# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Revelations of the massive battery storage sites. (BESS)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Item 5 - Reasons for Refusal from Staythorpe BESS Action Group

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Item 5 - Doc 1 - Reasons for Refusal and Counter Claims Response to PO Report from Parish Council a

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In early 2021, a proposal was submitted to Harrogate Borough Council (Planning ref 20/04124) for a very large Solar Farm, one of the largest in the country, to generate 49.9MW located at the edge of Scotton.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Moss Landing battery fire sparks calls to improve safety, ‘accountability’ for industry

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The site’s fourth blaze in five years destroyed most of a 300-MW battery array owned by Vistra Energy and should serve as a “wake-up call” for the industry, local officials said.

# data[].attributes.body
Re: Proposed Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Adjacent to Railway Line near Braybrooke

Dear Chloe,

Braybrooke Parish Council has thoroughly reviewed the proposal for the construction of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) near Braybrooke, adjacent to a main railway line. Given the considerable safety, environmental, and community concerns that such installations raise, the Council seeks clarity and assurance on several critical points outlined below:

Safety Risks and Historical Incidents

1. Following recent incidents, including the significant BESS fire at Thurrock in February 2025, what specific design, technological improvements, and operational strategies will be employed to prevent similar thermal runaway events?

2. Given the risk of toxic gas emissions, including potentially lethal hydrofluoric acid fumes from lithium-ion battery fires, what specific gas detection, ventilation, and emergency response systems will be integrated into the proposed site?

3. Considering Thurrock and other international incidents, can you confirm whether the BESS will use automated fire detection, alarm systems linked directly to emergency services, and adequate on-site water resources or other suppression methods to manage battery fires effectively?

Emergency Preparedness & Railway Proximity Concerns:

4. Please provide detailed information regarding emergency response times anticipated for the Braybrooke location, particularly given its proximity to the railway. Has Network Rail been formally consulted regarding the potential impact of a fire or other emergencies on rail infrastructure and services?

5. What mitigation strategies have been developed to manage the risks of thermal runaway incidents, especially given the known challenge of prolonged battery fires and re-ignition, as seen in Moss Landing, Thurrock, and similar incidents globally?

6. Please specify what provisions are included to guarantee rapid emergency access and firefighting water availability, ensuring uninterrupted response capability, especially considering potential access limitations the railway line poses.

7. Can you provide evidence that the BESS design complies explicitly with the latest regulatory frameworks and guidelines from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC), Network Rail, and the Environment Agency?

8. Are comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) being prepared, particularly addressing the environmental implications of hazardous material runoff from firefighting activities?

9. What public consultation processes are planned, and how will Aura Power engage transparently and meaningfully with Braybrooke residents regarding safety, emergency planning, and community impact?

Given the significant consequences observed internationally and domestically in BESS incidents, it is key that robust safety measures, transparent engagement with local stakeholders, and rigorous adherence to best practice are mandatory.

We look forward to your detailed responses to these critical issues, which will inform the Council’s formal position regarding the proposed BESS installation. To facilitate informed and constructive discussions, we kindly request detailed responses to these points by the forthcoming on-site meeting.

Yours sincerely,

Cllr. Paul Hitchcock
Chairman, Braybrooke Parish Council

# data[].attributes.headline
Updated Flood Risk - Braybrooke EA Mapping

# data[].attributes.subject
Updated Flood Risk - Braybrooke EA Mapping

# data[].attributes.headline
Expert Viewpoint- Lithium ion batteries-Professor (Emeritus) Peter Dobson OBE

# data[].attributes.subject
Expert Viewpoint- Lithium ion batteries-Professor (Emeritus) Peter Dobson OBE

# data[].attributes.body
The Braybrooke Parish Council acknowledges the expert viewpoint provided by Professor (Emeritus) Peter Dobson OBE, highlighting critical concerns related to Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems (LiB BESS). The following key points have been summarized for formal consideration:

1. Importance and Risks:

LiB systems are essential for renewable energy storage but pose substantial risks, primarily due to their inherent instability and potential for catastrophic thermal runaway incidents, leading to explosions, fires, and toxic emissions.

2. Safety and Regulatory Concerns:

No clear or adequate legislation currently governs the installation, operation, or decommissioning of LiBs in the UK.

A lack of British Standards or specific regulations means critical safety features and engineering specifications vary significantly across installations.

There is no restriction on using second-life batteries, which present greater unknown risks due to potential previous damage.

The Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) regulations are suggested as appropriate governance for LiBs but are not currently applied.

3. Environmental and Health Hazards:

LiB incidents can result in severe environmental damage from prolonged fires, toxic emissions, and contaminated firewater run-off.

The toxic compounds released (fluorinated compounds) can persist in the environment for decades, impacting aquifers, agriculture, and local ecosystems adversely.

4. Recommendations for Immediate Action:

Urgent implementation of specific safety regulations and preventative measures by government agencies is critical.

Introduction of moratoriums, as implemented in other jurisdictions, should be considered until suitable safety standards and regulations are in place.

This summary underscores the need for cautious evaluation and comprehensive risk assessment of any proposed LiB installations within the parish, ensuring the community's safety and environmental integrity.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We believe that sadly if these proposals go ahead, the residents of Feckenham face some very unpleasant and uncertain times ahead.

What if this affects negatively on the value of your home ? Let that sink in for a moment.....

Will people want to come to live here with the prospect of our village being surrounded with these unnecessary energy projects ? And the noise levels - It won't be peaceful any more.

The only way to keep this from happening is to mobilise not only our village but others too.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Find out everything you need to know about what is threatening your village right now

# data[].attributes.headline
BESS saturated market (See Martyn Shaw link FABSSS)

# data[].attributes.subject
BESS saturated market (See Martyn Shaw link FABSSS)

# data[].attributes.body
Proof that the Midlands doesn't need any more BESS sites.

27 January 2025

January 2025 - Author - Dr. Hugo N. Hammersley

Why BESS sites are no longer needed in Feckenham to meet the Governments targets.....

Summary of Collated Data extracted from Oct 2024 REPD for East & West Midlands areas showing all Stand-Alone Battery Storage (BESS) Facilities with a Capacity of 10MW or more.

We have performed a detailed statistical analysis of the latest government data (UK Government Renewable Energy Planning Database) relating to Battery Storage (BESS) facilities in the East and West Midlands, according to planning status. The results are shown graphically below:

Further analysis of this data indicates the following essential details, shown in the four tables below. We have compared these statistics to the UK Midlands Regional BESS targets published in the Government’s Clean Power 2030 Action Plan Documentation published on December 13, 2024.

· Thus, the sum of total BESS Capacity in Oct 2024 in the UK East & West Midlands, which is operational, under construction, or with existing planning consent totals 5,803MW.

· There is a further 4,291MW of BESS facilities for which planning applications have already been submitted and are awaiting a decision.

· The total BESS “Queue” for the UK Midlands area is now 10,094MW.

The Regional 2030 and 2035 Battery Storage Targets have recently been defined in the Government’s Clean Power 2030 Action Plan written by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) in Dec 2024, as follows:

Comparing the statistics in Table 1 with Tables 2 and 3 shows conclusively that BESS facilities that are Operational, Under Construction, or with existing Planning Permission (including Revised Permissions) awaiting construction totals 5,803MW, far exceeding the 2030 and 2035 targets of 4,300MW and 4,900MW, respectively. The 2030 target has already been exceeded by 135%, and the 2035 target by 118%. All that needs to happen is for the consented sites to be built, and no more planning consents are required from now on.

In addition, an additional 4,291MW of BESS planning applications have already been submitted to the relevant planning authorities in this same Midlands geographical area.

Conclusion

The BESS marketplace is very clearly already completely saturated, and no more planning consents are needed anywhere in the Midlands to achieve the Government’s December 2024, stated 2030 and 2035 aspirations.

This means that, from now on, NO developer should be able to claim “Very Special Circumstances” to justify breaking Statutory Green Belt Protections anywhere in the UK Midlands area. This includes all current and future BESS planning applications in Feckenham.

