# data[].attributes.body
Hmmmm, let's start with the evaluation this time. Any evaluative effort should be to justify your choice, but here it seems hard to justify your selection, as you have branded it both out of date and subjective. If this is the case, why choose it? If it's simply "any port in a storm", it's hard to see you gaining credit for its usage, so your focus should have been on the authority and reliability... but these, you left hanging. When you get to the presentation, you must do a more effective job of analysis and interpretation.

Eval = 5

In terms of comprehension, this suffers from the same flaws as before - namely, that you are casting to wide a net for your summary. Ideally, we should see why you want to use this text - what information is there that is helpful. Otherwise, you're basically just doing the same job as an abstract or a precis. In short, your summary lacks focus and, when you come to do your presentation, this is something you need to consider.

Comp = 6

# data[].attributes.body
On the whole a decent effort. However, with regard the summary, it doesn't really tell us a lot that the abstract does not; there's only a tangential sense that you have read and synthesized the article and there doesn't appear to be much focus. Whilst I appreciate the challenge of trying to produce a 100 word summary, it's all the more important, given the word count, that you focus on the areas that are important.

Comp = 6

Evaluation is better, but try to avoid making it sound like a fait accompli where the academic position of the authors de  facto makes it good - it's your job in any piece of academic work to justify your choices and not simply to state facts with no further analysis.

Eval = 7