# data[].attributes.body
Ryan's side won because they merged conventional debate topics with personal stories. This is a new type of debate known as Louisville style, and it's having a major impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan's team won because they used both traditional research and personal anecdotes to persuade people. They knew how to connect on an emotional level with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
The judge believes that leveraging personal tales in argument is vital, but they also want to see some normal debate abilities. Ryan's squad won due to a combination of emotions and facts.

# data[].attributes.body
Expanding on the emotional aspect, Ryan's team won by weaving a captivating emotional narrative, illustrating the power of relatable stories in producing a memorable and powerful debate.

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan's team breaking historical barriers demonstrates the continuous impact of performance debate, indicating a larger acceptance of varied methods within the competitive debate community.

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan's team's success can be linked to their strategic agility, which allows them to effortlessly include both traditional and performance elements into their arguments while navigating the changing circumstances of the debate area.

# data[].attributes.body
The judgment of the judge represents a change toward realizing the shifting environment, recognizing the significance of diversity, and welcoming various methods that go beyond traditional conventions.

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan's championship final argument stressed debate as a welcome arena for everyone, going beyond specific themes to address the general topic of inclusiveness among the debate community.

# data[].attributes.body
The triumph of Ryan's side highlights the growing importance of emotional intelligence in argument, demonstrating an understanding that personal ties and relatability can have a substantial impact on the judge's judgment.

# data[].attributes.body
The judge's argument demonstrates an understanding of the continuing dispute among the debate community.

# data[].attributes.body
Showcasing the potential of performance debate to generate a more engaging and meaningful dialog.

# data[].attributes.body
Purple- Judges Decision

Red- Anything relating to impact of Ryans win

Green- Ryan and his teams strategies

Blue- Louisville style debate impact

# data[].attributes.body
The community's reaction to Ryan's team's triumph reflects the ongoing influence of performance debate, raising concerns about the changing nature of competitive arguing.

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan's team's success can be ascribed to their ability to produce a memorable and emotionally charged debating experience that adheres to the Louisville style ideals.

# data[].attributes.body
The Louisville approach to discussion stresses a more open and varied approach. It gives a forum for people from all walks of life to express themselves genuinely by incorporating personal experiences, storytelling, and alternative argumentation approaches.

# data[].attributes.body
Traditional, restrictive frameworks have historically dominated debate. The Louisville style disrupts these standards, tearing down obstacles that may have prevented people from fully participating in the sport. This deviation from tradition opens up fresh opportunities for participation.

# data[].attributes.body
The result is a redesigned evaluation framework. Unlike traditional debates, which emphasize logic and evidence, the Louisville style encourages judges to consider emotional resonance, relatability, and the genuineness of debaters' stories.

# data[].attributes.body
This not only makes debates more interesting for the audience, but it also adds a human element to the discussion. Beyond the competition, the impact fosters a sense of closeness and understanding between debaters.

# data[].attributes.body
The Louisville debate method encourages debates to go beyond the current topic at hand. It recognizes that debates within the debate space can include broader cultural and social factors that contribute to a deeper comprehension of the topics of discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Which in turn will make debate in general more relevant in our society

# data[].attributes.body
This was super creative

# data[].attributes.body
Was truly a turning point in the debate community