References:

Renewable Energy Planning Database October 2024 (UK Government DESNZ)

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/673b215249ce28002166a93e/repd-q3-oct-2024.csv/preview

Clean Power 2030 Action Plan (UK Government DESNZ)

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-power-2030-action-plan

Why the Midlands has already Exceeded its 2030

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Intro

The increase in the use of lithium-ion batteries has brought convenience and efficiency into everyday life, particularly in electric vehicles and portable electronic devices. However, the rise in demand has also led to significant challenges related to battery waste management. The environmental consequences of improper disposal are profound. It raises serious questions about sustainability and public health, necessitating a deeper exploration of the topic.

This article offers a thorough examination of lithium-ion battery waste. We will uncover its implications on the environment, explore recycling techniques, and analyze existing regulatory frameworks. Additionally, we will delve into future trends regarding battery disposal. By understanding this topic, we can better appreciate the complexities and potential solutions surrounding this urgent issue.

Article Overview

Summary of Key Findings

The examination of lithium-ion battery waste reveals several critical points:

The increasing prevalence of lithium-ion batteries in various sectors leads to a proportional rise in waste, highlighting the need for effective management strategies.

Current disposal methods are often inadequate, resulting in harmful environmental repercussions.

Innovative recycling techniques offer promise in mitigating waste but face hurdles in implementation and scalability.

Regulatory frameworks are evolving but still require further enhancements to ensure sustainable battery management.

Research Objectives

The purpose of this exploration is to:

Identify the environmental impact caused by lithium-ion battery waste.

Assess current recycling processes and their effectiveness.

Review regulatory frameworks surrounding battery disposal and identify gaps that need addressing.

Highlight technological innovations aimed at improving waste management practices.

Key Results and Discussions

Main Findings

The results of the study indicate that while there are advancements in recycling technologies and regulations, gaps remain in public awareness and compliance. A significant amount of lithium-ion batteries still ends up in landfills, creating both short-term and long-term environmental issues.

Implications of Findings

The findings indicate an urgent need for more robust policies that adapt to the rapid growth of battery usage. The development of consumer education programs is essential to foster awareness regarding safe disposal practices. Moreover, collaborations between manufacturers, recyclers, and policymakers can lead to more effective management solutions.

The future of lithium-ion battery waste is contingent upon comprehensive strategies that prioritize sustainability, innovation, and regulation.

Preamble to Lithium-Ion Batteries

The rise of lithium-ion batteries marks a transitional phase in energy storage. Their significance transcends mere convenience; they are pivotal to contemporary technology and sustainable development. Understanding lithium-ion batteries provides insight into their lifecycle, applications, and the associated environmental challenges. As society embraces electric vehicles and renewable energy sources, a solid grasp of these batteries becomes crucial. This section will explore fundamental aspects that shape the narrative around lithium-ion batteries.

Overview of Lithium-Ion Technology

Lithium-ion technology stands out for its high energy density and efficiency. These batteries consist of an anode, a cathode, and an electrolyte, allowing lithium ions to move between these components during charging and discharging. Unlike traditional batteries, lithium-ion cells do not suffer from memory effect and have a longer cycle life.

The technology evolves continually. Research into solid-state batteries aims to further increase safety and energy storage capability. This ensures that they remain at the forefront of innovation, addressing consumer needs effectively.

Applications in Modern Technology

Lithium-ion batteries have seamlessly integrated into various sectors. Their applications extend beyond personal electronics, impacting transportation and renewable energy.

The flexibility of lithium-ion batteries fosters innovation across sectors, making them indispensable in today's technological landscape.

"The efficiency of lithium-ion batteries is a primary driver in the shift towards sustainable energy solutions and electric mobility."

By understanding these fundamental aspects, one gains insight into the significance of effective waste management, a pressing concern as usage continues to rise.

The Lifecycle of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Understanding the lifecycle of lithium-ion batteries is crucial for addressing the issues surrounding battery waste. Each phase - from manufacturing to end-of-life - has its own environmental impact and implications for sustainability. Recognizing the intricacies of this lifecycle helps stakeholders grasp the full scope of the challenges and solutions necessary for responsible battery management.

Manufacturing Processes

The manufacturing process of lithium-ion batteries involves several stages. The production begins with mining raw materials such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel. These materials are critical for battery performance. Environmental consequences arise during extraction, including land degradation and water pollution. Furthermore, securing these materials can lead to ethical issues, particularly regarding labor practices in some regions.

Following extraction, materials undergo extensive processing. They are refined and prepared for assembly into battery cells. Manufacturing facilities must adhere to strict regulations to minimize emissions and waste generation. Innovations in manufacturing can improve energy efficiency and reduce pollution. Additionally, some companies are exploring alternative chemistries that may lower environmental impact.

Usage and Performance

Once in use, lithium-ion batteries have several advantages, particularly in consumer electronics and electric vehicles. They offer high energy density and long cycle life, making them preferred choices for powering devices. However, battery performance can decline over time. Factors such as temperature fluctuations, depth of discharge, and charging practices contribute to accelerated degradation.

Understanding usage patterns is important for developing effective strategies for battery management. For instance, educational campaigns targeting consumers can promote practices that enhance battery lifespan. Additionally, manufacturers are investing in smart technologies to monitor battery health, allowing for better performance optimization.

End-of-Life Considerations

At the end of a battery's lifecycle, proper disposal and recycling become paramount. Lithium-ion batteries cannot simply be thrown away. They contain valuable materials that can be recovered through recycling processes. However, widespread public knowledge on safe disposal is often lacking, complicating these efforts.

End-of-life options include recycling, repurposing, or safe storage. Recycling processes can recover substantial quantities of lithium, cobalt, and nickel, mitigating the need for further mining. Regulations are evolving to mandate recycling while promoting circular economies.

In summary, the lifecycle of lithium-ion batteries encompasses significant stages that affect environmental sustainability. By addressing manufacturing, usage, and end-of-life considerations, stakeholders can enhance battery management practices and reduce the negative impact of battery waste.

"As lithium-ion batteries become more prevalent, their lifecycle management becomes critical for environmental sustainability."

Understanding these dimensions sets the foundation for innovative solutions aimed at reducing battery waste.

Environmental Impact of Lithium-Ion Battery Waste

The environmental impact of lithium-ion battery waste is a crucial concern in our current technological landscape. With the increasing usage of these batteries in electric vehicles and portable electronics, the urgency to understand their waste management has grown exponentially. Improper disposal of lithium-ion batteries can lead to significant environmental hazards, including contamination of soil and water, air quality decline, and broader implications for climate change. Each of these factors requires careful consideration in order to mitigate negative effects.

Soil and Water Contamination

Lithium-ion batteries contain toxic materials such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel. When discarded improperly, these substances can leach into the soil, leading to contamination. This not only affects plant life but also disrupts entire ecosystems. Furthermore, groundwater can become compromised, posing a health risk to humans and wildlife alike. The challenge of soil and water contamination emphasizes the need for designated disposal and recycling facilities specifically designed to handle battery waste. These facilities utilize methods to prevent harmful substances from seeping into the environment, thus safeguarding natural resources.

Air Quality Concerns

Air quality is significantly impacted by the inappropriate handling of lithium-ion batteries. If these batteries are incinerated without proper controls, hazardous fumes can be released. Such emissions may contain volatile organic compounds and heavy metals that contribute to air pollution. Exposure to contaminated air can have adverse health effects, including respiratory issues and other long-term health problems. Understanding these air quality concerns is vital for developing effective waste management strategies, as cleaner air is essential for public health and ecological stability.

Climate Change Implications

The implications of lithium-ion battery waste on climate change are profound. The carbon footprint involved in the production and disposal of these batteries is substantial. As electric vehicles become more prevalent, the demand for lithium and other materials grows, potentially leading to more mining and resource depletion. Improper disposal can perpetuate the cycle of environmental degradation, releasing greenhouse gases that exacerbate global warming.

Given these challenges, developing innovative recycling technologies is essential. Innovations can help recover valuable materials from used batteries, thus reducing the need for new resource extraction and minimizing overall environmental impact.

As we continue to rely on lithium-ion technology, understanding its environmental consequences is crucial for sustainable development.

Effective strategies for battery waste management must focus on raising awareness, enhancing recycling capabilities, and implementing stricter regulations. By addressing these environmental impacts, we can work towards a more sustainable future.

