# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
While ePortfolios might be described as digital collections of artifacts, a good academic ePortfolio also represents a process - specifically, the process of generating new or deeper learning by reflecting on one's existing learning.

So what is an ePortfolio?

An academic ePortfolio is a digital collection created by a student of their course-related work, like essays, posters, photographs, videos, and artwork; academic ePortfolios can also capture other aspects of a student's life, such as volunteer experiences, employment history, extracurricular activities, and more. In other words, ePortfolios document and make visible student learning. But a good ePortfolio should be more than just a collection of products.

A good ePortfolio is both about being a product (a digital collection of artifacts) and a process (of reflecting on those artifacts and what they represent). Like a Learning Management System (LMS), ePortfolios exist online and support student learning. They differ from Learning Management Systems in two key ways: namely, ownership and control. In a university course, the Learning Management System is "owned" and controlled or managed by the instructor who decides who has access, what tools are turned on or off, and so on. With an ePortfolio, the student is in charge: the student decides who can view the ePortfolio, what artifacts get added, how it is designed, and so on. Typically, a student loses access to the LMS when courses end; in contrast, ePortfolios remain the student's property after finishing university.

The learning theory behind ePortfolios

According to Basken (2008), ePortfolios "are a way to generate learning as well as document learning" (Basken, 2008). Both generating learning and documenting or recording learning are important, but the process of generating learning sometimes gets overlooked. ePortfolios generate learning because they provide an opportunity and virtual space for students to critically assess their academic work, to reflect on that work, and make connections among different courses, assignments, and other activities, such as work experience, extracurricular pursuits, volunteering opportunities, and more. ePortfolios are effective learning tools because they support students' own knowledge construction, make otherwise invisible aspects of the learning process visible, and place agency in the hands of students, which fosters learners' motivation.

Constructing knowledge

ePortfolios fall within a learning theory known as social constructivism, which proposes, in part, that learning happens most effectively when students construct systems of knowledge for themselves, rather than simply having information presented. Social constructivism also proposes that another determinant of effective learning is that it happens in a social context - that is, we construct our knowledge through dialogue and interactions with others. With ePortfolios, the process of reflection originates as a solo activity, but becomes social through a feedback loop, as the student's instructor, peers, mentors, and even family members respond to and provide commentary on those reflections. Making and then sharing an ePortfolio with others is somewhat like telling a story: the story of one's learning journey.

Making learning visible

Bass and Eynon (2009) describe the process of critical reflection involved in the creation of effective ePortfolios as one that makes "invisible learning" visible. By invisible learning, they mean two things.

First, Bass and Eynon refer to the intermediate steps that occur whenever a student, or any person, is attempting to learn something or do something. It's easy to focus exclusively on the final product (such as an essay), and to overlook the stages of learning and doing that preceded that product. By reflecting on these invisible stages, students can learn more: they can learn more deeply, they can learn more about how they learn, and they can learn how to do better the next time.

The other aspect of invisible learning is learning that goes "beyond the cognitive to include the affective, the personal, and issues of identity" (Bass & Eynon, 2009). In other words, the process of learning something doesn't involve just the rational mind; rather, feelings, personality, and sense of self are all involved - sometimes facilitating that learning process, and sometimes hindering it. By reflecting on those affective, personal, and self-identity factors, students can develop meta-cognitive skills that can enhance their learning.

Fostering student agency

Finally, because ePortfolios are a student-centered activity - one in which the student is free to choose what artifacts are included, and is free to reflect on the process of their learning - they foster engagement and motivation (Tosh, Penny Light, Fleming, & Haywood, 2005). Research on student engagement with learning suggests that when students perceive that they have choices in how to learn they are more engaged and motivated to move beyond simple information acquisition to try to gain an understanding of the subject (Entwistle & Karagiannopoulou 2014; Kuh et al., 2005). ePortfolios offer this opportunity for learner control and can support or promote deep learning as students are able to make connections between the learning that occurs in different contexts. Indeed, it is this recognition that learning occurs beyond the classroom that makes ePortfolios attractive to many educators.

