# data[].attributes.body
·       Cultural heritage protection and management and the inclusion of ethics and sustainability principles from international to national policies.

·       Reflection of ethics principles promoted internationally in a national driven approach and its influence on local communities

·       In which ways are principles of sustainable development present in national cultural heritage policies? How are promoted in the work of cultural institutes and other stakeholders?

·       Diversity in approaches at the European and international levels compared with selected national policies.

·       Cultural heritage protection as a reflection of sustainability and ethics principles

# data[].attributes.body
Intangible cultural heritage toward building strong local communities (resilience) with understanding of global socioeconomic and environmental context (inclusion) – resilience and inclusion at the same time

# data[].attributes.body
? 4. Economic drivers - policy decision making under increasing inflation, (lack of) scarcity primary resources (esp. from conflict areas), trade-off - invest into culture or other sectors - ratio?

# data[].attributes.body
We have expertise in ethnographic approaches which could look within societies and, in a spirit of a global future and advocating pluriversality and cross-cultural understanding, could also create spaces for a coming together across societies using arts and performance-based methodologies, which also seem to be well represented across the consortium.

# data[].attributes.headline
Suggested link between ethics and cultural heritage sides of the call...

# data[].attributes.subject
Suggested link between ethics and cultural heritage sides of the call...

# data[].attributes.body
If we take a values-based approach to cover the ethics side of the call, we could aim to come to know the way different societies respond to these drivers for change guided by ethical principles derived from a society’s cultural heritage. This would need to be attentive to a non-homogeneity of ‘society’, ‘heritage’ and ‘values’ and could hold itself a value of democratic values of liberty, equality and solidarity.

In terms of disciplinary expertise we have economics, politics (Czechia), design, technology (Spain), cultural heritage, sociology (Belgium), languages, arts, education – including environmental education and ethics (UK) – ethics, development, Global South networks (Christian Aid and British Council).

# data[].attributes.headline
Suggested focus to unite our proposal - The future of global society

# data[].attributes.subject
Suggested focus to unite our proposal - The future of global society

# data[].attributes.body
This could cover with different University's leading a work package of cross-University teams, Society’s responses to:

1. Environmental drivers – to consider views of stewardship and sustainability and the role of education in this

2. Demographic drivers – to cover within-population shifts, migration/immigration, political factors and the role of language/cross-cultural understandings in this

3. Technological drivers – to consider the opportunities for global connectivity, automation and knowledge generation as well as challenges to wellbeing, privacy etc

# data[].attributes.body
- Questions you think you would want to be included in the proposal matching your and your colleagues’ interests and expertise

How can cultural heritage work/engaging with cultural heritage contribute to/foster epistemologial diversity?

(https://www.routledge.com/Epistemologies-of-the-South-Justice-Against-Epistemicide/Santos/p/book/9781612055459)

- What aspects of cultural heritage you would have expertise in examining?

Cultural heritage as lived experience
based on an understanding of research as “living knowledge” (Facer & Enright, 2016): praxis knowledge that connects lived experiences on the ground (by students engaged in VE, for example) with the body of global critical knowledge in relation to cultural heritage

- What angle you would want to take on conflicting narratives in relation to cultural heritage?

This speaks directly to the need to bring marginalised knowledge to the fore,to overcome cognitive domination and injustice) and to engage with epistemologies of the Global South (de Sousa Santos, see above)

- Ideas for the research design you would want considered…

focus groups with students who have engaged in VE

social semiotic analysis of artfacts created by students in VE contexts

- Ideas for outcomes/dissemination you would hope we might consider (or approaches to developing outcomes)…

case studies, a toolkit for participatory/equitable/inclusive aproaches to cultural heritage work

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Table of Contents

Preface Manifesto for Good Living/Buen Vivir Minifesto for Intellectual-Activists Introduction Creating a Distance in Relation to Western-centric Political Imagination and Critical Theory Part One Centrifugal Modernities and Subaltern Wests: Degrees of Separation Chapter 1 Nuestra America: Postcolonial Identities and Mestizajes Chapter 2 Another Angelus Novus: Beyond the Modern Game of Roots and Options Chapter 3 Is There a Non-Occidentalist West? Part Two Toward Epistemologies of the South: Against the Waste of Experience Chapter 4 Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges Chapter 5 Toward an Epistemology of Blindness: Why the New Forms of "Ceremonial Adequacy" neither Regulate nor Emancipate Chapter 6 A Critique of Lazy Reason: Against the Waste of Experience and Toward the Sociology of Absences and the Sociology of Emergences Chapter 7 Ecologies of Knowledges Chapter 8 Intercultural Translation: Differing and Sharing con Passionalita Conclusion

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This book explores the concept of 'cognitive injustice': the failure to recognise the different ways of knowing by which people across the globe run their lives and provide meaning to their existence. Boaventura de Sousa Santos shows why global social justice is not possible without global cognitive justice.

# data[].attributes.body
Our concerns; ethical application of technology, access4all, digital inclusion, well being.
We want to help to bring cultural heritage close to citizenship, enriching the user experience with a focus on happiness and the impacts of wellbeing through the use of effective and easy of use technology.
We are fans of openlearning and we wonder how it can be better related to cultural heritage.
We will like to explore the sustainability of self-publication means, self-printing, crowfunding, and other means for cultural heritage disemmination and production.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mirjam: one of the foci of virtual exchange (VE) is intercultural  communication and learning. In each VE, participants bring - directly or indirectly - their respective cutural heritage "package" to the project table (even if the focus of the exchange is not cultural heritage as such). Often cultural identities are jointly de-constructed and re-constructed by  the participants/students via the content they are engaging with. Running VEs could be the implementation dimension of the project. These VEs could have a local outreach dimension, i.e. student engagmenet with local charities, NGOs, museums, you name it, as part of their exchange project work.

# data[].attributes.subject
Mirjam: one of the foci of virtual exchange (VE) is intercultural  communication and learning. In each VE, participants bring - directly or indirectly - their respective cutural heritage "package" to the project table (even if the focus of the exchange is not cultural heritage as such). Often cultural identities are jointly de-constructed and re-constructed by  the participants/students via the content they are engaging with. Running VEs could be the implementation dimension of the project. These VEs could have a local outreach dimension, i.e. student engagmenet with local charities, NGOs, museums, you name it, as part of their exchange project work.

# data[].attributes.body
is it just a research or are we thinking of developing product - that would lead to a more inclusive cultural heritage

# data[].attributes.body
what aspects of cultural heritage are we interested in?

# data[].attributes.body
the research that is focused in the global south

# data[].attributes.body
our interest in how we approach the topic and the ethics that is applied to the topic (whose ethics counts and is listened to)?

# data[].attributes.body
I would like us to come together in terms of how the research is designed (co-design)- to build a partnership with the researchers based in the global south

# data[].attributes.body
Memory, conflict and its impact on civic space​

2.Counter memories of marginalized groups​

3.Role of cultural heritage in overcoming social divisions​

4.Cultural heritage and its intersections with democracy.
5. Cultural heritage and humanistic values​
We hope that the research will be committed to epistemic justice. We would like the consortium to think about the assumptions within research design, particularly those surrounding power and power relationships.  We are interested in centering the voices of communities in the research.