Regulatory Framework for Battery Waste Management

The regulatory framework for battery waste management plays a crucial role in addressing the environmental challenges posed by lithium-ion battery waste. As the usage of these batteries in electric vehicles and various consumer electronics increases, the need for effective regulations becomes ever more pressing. A comprehensive framework not only sets standards for the disposal and recycling of batteries but also ensures compliance across stakeholders involved in the battery lifecycle. This framework serves multiple benefits, including the protection of environmental resources, public health considerations, and economic growth through recycling initiatives.

Current Legislation Overview

In many jurisdictions, legislation surrounding lithium-ion battery waste management is evolving. Legislation often focuses on a few main areas:

While many pieces of legislation exist to manage battery waste, gaps and inconsistencies still pose challenges for effective implementation. Each jurisdiction varies in its approach, leading to confusion and ineffective practices.

International Standards and Agreements

Internationally, several agreements and standards aim to address battery waste management comprehensively. These agreements emphasize cooperation between countries to mitigate the environmental impact of battery waste. Key elements include:

Adhering to these international standards is essential for promoting global best practices. They foster consistency and provide guidelines for countries developing their local regulations.

"An effective regulatory framework can transform battery waste management from a challenge to an opportunity for sustainability and innovation."

Recycling Technologies for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Recycling lithium-ion batteries is vital for reducing environmental impact and recovering valuable materials. This section discusses various recycling technologies, their benefits, and what considerations need to be taken into account. As battery demand continues to rise with the increasing use of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage, effective recycling becomes not just an option but a necessity.

Hydrometallurgical Methods

Hydrometallurgy involves using aqueous solutions to extract metals from solid ores or concentrates. This method is becoming prominent in lithium-ion battery recycling. By applying leaching solutions, it is possible to dissolve metal ions selectively, allowing for their recovery. Commonly recovered materials include lithium, cobalt, and nickel.

Benefits of Hydrometallurgical Methods:

Considerations:

Proper handling of chemicals is necessary to minimize environmental and health risks.

The process may require extensive water use, which should be managed carefully.

Pyrometallurgical Techniques

Pyrometallurgy refers to processes that involve the use of high temperatures to extract metals from ores. In battery recycling, this method typically involves the incineration of batteries to separate valuable components. This method is effective but poses several environmental concerns due to emissions.

Benefits of Pyrometallurgical Techniques:

Considerations:

High energy consumption leads to a larger carbon footprint.

Emission controls must be stringent to avoid releasing harmful substances into the environment.

Innovations in Direct Recycling

Direct recycling is an emerging field that seeks to reuse battery materials without breaking them down into their basic components first. This technique retains the structure of the materials, potentially offering lower costs and higher efficiencies in the recycling process.

Benefits of Innovations in Direct Recycling:

Considerations:

The technologies are still under development, and their scalability is uncertain.

Research on the long-term performance of directly recycled materials is ongoing.

"Innovative recycling technologies are essential to ensure the sustainability of lithium-ion batteries as their demand grows."

In summary, these recycling technologies represent a crucial aspect of lithium-ion battery waste management. Finding the optimal balance between efficiency, environmental impact, and economic viability is essential for a sustainable future in battery usage.

Stakeholder Roles in Waste Management

The management of lithium-ion battery waste is a multifaceted issue that necessitates collaboration among various stakeholders. Each group plays a distinct role in ensuring safe disposal and recycling of these batteries. Understanding these roles is critical for improving the overall waste management process and addressing the environmental challenges posed by improper disposal. The key stakeholders include manufacturers, consumers, and government agencies.

Manufacturers' Responsibilities

Manufacturers of lithium-ion batteries hold significant responsibility in waste management. Their role extends beyond simply producing batteries; they must implement sustainable practices throughout the battery lifecycle. This begins at the design phase, where manufacturers can create batteries that are easier to recycle. By adopting eco-design principles, they can minimize the use of hazardous materials and optimize battery longevity.

Further, manufacturers are often required by regulations to establish take-back programs. These programs help facilitate the return of used batteries for recycling. Providing accessible drop-off locations is crucial. When consumers can easily return batteries, recycling rates improve. Manufacturers also need to be transparent about the materials used in their products, as this information helps recyclers recover valuable resources effectively.

Role of Consumers in Recycling

Consumers play a pivotal role in the recycling of lithium-ion batteries. Their participation in proper disposal directly influences the effectiveness of recycling programs. Awareness about battery recycling options needs to be increased. Many consumers are unaware that they shouldn't dispose of lithium-ion batteries in regular waste.

The responsibility of consumers includes:

Understanding the importance of proper battery disposal.

Participating in community recycling programs.

Following manufacturer guidelines for battery disposal.

By actively engaging in recycling efforts, consumers contribute to reducing environmental pollution and conserving valuable resources. A well-informed public can significantly impact the success of battery recycling initiatives.

Governmental Oversight

Government agencies play a crucial role in enforcing regulations regarding battery waste management. They establish the legal framework that governs the disposal and recycling of lithium-ion batteries. This can include setting guidelines for manufacturers regarding their responsibilities and creating standard practices for recycling facilities.

Effective oversight includes monitoring compliance with environmental safety standards. Governments can also incentivize recycling through subsidies and grants aimed at improving recycling technologies. Additionally, programs designed to educate the public on the importance of battery recycling are essential. These initiatives can drive higher participation rates among consumers and promote responsible behavior.

"Stakeholder collaboration is essential for minimizing the risks associated with lithium-ion battery waste."

In summary, the roles of manufacturers, consumers, and governments are interconnected in driving effective waste management strategies. Each stakeholder must execute their responsibilities to ensure a more sustainable future for lithium-ion battery use and disposal.

Challenges in Lithium-Ion Battery Waste Management

The issue of lithium-ion battery waste management is critical. As the use of these batteries expands, the accompanying challenges grow more complex. Addressing these challenges directly affects the environment, economy, and public health. It is essential to find ways to deal with the waste produced by these batteries and ensure their proper disposal or recycling.

Technological Limitations

The current technologies for processing lithium-ion batteries are still evolving. Many recycling methods are not efficient or cost-effective. For example, some methods recover only a fraction of the valuable materials that can be reused. Advances in technology are needed to enhance both efficiency and recovery rates. Moreover, there are limitations in separating different materials in batteries. Improved separation techniques are essential for better recycling outcomes.

The technology used in public spaces for battery disposal is often inadequate. Many disposal options lack clear guidance or accessibility. People may find it challenging to know where or how to recycle their old batteries. This leads to improper disposal methods, where batteries are thrown into regular waste which increases environmental risks.

Economic Considerations

Economic factors play a vital role in battery waste management. The cost of recycling processes can be high, which often discourages companies from investing in them. There is a need for substantial financial commitment to upgrade existing facilities or develop new ones. This can be a significant burden for smaller companies operating in the market.

In addition, the demand for recycled materials must be consistent. If there is low demand, it becomes less economically viable for companies to invest in recycling. Government incentives or public-private partnerships could help alleviate these economic pressures. By promoting sustainability, the market for recycled materials could expand, creating a win-win situation for businesses and the environment.

Public Awareness and Education

Public awareness about lithium-ion battery waste is crucial. Many consumers are not educated on proper disposal methods. This lack of knowledge often leads to batteries ending up in landfills or improperly recycled. The issue is not just about information; it's about changing behaviors. It is essential to educate the public on the importance of recycling batteries and the potential environmental impacts of improper disposal.

Educational campaigns can inform citizens on how and where to recycle. Schools can incorporate this information in their curriculums. Initiatives to increase public engagement can also promote better disposal practices. By fostering a culture of environmental responsibility, society can collectively contribute to reducing waste and ensuring responsible battery management.

"The recycling of lithium-ion batteries is not just a necessity but a responsibility toward future generations."

In summary, addressing technological limitations, economic considerations, and public awareness are essential to improving lithium-ion battery waste management. These facets must work in concert to build an effective and sustainable waste management system. As the demand for batteries continues to rise, these challenges become increasingly relevant.

Future Trends in Battery Waste Management

The matter of battery waste handling is increasingly significant. The advancement in technology and rise in electric vehicles, alongside portable devices, have accelerated the demand for effective waste management processes. Future trends in battery waste management suggest a combination of innovative practices, updated policies, and public education. The key focus is on sustainability, both in production and disposal methods, to ensure that lithium-ion batteries can be managed efficiently and with minimal environmental impact.