Types of ePortfolios

Some educators see ePortfolios primarily as a tool for generating new or deeper learning while others view them as a tool for assessment (of students and, by extension, of university programs). Barrett (2008) described the difference in perspective this way: "There's a major tension right now between student-centered and institution-centered ePortfolios." Institution-centered ePortfolios, she adds, are driven by "assessment of learning." Student-centered ePortfolios, on the other hand, are driven by "assessment for learning," which refers to academic assignments that fulfill the traditional role of assessing student learning while at the same time providing an opportunity for students to learn as they complete the assessment.

Even within the student-centered approach to ePortfolios, it's possible to classify different kinds of ePortfolios based upon the purpose of the ePortfolio for the student. Different organizations use different names with some distinctions between what the institution or research group wants to emphasize. LaGuardia Community College's ePortfolio initiative, for example, distinguishes between assessment ePortfolios, where the audience is internal to the institution and the goal is to support institutional outcomes assessment, learning ePortfolios, where the audience is students themselves, and the goal is helping students examine and reflect on their learning, and Career/Transfer ePortfolios, where the audience is external, and the goal is to provide students with a tool for showcasing their achievements to employers or transfer institutions.

Best practices for instructors

When ePortfolios have broader institutional uptake, students will be encouraged in all of their courses to use their ePortfolio, and to reflect on and make connections between all of their courses and academic experiences. For this reason, ePortfolios are most effective when they are established as an institution- or program-wide initiative, but they can still be successful at the individual course level. To ensure this success, it's important to observe a number of best practices.

Explain the benefits of ePortfolios to students

ePortfolios can: help learners develop new or deeper learning, which results in higher grades; help learners develop a better sense of themselves as students and as individuals; be shared with friends and family members; and showcase learners' achievements when they are applying for a job.

Establish clear expectations

Explain to your students what you expect them to do in their ePortfolios. Learners may have difficulty understanding the need for them to reflect on their work and the need for them to make connections between different courses and experiences.

Provide numerous examples of successful ePortfolios created by students

Direct students to examples of effective ePortfolios created by Waterloo students, like Inkless, a project-focused ePortfolio created by Mechatronics Engineering student Kevin Liu or this ePortfolio by Knowledge Integration student Danielle Cruz that features "course skills spotlights" and more.

Scaffold student learning

Help students start small: ask them to choose just one artifact (such as an essay) and have them reflect on the challenges they had to address as they wrote their essay. Or, have the students select two assignments from different courses, and have them reflect on how each of those assignments helped them to better understand the other assignment.

Walk the talk

Create an ePortfolio for yourself and share it with your students. You'll better understand the challenges and benefits of maintaining an ePortfolio, and it will also persuade students that it is a useful endeavour.

Tie ePortfolios to assessment

Maintaining an ePortfolio demands a significant amount of time and energy from students, and they will resent it if their time and energy are not reflected in their final grade. If ePortfolios are merely an optional assignment that is encouraged but not required, most students will not undertake one.

Make it social

Integrate viewing and commenting on other students' ePortfolios as part of the assessment. You could, for example, have a link to each student's blog in the online space that your course has in your university's LMS. Additionally, you could create a discussion forum in that online space where students make helpful and encouraging comments on one another's ePortfolios. The ePortfolios, then, become an integral part of the online community of students. Adam Rothman, of Georgetown University, refers to this approach as the hub-and-spoke model.

Assessment of ePortfolios

Because ePortfolios require a significant investment of time and energy from students, it is important that they be assessed carefully, and that the assessment contributes in a substantial way to a student's final grade in a course. However, there are challenges to assessing ePortfolios: how, for example, does one evaluate the quality of a student's "reflections"? Furthermore, if students come to see their ePortfolios as "just another assignment," then they will not engage with it in an authentic way and it may become just another "hoop" for them to jump through. Helen Barret (2005) suggests that "high stakes assessment and accountability are killing ePortfolios as a reflective tool to support deep learning." A balance needs to be found, one that strives to help students appreciate the genuine benefits that they will experience by developing an ePortfolio that captures their work and personal reflections, but which also acknowledges that assessing ePortfolios is not a merely "subjective" matter. In other words, ePortfolios can be personal in nature, and yet still assessable by objective standards.

