# data[].attributes.body
The ad is for Donald Trump. The ad says Hillary is demonizing hard working people.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
NEW DONALD TRUMP TV AD: “DEPLORABLE” Basket Of Deplorables

# data[].attributes.body
This cartoon is of a citizen and a criminal. The citizen gets his gun taken away and the criminal keeps it. It means just because you take away guns doesn't mean crime will stop.

# data[].attributes.body
This flyer is to vote for Trump for president.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about Hillary's hacked emails. Chelsea Clinton is frustrated about the emails. The Clinton family is frustrated and having troubles with the email topic.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Campaign Memo

Chelsea Clinton was alarmed.

During a 2011 trip to London representing her family's foundation, she got wind that people close to her father, Bill Clinton, had been lobbying members of Parliament for their own consulting clients, telling the officials they were calling "on behalf of President Clinton."

People she ran into whispered that the practice reminded them of former Prime Minister Tony Blair's sneered-upon post-Downing Street moneymaking ventures, a comparison that she said "would horrify my father," who had no idea his name was being used.

It was an eye-opening moment for Ms. Clinton, the only child of America's most famous political power couple, who was making a new name for herself as a defender of her father's legacy and, by extension, of her mother's coming second presidential campaign.

Her comments about her father's aides were revealed in the thousands of emails obtained by hackers and released by WikiLeaks over the past month. In addition to showing the internal strategizing, sniping and off-the-cuff commentary within Hillary Clinton's inner circle, the emails paint an unexpectedly detailed portrait of Mrs. Clinton's guarded and private daughter as she set about her goal, as she explained in one email, of "protecting my father and the nonprofit status of the foundation."

As Ms. Clinton asserted herself at the Clinton Foundation, eager to embrace her role as a board member and de facto heir, she became concerned about what seemed to her to be a lack of professionalism, as well as a blurring of the lines between the foundation's philanthropic activities and some of its leaders' business interests.

"My only objectives were to take stock, professionalize the foundation, build it for the future and build it in such a way that supported his work and my mom's," Ms. Clinton wrote in an email to her parents' closest advisers in November 2011, around the time she enlisted outside lawyers to examine the foundation's practices.

Though her housecleaning role had Hillary Clinton's tacit approval ("My mother strongly agreed," Ms. Clinton said in one email laying out proposed changes at the foundation), it proved not to be so simple. Her efforts set off a cascade of grievances, gossip and infighting as her ascendance diminished the longtime aides whom Mr. Clinton often referred to as surrogate children.

Ms. Clinton had already started to fret about the intermingling of foundation business with Teneo, the corporate consulting firm co-founded by Douglas J. Band, one of her father's closest aides. She suggested an audit of the charity and wrote that she was concerned that Teneo's principals had been "hustling" business at foundation gatherings.

Ms. Clinton, 31 at the time, had held various jobs, including positions at McKinsey & Company and Avenue Capital, a hedge fund owned by a major Clinton donor. She had degrees from Stanford, Oxford and Columbia but had not quite found a way to harness all of her academic wherewithal.

To Mr. Band, who had remained loyal to Mr. Clinton when others abandoned him post-impeachment, and who was instrumental in building the Clinton Foundation from scratch, Ms. Clinton seemed like a dilettante.

In response to the scrutiny, Mr. Band wrote a 13-page memo outlining how he had raised many millions of dollars for the foundation from Teneo's corporate clients, including Coca-Cola and Dow Chemical, without taking a fee. In the memo, which WikiLeaks released this week, Mr. Band also described arranging tens of millions of dollars in income for Mr. Clinton in the form of lucrative speeches and consulting arrangements, some of them from foundation donors.

"We have solicited and obtained, as appropriate, in-kind services for the president and his family - for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like," Mr. Band wrote.

The subtext was clear: Where Ms. Clinton saw a messy overlapping of business and charity that could haunt both of her parents, Mr. Band saw an ungrateful daughter who was naïve about how what he called "Bill Clinton Inc." made its money, and how her own expensive lifestyle was funded.

"I just don't think any of this is right and that we should be treated this way when no one else is, only because CVC has nothing better to do and need justify her existence," he wrote in one email, using the initials for Chelsea Victoria Clinton. Mr. Band, who had already planned to leave the foundation to focus on Teneo, often expressed frustration at the global charity's nepotism, pointing to Ms. Clinton's installing her friends in central roles.

Mr. Clinton, who does not use email, is almost absent in the battles happening beneath him, mentioned only in passing as "Dad" or by his initials, "WJC."