Emerging Technologies for Sustainability

Emerging technologies are vital for sustainable waste management. Here are a few noteworthy innovations:

These technologies not only improve efficiency in battery recycling, but also conserve natural resources and reduce pollution.

Policy Innovations and Incentives

Effective policies are crucial in facilitating better battery waste management. Future trends include:

"Consolidating policy frameworks globally can enhance the efficacy of battery waste management systems across borders."

This combined approach can lead to more sustainable practices in managing lithium-ion battery waste.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Understanding Lithium-Ion Battery Waste: Challenges and Solutions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore the urgent issue of lithium-ion battery waste ♻️. Learn about its environmental impact, recycling innovations, policies, and sustainable disposal methods.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Children as young as five-years-old were found to be working in one illegal mine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Electric vehicles, laptops, battery packs, smartphones...it's a long list of items we rely on every day that rely on a key material: lithium.

But have you stopped to think who mines for this precious metal? In northern Nigeria, it has been found to be children.

Lithium mining is dangerous and exhausting work.

Miners descend several feet into dark pits then wield axes to hack through rocks.

In some old but viable mines, they crawl through yards of snaky, narrow passages, wedging themselves between unstable mud walls before starting to dig.

Miners are aware of the dangers

Abdullahi Sabiu has spent years in these pits after he started working the mines at 20.

"I know that mining activities are dangerous, and there are disadvantages, but every profession has its own disadvantages, including driving, and death is unpredictable," says the lithium miner in Nassarawa state, north central Nigeria.

"Someone might be riding on a motorcycle, and a driver could knock him down and die," Abdullahi added.

For new mines, the ground is first blasted open with dynamite, which is usually smuggled because a license is required to keep the chemical, sending tremors across the land.

Despite being aware of the dangers many, like Abdulahi, continue to mine. For them, this is more about survival.

"The reason why I went into the mining business is so that I can take care of myself, my wives, and my children. It generally helps me to take care of my needs, and we cannot wait for the government to help us," he said.

Perhaps unbeknownst to him and others, once sorted the minerals are bagged, beginning their journey from his rural village of Pasali in Nassarawa State, near the federal capital Abuja, to the global electricals market.

Their work feeds the stock of Chinese businesses, who dominate Nigeria's laxly regulated extractive industry and are often blamed for illegal mining and exploitative labour.

A business for the poorest, including children

In what is becoming a business for the poorest and most vulnerable, local officials here say children are not spared. According to a local lithium seller, a team of six children can sort and bag up to ten 25-kg bags a day.

Two of the children - Zakaria Danladi, a five-year-old boy, and Juliet - once attended the local elementary school before their paths diverged under the weight of poverty, while others have never been to school at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

Generally, they hunch over heaps of rock, sifting through the rubble, picking rocks that they chipped away at with crude stone tools to extract valuable fragments.

The shadowy world of Nigeria's illegal artisanal mining thrives on informal networks of buyers and sellers, operating with minimal government oversight.

Aliyu Ibrahim, a lithium merchant in Nasarawa, owns unlicensed mines and also buys lithium ore from other illegal sites like those in Pasali.

He is aware that children out of school are working at his mines and those supplying him, but he has a chilling justification.

ADVERTISEMENT

"Many of the children are orphans or from poor families, with no other means of survival," he said in Hausa.

According to official data from Nigeria's statistics bureau, children amount to 51 per cent of the country's poor, the vast majority of whom live in rural areas.

In the face of a serious economic crisis, Africa's top oil producer now aims to reduce its reliance on petroleum exports with solid minerals.

Yet much of this wealth - lithium included - is siphoned off through unlicensed mines like those in the deep bushes of Pasali, fueling an illegal trade that costs the nation billions of dollars and drives insecurity, according to a parliamentary probe this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

There have been multiple cases of illegal mining arrests and prosecutions involving Chinese nationals in recent months.

China, the dominant force in the global supply chains for renewable energy, is controversially involved in Nigeria's extractive sector.

Its nationals and companies are frequently spotlighted for environmentally damaging practices, exploitative labour and illicit mining.

Nigeria's president, Bola Tinubu, has blamed illegal mining for the worsening insecurity and insurgency in the northern region.

ADVERTISEMENT

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Children are mining for the lithium that powers our electric vehicles

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Children as young as five-years-old were found to be working in one illegal mine.

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding:

Braybrooke Parish Council has significant concerns regarding the ethical and sustainable sourcing of materials for Regener8 Power (RG8) and Aura Power (AP) 's proposed battery energy storage systems (BESS). The extraction and processing of essential battery components, including lithium, cobalt, nickel, and other rare minerals, present serious ethical, environmental, and social implications.

The Parish Council is particularly concerned about issues such as potential human rights violations, child labour practices, unsafe working conditions, and severe environmental impacts commonly associated with the mining and processing of these materials. Transparency and accountability within the supply chains for battery materials are essential to maintaining the integrity and sustainability of the proposed developments.

Community Questions Specific to Ethical Sourcing:

Ethical Supply Chain Verification: "Can the developer provide detailed documentation demonstrating an independently verified ethical sourcing process for all battery materials, ensuring adherence to international human rights and environmental standards?"

Transparency in Material Sourcing: "What steps have been taken to ensure transparency in the battery material supply chain, and can evidence of compliance with ethical sourcing standards, such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) or equivalent certifications, be provided?"

Child Labour and Working Conditions: "How will the developer guarantee that materials used within the BESS developments are free from child labour, forced labour, and other exploitative practices, and what auditing measures will be implemented to enforce this?"

Environmental Impact Management: "Can the developer detail specific measures implemented to mitigate environmental harm associated with the extraction and processing of battery materials, including strategies to reduce pollution, manage waste responsibly, and rehabilitate mining areas?"

Supply Chain Auditing: "What independent auditing and ongoing monitoring processes will be established to verify ethical sourcing compliance continually, and how will any non-compliance issues identified through audits be addressed?"

Local and Global Accountability: "How does the developer intend to publicly communicate ongoing efforts and progress towards ethical and sustainable sourcing practices, thereby ensuring both local accountability and global corporate responsibility?"

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding: Braybrooke Parish Council has significant concerns regarding potential noise impacts arising from the proposed Regener8 (RG8) Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). The proximity of sensitive residential and commercial receptors—including Park Hill Farm, the local business "The Plant Man," and the nearby Travellers Site—raises particular concerns about the adequacy of noise mitigation measures during construction, operational, and decommissioning phases of the development.

Noise from battery cooling systems, electrical transformers, maintenance activities, and increased traffic is anticipated to pose a continuous or intermittent disturbance. The Parish Council emphasises the need for stringent adherence to noise regulations and clear evidence that noise management strategies are sufficient to prevent negative impacts on local residents and businesses.

Strengthened Community Questions Specific to Noise Impact:

1. Baseline Noise Assessment: "Has a detailed baseline noise assessment been conducted at sensitive receptors including Park Hill Farm, 'The Plant Man' business, and the Travellers Site, to accurately measure existing ambient noise levels and inform effective noise mitigation strategies?"

2. Noise Mitigation Measures: "What specific, evidence-based noise mitigation measures are proposed to ensure that operational noise levels from battery cooling units, transformers, and maintenance activities will remain within acceptable thresholds for nearby residents and businesses?"

3. Construction Phase Noise Controls: "Can the planner detail the specific controls and limitations on construction-related noise, particularly vehicle movements and heavy machinery operations, designed to minimise disturbances to Park Hill Farm, the Travellers Site, and 'The Plant Man' during construction?"

4. Continuous Monitoring and Compliance: "What ongoing noise monitoring arrangements will be implemented to ensure continuous compliance with regulatory noise standards, and how will exceedances be addressed promptly?"

5. Communication and Complaint Procedures: "What clear procedures will be put in place to ensure effective communication with affected residents and businesses about noise levels, including a responsive complaint-handling mechanism during construction and operational phases?"

6. Cumulative Noise Impact Assessment: "Has an assessment of cumulative noise impacts, considering both RG8 operations and existing background noise from nearby infrastructure and traffic, been carried out, and how are cumulative impacts mitigated?"

