# data[].attributes.body
Thesis:
Morris addresses the poor standard of living of middle and lower classes as a consequence of money-driven scientific innovation, whilst also criticizing the exclusivity of art from an idealistic point of view.

1. the use of a monotonous color scheme, superlatives, and personification to explore the environmental repercussions of the industrial revolution

2. the use of personal pronouns and oxymorons to address the poor life quality of middle classes

3. anaphora and personification to finalize his critique towards art's exclusivity within an inherently segregated society

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis statement:
William Morris targets a low class people and conveys his messaege of inequality/injustice through the use of personification, imagery and a defined structure.
Plan:
P1: The direct target audience; low class workers and a second target less visibly.
P2: His use of personification in combination with metaphors to create a more empathic connection with the audience.
P3: The imagery conveyed throughout gives the audience a visual potrayal of the situation taking place.

# data[].attributes.body
Plan:

P1 Personification of Art
P2 Use of emotive language
P3 Use of opinions/personal ideas

Thesis statement:

In this text, a speech given in 1877, the author William Morris expresses his ideas and beliefs on art; through the use of techniques and devices such as personification, emotive language, and opinions, he seeks to raise awareness on how the proletariat should be allowed access to the arts, as opposed to "[keeping it] in the hands of a few highly cultivated men".

# data[].attributes.body
thesis statement: In the text presented, William Morris gives a lecture in 1877 about the use of art not being able to be obtain by everybody , with the use of emotive language and direct address to reflect his point, he express that these new industrial business are destroying the image of art for everybody , but allowing the wealthy to gain from it.
plan -
P1: Tone, the way he expresses his idea towards his audience
P2: personification of science
P3: the contrast between the rich and poor

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis Statement

In this text the author refers to art, science and pollution in 1877 when industrial revolution was progressing with Britain's economic development. the author hived this lecture by personifying science and art through emotive language, metaphor and comparison aiming to victimise masculinity.

Plan
P1 -  How femininity and masculinity are portrayed in the text
P2- Personification of science and art
P3- Change of tone and target towards audience
P4- Living conditions experiences by men

# data[].attributes.body
thesis statement- William Morris is trying to show the audience that art is a way of making your life cheerful.
plan
introduction
P1- Language and tone
P2- personification of the science and art
P3- techniques and literary devices
conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: William Morris appeals and threatens the audience's connection to the arts with the purpose of achieving other benefits, such as improving others' living standards
Plan:
P1 - Personification of the arts + female pronoun
P2 - Rich vs. poor confrontation
P3 - Environmental description

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: Throughout his speech for the Trades' Guild of Learning in 1877, William Morris persuades his audience about the importance of the availability of art to all people and the significant scientific development to be done, through the use of female personification, persuasive devices and other speech techniques.
P1 female personification
P2 antithesis throughout text
P3 persuasive devices
P4 speech techniques

# data[].attributes.body
Plan
Thesis statement:
- The text presented is an extract from a lecture The decorative Arts, their relation to Modern Life and Progress, presented in London 1877, in order to spread awareness that the arts are being misused as well as being excluded from most of society. The author achieves this through the use of different techniques such as personification, rhetorical questions and so on. The author does this to persuade the audience that something has to be done in order to make the arts available to all. The audience being the members of the trade Guild of Learning.

P1- Use of personification on gender base
P2-  Environmental description
P3- speech techniques

# data[].attributes.body
In this text William Morris is trying to draw attention to the environment.
P1 Personifies art and science
P2 Discussing "the rich"
P3 Structure art, science, metaphor
P4 Declaration and statement las line

# data[].attributes.body
Plan
Thesis Statement - In the extract by William Morris, Morris use personification, descriptive, rhetorical question to address the  global issue regarding pollution and evaluates the use of science in solving global issues.
Par 1 - Pronouns, rhetorical question, personification (status between women and men in that period)
Par 2 -  Uses of ethos, logos and description (Credibility and structure analysis)
Par 2 - Tone and audience

context - industrial revolution

# data[].attributes.body
Plan
Intro
Thesis : William Morris uses a mix of literary devices including styles of speech and specific word choices to form an argument to a group of educated men about the importance of art. He uses the context of time relating to arguments he forms using gender roles.
P1- use of gender role
P2 - Literary Devices
P3 - Word choice
P4 - Style of speech