In another email, Ms. Clinton alludes to her father's feelings about the tensions at his foundation. "Doug apparently kept telling my dad I was trying to push him out, take over - and Dad kept asking him - has she said that to you? To anyone? She's never said it to me," she wrote. Mr. Band has said the exchange Ms. Clinton describes never happened.

If the emails show Ms. Clinton getting a crash course on the cutthroat world on the periphery of the Clinton family, they also show a young woman deeply devoted to her parents and very much her mother's daughter.

Ms. Clinton often gravitated to weighty policy discussions and interspersed statistics and SAT words into casual conversations.

Hours after the 2012 attack on the United States mission in Benghazi, Libya, she mused about the unrest in Egypt and Libya in a late-night email to her mother. "Such anathema to us as Americans - and a painful reminder of how long it took modernism to take root in the U.S., after the Enlightenment, the 14th, 15th, 16th, 19th amendments," she wrote. "Much to discuss when we talk, hopefully tomorrow?"

In another email addressed to "Dad, Mom," Ms. Clinton seemed apologetic, writing, "I hope this mini-behemoth is not rife with grammatical errors or inadvertent gaps; I am sorry if either true."

Coming from a unwitting celebrity whose adolescence unfolded, often unkindly, in the public eye, Ms. Clinton's emails - which she usually sent under one of two aliases, Diane Reynolds or Anna James - also reflect her life in a rarefied world.

"So nice from the Bon Jovis," she wrote to her mother in 2013, forwarding well-wishes from the rock star and his wife after Hillary Clinton had been hospitalized.

Last year, a close aide to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, wrote in a message to John D. Podesta, the Clinton adviser whose email account was later hacked, that the Clintons' house in Chappaqua, N.Y., had to be cleaned after an employee had a stomach virus so that Mrs. Clinton could babysit for Chelsea's daughter, Charlotte.

"Sanitizing the house all day so the baby can be there," Ms. Abedin wrote. "WJC was out buying clorox wipes yesterday!"

Even when emailing with her parents, Ms. Clinton was not shy about delivering blistering criticism, as when she wrote to them after a trip to Haiti, which the foundation was trying to help rebuild after the devastating 2010 earthquake. "To say I was profoundly disturbed by what I saw - and didn't see - would be an understatement," Ms. Clinton wrote to her mother. "The incompetence is mind numbing."

And in rare instances, her emails contained an emotion that she never publicly shows: despair.

"I am sure there are three sides as my grandmother would say - his, hers and the truth," Ms. Clinton wrote to Mr. Podesta amid the foundation disputes. "All of it makes me very sad."

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page A15 of the New York edition with the headline: Hacked Emails Reveal Image of Chelsea Clinton. Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Chelsea Clinton's Frustrations and Devotion Shown in Hacked Emails

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Campaign Memo Chelsea Clinton was alarmed. During a 2011 trip to London representing her family's foundation, she got wind that people close to her father, Bill Clinton, had been lobbying members of Parliament for their own consulting clients, telling the officials they were calling "on behalf of President Clinton."

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about Trump's golf course and if the Women's Open championship should be held there or not. Then Trump wants to redesign the last two holes and they get denied. Ferry Point has trash on it and is not clean.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
For anyone who predicted at the infancy of Donald J. Trump's presidential bid - so many mean, vengeful, condemning, deranged remarks ago - that the unhinged nature his candidacy revealed would surely serve his business interests poorly, the past few weeks have delivered gratifying confirmation. Residents of a row of Trump buildings on Riverside Boulevard on the Upper West Side are rallying to have the Republican nominee's name expunged from the facades. Simultaneously, protests have mounted against the United States Golf Association's plan to hold the United States Women's Open next year at a Trump course in New Jersey, where it was scheduled four years ago, on the theory that holding it there would be like celebrating Earth Day in a pesticide factory.

Jeffrey Sammons, a professor of history at New York University, has emerged as a particularly prescient figure in this battle. In June, he resigned from the Golf Association's Museum and Library Committee and its African-American Golf Archive, arguing that as long as its association with Mr. Trump continued, the U.S.G.A. - the governing body for the sport - could no longer be regarded as a suitable repository for the history of black golfers. In the letter terminating his relationship with the organization, Mr. Sammons reminded administrators that he had been warning them about the organization's affiliation with Mr. Trump for five years.

The U.S.G.A., which would be choosing decency over pragmatism - it faces significant financial losses and presumably a lawsuit if it moves the Women's Open elsewhere - has said nothing publicly about the controversy beyond the anodyne and oblivious statement it released last spring, proclaiming that it would focus on "conducting an excellent championship for the players, the spectators, the fans and the volunteers." An organization that has sought to diversify and make more welcoming a sport long tainted by elitism is now in the strange position of having to hope there are enough players, spectators, fans and volunteers capable of accommodating Mr. Trump's degrading prejudices for an "excellent championship" to take place.