# data[].attributes.body
1. Acoustic report has this been conducted and what are the remediation works that will be needed to be conducted for those affected and compensation?
2. Flooding not just the impact in the area of location but also the effect downstream and what prevention or measures will be put into place?
3. Do you have a copy of the Environmental report?
4. Does the Environmental report also cover the electromagnetic force and the effects of location?
5. When speaking to the developer, they advised that it was privately funded? But by who as the financial cost of this seems to be greater than them from accounts.
6. What is the compensation that the Parish Council will receive and how will this be allocated: flood defence and maintenance?
7. As a review on previous developments being conducted and the success rate as I noted from the meeting that they said they’ve done four developments but no longer own two of them which concerns me that it’s purely a profit and sale.
8. I also have concerns over the carbon footprint of the batteries as noted in the meeting. They said that the batteries would hopefully last up to 10 years but there is no evidence of this as of yet. Then decommissioning of said batteries would have to be exported out of this country as the technology is not here. It seems completely farcical based on the idea!

# data[].attributes.headline
Flood zones - River Jordan (Lower Valley)- Little Bowden - Market Harborough

# data[].attributes.subject
Flood zones - River Jordan (Lower Valley)- Little Bowden - Market Harborough

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get flood risk information and maps for planning applications and planning permission in England, including flood zones and flood risk assessment data.

# data[].attributes.headline
Flood zones, EA Mapping, Sequential Test discussion

# data[].attributes.subject
Flood zones, EA Mapping, Sequential Test discussion

# data[].attributes.body
Rosie Wrighting MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
rosie.wrighting.mp@parliament.uk
Your ref: RW03651
Our ref: MC2025/04156/SU

18 March 2025

Dear Rosie, Thank you for your email of 24 February on behalf of your constituent, Paul Hitchcock of Braybrooke Parish Council, about increased flood risk in the Braybrooke area.  I am replying as the Minister responsible for this policy area.

The government is strongly committed to requiring standardised Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) in new developments. The government is exploring, alongside consideration of Schedule 3, other potential solutions to improve and secure SuDS outcomes. These should be to designs that cope with changing climatic conditions as well as delivering wider water infrastructure benefits, reduce run off and help to improve water quality, amenity and biodiversity. It is also important to ensure appropriate adoption and maintenance arrangements are in place.

We believe that these outcomes can be achieved through either improving the current planning led approach using powers now available or commencing Schedule 3 to the Flood and Water Management Act 2010. A final decision on the way forward will be made in the coming months.

We have made some immediate changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to support increasing SuDS. The NPPF now requires all development to utilise SuDS where they could have drainage impacts. These systems should be appropriate to the nature and scale of the proposed development.

The government will review the planning system holistically and consider whether further changes are required to address SuDS when we consult on further planning reform, including national policy related to decision making, in 2025.

Flood risk officers from the local Environment Agency (EA) team have been talking to Braybrooke Parish Council. They also joined councillors on a visit to the River Jordan in Little Bowden to discuss their concerns. They will keep working with Braybrooke Parish Council and stay in regular contact with North Northamptonshire Council's Flood and Water Management Team.

The Area Flood and Coastal Risk Manager will meet Leicestershire County Council, scheduled for week commencing 17 March 2025, to talk about the flooding issues in Market Harborough this winter. The EA is a statutory consultee for planning purposes. This means the local planning authority must consult the EA when considering certain planning applications.

The EA’s comments on planning applications relate to environmental matters that it is responsible for reviewing, as set out in Schedule 4 of the Development Management Procedure Order (DMPO) 2015. These environmental matters include flood risk and protecting and enhancing the water environment. Schedule 4 of the DMPO 2015 also outlines that the Local Lead Flood Authority is the consultee for major developments with surface water drainage. The Local Lead Flood Authorities for the Jordan Valley catchment are North Northamptonshire Council and Leicestershire County Council.

North Northamptonshire Council do require, in line with the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework that new development should include SuDS. They have their own local guidance on SuDS which is provided to give greater clarity on requirements in this area. Further details can be found here

Climate change is an important consideration. The EA’s National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England sets out a vision of a nation ready for, and resilient to, flooding and coastal change today, tomorrow and to the year 2100. The following links provide more detail on how climate change should be considered in relation to new development. Guidance on flood risk assessments climate change allowances and flood risk assessments applying for planning permission.

The EA’s role in the planning system means it will review the adherence to these requirements in the individual applications it is consulted on.

Yours sincerely,

EMMA HARDY MP

Best Wishes,

# data[].attributes.headline
Climate adaption and infrastructure resilience

# data[].attributes.subject
Climate adaption and infrastructure resilience

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding:
The Parish Council notes a significant recent increase in flooding incidents within Braybrooke and downstream in Little Bowden, which is believed to be exacerbated by housing developments upstream in Desborough, contributing to historically high water levels in the River Jordan. Given the geographic location of the proposed Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) by Regener8 Power (RG8) and Aura Power (AP), there is considerable community concern regarding their potential impact on local water management, groundwater levels, and flood risk. Specifically, RG8’s proposal includes water attenuation directly into the River Jordan, raising questions about downstream impacts. Meanwhile, AP’s site raises separate concerns regarding groundwater flooding and surface water management, particularly considering recent Environment Agency flood predictions, which have indicated an increased risk of standing water and groundwater emergence near the railway track adjacent to the AP site.

The Parish Council is concerned that current water management proposals may not adequately reflect projected climate change impacts, specifically the anticipated increase in rainfall intensity and frequency over the expected 50-year lifespan of these installations. Consequently, clear evidence of robust flood risk assessments, sustainable drainage systems (SuDS), and long-term water management strategies is required.

Community Questions Specific to Flood Risk and Water Management:

1. Climate Change Projections:
"Can the planner confirm explicitly how future climate change rainfall projections, including increased storm frequency and intensity, have been accounted for in flood risk modelling and water attenuation designs for both the RG8 and AP sites?"

2. Impact on River Jordan Flood Levels:
"Has a detailed hydrological impact study been carried out to demonstrate conclusively that the RG8 water attenuation system will not worsen existing flood conditions downstream along the River Jordan, particularly in Braybrooke and Little Bowden?"

3. Groundwater Management at AP Site:
"Given recent Environment Agency flood risk data predicting increased groundwater levels near the AP site, what specific groundwater mitigation and management strategies are proposed to ensure long-term resilience and prevent site flooding?"

4. Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS):
"Could the planner clarify the type and scale of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) planned for both sites and how these will effectively manage surface water runoff in alignment with North Northamptonshire’s flood risk management policies?"

5. Monitoring and Maintenance:
"What arrangements are proposed for long-term monitoring, maintenance, and management of the proposed water attenuation systems and drainage infrastructure, particularly in response to extreme weather events?"

6. Sequential Flood Risk Assessment:
"Has a sequential flood risk assessment, considering alternative locations with potentially lower flood risk, been conducted by North Northamptonshire’s Joint Core Strategy Policy 5 (Water Environment, Resources & Flood Risk Management)? Could the results be made available to the Parish Council?"

7. Emergency Planning for Flood Events:
"In the event of flooding at either site, could the planner clarify what specific emergency response measures have been outlined, particularly given the limited access to emergency services?"

# data[].attributes.body
🔴 Planning Policy Conflicts: Overview of BESS Proposal Incompatibility

The Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) proposals near Braybrooke, submitted by Aura Power and Regener8 Power, are fundamentally incompatible with several adopted planning documents which guide development in this area. These include the Braybrooke Neighbourhood Plan (BNP), the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and the Kettering Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan (SSP2). The conflicts are material and significant, as outlined below:

🏘️ 1. Braybrooke Neighbourhood Plan (BNP) [2021]

BNP Policy ENV13 – Landscape Character and Views

The proposals would industrialise currently open and tranquil countryside, harming Braybrooke's visual setting and obstructing identified important views.

Conflict: The proposed developments are located within designated ‘important views’ corridors (e.g., looking north from Braybrooke Village and south from the Jurassic Way), contrary to ENV13.

BNP Policy ENV14 – Tranquillity, Dark Skies and Valued Environments

The scale and operation of the BESS, including lighting, noise from cooling systems, and security fencing, conflict to maintain local tranquillity and dark skies.

