# data[].attributes.body
I believe the challengers were right in the controversy because kids are naive, and we must protect them from being tainted by demonic media. Reading content like this should be solely for adults, and it is unethical to market to our children, who are our future. Kids do not need to be reading sex comics and drug ring books. They should be learning as much about themselves as possible. They should be reading about things that will help them to flourish when following their dreams and aspiration. Feeding media like this banned books to the kids shows that the author sees them as nothing but trash and a check.

# data[].attributes.body
The patterns that emerge throughout the book are underage use of substances, mental and emotional abuse, and the life of a kid who feels like they have nowhere to go. The main arguments for censoring the book the explicit drug use and sexual content, which should not be anywhere near an environment meant to teach the youth. There are no middle-ground solutions for the problem, but the author may have written this book to show kids what not to do. Kids are always going to do the opposite of what you tell them because even if they are young and intelligent, they are also young, naive, and hard-headed.

# data[].attributes.body
These issues arose many years after the book was released in 2004. They appeared in 2022, when the book was challenged 48 times. I feel the actual reason people challenged the book was to truly protect their children. I wouldn't want my child reading about sex and drugs when they should be focused on their multiplication tables or their history project on the first president of the United States. I feel the ban was justified based on my previous statement and am appalled that it has taken so long to do so. The book is targeted to middle and highschooler and has been out for years swaying thoughts of our good kids that had bright futures.

# data[].attributes.body
The community represented by this book are young people that are fast at life and don't realize what they are doing. Committing crimes, doing drugs, and having sex. These are common themes among delinquent teens that are heading in the wrong direction off the path. Parents and guardians most likely did not want to expose clean kids to such media. As I stated in the last post, young individuals are sponges. They take after what they see because they cannot yet think clearly for themselves, with the exception of a rare few.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that the challengers are right. They have the right to protect their offspring, and it's already hard enough being a parent as it is. Imagine coming home and your twelve-year-old son telling you he read a book with sexually explicit content and wants to do everything in that book word for word. It's not what he should be focused on at the moment. He should be worried about what his next science fair project will be or his multiplication table. All I am saying is, why do kids need tools to help them with their sexuality at such a young age? They do not even know if they really want to be an astronaut or not. There are more important things to worry about, whether the boy is blue, pink, yellow, or green.

# data[].attributes.body
We have amendments, but there is a fine line that has to be drawn when teaching and exposing the youth to specific subjects. These issues arose recently as the book was published in 2020. The topic is controversial nowadays, with many people losing themselves and being controlled by what is currently on their screen. When it comes to people protecting the youth and being offended by the topic, I feel that it is both. The youth is our main priority because they are the future, and the subject being discussed is fairly new and slightly trendy. It may have been Johnson's actual experience, but it makes a great headline for having your book banned.

# data[].attributes.body
Patterns that emerge in books like the one being discussed are sexual contents that parents feel their kids should not be digesting at such a young age. Johnson targets a younger audience, and the argument held by challengers is that this book introduces them to thoughts they may not have been thinking before. This take is understandable, seeing that media is food that has to be digested, and the younger you are, the more you absorb, but Johnson looks at the book as a tool rather than an introduction to the subject. There are two different communities with little to nothing in common, so commonality plays little to no part when arguing sides.

# data[].attributes.body
It's obvious which community is being represented in this book by George M. Johnson, the queer black young man. In an older interview, he explains that this book was his way of fighting the standard methods of being as well as standing up and showing recognition of the cause. The issue with the text is the LGBTQ content being spread to the spongelike youth, which caused many questions and challenges, 86 to be exact. The sexually explicit content was no help to the cause hence why the book was banned.

# data[].attributes.headline
All Boys Aren't Blue by George M. Johnson

# data[].attributes.subject
All Boys Aren't Blue by George M. Johnson