# data[].attributes.body
In the past D2L has been pushed to meet the eLO target numbers that resulted in our TELT funding.

# data[].attributes.body
I am concerned that teachers will feel that their choices are becoming more limited with LMS that they are free to choose to use. Will we continue to support other LMS?

# data[].attributes.body
Not comfortable with plan to have mandatory 4 courses in secondary in Ontario

# data[].attributes.body
Moving a system to a tool it needs to be stable. Downtimes should be outside the school hours.

# data[].attributes.body
Portfolio app is cool and has potential. Need to be connected to student not course(s) and there needs to be more than two interfaces (i.e., primary, and normal)

# data[].attributes.body
The platform is so robust that it loses something in its intuitiveness compared to other LMS that colleagues are having a great deal of success with. Even if they like the assessment side of things having to move to another less easy tool may be frustrating

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder about the reception and feedback from Elementary teachers. How are their needs within D2L different from Secondary and being adressed?

# data[].attributes.body
What are ways/examples of best practices?

# data[].attributes.body
How do we model student empowered models of learning and student voice in assessment in a LMS (not really an issue with brightspace but the concern with any Virtual Learning Enviornment as they were designed for distance educatiion).

# data[].attributes.body
Only collects so is ok for gathering evidence, but to tag/organize etc, it has to be done in the D2L web environment which may be hard for younger students, and even some teachers

# data[].attributes.body
We created 2/3 self guided MOOCs for professional learning. Not much pick up from staff. Perhaps start with NTIP where there is eagerness/funding.

# data[].attributes.body
I have some concerns about the interface as it feels less dynamic than an LMS like GC. Aside from assessment & security, I wonder what the impetus for switching from another LMS like GC would be? We recently migrated to GC from Outlook from MySpace. A lot of change in a short time and I am not sure of the motivators for change. GC has worked well at elementary level.

# data[].attributes.body
With what age groups and how often has the platform been tested in schools. Successes? Failures?

# data[].attributes.body
Just a capturing tool - glitchy with MY DEVICE option. Is there another app that will make access easier for MS/HS

# data[].attributes.body
What support is D2L able to provide to help onboard Peel teachers?

# data[].attributes.body
In the past they have chosen Peel to feature - highlight tools seeing mock ups and even interactive elements but never got to see them in place (e.g. badging & gamification- live now 4 years later) or wanted additional funding.

# data[].attributes.body
In theory, I find the idea of having a unified LMS in which assessment is embedded promising as with Google Classroom, I always kept the workflow separate from the assessment pieces and had to use additional tools to connect the two.