# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense because Steve's story is plausible, he also never agreed to take part in the crime. Steve was not on the scene of the crime when the crime happened, therefore he shouldn't be charged with murder. Petrocelli made it seem like Steve's character was irrelevant when really it was important because a good, honest person should be looked at as that type of person. Following the rule of innocent until proven guilty.

# data[].attributes.headline
Lydia -- Who do you agree with - the defense attorneys or Petrocelli? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Lydia -- Who do you agree with - the defense attorneys or Petrocelli? 

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorneys because in previous chapters the others have admitted to being a part of the robbery. Since they have done this they could be trying to lie about some of the facts and what exactly happened during the robbery. Petrocelli and the others could be trying to make Steve look guilty based on the events by lying or not being completely honest. They could want the jury to see Steve as guilty and not have a completely honest mindset either. We also never know for sure if he agreed to take part in the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense i think they are just saying what they have been told to say. Because the only reason "bobo" said that he was in the store and that king was with him was because he was told too. I also hate mrs. petrocelli cause she is annoying

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorneys more. You shouldn't take everything a known and convicted criminal says as the truth. They could just be saying what could make them look better, and not exactly the truth. They could just be trying to push the blame onto someone else so they don't look as bad. Also, Petrocelli was claiming things about how a person's past doesn't decide who they are in the future as a person, which it definitely does. I personally believe Steve's story, and the positive things that people have said about him.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorneys because I believe the criminals are attempting to have the blame on someone else and try to not get a long sentence. I also believe that Steve is innocent. There is also more things showing Steve innocent way more than being guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense because criminals would most likely try to put the blame on someone else to receive a lighter sentence in return.

# data[].attributes.body
i belive the defense becuase the prosocuters are just taking what they said and saying its false and he looks inocent

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorneys because I believe that Steve is innocent. Everyone is just trying to get out of jail or a lesser sentence by blaming anyone but themselves. There are more things showing that Steve is innocent rather than guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorney because I don't think you can completely decide who's innocent and who's guilty just based off of what criminals said, and I think they are just trying to put the blame on someone else to get someone else in trouble so they have to get a shorter sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorney because I believe that Steve is innocent. They are believing everyone else but Steve just because he is in jail the other people are just blaming Steve to get the blame off of themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the degense attorneys. This is because the criminals could just be saying things to blame what happened on someone else so that they can get a shorter sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't agree with Petrocelli since she was being pushy and saying that the past of people or what they did doesn't dictate what they will say, even though it certainly does. She also comes up to the conclusion that Steve gave the all-clear sign which wasn't proven or made clear. I agree with the Defense attorneys mostly since they give a good clear reason to doubt Bobo and Osvaldo

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attourney becuase other criminals would just be trying to put the blame in somebody else rather than them take thier own punishment. There are more people than can say that Steve is a good and respectful young man just trying to get the truth out

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense because the criminals are just trying to lie to get out of the prison time so they blame someone that's innocent.

# data[].attributes.headline
    Kristlan Who  I agree with- The defense attorney 

# data[].attributes.subject
    Kristlan Who  I agree with- The defense attorney 

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorney because with the pictures shown he looks innocent and I believe his story. Steve really does seem innocent because the pictures provided made it look like he was just shopping for the candy, and then walking home. His story fits and the other two people involved already testified.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the defense more because the criminals are really just saying things to reduce their own sentences and they should be considered but not held over the evidence and statements of those who are not just out for themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the defense attorneys because I think Petrocelli is ignoring the obvious facts. Petrocelli is not talking about King's cousin. She is ignoring that the only witness did not see the murder or the robbery because she was hiding in the bathroom.