# data[].attributes.body
the author makes this commet to persuade the general public should not have a ban and he thiks it is unecassary. from the souce "implementing a ban wld erase all the work that hs been done" shows that banning e scooters are not the only solution ad r also a conveiet and fast way to trael atound. the author hopes that people will learn how to use the moility devices responsily ad properly
sry my keyoard is ot wrkig so have letters missig

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince the government to repeal the ban of e-scooters. However, for this to happen, the author of the comment would first attempt to convince Singaporean citizens that the ban placed on scooters was unwise. According to Source B, the comment stated that "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done." This is to highlight to the readers of the comment that the ban implemented would wipe out all of the effort that the Singaporean citizens put in, with this resulting in the waste of time and hard work the citizens put in only for a ban to be placed. Furthermore, the author also suggested a few ways to use e-scooters more safely and wisely, stating that "In the short term, [we could instead] increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs. E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely." This tells readers that there are still ways to salvage the situation and the ban of e-scooters might not be the most practical way to resolve the safety issue regarding e-scooters. With the approval of media to repeal the ban, whereby media playing a huge role in society as of today, this might be a signal to the government to revoke the ban. Not only is the author criticizing the government's actions, but he might also be attempting to call the government out, hoping for a change with the government's actions so as to keep the benefits reaped by all the Singaporean citizens. Hence, the author made this comment to persuade the government to refute the ban of e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to educate the public about implementing a ban on e-scooters would do more harm than good. This can be seen in Source B which says 'reaping the benefits of e-scooters in terms of increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions'. There are many poor income families who depend on food delivering as their second or primary income source. By banning e-scooters, it would only serve to worsen their situation as they would lose their job. Thus, he wants the public to be made aware and not support the banning of the e-scooter.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to convince the readers that the ban of e-scooters in Singapore are unecessary as there are other ways to teach Singaporeans on how to use e-scooters responsibly and safely, instead of banning them altogether. This is so that Singaporeans can enjoy the benefits brought about by e-scooters such as its affordability and convenience. This can be seen in source B which suggests “ we could instead increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs”

# data[].attributes.body
The author makes this comment to convince the general public that an e-scooter ban may not be the way to move forward as e-scooters are extremely beneficial to singaporeans from "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done” shows that the authors thinks that banning e-scooters is not the way to go and only negates the work that has been done thus the author is emphasising the benefits of e-scooters and how they are a valuable tool to travel around efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment because he wanted to convince the Singapore government to not implement the ban on e-scooters. From the line 'becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation' it shows that his message is that e-scooters have helped the society progess and improve in many ways, such as becoming more efficient in deliveries, and implementing the ban would erase the progress we made with e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to persuade the government not to enforce a ban of e-scooters but to take alternative action. “Implementing a ban would erase all the work we have done”. This shows how banning e-scooters would be a waste since so much effort has already been put in. If the government were to enforce a ban, it would have. A negative impact on our lives, especially those who depend on e-scooters as a mode of transport. Thus, the comment was made to stop the singapore government for creating more harm.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to the general public in order to persuade the government to not ban the use of e-scooters. Source B states, “We have been reaping the benefits of e-scooters in terms of increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation. Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done.” This suggests that the author feels that the e-scooter benefits many, and a ban would put people at a disadvantage. The author suggests ways to increase controls and accountability. For example he suggests, “courses on how to use the e-scooter safely”, instead of putting a ban on e-scooters entirely, which shows the author’s strong disagreement towards the ban. He gives alternative solutions to combat e-scooter problems in an attempt to convince the government and the general public to lift the ban of e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to convince the government not to ban e-scooters on footpaths in Singapore. This post was made around the time the e-scooters were just banned. He did not agree with it as the source states that, "We have been reaping the benefits of e-scooters in terms of increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation." He believes that it should not be banned as there are so many advantages to it, which makes life more convenient. He even stated an alternative solution which was to, "increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs", which shows how much he does not believe that the e-scooters should be banned on footpaths.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment as he wants to convince the government to not ban the e-scooters but to implement rules and regulations to ensure the proper usage of e-scooters .This can be seen from the part "we could instead increase controls and availability via licensing and educational awareness programs. "This shows that the author does not agree with the ban of e-scooters, as he feels that this will not benefit the public ,instead he feels that with proper educations and regulations applied , it would be safe for e-scooters to be used .Thus , he made this comment to convince the government to not completely ban the usage of e-scooters as he feels that it is unnecessary .

