the sharing to the class topic.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Let them continue advise them to seek professional help.

2. Let them continue and explain their point of view/experience.

3. allow them to explain and be sympathethic towards the situation instead of forcing the topic of the discussion onto them.

# data[].attributes.body
We will hear the person out unless he is taking too much time.

To us, it is not a breach of privacy issue if he is open to sharing and thinks that it is relevant to the discussion topic.

If his sharing surpasses discussion topics, we would advise him to seek professional help.

# data[].attributes.body
Depends on the extend of favouritism as it doesn't affect/impact grades. But definitely not fair and it's not professional!

# data[].attributes.body
Clarify with the classmate if they are okay to share the experience and if there is the consent of other parties involved in the matter

# data[].attributes.body
I would choose to think that the particular student needs more help in learning unless any other classmate is deprived of equal opportunity to learn.

# data[].attributes.body
Before presentation, would have voice out about inactive contribution and nudge them to contribute. If continues, then will not openly disclose but will confirm indicate as part of peer evaluation

# data[].attributes.body
We will accept it but will bring it up on course evaluation.

We think that it is not fair for everyone in the same class. Everyone in class should benefit from the same opportunity and guidance from the professor.

# data[].attributes.body
Bring the issue up to the professor/higher authority as it is not fair to the other students if he offers extra help/guidance to one student only.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Report to higher authorities and escalate the situation. as it is a unfair treatment. only if you can prove that there is an unfair advantage to the particular student.

2. Bring it up with the professor, and ask if the extra guidance is limited to the student or is available to the rest of the class.

3. Suck it up life is not fair, biasness and favortism happens everywhere, at home and at workplace.

# data[].attributes.body
Raise the issue to the professor and make sure that the class is aware of the guidance that was given to the student so that they are treated fairly

# data[].attributes.body
I would have addressed about it before the presentation. Won't be complaining about the disparity openly.

# data[].attributes.body
We will disclose the disparity in contribution to ensure fairness for everyone in the group. We will inform the professor or request for peer evaluation.

We will discuss with the same group members who are responsive to their views and request for peer evaluation together.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Communication beforehand, tell him that you will take action if he is unresponsive.

2. wont bring it up during presentation, but bring it up afterwards in private.

3. will give low peer evalutation, will not confront directly. unless groupmate is going agasint the flow and giving a harder time, then will try to get him into trouble instead.

# data[].attributes.body
I would just accept it and move on as this problem is too late to solve at the presentation stage. It is better not to begin conflict so late into the project