# data[].attributes.body
In the novel,I believe that the clutters are innocent. The documentary gave us a perspective of close relatives from the family. The book didn’t cover like self perspective or of members. But you never know people always change what things say to make the reader see a different perspective rather than seeing the whole story.

# data[].attributes.body
Sebastian Gonzalez
Both in the Novel and the documentary had Different types of views and characteristics. The Clutters are basically shown as a family who is basically completely innocent. In the Documentary it had many points of views about family and the Novel from what I've seen didn't cover it as much as the Documentary did i basically preffer the documentary due to it being very descriptive

# data[].attributes.body
in the novel and the documentary the events and details are depicted which are both good to give an idea of how the clutter family was though in the book time is taken to depict each family member while the documentary shared the murder through different eyes and opinions which also adds in to how nice and good the family was both the documentary and the book are good resources to describe this very sinister crime that captivates the attention of the reader or listener

# data[].attributes.body
In the novel and the documentary, both recordings capture the miserable events in different ways. The narrative in the novel is recorded in 3rd person omniscient point of view that captures the victims' and murderers' perspective. While in the documentary, the perspective of the people involved with the Clutter family is captured through testimonies that create a more authentic narrative.

# data[].attributes.body
It is important to note that the documentary and the novel recount the tragic events in very distinct manners. The documentary establishes a style of story telling involving various perspectives and memories in order to create a collage of testimonials in order to come off as more of an informative source. On the other hand Capote utilizes a more personal approach when considering the audience. In this manner Capote recounts events in a way that allows the reader to see themselves within the environment

# data[].attributes.body
In the novel and the documentary, the clutters are shown as a family who where innocent. another comparison to highlight was the documentary had perspective from close relatives of the family while the book didn't cover much of the members. lastly, just like most documentaries, some of the information was taken out and the context but had a tone of serious..
so i rate this a 3 star.

# data[].attributes.body
While the documentary instantly talks about the murder, the book takes its time by describing all aspects of events leading up to it. The documentary focuses on describing the Clutter family and only talks about the killers, 🤬 and Perry, at the very end. In Cold Blood initially alternates between the family members' perspectives and the killers' perspective. The way Perry and 🤬 are being described are also contrastingly different. The documentary explains their actions as cruel and chose to include a quote that makes them be seen as ruthless killers. In Cold Blood details them in a way that portrays them as human and normal. The primary similarity that both Cold Blooded and In Cold Blood have is the way they show how the Clutter family effected the community in a positive way.

# data[].attributes.body
Where the documentary recounts the murder and the events leading up to it, the book places the reader there, describing the setting and seemingly minor details that don't directly tie into the occurrence. Both act to present the events with chronology and accuracy in mind but the novel tells a story with depth and description just not possible (as well as not intended) through the documentary. Capote wants the reader to not just know the events of the story, something the documentary accomplishes efficiently, but to feel present there; the shock and horror of the event to resonate deeply with the reader--enough for them to reflect on morality as well as good and evil. The documentary retells what happens, and while the book does so as well, it also strives to put it all through a lens where the reader can see the story big picture.

# data[].attributes.headline
Alfredo-                                     In both the novel and the documentary,  the murder of the clutter family is addressed in their own unique while still emphasizing the idea that it was a catastrophic event. In the novel however, they start with background story telling, as if leading up to the suspense of the main reason the book itself revolves around. The book also gives many descriptors which is forces the reader to imagine and better put themselves in the story and leave it to their discretion to imagine and perceive the event in a manner they choose to. The documentary mainly interviews people while showing small re-enactments to give an idea as to how the murder occurred. This leads to the effect to try and convey a more personal matter as we see their emotions and vocal tones shift from normal to uneasy which will lead to compassion. So although the documentary shows a visual aspect, the book creates a easier way to be imagined in a more detailed manner.

# data[].attributes.subject
Alfredo-                                     In both the novel and the documentary,  the murder of the clutter family is addressed in their own unique while still emphasizing the idea that it was a catastrophic event. In the novel however, they start with background story telling, as if leading up to the suspense of the main reason the book itself revolves around. The book also gives many descriptors which is forces the reader to imagine and better put themselves in the story and leave it to their discretion to imagine and perceive the event in a manner they choose to. The documentary mainly interviews people while showing small re-enactments to give an idea as to how the murder occurred. This leads to the effect to try and convey a more personal matter as we see their emotions and vocal tones shift from normal to uneasy which will lead to compassion. So although the documentary shows a visual aspect, the book creates a easier way to be imagined in a more detailed manner.