# data[].attributes.body
The purpose of this comment is to persuade the Government of Singapore to allow the use of e-scooters in Singapore, by convincing them about the benefits of e-scooters. The evidence from Source B is, that if e-scooters were to be banned, it “would erase all the work we have collectively done"., as e-scooters benefit the public by "increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation". From this, it is evident that the author believes that it is impractical to ban e-scooters, due to the several cost-cutting and time efficient benefits that they bring to the society. The author believes that by banning e-scooters, Sg would be regressing on its development. Thus, the author wants to convince the Sg government to refute the ban of e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince Singaporeans who agree with the ban that e-scooters can be vary beneficial if safety precautions are taken. This is so that people will be sate using e-scooters. This can be seen in Source B which suggests,"In the short term, [we could instead] increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs." With the uses of e-scooters, it can be helpful in people's lives where it can make lives more convenient for users, where when used properly and safety, it is very beneficial

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to convince the citizens that escooters should not be banned. He thinks that e-scooters are beneficial to the society and is very convenient as e-scooters are "becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation." Thus he thinks that e-scooters should not be banned as it is very useful for many groups are people and is a easier and cheaper mode of transportation. However he knows that there are consequences when e-scooters are not used safely and also considers that in his opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to persuade the public that feels that it will be a waste of effort if the ban on e-scooters is implemented, and that Singaporeans should not support the ban, because "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done". The author thinks that a large portion of the society uses the e-scooter for easier and cheaper transportation. However, he hopes that those who ride the e-scooters are willing to go for courses so that it would be safer, and that there should not be a ban on e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince the general puublic that e-scooters should not be banned.. the source states,'implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done.' The author is stating the benefits of e-scooters, and how e-scooter users can be more responsible. He hopes that e-scooter users would willingly go for courses on how to ride e-scooters properly, and that e-scooters would not be banned

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to protest to the Singapore government that e-scooters should not be banned on footpaths. This can be seen from Source B where the author said that "we have been reaping benefits of e-scooters" and he also suggested alternative solutions such as "educational awareness programmes". This is so that the Singapore government will consider reviewing and lifting the ban on e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to persuade the government that the benefits of e-scooters are worth the cost of educating all e-scooter riders to practice road safety. This is so that the ban on e-scooters will be lifted and we will be able to benefit from them while remaining safe. This can be seen in source B which suggests that 'implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done'.

# data[].attributes.body
the author made this comment in hopes to persuade the Singapore government to take alternative actions to those who ride e-scooters instead of directly enforcing a ban. this can be seen from the source, which states that, "implementing a ban would erase all the work we have collectively done". this shows that the author believes that implementing a ban would have negative impacts on the livelihoods of those that depend on the usage of e-scooters for their employment, savings costs for families and efficiency in deliveries. the author believes that if those people relying on e-scooters to work became unable to use e-scooters, their quality of life would drastically decrease as their main source of income depends on the frequent usage of e-scooters. instead, the author believes that the Singapore government could take less drastic but equally strict rules on the usgae of e-scooters, such as enforcing the need for a license and educational awareness programmes to deter unsafe usage of e-scooters. therefore, i believe that the author made this comment to persuade the Singapore government to implement other equally strict measures on the usage of e-scooters rather than immediately enforcing a ban on them.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince the public and maybe the government from fully banning e-scooters off footpaths by stating the many benefits e-scooters have and giving some suggestions on how to avoid e-scooter accidents. From the line, "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done." implies that the author is saying the ban made by the government can have many negative effects too, which is effectively persuading the government to think twce about their decision. In addition, to soften the blow not taking action, the author then states that "In the short term, [we could instead] increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs. E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely.", by saying this, he is trying to convince the government that there are other ways to prevent e-scooter accidents rather than permanently ban them from footpaths .

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to persuade the Singapore government to not ban the use of e-scooters in Singapore. From Source B, it says "increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation". This shows that the author does not want the ban as e-scooters bring many benefits to Singaporeans. Hence, the author made this comment to persuade the Singaporean government to not ban the use of e-scooters in Singapore.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince the general public that the ban of e-scooters on public paths is unbenficial to the people and is undoing all the hard work of the people to improve quality of life. The author wants to spur the general public to take a stand against this ban, which is seen through the author stating that the ban would "erase all the work that we have collectively done" and that instead of doing this , we could "increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs", citing that "E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely". The author gives the public an alternative solution to further persuade them that this ban on e-scooters is unnecessary.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to reveal to Singaporeans that e-scooters are actually an integral part of Singapore’s employment life. This is to convince the readers to get them to disagree with the law? This can be seen through "We have been reaping the benefits of e-scooters in terms of increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation." This is to convince the readers that e-scooters actually have more benefits than people say they have.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to persuade the Singapore government to  remove the ban of e-scooters respectfully.  This is so that the Singapore government will consider removing the e-scooter ban on footpaths and instead of approving the idea of the ban on e-scooters. This can be seen in Source B which suggests "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done." This shows that the author is disapproving about the ban by implying that the work/efforts of creating e-scooters would be wasted. The author seemed to be a worker of creating e-scooters and favour e-scooters. it shows that the source seemed to be in a professional tone as like in clearly making a statement on behalf of the people who likes e-scooters or workers who are in that particular industry. the evidence state, " [we could instead] increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs" The "we" shows that she is not only one who disapprove the idea of the ban of e-scooters. The author seemed to be updated with the issues regarding e-scooters. That source were made after the ban was first announced. This could have influenced the author's perspective as she made a statement unhesistantly when she likes e-scooters. The author's main point is that she disapprove of ban on e-scooters by giving suggestions such as  "increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs. E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely."

