# data[].attributes.body
A trait that would allow Gregory to thrive in college is being cooperative. In Gregory’s essay it states, “ ...but I am flexible. I am able to work with any kind of jelly.” This shows that he can work with a lot of people so he is cooperative. This would allow him to succeed in college because in college there are many people and being able to work with them is very helpful. In his essay it also states, “I have unselfishly stepped aside on the basketball court to let the team shine as a whole.” This also shows that he is cooperative because he isn’t selfish, he shares and is able to work with any type of person. So in conclusion, the attribute that helped Gregory to succeed in college is being cooperative.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because it showed what we was missing and what we could have improved in. For example say if someone had missed my point and had tracked off from the writing / point of my essay than the editor could have said that and helped me improve and given me tips on how to fix/ improve that.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful.This is because it allowed me to see someone else's point of view of my essay.I saw some of the mistakes I made and the ideas I could improve on.It also showed me the aspects that I did good in.I wouldn't have saw these mistakes because I thought my writing was good when in reality I had some mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because you can see how others view your essay. The constructive feedback helped better my writing because I can see how others see my essay. I can use the feedback and reconstruct my essay making it better for people to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful to me because my partner helped me see things in a different way. It also help me see mistakes that I did not catch on to. The constructive feedback help me realize what was needed to add to my essay to make it a four. It also helped me correct mistakes and see things in a different perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because it gave feedback from another perspective that showed writing skills that needed to be improved. An example is, feedback showed that there could have been some better explaining of the quotes in my essay. This helped me understand that I should try better to connect two ideas to further explain the quotes. The process really helped in many different ways to improve my writing.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing was helpful because it help me fix my errors in my writing. The construction feedback helped me improve my writing because it shows how I need to be better at writing. An example is, the feedback that showed That I made a few grammatical errors in my essay. This helped me figure out that I need to read over my writing to fix the mistakes. The process with peer editing helped in many reasons to fix and improve my essay.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because it made my writing better. The constructive feedback helped me understand what i needed to include in my essay to receive a level four. For example, i made a few grammatical mistakes which made me realize i need to double check my work to correct everything. If my colleague didn't tell me to check my work my writing wouldn't have been a level four.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because it helped me understand the things i need to work on. For example, I had a few grammatical errors and the feedback i received helped my proof read my work. The constructive feedback improved my writing to help me explain my evidence clearly for readers to understand why the evidence was valid.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because it pointed out the things that i may have missed. For example words that I thought were spelled correctly were misspelled and my peer editor pointed it out to me. This is how the process of peer editing is helpful to me. The constructive feedback helped improved my writing because now I know that I have to proof read to make sure all my words are spelled correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it was helpful because it helped so find mistakes I didn’t see and give more feedback and new ideas to make my essay better. The constructive feedback helped improve my essay because I had several grammatical mistakes and the feedback helped to correct them. Also my essay lacked transitional words and I found that out through the feedback which helped my essay become better.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editing process was helpful because it helped with my grammatical errors. For example I forgot to put a space a period and my peer helped point it out so I could fix it. And many times and forgot to make letters upper cases and lower cases and my peer helped point it out and fixed it so next time I will not forget. That's why peer editing process was helpful

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing was helpful because it showed me what mistakes I made and what I did good. I also learned what things I need to take in thinking  that I would need to fix while writing an essay next time. An example is that I made grammar mistakes, and I also got to know what things I did good in the essay. So overall the peer editing really helped me to see what mistakes I made in my essay

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editing was helpful to me. It was helpful to me because my peer told me that I need to fix my grammar. When I wrote I name it wasn’t a capital Based on my essay  “ By Mendoza being confident she was able to be successful. This show that any name of a person should be capitalized. The text also states this show that she learned that it’s ok to love where she came from” this proves that I have to be careful about my grammar

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing was process was helpful because it helped me realise that I could've used better analysis to support my evidence. In my second body paragraph my analysis for my first piece of evidence could have been stronger. I wrote "this quote indicated that Mendoza was confident in herself and her heritage", however I could have elaborated my explanation a little bit more. Also my second piece of evidence could have had a better analysis as well. This is why I thought the peer editing was helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful because it showed me my mistakes and showed me what I when to work on. I needed to explain my evidence more I wouldnt have realized if my partner didn't tell me. I have to be less cage because they wouldn't know who I am talking about. If my partner didn't tell me I would have got a low grade for that reason. This is how the peer editing process was helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was very helpful to me because it showed my weaknesses and strengths in my essay in my esRepair editing process was very helpful to me because it showed my weaknesses and strengths and my essay. My Editor Kyara helped me and told me my thesis statement needed to be more to the point and next time support my evidence better

# data[].attributes.body
The peer editing process was helpful to me. It was helpful because I realized some mistakes that I made and didn’t know. For example I didn’t use enough transition words and I wouldn’t of known that if my editor didn’t tell me it. Moving forward I would use more transition words for my essays including this one when I will edit it.