Conflict: The sites would introduce industrial noise and light into a previously tranquil area, breaching ENV14’s protection of quiet rural environments.

BNP Policy ENV9 – Flood Risk Management

Development must demonstrate that it will not increase runoff or reduce the area’s ability to manage floodwaters.

Conflict: Proposals rely on attenuation into the River Jordan catchment despite already observed flood events in Braybrooke and downstream in Little Bowden.

🌿 2. North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (JCS) [2011–2031]

JCS Policy 3 – Landscape Character

Development must protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and safeguard essential views.

Conflict: The massing and industrial nature of the BESS proposals undermine the character of the undulating agricultural setting of Braybrooke and directly affect protected views under both JCS and BNP policies. Braybrooke's undulating, agricultural setting Flood Risk Management

Proposals must manage surface water sustainably and avoid development that would exacerbate flood risk elsewhere.

Conflict: Flood attenuation schemes risk accelerating peak flow into the River Jordan, contrary to Policy 5, and raise concerns regarding hazardous run-off in the event of fire suppression.

JCS Policy 8(d) – Place Shaping Principles: Amenity and Quality of Life

New development must not have an unacceptable impact on the amenities of neighbouring properties or compromise the quiet enjoyment of rural areas.

Conflict: Aura and Regener8 BESS proposals would result in unacceptable levels of visual intrusion, operational noise, and light pollution, particularly near national walking trails and quiet lanes.

JCS Policy 26 – Renewable Energy

While supportive of renewable energy, the policy emphasises that schemes must be compatible with landscape character, biodiversity, and residential amenity.

Conflict: The BESS is not a renewable energy generator and fails to comply with the location sensitivity tests embedded in Policy 26.

Notably, the JCS stresses using previously developed or lower-quality land, which has not been demonstrated in either proposal.

📍 3. Kettering Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan (SSP2) [Adopted December 2021]

SSP2 Policy RA5 – Development in the Countryside

Development outside village boundaries must be appropriate to a rural setting, such as agriculture, rural enterprises, or infrastructure justified by exceptional need.

Conflict: BESS is a large-scale industrial facility that is unjustified in this open countryside location and not aligned with the types of development supported under RA5.

SSP2 Policy ENV10 – Biodiversity and Geodiversity

Proposals must demonstrate clear net gains in biodiversity and protect locally essential habitats.

Conflict: Biodiversity Net Gain calculations are based on a low ecological baseline, which may result from historical agricultural degradation. This undermines the fairness and accuracy of the developer’s net gain claims.

SSP2 Policy ENV5 – Pollution and Land Instability

Developments must demonstrate how they will mitigate potential pollution risks, including those from noise, dust, and hazardous substances.

Conflict: BESS proposals do not provide a sufficient toxic gas management plan, and hydrofluoric acid emissions remain a critical, unaddressed issue. Firewater runoff is also not addressed per SSP2 expectations.

⚖️ Conclusion

The current BESS proposals:

Do not align with the vision, scale, or character of Braybrooke Parish.

Breach multiple, clear, enforceable policies in the BNP, JCS, and SSP2.

Fail to meet acceptable thresholds for location, design, flood safety, community integration, and environmental impact.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What is a Battery Energy Storage System briefing note

# data[].attributes.headline
Contact addresses where parishioners can submit concerns individually

# data[].attributes.subject
Contact addresses where parishioners can submit concerns individually

# data[].attributes.headline
Letters to the press, public engagement summaries

# data[].attributes.subject
Letters to the press, public engagement summaries

# data[].attributes.headline
Community feedback summaries, petition results

# data[].attributes.subject
Community feedback summaries, petition results

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council - BESS Projects Consultation Report

Community Concern Levels

Average Concern (Aura Power BESS Proposal): 7.9 out of 10

Average Concern (Regener8 Solar and BESS Proposal): 8.5 out of 10

Community Consultation Feedback

Feel Inadequately Consulted: 29 respondents

Feel Adequately Consulted: 5 respondents

Support for Formal Objections

Aura Power Proposal:

Support formal objections: 30 respondents

Against formal objections: 3 respondents

Prefer not to say: 1 respondent

Regener8 Proposal:

Support formal objections: 33 respondents

Against formal objections: 1 respondent

Interest in Joining Action Group

No: 13 respondents

Maybe: 10 respondents

Yes: 9 respondents

Main Concerns Identified

The top concerns highlighted by the community include:

Visual Impact on Countryside (4 mentions)

Fire Safety (4 mentions)

Environmental damage and wildlife disruption (4 mentions)

Flooding Risk (4 mentions)

Noise and Lighting (3 mentions)

Broader concerns encompassing multiple issues (several individual mentions)

This report underscores significant community concerns, notably regarding environmental impacts, safety, and the adequacy of consultation processes. It reflects strong community backing for formal objections against both BESS projects.

# data[].attributes.headline
Notes from consultation events or meetings

# data[].attributes.subject
Notes from consultation events or meetings

# data[].attributes.body
Rigorous Business-Protection Questions to Regener8 Power Regarding BESS and Solar Scheme

A. Operational Noise and Visitor Experience

1. Can Regener8 provide the full noise impact assessment (including low-frequency and tonal noise) for the proposed BESS's daytime and nighttime operation, as measured at the property boundary of The Plant Man nursery?

Has this assessment considered the unique quiet rural baseline and customer sensitivity to background disturbance?

2. What modelling or research has been conducted to assess the impact of persistent mechanical and electrical noise (e.g., cooling fans, transformers, inverters) on businesses dependent on a peaceful environment and customer experience, such as garden centres or rural retreats?

3. What noise mitigation technologies (e.g., acoustic barriers, liquid cooling systems, orientation of noisy infrastructure) will be employed nearest The Plant Man site?

B. Visual and Landscape Impact

4. Has a zone of visual influence (ZVI) study been conducted to determine the visual impact of solar panel arrays, fencing, containerised batteries, and lighting on views from The Plant Man’s entrance and garden display areas?

If so, please provide this documentation in full.

5. What is the proposed height and finish (e.g., colour, reflectivity) of all equipment visible from Park Hill Road, and what landscaping or screening measures are proposed to mitigate their presence along this stretch of rural lane?

6. Will Regener8 commit to a legally binding landscape buffer that preserves the character and setting of rural-facing businesses for the lifetime of the development (i.e., 40+ years)?

C. Traffic and Accessibility

7. What is the estimated volume and timing of HGV and construction vehicle movements along Park Hill Road, and what modelling has been undertaken to assess the disruption to visitor access to The Plant Man nursery during the construction phase?

8. Has Regener8 modelled the impact of HGV use on the structural condition of Park Hill Road and its suitability for dual use as both a business access route and construction haulage route? If so, what are the repair and restoration guarantees post-construction?

9. Will Regener8 agree to restrict heavy vehicle access during business hours (e.g., 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.) to minimise interference with customer flow and nursery operations?

D. Business Impact and Policy Conflicts

10. What assessments have Regener8 conducted into the socio-economic impact of the development on local rural businesses, particularly those whose value depends on tourism, landscape setting, or a quiet ambience?

11. In light of Policy 25 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy, how does Regener8 justify a development that may materially undermine the viability of a permitted, lawful rural enterprise such as The Plant Man?

12. What mechanisms of redress or compensation will be offered should measurable visitor decline or operational disruption result from the construction or operation of this development?

E. Public Engagement and Alternatives

13. Was the proprietor of The Plant Man or any other Park Hill Road business formally consulted during the site selection process, and if not, why was this not undertaken as part of good-faith community engagement?

14. Did Regener8 assess less sensitive alternative sites (e.g., brownfield land or areas further from commercial receptors), and what specific criteria led to this location being chosen over those alternatives?

# data[].attributes.headline
Policy - Local Economy Support in JCS/BNP/SSP2

# data[].attributes.subject
Policy - Local Economy Support in JCS/BNP/SSP2

# data[].attributes.headline
Business Traffic Access, Road use and Concerns for Trade

# data[].attributes.subject
Business Traffic Access, Road use and Concerns for Trade

# data[].attributes.headline
Draft lifecycle and futureproofing concerns

# data[].attributes.subject
Draft lifecycle and futureproofing concerns

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding:

Braybrooke Parish Council expresses significant concern regarding the long-term viability and future-proofing of the proposed Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects over the proposed 50-year lifespan, after which sites are intended to be decommissioned and returned to greenfield status. Technological advancements in renewable energy, evolving energy storage solutions, and shifts in national and global energy policy may potentially render current BESS installations obsolete within this timeframe.