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to convince the Singapore Government and citizens that the benefits of e-scooters outweigh the risks they possess. This is so that the ban on e-scooters would be lifted. This can be seen in Source B where the author wrote "[we could instead] increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs. E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely." This shows that the author is suggesting ways to improve the use of E-scooters so that the ban might be lifted

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince other Singaporeans to not support this ban. The source states that "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done" and that "E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely.". This means that the author thinks that implementing the ban would be unbeneficial and detrimental to the people, and let all the efforts the community had put in go to waste. He thinks that there are other better ways that could help solve the problem instead. Thus, he hopes that Singaporeans would not support this ban.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to convince the government not to ban e-scooters on footpaths in Singapore. The author hopes to send across the message that although it does cause many injuries, they still had many benefits and the author hopes to get the response that people will be more understanding of the situation and the ban could hopefully be lifted. This can be seen when the author states that 'Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done' and that 'E-scooter users are willing to go for courses on how to use the e-scooter safely.' This shows us that the author feels that implementing a ban would just be harmful instead of beneficial to Singapore and that e-scooter users would be willing to go for courses so they  could improve on the way they use e-scooters so that it could be more beneficial to Singapore instead of causing more harm.

# data[].attributes.body
the author made this comment in an attempt to convince the government not to ban the use of e-sooters on footpaths. in source b, the author states that e-scooters are indeed very beneficial and the government "could instead increase controls and accountability via licensing and educational awareness programs". this suggests that the author believes that the benefits that e-scooters bring about outweigh the disadvantages such as being a fire hazard, and should be closely monitored instead of simply being banned. the author is suggesting that there are other ways to control this situation of e-scooters being a hazard. by making this comment, the author wishes to convince the government that e-scooters do have useful benefits and thus should not be banned, by giving suggestions on how to ensure that the usage of e-scooters is safe.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to criticize the Singaporean government. This is so as to convince the citizens that that placing a ban on e-scooters was unwise. This can be seen from "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done." In this source, the author says that we have profited off from e-scooters, and placing a ban would counter these benefits. This tells me that the author is not in agreement of the ban that was placed on e-scooters and this source is to criticize the Singaporean government on their actions.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to convince the government to not ban the use of e-scooters. Source B states that, "Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done." . This statement suggests the negative outcomes of banning the use of e-scooters. This is the author trying to convince the government to not ban the use of
e-scooters.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment to the Singapore Government [AUDIENCE] to convince [PURPOSE] them to not implement or remove the ban on e-scooters [OUTCOME] as the ban greatly affects them [ MESSAGE] . Source B states that 'Implementing a ban would erase all the work that we have collectively done.' This shows me that with the ban of e-scooters would waste what they have been able to do with an e-scooter as the e-scooter brought a lot of convienience, such as stated in the source, 'increasing employment, becoming more efficient in delivery solutions and even saving costs for family transportation.'  And without it things would not be as easy to do. [ SUPPORT ]

# data[].attributes.body
Here's the direct link to the SLS Lesson: Chapter 2.
https://vle.learning.moe.edu.sg/mrv/assignment/attempt/def071da-aa19-427d-ac9d-1dbc7607b98f

Chapter 2 Activity G Page 2 Qn 2

# data[].attributes.body
Study Source B. Why did the author make this comment? Explain your answer.

Check that your corrected answers have all the following components:
1. Purpose verb
2. Audience
3. Message
4. Outcome
5. Support

# data[].attributes.headline
If you are still feeling lost, consider this format when attempting your corrections.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you are still feeling lost, consider this format when attempting your corrections.

# data[].attributes.body
The author made this comment in order to [phrase as reason] _____[P] ________ [A] that ___________________________ [M] This is so that __________ [O]. This can be seen in Source B which suggests ______________ [S]