# data[].attributes.body
I believe we shouldn't store nuclear waste in the desert because there isn't actual evidence to make sure the waste doesn't leak, our technology isn't advanced enough and there are a lot of troublesome accidents that happen.

# data[].attributes.body
- until a container that has been created and tested has been made, it is 'irresponsible' to continue to make containers to store them in.
- the time nuclear waste has to be isolated for is extremely high. Not a single one of our political or social institutions have 'remained free' for as long as 1,000 years. So there is no way to ensure the stability for that long
- it is said that there is a "perfect" record of no major accidents while transporting nuclear waste. - but a lot of troublesome incidents have. People believe that the percentage of transportation accidents is low, bu that is highly uncertain. A number of five nuclear waste transportation accidents will occur by 1990, rising to 27 accidents by the year 2000.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Radioactive waste: Dumped and Forgotten - Chris busby, John Large, Greenpeace 2013

# data[].attributes.body
- disposing high-level nuclear waste doesn't compare to the danger we already live with. many hazardous materials are already on earth like: poisonous gases, natural disasters and man-made structures pose a threat if they would fail
- the critics that are responsible for potential risks exaggerate the outcome. finding a strong and permanent method to dispose small quantities is so low it does't really cause a problem.
- 5,000+ fuel elements have already been sipped over in the past 20 years is special containers without causing any release of harmful radiation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Atoms made from Uranium are spilt, and they release energy that makes the fuel hot. The heat turns the water into steam.

2. The turbine is spun by the steam.

3.  A generator is spun from the turbine and electricity is made.

4. The electricity then goes up to produce the correct voltage at the transformers

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-17/barndioota-nuclear-waste-site-planning-outrages-locals/9456052
The issues the author brings up is:
if either Kimba, on the Eyre Peninsula and at Barndioota, south of Lake Torrens, near Hawker is chosen it will become a permanent place for nuclear waste that is low-level, and will hold in the meantime intermediate-level waste. The government is planning to bring "stuff" that's temporarily stored somewhere else to a brand new site. Bruce McCleary stated that 'nuclear waste facilities could be tourist destinations', meaning that they are associating nuclear waste and tourism together. The Barndioota site, and the entire Flinders Ranges is being considered as 'seismically active'. Hence, why the locals are angry because it's unsafe ad according to Chris Vonderborch 'it was the worst place to put a nuclear waste facility'.

# data[].attributes.body
-Radioactivity: radioactivity is to release elementary particles that is caused from unstable nuclei disintegration
-Nuclear waste: is the waste from radioactive material
-Radioisotopes: an isotope that is radioactive
-Nuclear power: a power created from a nuclear reactor
-Half-life: is the time it takes for the radioactivity from a specified isotope to half its original value