The Parish Council highlights the importance of considering likely developments such as advancements in hydrogen storage, improved grid infrastructure, alternative renewable storage methods, and energy efficiency technologies that could negate the necessity for large-scale BESS developments, thereby potentially making the current proposals redundant or economically unviable.

Community Questions Specific to Future-Proofing:

Technological Obsolescence: "What analysis has been conducted to assess the risk of technological obsolescence for the proposed BESS installations, and how adaptable is the current design to future technological innovations in energy storage?"

Alternative Green Energy Developments: "Has the developer considered the potential impact of advances in alternative green energy technologies, such as hydrogen storage or other innovative energy storage solutions, which could negate the requirement for battery-based storage within the project's operational lifetime?"

Infrastructure Flexibility: "What flexibility is incorporated within the project's design and infrastructure to adapt to changing national and international energy policies, grid improvements, and potential shifts towards more sustainable or efficient energy storage technologies?"

Economic Viability: "Can the developer provide detailed economic projections or scenario analyses demonstrating the continued viability of the BESS site throughout the full 50-year period, taking into account potential technological advancements and shifts in energy policy?"

Decommissioning and Greenfield Restoration: "What robust provisions and financial guarantees have been made to ensure full decommissioning, safe disposal or recycling of batteries, and restoration of the site to genuine greenfield status should the facility become redundant or obsolete before the 50-year timeframe concludes?"

Policy Alignment and Adaptability: "How will the proposed BESS projects maintain compatibility with evolving local, national, and global planning and environmental policies, ensuring that the development remains beneficial and appropriate throughout its operational lifespan?"

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding:

Braybrooke Parish Council holds substantial concerns regarding the ethical disposal and recycling of lithium-ion batteries associated with the proposed Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects. The lifecycle management of batteries, from production through to decommissioning and disposal, raises critical ethical and environmental considerations. There are significant apprehensions that inadequate recycling measures could lead to environmental contamination, unethical disposal practices, or illegal dumping, potentially harming both local and broader ecosystems.

Given the complexity and resource-intensive nature of recycling lithium-ion batteries, the Parish Council emphasises the necessity for stringent recycling processes, accountability in waste management, and full transparency to safeguard community and environmental health.

Community Questions Specific to Battery Recycling:

Battery Lifecycle Management: "Can the developer provide comprehensive details regarding the complete lifecycle management plan for the lithium-ion batteries used, explicitly including recycling, disposal, and any potential reuse strategies?"

Ethical Waste Disposal Assurances: "What concrete assurances can the developer offer that lithium-ion battery waste will be ethically and responsibly disposed of, adhering to internationally recognized environmental and safety standards?"

Recycling Capacity and Facilities: "Does the developer have confirmed arrangements with established and reputable recycling facilities capable of handling lithium-ion battery waste safely, and can documentation verifying these arrangements be provided?"

Transparency and Accountability: "What ongoing transparency measures and independent oversight mechanisms will be implemented to ensure that the recycling and disposal processes remain ethical, safe, and compliant throughout the operational lifespan and beyond?"

Contamination Prevention Measures: "What specific measures and emergency response plans have been developed to prevent or mitigate environmental contamination or public health risks resulting from battery leakage or improper disposal practices?"

Long-Term Financial and Environmental Responsibility: "What long-term financial guarantees or insurance measures will be secured to ensure that future recycling and disposal obligations can be met fully, without placing undue burdens on local communities or public finances?"

# data[].attributes.headline
Battery lifecycle stages and uncertainty

# data[].attributes.subject
Battery lifecycle stages and uncertainty

# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence from walkers, residents, visitors

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence from walkers, residents, visitors

# data[].attributes.headline
Public amenity and access rights discussion

# data[].attributes.subject
Public amenity and access rights discussion

# data[].attributes.headline
Impact on community use and rural setting

# data[].attributes.subject
Impact on community use and rural setting

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding: Braybrooke Parish Council recognises the local value placed on maintaining and protecting dark sky conditions, which contribute significantly to the rural character and ecological integrity of the area. The proposed Regener8 (RG8) and Aura Power (AP) Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) developments have potential implications for light pollution, affecting both visual amenity and local wildlife habitats. The introduction of security and operational lighting, particularly given the proximity to residential properties, businesses, and natural habitats, raises concerns about degradation of local dark skies.

The Parish Council seeks clarity on how developers propose to manage and mitigate potential adverse impacts on dark sky conditions, ensuring compliance with best-practice guidelines and local policies protecting dark sky environments.

Strengthened Community Questions Specific to Dark Skies Impact:

1. Detailed Lighting Impact Assessment: "Has a detailed lighting impact assessment been conducted for both RG8 and AP sites to quantify potential impacts on local dark skies, particularly considering proximity to residential areas, sensitive wildlife habitats, and the Travellers Site?"

2. Mitigation and Management Measures: "What specific mitigation measures will be implemented to minimise operational and security lighting impacts on dark skies, including types of lighting, shielding, brightness control, and automated operation?"

3. Alignment with Local Dark Skies Policies: "How do the lighting proposals for RG8 and AP developments align explicitly with North Northamptonshire and Braybrooke Parish policies aimed at protecting local dark sky conditions?"

4. Continuous Lighting Monitoring: "What measures are planned for ongoing monitoring of lighting impacts throughout the operational life of the BESS installations to ensure long-term compliance with dark sky protection guidelines?"

5. Cumulative Lighting Impacts: "Have cumulative lighting impacts been assessed, considering existing sources of artificial lighting in the vicinity, and how will the proposed developments ensure minimal additional impact on the area's overall dark sky quality?"

6. Community Engagement on Lighting: "How will local residents and businesses be consulted on lighting plans and ongoing management strategies to ensure community concerns about dark skies are adequately addressed and incorporated?"

# data[].attributes.headline
Objection draft focusing on countryside industrialisation

# data[].attributes.subject
Objection draft focusing on countryside industrialisation

# data[].attributes.headline
Visual Intrusion and screening shortcomings

# data[].attributes.subject
Visual Intrusion and screening shortcomings

# data[].attributes.headline
Draft content on emergency planning weakness

# data[].attributes.subject
Draft content on emergency planning weakness

# data[].attributes.headline
Access via Park Hill Road and substation haul road

# data[].attributes.subject
Access via Park Hill Road and substation haul road

# data[].attributes.headline
Attenuation systems, SuDS proposals, river impact

# data[].attributes.subject
Attenuation systems, SuDS proposals, river impact

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding: Braybrooke Parish Council acknowledges and appreciates the detailed correspondence received from MP Rosie Wrighting, which emphasises the government’s strong commitment to enhancing the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) in new developments, particularly in adapting to climate change impacts. It is noted from the Minister’s response that recent changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) explicitly require the implementation of SuDS for developments with drainage impacts, tailored appropriately to the nature and scale of projects.

However, the Parish Council remains concerned about the current insufficiency of clear and enforceable regulatory frameworks governing the long-term care and maintenance of SuDS infrastructure. This regulatory shortfall poses a substantial risk, potentially undermining the effectiveness and resilience of SuDS over the lifespan of developments such as the proposed Regener8 (RG8) and Aura Power (AP) Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). The Council recognises the government's intention to ensure robust adoption and ongoing maintenance but stresses that without stringent regulatory assurances, the long-term viability and environmental sustainability of these developments remain questionable.

Given the statutory role of the Environment Agency (EA) and Local Lead Flood Authorities, the Parish Council anticipates comprehensive scrutiny of flood risk management proposals, particularly addressing the adequacy and enforceability of SuDS maintenance and management arrangements.

Community Questions Specific to Attenuation Systems, SuDS Proposals, and River Impact:

1. Compliance with Updated NPPF Requirements: "Can the planner explicitly demonstrate how the proposed RG8 and AP attenuation and drainage strategies meet the recent amendments to the National Planning Policy Framework regarding mandatory use of SuDS tailored to site-specific conditions?"

