# data[].attributes.body
They had a nice clear paragraph and it was right to the point , they sited numbers from the graph

# data[].attributes.body
I like your explanation because it really shows how you got the answer, it had good vocabulary and easy to understand

# data[].attributes.headline
This response is very clear and gets to the point. It puts a lot of detail and the person answers the questions first then shows details supporting the claim. 

# data[].attributes.subject
This response is very clear and gets to the point. It puts a lot of detail and the person answers the questions first then shows details supporting the claim. 

# data[].attributes.body
This response is pretty clear. I like

# data[].attributes.body
We liked that they brought up multiple different supporting details

# data[].attributes.body
This person wrote  well because they talked about measures of center and using nice math vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.headline
The person has very good handwriting, and they use good math vocabulary.  The response was very descriptive and well written.  We like that they explain how they know that Carl was consistent.

# data[].attributes.subject
The person has very good handwriting, and they use good math vocabulary.  The response was very descriptive and well written.  We like that they explain how they know that Carl was consistent.

# data[].attributes.body
It was good to see that they used measure of center to support their opinion. They included the mean, MAD, range, etc. They compared the MAD and range to prove which person was more consistent.

# data[].attributes.body
This paragraph was overall well written. It included important math terms like MAD and ablsolute deviation.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that he did very well explaining what he thought and what he did, also he is doing well yea...

# data[].attributes.body
We think that there work is neat and organized along with there vocabulary and it gets the point across clearly and nicely.

# data[].attributes.body
They had good math vocabulary and they explained about what was going on in the data. They did a good job incorporating percentages! Good job!

# data[].attributes.body
This response is good becasue this response has good math vocabulary and he gets deep and explains on why carl is consistent

# data[].attributes.body
They were very concise and clear with their explanation

# data[].attributes.body
They used the mean absolute deviations to compare the scores and say how Carl was more consistent.

# data[].attributes.body
The response was very clear. Good that you talked about percentage in question 9.-Rishith

# data[].attributes.body
The person did well on question 8 because he/she did swell job using data and very accurate response.

# data[].attributes.body
We think they did well on explaining what was going on and it was very clear. They used key vocabulary like MAD, Range, consistency. They’re expintaion was very clear on the test to because they used the information that they had from the box and whisker plot.

# data[].attributes.body
We liked how you explained the median and MAD showing it’s veriability. Question 9, we liked how you explained the median and the percentages to show the values of their work.

# data[].attributes.body
This person communicated their thoughts clearly, using good vocabulary, and they mentioned MAD and range.

# data[].attributes.body
He/she could improve by organizing 9a so that we could see super clearly what he/she is saying!🤔

# data[].attributes.body
I thought it was really good because it used vocabulary. If the person who wrote this got a random hobo from the streets and showed them the problem, they would most likely understand the whole thing.

# data[].attributes.body
For one thing I love how neat the writing was and they throughly explaind why Carl’s scores were more consistent than bills

# data[].attributes.body
They compared Carl’s data with Bill’s data and they had a clear explanation on why Carl would be a better teammate.

# data[].attributes.body
This person is very organized and clear it puts a lot of evidence to it

# data[].attributes.body
They used key vocab and also they explained why Carl should be on their team and what they offer. They explained the use of each player and why they would have Carl as their player. To be honest this is well written and it uses the accuracy of explaining the problem out loud.

# data[].attributes.body
Its excplains why Carl is more concicstent using vocabolary like MAD and range. It also compars Carls and the other dudes mad and range.

# data[].attributes.body
I like the fact that they used advanced vocabulary correctly. Some examples are outliars, MAD, and range.

# data[].attributes.body
This person is very descriptive, uses good vocab, and included good explanations about how Carl is more consistent with MAD and range

# data[].attributes.body
I like how The information is very specific

# data[].attributes.body
This explanation shows a good in depth understanding of the question. I like how this student talked about the overall scores and the student used good vocab like range and MAD, and it shows that they understand how range and MAD show a consistency in a data table.

# data[].attributes.body
Very straight to the point, used excellent vocabulary, and great explanations, especially comparing the medians, ranges, and MADs

# data[].attributes.body
We like how the explanation is straight to the point and explains the problem well.

# data[].attributes.body
The explanation of each question was very descriptive and used a lot of vocabulary words.

# data[].attributes.body
They explained how Carl’s data’s if very different from bills data and they clearly explained their opinions and why they chose their answer