# data[].attributes.body
Housing affordability is a pressing economic issue for low-income families and college students.

A lack of affordable housing impacts financial stability and economic mobility.

High housing costs force students to shift time and money away from their academics.

At UW–Madison, there are very few affordable housing options near campus.

This can lead to long commutes, part-time jobs, and added stress for students.

These challenges can hurt students' academic performance and overall well-being.

Solutions include building more affordable housing, expanding dorms, and passing supportive policy changes.

Fixing housing issues helps both students and the larger economy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Graph illustrating student housing pressures 

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Texas Tech vs. UW-Madison housing comparison

# data[].attributes.body
Student Housing Crisis in Madison, WI

High rent costs:

Average off-campus rent is $1,273 per bed

Students report they can only afford around $980

Nearly 70% of rentals are considered unaffordable

Room sharing:

27% of students share bedrooms to manage housing costs

Overcrowded on-campus housing:

104% average occupancy from 2010–2023

Peaked at 114% (excluding 2020)

Off-campus market strain:

98% occupancy rate, showing intense demand and limited supply

City and university response:

Zoning changes allow taller buildings in exchange for affordable student units

UW–Madison is expanding on-campus housing

10-year trend (graph data):

Rents have steadily increased

Overcrowding has remained constant

Highlights the urgency of the student housing crisis

# data[].attributes.body
Madison vs. Lubbock: Student Housing Comparison

Madison, WI (UW–Madison):

Students pay around $1,273 per bed per month

Most students say they can only afford about $980

This gap forces students to share rooms or stretch their budgets

Overall cost of living is around the U.S. average

City has started zoning changes to promote affordable housing

Still faces a market failure: high demand, limited supply, and unaffordable prices for many students

Lubbock, TX (Texas Tech):

Average rent is just $766 per bed

Much easier for students to find affordable housing

Overall cost of living is lower than Madison’s

Lower housing costs happen naturally, without major policy changes

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Have you struggled to find affordable housing as a student at UW–Madison?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
No, I’ve been able to find affordable housing

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Which stakeholders do you think have the most influence in solving the housing crisis?

# data[].attributes.body
The housing crisis has affected students at UW–Madison. Affordable housing plays a huge role in how well students do in school and their overall quality of life.

When rent is manageable, students and families can put more money toward things like supplies, textbooks, technology, and extracurriculars.
→ This ties into the idea of budget constraints and how we have to choose where our money goes when resources are limited.

When housing is expensive, it creates more stress and instability, which makes it harder for students to focus and succeed in school.

A lot of students end up commuting longer or taking on part-time jobs to afford rent.
→ This connects to opportunity cost—when students are spending time working or commuting, they have less time for school.

High rent also means students might have to skip out on unpaid internships or study abroad programs that could help their future.
→ Missed investment in human capital, which affects long-term career opportunities and mobility.

All of this combined can hold students back from reaching their goals and even lead to cycles of poverty over time.
→ This shows how economic barriers can impact equity, access, and upward mobility.

# data[].attributes.body
Stakeholders:

Local Governments:

Create zoning laws.

Offer subsidies for affordable housing.

Developers:

Face challenges like unclear zoning rules and lengthy approval processes.

Financial Institutions:

Provide loans for housing projects.

Community Organizations and Renters:

Advocate for affordable housing.

Trade-offs:

Using land for affordable housing vs. luxury condos.

Balancing budgets between housing and other priorities.

Equity:

Crucial for low-income families and students who lack resources.

Winners:

Rich homebuyers.

Real estate investors.

Losers:

Existing homeowners.

First-time buyers.

Retirees transitioning to renting.

Conclusion:

Effective solutions require cooperation, equity, and long-term investments from all stakeholders.

# data[].attributes.headline
once in a lifetime opportunities will be missed out on if you are always stressing about income!

# data[].attributes.subject
once in a lifetime opportunities will be missed out on if you are always stressing about income!

# data[].attributes.body
The policy issue addressed is the lack of affordable housing, particularly in the vicinity of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The paper identifies several key facts:

The average rent is $1,273 per bed, which is significantly above the $980 deemed affordable by students, placing a substantial financial burden on them.

Residence hall occupancy has exceeded 100%, reaching a high of 114%, placing a significant strain on the existing housing facilities.

The fact that ninety-eight percent of off-campus housing is occupied is a clear indicator of the high demand and the limited supply in the market.

Zoning constraints, developer uncertainty, and investment speculation have all contributed to the housing crisis.

These facts reflect market failure—specifically, the private housing market underproduces affordable housing due to limited profit margins.

From a value-based standpoint, the essay argues that housing should be a fundamental right, particularly for students and low-income families. It emphasizes:

The need for equity: Without intervention, disadvantaged groups are more likely to suffer from housing instability. However, with the right policies and actions, we can bring about a positive change.

The importance of stability and opportunity: Affordable housing is tied to academic performance, mental health, and career prospects. Moreover, it can stimulate local economies and reduce the burden on social services.

Policy must strike a balance between community preservation, which includes the value of historical site restrictions, and the need for expansion.

The argument supports interventionist policies that prioritize human welfare over pure market efficiency.

In conclusion, Effectiveness depends on how policies balance efficiency, equity, and feasibility:

Efficiency: Zoning changes and incentives for developers could increase supply with minimal cost to the government. However, rent control may reduce efficiency by discouraging new development.

Equity: Tax credits and housing vouchers directly assist low-income students and families, targeting those who need support the most.

Winners and Losers: While students and renters stand to benefit, some developers and landlords may resist regulations or rent limits. It is the responsibility of local governments to carefully navigate these trade-offs, emphasizing the need for strategic decision-making.

Overall, the most promising solutions include zoning reform, housing tax credits, and expanded university housing. These strategies offer a path toward sustainable, equitable housing that benefits both the local economy and student success. However, policies must be tailored to regional constraints and involve coordinated stakeholder efforts to truly make a lasting impact truly.

# data[].attributes.body
Besides supply and demand, other factors make housing less affordable in Madison.

Zoning laws can slow down development. Height limits around the Capitol building, for instance, prevent developers from building more units.

Uncertainty regarding the approval process also discourages investors since they are unsure of how long it will take or whether the rules will be changed.

Information gaps (aka informational asymmetry) are also an issue, because tenants are unaware of less expensive or subsidized housing.

Investor demand can drive prices higher when big firms purchase a lot of properties in a single location.

These non-standard issues make it increasingly challenging to increase affordable housing, despite the fact that new buildings are being developed.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Which of these non-standard factors do you think has the biggest impact on the housing crisis?

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Zoning laws and height limits (Capitol building)

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Approval delays and regulatory uncertainty

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.poll_choices[].choice_text
Lack of information about affordable housing

# data[].attributes.body
A Low-Income Housing Tax Credit would benefit low and middle income households by directly providing them with financial assistance.

Some of these ideas are rent control, housing vouchers, supply-side subsidies, or inclusionary zoning—all with pros and cons.

Rent control can provide relief in the short run but can deter developers from constructing new units or preserving existing ones.

A combination will probably work best. Cities like Madison need to weigh the desire for additional housing against factors like height limits near the Capitol Building.

The goal should be to create long-term solutions that are fair, effective, and help people stay in their homes.

# data[].attributes.wish_content.attachment_props.question
Which policy do you think would help most with housing affordability?

# data[].attributes.body
This highlights informational asymmetry — how people miss out on help because they don’t know what’s available.

# data[].attributes.body
This image depicts that a mix of housing policies is needed depending on the city, needs, and trade-offs. Its important to keep in mind that not all policies work in every location though, and must be adapted to fit the locations needs'.