# data[].attributes.body
page 2 of Hempel

# data[].attributes.body
Reflection
the team experience in the evaluation assignment
1+1+1=6
Key Learning
1- The team get familiar to Hempel criteria as a useful tool of research evaluation
2- Developing reading critique skills is going to add in practice setting were the result does impact on work  done.
Page 1 Hempel

# data[].attributes.body
1 encourege deep approch of learning
2 work to gather as team increase learning aspect and sharing ideas
3 develop better understanding of critical reading, process and valuation
4 involve the team in critical reflection

# data[].attributes.body
Good using hample:
Identfy the performance
Help 2evaluate the process and find out the strenghth and weekness
Help 2improve or further improvement on the process
Help 2reform the performance

# data[].attributes.body
Process of working as a team, how our opinions changed, will we recommend the journal club at work

# data[].attributes.body
Key learning: what we learned from the article and the tool as a team

# data[].attributes.body
Critique:
- What we did?
- How did we answer in the Hempel criteria
- how good was the Hempel criteria, were there any weaknesses in this criteria
- in the disputed answers of Hempel criteria, why were there disagreements?

# data[].attributes.body
Weak points
1. Unclear source of their baseline data.
2. Data discripancy (62%. 57%).
3. Late involvment of sheaf residents.
4. Technical weakness of allowing doctors to skip reconciliation

# data[].attributes.body
Strong points of the articles.
1. Clear justification for the study improvement plan By A. JCIA requirement(one of international safty goals)
B. Poor compliance
2. Measurable objective. ( figure 2)
3. Testing the process in pediatric medical/ surgical unit before publication of the change.
4. Intervention #2 point 2 modifying the road map
5. Intervention #3 point 1 Saling the idea before start (pp presentation )