2. Detailed Flood Risk Assessment: "Has a comprehensive, climate-adapted flood risk assessment, incorporating the latest Environment Agency climate change allowances, been undertaken to evaluate how effectively the proposed SuDS at RG8 and AP sites will mitigate potential flooding impacts on Braybrooke and the River Jordan catchment?"

3. Maintenance and Adoption Plans for SuDS: "Given the government’s emphasis on robust adoption and maintenance, can detailed plans for the long-term maintenance, funding, and management of the SuDS infrastructure for both developments be clearly outlined and legally secured?"

4. Collaboration with Local Authorities and Environment Agency: "What specific consultation has occurred or is planned between the project developers, North Northamptonshire Council, Leicestershire County Council, and the Environment Agency to ensure SuDS designs at RG8 and AP fully address local flood risk concerns as highlighted by MP Rosie Wrighting’s correspondence?"

5. Pollution and Water Quality Protection: "Considering the EA’s statutory consultee role outlined by MP Wrighting, what explicit pollution prevention measures are integrated into the SuDS proposals for both sites, especially regarding risks associated with toxic runoff from battery fires?"

6. SuDS Design Tailored to Local Conditions: "Given the identified rapid runoff characteristics of the local clay soils and steep slopes, can the planner confirm how the SuDS design specifically accounts for these local geological and hydrological conditions at RG8 and AP sites?"

7. Emergency Flood and Contaminant Containment: "In the event of extreme rainfall or a battery-related incident at either site, how will the SuDS and attenuation infrastructure safely contain and manage contaminated runoff, preventing any adverse impacts on the River Jordan and surrounding ecological habitats?"

# data[].attributes.headline
Draft content on emergency planning weakness

# data[].attributes.subject
Draft content on emergency planning weakness

# data[].attributes.headline
Flood zones - River Jordan (Upper Valley)- Braybrooke

# data[].attributes.subject
Flood zones - River Jordan (Upper Valley)- Braybrooke

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get flood risk information and maps for planning applications and planning permission in England, including flood zones and flood risk assessment data.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hydrological assessment and runoff analysis

# data[].attributes.subject
Hydrological assessment and runoff analysis

# data[].attributes.headline
Proximity to railway and human habitation

# data[].attributes.subject
Proximity to railway and human habitation

# data[].attributes.headline
Thurrock and Moss Landing incidents overview

# data[].attributes.subject
Thurrock and Moss Landing incidents overview

# data[].attributes.body
Braybrooke Parish Council Understanding: Braybrooke Parish Council acknowledges recent significant incidents at Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), notably at Thurrock, Essex (February 2025) and Moss Landing, California (September 2022). These incidents underline ongoing uncertainties regarding the safety and reliability of large-scale battery installations. Investigations into these events have not yet conclusively determined their root causes, particularly concerning thermal runaway, fire suppression effectiveness, and toxic emissions management. Given the current lack of definitive conclusions and guidelines derived from these events, the Council believes it is premature to proceed with similar installations in Braybrooke without a more comprehensive understanding and updated regulatory framework.

The Parish Council emphasises that proceeding with the Regener8 (RG8) and Aura Power (AP) projects without fully addressing these recent incidents' unresolved safety and environmental concerns represents an unacceptable risk to community safety and wellbeing.

Strengthened Community Questions Specific to Thurrock and Moss Landing Incidents:

1. Lessons from Recent Incidents: "What specific lessons learned from the Thurrock and Moss Landing incidents have been directly incorporated into the design, operation, and emergency management strategies proposed for the RG8 and AP sites?"

2. Root Cause Analysis and Reporting: "Given the ongoing investigations into Thurrock and Moss Landing incidents, can the developers confirm what steps they will take to incorporate future findings and recommendations into their safety and operational protocols prior to construction commencement?"

3. Thermal Runaway and Fire Suppression Systems: "How have recent failures and limitations in fire suppression systems at Thurrock and Moss Landing influenced the selection and specification of fire safety measures proposed for RG8 and AP?"

4. Emergency Response and Toxic Emissions Management: "Considering the unresolved concerns regarding toxic emissions at recent battery fires, what advanced emergency response strategies have been developed to safeguard local residents, businesses, and emergency services personnel in Braybrooke?"

5. Delay Pending Definitive Outcomes: "Given the absence of definitive conclusions from recent critical incidents, what is the rationale for proceeding immediately with the Regener8 and Aura Power developments rather than awaiting conclusive investigation outcomes and subsequent safety guidance?"

6. Regulatory and Best Practice Updates: "How will RG8 and AP projects ensure ongoing compliance with emerging regulations and best practice guidance that will inevitably arise from detailed analyses of the Thurrock and Moss Landing incidents?"

# data[].attributes.headline
Fire suppression systems and BMS evaluation

# data[].attributes.subject
Fire suppression systems and BMS evaluation

# data[].attributes.headline
Drafting templates and response outlines

# data[].attributes.subject
Drafting templates and response outlines

# data[].attributes.headline
Planning policy excerpts (NPPF, HSE, EA, NFCC)

# data[].attributes.subject
Planning policy excerpts (NPPF, HSE, EA, NFCC)

# data[].attributes.headline
Drafting templates and response outlines

# data[].attributes.subject
Drafting templates and response outlines

# data[].attributes.headline
North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (JCS)

# data[].attributes.subject
North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (JCS)

# data[].attributes.body
✍️ How to Add Your Contribution

We welcome input from everyone in the community — whether you're sharing a personal concern, specialist knowledge, or simply helping us stay organised.

Here's how you can contribute to this Padlet board:

📁 1. Posting a File or Link

Click the ‘+’ button under the relevant column.

Use the upload button to attach PDFs, images, Word files, or screenshots.

Add a brief title and summary explaining what the file shows.

You can also paste in links to websites or articles, and add comments or context.

🧠 2. Sharing Ideas or Objections

Add a post with your observation, idea, or suggestion under the matching column (e.g. fire, flood, access).

Begin with a short headline, then explain your point clearly.

Include references or personal experiences if relevant.

📝 3. Commenting on Existing Posts

Click on any post to open it.

Use the comment box to add thoughts, further information, or polite questions.

This helps us develop stronger and clearer planning responses together.

🧭 Not Sure Where Something Goes?

Post it in the Introduction column, and we'll help move it to the right place.

# data[].attributes.body
📌 Brief Overview: BESS Projects and Purpose of This Board

Two large-scale Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects have been proposed near Braybrooke:

Aura Power site: Located between Harborough Road and the A6, adjacent to the National Grid substation.

Regener8 Power site: Located off Park Hill Road, on land near National Rail infrastructure and national walking routes.

Both proposals raise serious concerns relating to:

Fire safety and toxic gas risks

Flooding and hydrological impact

Emergency access and response times

Impact on public rights of way and local landscape

Long-term environmental sustainability and waste management

📍 This Padlet board has been created to:

Help members of the action group share evidence, questions, and documentation in an organised way.

Support the drafting of a formal objection response by the Parish Council and community.

Enable the community to log observations, suggest objections, and prepare materials for public awareness.

Please explore the column headings, and post relevant content in the appropriate place. This board will evolve over time, and all input is welcome and appreciated.

If you're unsure where something belongs, post it in this column and we’ll move it to the correct place.

# data[].attributes.body
Welcome to the Braybrooke BESS Action Group Planning Response Workspace. This Padlet is a shared digital board to help us coordinate our efforts as a parish and community in response to the proposed Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) developments near Braybrooke.

This board is structured to help us:

Gather evidence under key concern areas (e.g. fire safety, flood risk, environmental impact).

Collaborate on objection drafting for submission to the planning authority.

Share community feedback and ideas for public engagement.

Store and reference key policy documents, developer materials, maps, and letters.

🔹 You are warmly invited to:

Add useful links, documents, summaries, and quotes.

Comment on drafts or upload new materials under the appropriate column.

Suggest planning objections or relevant policies.

Contribute notes from public meetings or site visits.

📅 Key Deadlines:

🧭 Please keep your posts constructive, factual, and focused. Every contribution strengthens the credibility and impact of our response.

Thank you for supporting our village.

Cllr. Paul Hitchcock
Chairman, Braybrooke Parish Council

# data[].attributes.body
Central resource hub.

# data[].attributes.body
To orient group members and newcomers