# data[].attributes.body
For me the biggest challenge is in using letter grades. I would like to see how narrative grades could work. Perhaps, the whole class could be filmed discussing their colleagues work in the class. And as professor, I could continue do an exit interview of sorts as the final grade

# data[].attributes.body
Organizational Analysis Preview Presentation/Dialogues

# data[].attributes.body
1. Students create rubrics for assignments - based on the learning outcomes for the specific course and guided by the mission the school.

2. Notice, Value, Question Model for Review

What did you notice about the assignment?

What did you value about the assignment?

What questions are you left with after completing the assignment?

3. Guided peer evaluation, with multiple opportunities for re-submission

# data[].attributes.body
How do I align program, state, federal and individual course requirements for evaluation? I struggle with this and I need to really focus on evaluation, as I myself have never been properly evaluated. This is where I need to focus my time and energy, as much as I myself resist this notion

# data[].attributes.headline
Small group members name one or two positive qualities that each participant drew on in each stage of the project: conceptualization, construction and implementation. Each person is given this list of the positive qualites that others saw in them. Knowing they will need to do this changes the group dynamic, helping them watch for and appreciate the best in each other.

# data[].attributes.subject
Small group members name one or two positive qualities that each participant drew on in each stage of the project: conceptualization, construction and implementation. Each person is given this list of the positive qualites that others saw in them. Knowing they will need to do this changes the group dynamic, helping them watch for and appreciate the best in each other.

# data[].attributes.headline
I ask my students to formulate research queries individually, then write them on the white board in the classroom. We then evaluate them as a group, identifying what works, what doesn't, where we see commonalities and differences. It makes students more comfortable with their own skills when they realize that no one does it horribly wrongly AND no one does it perfectly.

# data[].attributes.subject
I ask my students to formulate research queries individually, then write them on the white board in the classroom. We then evaluate them as a group, identifying what works, what doesn't, where we see commonalities and differences. It makes students more comfortable with their own skills when they realize that no one does it horribly wrongly AND no one does it perfectly.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer evaluation of each other's work, where everyoe is working on a similar project and with a smilar rubric or set of criteria for evaluation. They review and advise each other on the paper writing process, which both gves them the opportunity to revise n a variety of points of view as well as push the students to critically evaluate the process from the point of view I will be adopting to evaluate their work.

# data[].attributes.headline
There are small assignments that build upon each other, the students will get feedback, and revise and build.

# data[].attributes.subject
There are small assignments that build upon each other, the students will get feedback, and revise and build.

# data[].attributes.body
Hello