Perhaps the best way to overcome these assessment challenges, while still ensuring that students benefit from their ePortfolios, is to assess ePortfolios with a rubric (such as this rubric developed by the University of Wisconsin). Furthermore, consistent formative feedback, either left by the instructor or by other students, helps learners maintain motivation to work on their ePortfolio, while also providing feedback to assist in subsequent reflections or other additions to their work. In this case, there is no need to provide a grade for the work they have contributed - scaffolded feedback to guide them in their learning journey can be very beneficial.

References

Barrett, H. (2008). Balancing "eportfolio as test" with "eportfolio as story." Presented at Making Connections conference.

Basken, P. (2008, April). Electronic portfolios may answer calls for more accountability. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Bass, R. & Eynon, B. (2009). Capturing the visible evidence of invisible learning. The Academic Commons.

Entwistle, N. & Karagiannopoulou, E. (2014). Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback. Kreber, C., Anderson, C., Entwistle, N. & McArthur, J. (eds.). Edinburgh University Press, pp. 75-98.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Tosh, D., Penny Light, T., Fleming, K., & Haywood, J. (2005). Engagement with electronic portfolios: Challenges from the student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3).

Resources

CTE resources

CTE teaching tips

Other resources

Catalyst for Learning: ePortfolio Resources and Research

LaGuardia Community College's ePortfolio initiative

Cambridge, D., B. Cambridge and K. Yancey (2009). Electronic Portfolios 2.0: Emergent Research on Implementation and Impact. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Cambridge, D. (2010). ePortfolios for Lifelong Learning and Assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Chen, H.L. & Penny Light, T. (2010). Electronic Portfolios and Student Success: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Learning. Washington: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Eynon, B. (2009, January). "It helped me see a new me:" ePortfolio, learning, and change at LaGuardia Community College. Academic Commons.

Peet, M., Lonn, S., Gurin, P., Boyer, K. P., Matney, M., Marra, T., Simone Himbeault, T., & Daley, A. (2011). Fostering integrative knowledge through eportfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 11-31.

Penny Light, T., Chen, H.L., & Ittelson, J.C. (2011). Documenting Learning with ePortfolios: A Guide for College Instructors. Jossey-Bass.

This Creative Commons license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon our work non-commercially, as long as they credit us and indicate if changes were made. Use this citation format: ePortfolios Explained: Theory and Practice. Centre for Teaching Excellence, University of Waterloo.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ePortfolios Explained: Theory and Practice | Centre for Teaching Excellence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
While ePortfolios might be described as digital collections of artifacts, a good academic ePortfolio also represents a process - specifically, the process of generating new or deeper learning by reflecting on one's existing learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Update: I've added a post to this padlet wall with links to ePortfolios and Learning Portfolios. I'm parking the big piece of work, below, for now, on foot of our recent meeting.

.....

Previously: Hi, I'm spending a few weeks reviewing the year 1 students' websites started in semester 1 with a view to giving them a plan and support resources to organise and develop these as ePortfolios they will have for the rest of the programme.

It's a squeeze, so it'll take me until Review Week to complete the review and recommendations and basic things to be implemented then by students.

Update: knocked this on the head after discussions in review week to pick up again later; returned to the idea at the end of academic year. Intention now to start in earnest in 2017-2018.

# data[].attributes.headline
Digital Pedagogy - About ePortfolio via MLA Commons

# data[].attributes.subject
Digital Pedagogy - About ePortfolio via MLA Commons

# data[].attributes.body
If you look at just one overview... suggesting you make it this one:

Electronic portfolios often are introduced by way of a reflective letter or essay contextualizing and introducing the contents, which provides students with the opportunity to provide a personal account of their own learning. To prepare for writing this text, students frequently engage in other kinds of reflective writing throughout the term so that reflection becomes both a habit of mind and a social practice: for example articulating prior knowledge situating their learning; synthesizing their learning within a course and connecting to learning in other contexts; and assessing how well they are doing in the course. In such cases, the learning from a given course or program can be reflectively integrated with learning from other contexts, with students speaking with authority as “agents of their own learning” (Yancey 1998).
LINK HERE

# data[].attributes.headline
EXAMPLE:   Cork Institute of Technology (IRL)

# data[].attributes.subject
EXAMPLE:   Cork Institute of Technology (IRL)

# data[].attributes.body
Ed4Life and ePortfolio Development

CIT offers full-time, part-time and specialist courses in Art, Business and Humanities, Computing and Information Technology, Engineering, Media, Music, Nautical Studies, and Science.
LINK HERE

