# data[].attributes.body
In pairs / small groups, reflect on what you learnt about critique in a previous lesson:

• Do you understand what ‘critique’ is?

• Do you know when and how to include critique in the Literature Review main body?

• What do you think are the most difficult aspects of critique?

• Do you have any questions about critique?

# data[].attributes.body
Work in groups of 3 or 4. Read the critique sentences shared by other students in your group.

Give feedback to other students in your group:

1.  Is the critique written in clear English? YES / NO

2.  Is the critique clearly positive or negative? YES / NO

3.  Is it clear WHAT the student is critiquing? (Method / results / conclusions / general research gap) YES / NO

4. How could the student improve this critique? (Clue: consider structure / language)

# data[].attributes.headline
Add your critique here (or share it in your group).

# data[].attributes.subject
Add your critique here (or share it in your group).

# data[].attributes.body
Select two journal articles from your Annotated Bibliography. Write a critique (1 or 2 sentences) for each one.

For guidance, refer to:

• The critique checklists on Blackboard (and on this Padlet)

• The example student critiques from Week 1, Lesson 3 Activity 3 (below)

• The example critique and example structure / language (below)

# data[].attributes.headline
General Critique (add a few times before the gap at the end of the main body)

# data[].attributes.subject
General Critique (add a few times before the gap at the end of the main body)

# data[].attributes.headline
Critique for the Research Gap at End of Main Body

# data[].attributes.subject
Critique for the Research Gap at End of Main Body