# data[].attributes.body
Abrar is a Protagonist, his personality type is ENFJ, with this personality type he can stand up for his team and he can understand his team member and lead them for any kind of presentation. He is so caring and kind to support us, according to our teams 8Beaters.

# data[].attributes.body
Abrar- ENFJ
Anwar- ENFJ
Nazifa- INFJ
Taz- ENTJ

# data[].attributes.body
Manjil: ENFJ
Anup: ENFP
Sandesh: ISTP
Ujwol: ENFJ

# data[].attributes.body
Organisations that want to create teams that work well must examine the personalities that make up these groups, assist team members in understanding their own characteristics, and teach them to value the contributions of the other team members.

# data[].attributes.body
Manjil is a Protagonist ENFJ, which is his personality type, and because of this, he can stand up for a team and help team members finish a presentation while still being kind, loving, and supportive in nature, according to our group Z discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Intrateam communication will come more naturally to extroverts than to introverts, intuitives than sensing personality types, and thinkers than feelers.

Thinkers tend to be more cohesive than feelers. In their eagerness to share their opinions, the thinking team members frequently upset the more sensitive team members, leading to resentment and an emotional rift between them.

The amount of each personality type on a team is referred to as team heterogeneity. In general, each category can offer something useful. In actuality, issues typically arise when there is a high degree of psychological homogeneity. While a homogeneous team might come to an agreement more quickly.

# data[].attributes.body
RAMANDEEP -ENFT
SATNAM SINGH -ENTJ

# data[].attributes.body
According to the analysis in this section, personality types on a team do seem to be a significant explanatory variable for variations in team performance.

The analysis's findings show that team 2's better mix of extroverts and introverts, sensing types and intuitive types, and thinking and feeling types appears to have influenced the team's ability to work together successfully. The project was finished on schedule thanks in part to Team 2's large majority of judges.

# data[].attributes.body
abdullah is a team member of group A and his personality tyoe is ENFT which represents him as a PROTOGANIST as a good leader to carry with his ideas

# data[].attributes.body
three characteristics of productive teams that are strongly related to individual differences seem to dominate: effective leadership, intra-team communication, and group cohesion[3,6,10-12]

# data[].attributes.body
abdullah is a leader in group A and he gives us his personality types as  ENFT and it so helpful to get good ideas from him to take the group move.

# data[].attributes.body
Intrateam communication will come naturally to extroverts more than introverts, sensing personality types than intuitive, and thinking personality types than feeling personality types. Thinking as opposed to feeling has a greater impact on cohesion. When rushing to share their opinions, the more sensitive team members are frequently offended by the thinking team members, which leads to resentment and an emotional rift between them. Team heterogeneity is the proportion of each personality type within the group. Generally speaking, any type can offer something useful. Actually, a high level of psychological similarity typically results in issues. Although a homogeneous team might reach consensus more quickly.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Manjil: ENFJ
2. Anup: ENFP
3. Ujwol: ENFJ
4. Sandesh: IOTP

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of this paper is to highlight the impact of personality type on team productivity and to propose a model that can be used to analyse the personality-type composition of an IS development team

# data[].attributes.body
According to our group Z discussion, Manjil is a Protagonist ENFJ, which is his personality type, and because of this, he has the ability to stand up for a team and assist team members in finishing a presentation while also being caring, loving, and supportive in nature. So he would be the perfect leader for our group.

# data[].attributes.body
The main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the effect of different personality type working in a same group to produce a desired outcome. In addition,with the combination of multitasking members and harmony among members could help in getting the most effective results.

# data[].attributes.body
According to the research and this case study, successful team performance often requires diversity and balance among team member personality types.

# data[].attributes.body
najath-INTJ
ABDULAH- ENFT
HUSSAIN -INF

# data[].attributes.body
The two findings are; team 1's high proportion of introverts, thinkers, and perceivers may have made group communication less effective, whereas team 2's high proportion of extroverts, feeling types, and judgers may have made group communication easier.

# data[].attributes.body
Organizations must analyze personality compositions and help team members understand their attributes and appreciate each other's contributions.

# data[].attributes.body
An IS development team's success is significantly influenced by leadership.

The affects an IS development team's success is intra-team communication.

A cohesive team will exhibit a sense of camaraderie and support for one another, which aids in swift conflict resolution.

The fourth aspect is the variation in personality types among the IS team members.