# data[].attributes.headline
EXAMPLE:   Advocates in Primary & Post-Primary (IRL)

# data[].attributes.subject
EXAMPLE:   Advocates in Primary & Post-Primary (IRL)

# data[].attributes.body
PDST Technology in Education, INVENT, Dublin City University.
Promotes and supports the integration of ICT in teaching and learning in first and second level schools and is managed by the Dublin West Education Centre.
LINK HERE

# data[].attributes.headline
EXAMPLE:   The Case for Post-Primary Schools (IRL)

# data[].attributes.subject
EXAMPLE:   The Case for Post-Primary Schools (IRL)

# data[].attributes.body
Schools working with the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment on the development of the guidelines have identified portfolio assessment as an approach that is well suited to the task and the student group in question. The evidence of learning is assembled over three years of Junior Cycle and it is record it the student’s portfolio.
LINK HERE

# data[].attributes.headline
EXAMPLE:   The Case for Undergraduate Learning (USA)

# data[].attributes.subject
EXAMPLE:   The Case for Undergraduate Learning (USA)

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of prioritising e-portfolio technology, folio thinking addresses the adoption and integration of e-portfolio praxis in existing contexts as a critical first step toward a successful implementation that can lead to wider scalability and longer-term sustainability of the e-portfolio initiative. LINK HERE

# data[].attributes.headline
EXAMPLE:   Auburn University Alabama (USA)

# data[].attributes.subject
EXAMPLE:   Auburn University Alabama (USA)

# data[].attributes.body
Welcome to the Auburn University ePortfolio Examples page. Below are links to ePortfolios from Auburn students and alumni. Here you will find a variety of ePortfolios that include thoughtful reflections and relevant artifacts that showcase student learning to audiences outside the University.  LINK HERE

# data[].attributes.body
Research shows that students at all levels see assessment as something that is done to them on their classwork by someone else. Beyond "percent correct," assigned letter grades, and grammatical or arithmetic errors, many students have little knowledge of what is involved in evaluating their classwork.

Portfolios can provide structure for involving students in developing and understanding criteria for good efforts, in coming to see the criteria as their own, and in applying the criteria to their own and other students' work.

Research also shows that students benefit from an awareness of the processes and strategies involved in writing, solving a problem, researching a topic, analyzing information, or describing their own observations.

Without instruction focused on the processes and strategies that underlie effective performance of these types of work, most students will not learn them or will learn them only minimally. And without curriculum-specific experience in using these processes and strategies, even fewer students will carry them forward into new and appropriate contexts.

Portfolios can serve as a vehicle for enhancing student awareness of these strategies for thinking about and producing work--both inside and beyond the classroom.

Source for the paragraphs above:
http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/OR/ConsumerGuides/classuse.html

More general examples of ePortfolios / Learning Portfolios
https://www.ccny.cuny.edu/cps/student-e-portfolios

# data[].attributes.body
New Research Journal on current use and purpose of ePortfolios by AAEEBL 'Authentic, Experiential and Evidence Based Learning' (Issue 1 Nov 2016)

# data[].attributes.body
Using wix.com to make ePortfolios. Most our current first years have opted for Wix.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A Step-by-Step Guide for Using Wix to Make an ePortfolio

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Wix is a free platform for building websites. It can also be used by students to create an ePortfolio. This video shows the steps to do so (it does not have audio -- all the steps are shown visually).

# data[].attributes.body
Overview of purpose and value of ePortfolio in Individual, College & Work Contexts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.entities[].name
National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.entities[].name
Center for Engaged Learning Research Seminars

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
George Kuh on ePortfolio as High-Impact Practice

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
George Kuh, Director of the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, discusses ePortfolio as a high-impact practice (HIP). On July 25, 2016, at the Center for Engaged Learning's Conference on Excellent Practices in Mentoring Undergraduate Research, Kuh identified ePortfolio as a new, eleventh entry on the list of high-impact practices often attributed to him.

# data[].attributes.body
Irish support 'hub' for ePortfolio development. Established across 3rd Level Sector including DIT. General one-stop-shop type resource. Decent set of what? why? how? videos.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn everything you need to know to create and incorporate an ePortfolio that will act as your electronic portfolio of evidence on your learning journey.