# data[].attributes.body
ask broader community the same questions from today's retreat

# data[].attributes.body
including authors from the equity framework in next steps

# data[].attributes.body
scanning through language for action items to take in this work, ways to help people activate these practices

activism/action oriented for the next revision - this is the work we do and practice

# data[].attributes.body
PIE - equity should be up front and labeled, appreciated the relationality and that it's woven throughout (metaphor for pie)

# data[].attributes.body
where does positionality and power play into this? do people feel safe to have a space to be heard?

# data[].attributes.body
have we truly embraced a PI mindset? do we welcome a multiplicity of perspectives? do we create space for that to interrogate it and give it an authentic hearing?

# data[].attributes.body
piece of the equity framework they liked was the reflective question area with how "equity responds" etc.

# data[].attributes.body
thinking more about our lived experiences right now - thinking about power structures

we're surrounded by systems and structures that are historically oppressive

are we as a college enacting PI?

# data[].attributes.body
Challenge of limited time in teacher prep program - so hard to fit everything in. Looking at a focus on induction.

# data[].attributes.body
how can we get those back who removed themselves from this work early on? getting the voices in the room who need to be at the table and part of this work?

# data[].attributes.body
if kern were not present, what would MLFTC be focusing on?

# data[].attributes.body
There are winners and losers in the current system... foregrounding equity will make changes to that, and some winners will lose something. how do we confront that? Making positive change for humanity is not so straightforward.

# data[].attributes.body
how do we avoid PI just becoming lip service? how is the college, culturally, ready to approach these two frameworks?

# data[].attributes.body
what's the relationship supposed to be between the PI and equity frameworks? how are we as college members supposed to view them?

# data[].attributes.headline
How can we bring the PI framework to our school partners and to young people?

# data[].attributes.subject
How can we bring the PI framework to our school partners and to young people?

# data[].attributes.body
The section that pairs questions together is powerful. How can we use this more?

# data[].attributes.body
Deeper personalized learning for ALL students. Not just gifted and talented, etc. Deeply embedded culture of tracking in our schools.

# data[].attributes.body
We may take first steps and then focus on how to improve next steps etc. - related to equity - how can we talk about it as a core value?

# data[].attributes.body
intentional pass, read through with equity being in focus/more central/intentional

have the framework reviewed by other communities (activists?)  - see how it's interpreted beyond MLFTC

scan through language that is passive or neutral and making them more action-oriented

capitalize on the resources in the college

# data[].attributes.body
Problem with grants is being beholden to a funder. How does Kern define character and equity?

# data[].attributes.body
seeking knowledge from others should be ALL

# data[].attributes.body
acknowledge what your role is in the existing system

# data[].attributes.body
Structures, systems and processes in place that automatically silence people. If people are systematically not able to have voice, it creates a really problematic space.

# data[].attributes.body
acknowledge what voices are missing

# data[].attributes.body
need for self-reflection and critical reflection

# data[].attributes.headline
Will putting equity in a central role cause us to disrupt other systems? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Will putting equity in a central role cause us to disrupt other systems? 

# data[].attributes.body
What are we focusing on when we say equity? How do we convey that it is many types of equity etc. not just racial diversity etc.

# data[].attributes.body
framework lacks the steps or ways to "do it" when the framework says we value equity and justice

# data[].attributes.body
need to make a more explicit statement around intention/action to equity pursuits

# data[].attributes.headline
Is weaving equity into the framework explicit enough? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Is weaving equity into the framework explicit enough? 

# data[].attributes.body
Equity takes many forms - equitable financial compensation, programs, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Systems that exist that oppress clinical faculty vs. tenure track faculty. They are limited in how they interact and engage, are reviewed, promoted, etc. Need to apply it in our own settings - not just external facing. A lot of internal culture and climate shift. "Culture will shift strategy for breakfast any day of the week"

# data[].attributes.headline
who's safety is being sacrificed or minimized to make others feel more comfortable

# data[].attributes.subject
who's safety is being sacrificed or minimized to make others feel more comfortable

# data[].attributes.body
not just mind set, protection, strength to continue sp

# data[].attributes.headline
How do we honor expertise as well as equity?

# data[].attributes.subject
How do we honor expertise as well as equity?

# data[].attributes.body
How do we put teams together - is equity the driving force or the expertise? Are they mutually exclusive? Is there a win-win here?

# data[].attributes.body
when looking at the framework, hard to see the intentionality on equity, expand on our commitment to humanity, the intention is not very explicit for equity

what if we did a keyword search in the framework? where does equity, justice, systemic inequities come up?

# data[].attributes.body
it is structured in a way that can and does incorporate equity, but quite not explicit, inferred A LOT There are ways to make it explicit. Cristobal's idea - how does PI get us there? re: systemic equity and justice, from inequitable to equitable. The role PI plays, where we are hugely a large part of that, particularly moral and civic - it all comes don to mindset. cultures and systems that develop that allow inequities to continue are put in place by people, to change those people will either change them or not - goes to the mindsets of the people working in those organizations, that is where PI is a huge lever. helps people to consider and change what they are doing and how they are thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
somehow remove historical context with character?

# data[].attributes.body
equity, opportunity, etc. - how long will these be out biggest concerns? what's the timeline it will take to make these priorities uneeded? (because they will be imbedded in culture)

# data[].attributes.body
components of creating more equitable frameworks (compassion, resilience)

# data[].attributes.body
Systematic and structural oppression is not named in the framework. This is a big hole. We need to name it from the beginning. To what extent do we name particular groups, particular types of oppression. We can incorporate really intentional language.

# data[].attributes.body
connection between framework and equity, definition of character education is really broad

# data[].attributes.body
Ann nielsen - the work we're doing in the college doesn't always align with the university's policy - how do we navigate other units/policy when something isn't "fair"

# data[].attributes.body
ideas of answerability is great, grounded in love and compassion, reciprocity, links to a lot of contemporary stuff around racism and anti-oppression, addresses the cultures and structures of our current systems in education. at the end of the document, 4 bullets help us ask and target to see if we have a direct link with equity and what we are doing.

# data[].attributes.body
A key priority of the college is equity... it could serve as the "principled" part of PI
Character can be used in inequitable ways too