# data[].attributes.body
The modern information systems (IS) development

model includes the use of cross-functional teams, which comprise both users,

such as accountants and salespeople, and IS professionals such as systems

analysts and programmers. Team members must work together effectively to

produce successful systems.

# data[].attributes.body
Teams with the wrong makeup sometimes end up being ineffective.Only the first action deciding to employ a team strategy has been taken. To ensure the team's ultimate efficacy, great caution must be taken when building it.

# data[].attributes.body
The main purpose of this paper is to combined everyone's views and ideas to get a targeted outcomes. More over it demonstrates the influences of personality type on two teams that are comparable in age, IQ, problem-solving ability, gender and task responsibility..

# data[].attributes.body
Inappropriate team composition could lead to less effective in a team work because of the different views of the persons involved in a group. The result could be unsatisfactory.

# data[].attributes.body
A simulation of the impact of personality type on team performance
The original model (see Figure 1) can now be enhanced by including personality type theory into the four factors impacting team effectiveness. An ESTJ or an ENTJ makes for the perfect leader in general, depending on the work at hand. Instructions and company information will be easily communicated by the departing leader. If the IS being developed is an upgrade to an existing system or if it is focused on a well structured issue that does not necessitate the introduction of new technology, the sensing leader should perform effectively. If the new IS requires the creation of creative solutions to issues that could not be easily understood, the intuitive leader should function best.

# data[].attributes.body
play an important role in the quest for innovative solutions to today’s complex problems.

# data[].attributes.body
The results of the analysis presented in this section indicates that team 2’s greater balance of extroverts and introverts, sensing types and intuitive types, and thinking and feeling types appears to have influenced successful team performance.

# data[].attributes.body
The IS stands for inovative solutions which aim is to find effective solutions through the combined team work. We can benefit more productivity, satisfied results, less stress and we can save time.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to analyse the personality-type makeup of an IS development team, a model is proposed in this study that may be utilised to emphasise the impact of personality type on team productivity.

# data[].attributes.body
A knowledgeable, assertive leader must not only be available and properly trained in group dynamics techniques, but must also be the type of person who can lead people who represent different functional areas and different levels of management.

communication is another critical factor that influences IS development team success

Cohesion has also been identified as a crucial ingredient in team effectiveness. A cohesive team will demonstrate a spirit of togetherness and support for one another that helps team members quickly resolve conflicts without residual hard feelings. Political problems are often a symptom of lack of cohesion. Team members must be able to empathize with one another in order to avoid political infighting.

different types of individuals with a variety of skills, knowledge, abilities and perspectives are more effective than groups that are more homogeneous. In other words, diversity in skills and knowledge combined with a balance of personality types is desirable for effective teams.

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of this paper is to highlight the impact of personality type on team productivity and to propose a model that can be used to analyse the personality-type composition of an IS development team ..

# data[].attributes.body
IS development can range from developing small-scale systems, such as a simple database application, to complex enterprise-wide systems, such as enterprise resource planning systems or customer relationship management systems.

# data[].attributes.body
The IS development process is the steering committee, a team composed of the heads of major departments in the organization. Moreover (IS) development model includes the use of cross-functional teams, which comprise both users, such as accountants and salespeople .

# data[].attributes.body
4 critical factors of a productive IS development team are :

1) leadership:  The art of getting other peoples into their own way to do certain task is said to be leadership. In other words, peoples are easily influenced by leader ideas, motivation and insights.

2) Communication : It is act of exchanging information from one person to another. With the help of better communication a team could easily perform at their best.

3) cohesion:It is the social attachment between person to person to achieve a goal in organisation. With the help of cohesion people will easily support and trust others ideas and beliefs.

4) Heterogeneity: It means collection of people with different skills and ideas to get most desirable outcome. It is so much diverse in knowledge and different personality types.

# data[].attributes.body
these are the 4,
~Leadership -  the type of person who can lead people who represent different functional areas and different levels of management.

~Communication - the exchange of meanings between individuals through a common system of symbols

~Cohesion -A cohesive team will demonstrate a spirit of togetherness and support for one another that helps team members quickly resolve conflicts.

~Heterogeneity -In general, their research concludes that for complex problem solving, such as IS system development ,

# data[].attributes.headline
Please include the diagram and briefly explain each factor.

# data[].attributes.subject
Please include the diagram and briefly explain each factor.