# data[].attributes.body
A 1 because it doesn't have a pg number

# data[].attributes.body
1 because it is just restating what they had already said

# data[].attributes.body
3

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this CER a 3 because the reasoning isn't very strong, it is a little weak

# data[].attributes.body
A 2

# data[].attributes.body
2 not very good explaining

# data[].attributes.body
A 1

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this CER maybe a 3. I'm debating because the evidence was spot on, but I think there could've been more reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
1 the reasoning does not explain the quote it just restates the claim

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this CER a 3 because there isn't enough strong reasoning, they don't list the page number

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it deserves a 2-3 because its well explained but there are also a few errors. Even though Salva stubbed his toe once doesnt mean his journey is dangerous.

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
3-4

# data[].attributes.body
its that bad

# data[].attributes.headline
It does not have any evidence from the text so it would be a 1 or 2

# data[].attributes.subject
It does not have any evidence from the text so it would be a 1 or 2

# data[].attributes.body
3

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
3

# data[].attributes.body
2 because the evidence does not show how it affects Salva emotionally and the evidence does not show how Salva is getting affected by how little water there is

# data[].attributes.body
2-3
no page

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this deserves a 2 because even though there is a little amount of water, it doesn't really make any sense because the evidence and the reasoning doesnt go along with the claim.

# data[].attributes.body
2 because Little water dosent have anything to do with “Salva had to walk barefoot”.

# data[].attributes.headline
The second one's claim has him being barefoot and him needing water . but it only has a little evidence that is only for him being barefoot so i would give this a 2

# data[].attributes.subject
The second one's claim has him being barefoot and him needing water . but it only has a little evidence that is only for him being barefoot so i would give this a 2

# data[].attributes.headline
I would give this a 2 because there is no page number and the reasoning isn't very strong.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would give this a 2 because there is no page number and the reasoning isn't very strong.

# data[].attributes.body
2-3

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like this is a 2 because, yes he is getting hurt but even tho his lips are cracked it doesn't really mean that is getting hurt the whole way. I mean everybody gets their lips cracked all the time.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sardoine 2 because it doesn’t really explain 

# data[].attributes.subject
Sardoine 2 because it doesn’t really explain 

# data[].attributes.body
I give this a 2 because they just typed the claim again.

# data[].attributes.headline
3 1/2 because it kinda explains and it has evidence sardoine

# data[].attributes.subject
3 1/2 because it kinda explains and it has evidence sardoine

# data[].attributes.body
a 2 because they took it literally

# data[].attributes.body
2 because even though its has a piece of evidence it doesn't tell us what page and it repeats in the reasoning

# data[].attributes.body
i give this a 2 because the explanation isn't stated well.

# data[].attributes.body
i give this a 2 as well because they didnt make a good enough statement. It doesn't really make sense to me.

# data[].attributes.body
i also give this a 2 because they basically typed the claim all over again.

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this a 2 because it has reasoning but its really basic when it comes to giving a reason

# data[].attributes.body
Prob not bad Enough for a 1 But. he do not Put a page number.
And he restates the same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
they Put effort into it but they didint enplane it Well.

# data[].attributes.body
The claim is totally different from the evidence and reasoning, and it doesn't connect

# data[].attributes.body
It does not connect so I think a 2

# data[].attributes.body
bad grammer

# data[].attributes.body
its not bad but bad

# data[].attributes.body
2/3 because the evidence and reasoning was not that strong. Claim was all right.

# data[].attributes.body
a 2 page number

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this a 3 because it has a page number and decent amount of words

# data[].attributes.body
11111111

# data[].attributes.body
2 because its haft explained  but with a few mistakes..

# data[].attributes.body
2 because it doesn't explain why they think that and the evidence has nothing to do with the claim

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this a 2, mainly because the grammar is decent, but the reasoning is barley there, nor is it strong enough.

# data[].attributes.body
2 repaved little punctuation

# data[].attributes.body
it dose not seem that strong but. there's meny things i think are good?

# data[].attributes.body
2 because the grammar is bad and the whole CER is not to clear but it does show the page number and made a good claim

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this a 3 because It had good evidence and it also needs ,.,!

# data[].attributes.body
2. The reasoning has nothing to do with the evidence, first it's about how little water there is, then its about how he has to walk barefooted and his emotions are affected.

# data[].attributes.headline
i give this a 2 cause they used big words an decplained well but its not the best evidences.

# data[].attributes.subject
i give this a 2 cause they used big words an decplained well but its not the best evidences.

# data[].attributes.body
3 it is good but they didn't make sense on the last part

# data[].attributes.body
1 because it doesn't have a pg   and because it shows he is fiscally effected not emotionally effected

# data[].attributes.body
2

# data[].attributes.body
2 because doesn't tell us page number and not good reasoning

# data[].attributes.body
because its ok evidence but it represents  Salva's pain rather than emotion.

# data[].attributes.headline
2 because reasoning and evidence does not match

# data[].attributes.subject
2 because reasoning and evidence does not match

# data[].attributes.body
I would say a 2 beacuse the text evadence is not the best on why he is getting hurt in the desert

# data[].attributes.body
a 2 cause he did not say the the page number and not good at explaining

# data[].attributes.body
2 because it dose not really explain that well

# data[].attributes.body
1 because it says that it affects him because there is little water but then it talk about Salva walking bare foot

# data[].attributes.body
2 because the reasoning and the evidence are totally different

# data[].attributes.body
A 1 because there is no page number and it's basically repeating the claim

# data[].attributes.body
the evidence, and reasoning are diffrent from the claim

# data[].attributes.body
2 the evidence doesn't really explain how he is getting hurt

# data[].attributes.body
I will have to say a 1 because the claim makes no sence the text expanation dosen't go with the claim it's just horrible.