At the same time, the U.S.G.A. has planned no other tournaments on Trump courses through 2026. This has not kept the Trump Organization from petitioning New York City to expand its role at Trump Golf Links at Ferry Point, the municipal course that it manages in the Bronx, in part on the basis that the course could then more easily attract the United States Open or other prominent tournaments. In a letter sent this month to the city's parks commissioner, Mitchell J. Silver, Eric Trump proposed that his family's company redesign the 17th and 18th holes of the course and take over the development of an adjacent strip of waterfront into a small park the city had planned to construct itself.

"I know you will agree that this course represents perhaps the most successful public-private partnership in the history of the city," Mr. Trump wrote, a delusion that ignores the fact that his father's litany of offenses over the past year has led the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio, a Democrat, to explore the possibility of getting out of its contracts with the Trump Organization at Ferry Point, Wollman Rink and other sites altogether.

Deputy Mayor Alicia Glen wrote back to him several days later, essentially telling him no, and adding that a previous request to extend the Trumps' contract would also be denied.

While the city's investigation into extricating itself from its contracts with Trump concluded that it could not do so without violating the First Amendment, Nelson Tebbe, a professor at Brooklyn Law School, and Cory Brettschneider, a political scientist at Brown University, have advanced a theory of "mixed speech" that could be relevant to the future of Ferry Point. Taking as an example license plates issued by states that might contain personal and potentially ugly sentiments, they have argued that courts should balance the private right to free speech with the government's interest in conveying its own messages, known as the government speech doctrine.

"If you think of the golf course as government speech," Professor Tebbe said, referring to the fact that the course sits on public land, but bears the name Trump, "then the city doesn't have to associate itself with the Trump name and everything it stands for; it could say that the Trump name has come to stand for something it doesn't want to communicate." Under the government speech doctrine, the city could feasibly seek to take down the Trump signage without vacating its contract.

Even if that were to take place, the city would still not be free of its problems at Ferry Point. Residents of the neighboring area in the Bronx, among them cricket players from a wide range of countries, are upset that the park adjacent to the golf course, known as Ferry Point West, remains a wreck of parched grass, filth and trash-filled parking spaces while the Trump facility next to it glistens.

Wouldn't a cricket stadium, or at least well-kept fields, absent the Trump name, have served the immigrant population of the Bronx more effectively? Martin Prince, the chairman of Community Board 10, which includes Ferry Point, told me many residents don't care about the waterfront strip that the city and the Trump Organization are squabbling over, and see it as nothing more than a walkway. They want improvements to the enormous park that they actually use.

"People," Mr. Prince said, "are going to say, 'What's coming to us?'"

Email bigcity@nytimes.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For anyone who predicted at the infancy of Donald J. Trump's presidential bid - so many mean, vengeful, condemning, deranged remarks ago - that the unhinged nature his candidacy revealed would surely serve his business interests poorly, the past few weeks have delivered gratifying confirmation.

# data[].attributes.body
The article is about Gary Johnson and what he is doing to win the election. However, he is not doing so well. He has his name on the ballot of all 50 states. Then the article gets into how he is going to win the election.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The politician who may help determine the winner of the presidential election travels without an entourage, flies coach and browses Yelp when he needs to find a place to grab a quick bite to eat between campaign stops.

Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party's candidate for president, will be on the presidential ballot in all 50 states, the first time a third-party candidate has managed that feat in 20 years. And if current polls hold true - they have him in the high single digits - he may be on track to win more votes than any third-party peer since the Texas billionaire Ross Perot ran as an independent in 1992.

But Mr. Johnson, a 63-year-old former governor of New Mexico, is walking a lonely road. While his name may be familiar, his face is not: He is rarely recognized as he hustles through airport taxi lines, wheeling his own luggage.

Last week, he missed the chance to make his case to more than 80 million Americans, when he fell shy of the 15 percent polling average needed for inclusion in the first presidential debate. Even his running mate, William Weld, a former Republican governor of Massachusetts, has been playing down the strength of their ticket, saying that he is not sure anyone is more qualified to be president than Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The politician who may help determine the winner of the presidential election travels without an entourage, flies coach and browses Yelp when he needs to find a place to grab a quick bite to eat between campaign stops.

# data[].attributes.body
The editorial cartoon I have for Gary Johnson is a group of people saying they would vote for him if he had a chance to win. This means Gary Johnson doesn't have any chance to win.

# data[].attributes.body
The editorial cartoon I have for Hillary means Bernie Sanders was trying to stop Hillary from winning the election.

# data[].attributes.body
The editorial cartoon I have for Trump means Trump is mean to people.