# data[].attributes.body
In the book and the documentary, the perception of the family in each work have a different standing. Whereas the book makes the reader feel like they are really getting to know the family and community as a whole, the documentary only slightly touches on each of the individuals personal lives. This gives the book the advantage of making the story feel more realistic to its audience, where the documentary can feel like just another story being told. However, they both share the aspects of the family that were most adored by the community in which they resided. Both the book and the documentary paints this image of a wholesome and friendly family in which everyone adored.

# data[].attributes.body
In the book, In Cold Blood, the author uses imagery to create a picture of the setting, he also describes the family with deeper details while the documentary goes right into their story, the documentary provides more details about the murder, while the book provides more details and background information of the actual family. Both sources provide us with information about how the family was, and they portrayed them as a very good family. Overall the documentary provides us with information about the people and city and how they had to deal with this and how they felt to center the focus on the murder, and the book creates a setting that centers more on providing enough information about the family and how they were.

# data[].attributes.body
The story of the Clutter family murder effected many people who lived in the small town of Holcomb, Kansas. The book, In Cold Blood, is told through the play by play actions of the victims and witnesses up to the day in which the murder happened to help the audience better picture the exact story. Although the documentary, Cold Blooded, utilizes the personal connections of the people who were closely affected by the murder, the documentary is told through the memories of present day people who were in close relations. The fact that the book is well organized in to chronological order of events that took place, it appeals more to the audience than the documentary.

# data[].attributes.body
Of course, where the book contains imagery the visual aspect of the documentary takes its place, but they both try to shape the town, one is through the narrator while the documentary is through those interviewed, this allows for the audience to get more involved with the people in the documentary. Additionally, the documentary has more than one inut, aside from the interview it also has accounts or retelling from key figures in the investigation and even the murderers.

# data[].attributes.body
In the book "In cold blood" the farm in Holcomb Kansas is described just as it is in the documentary. Both talk about how peaceful the everyone in Holcomb lived before the murder of the Clutters. The Clutters are portrayed as a very respected and prominent family. However, in the novel there is not as much information of the murder itself like there is in the documentary. The book goes back and forth between the family's lives and then to the current lives of the subjects. Truman highlights every detail to be the last before the members of the family die. The documentary is much more explicit giving details of where and how exactly they were killed. Additionally, we also have a grasp of different perspectives of  people that were crucial in the components of developing this investigation.

# data[].attributes.body
In both the novel and the documentary talks about their family and the type of people they are. Both of them talk about the Clutter family and how they are innocent and a Christian family.

# data[].attributes.body
in cold blooded there is a lot more involvement between the characters compared to the novel where there is not much of it.

# data[].attributes.body
In both the novel and the documentary, the Clutter family is portrayed as a very normal, religious, & admired family. In the novel Capote tends to touch base on how they were before the murder, he speaks about the last day they lived. However, in the documentary they have many individual interviews that focus on how the family was. They also go and dig deeper into the murderers reasoning behind what they did

# data[].attributes.body
In the book and the documentary, it talks about the family and their lives, but the documentary brings up the murder more. Based off what I have read so far in the book, it goes on to tell the setting of small town, the farmers, the family and doesn't really mention any murder about the family. Even though it may seem a little boring, it gives us the small detail that we need to know about the family or the book may seem rushed. The documentary goes right into the mystery of the murder, they do bring up close relatives or friends of the family but the whole episode is about who has done it and for what reason. The documentary I feel is more meant to catch the attention of the viewers about a murder of a good family than to give us too in depth details about the family's lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Both the documentary and novel go over the basics of the family and the types of people they were and how others viewed them and respected them. They both also make sure to include the detail of there being no fear before the murder and the fairytale life everyone experienced was crushed. However Capote paints a more specific picture on the family and their everyday life giving the reader the chance to picture what was described as though they were there themselves. While the documentary quickly goes into the specifics of the investigation rather the clutters and brings in the accounts of family members and friends of the clutter family and their personal thoughts on the story.

# data[].attributes.body
Both the novel and the documentary talk about the family, things like what kind of family they were, who each person was and etc. But the difference between them was that the video had details of other family members and close friends that knew the clutter family while on the other hand the book gave very few detail about different perspective of different people, didnt have visual of the things that the video could do.

# data[].attributes.body
Both in the novel, "In Cold Blood" and in the video, "Cold Blooded" are shown as describing the Clutter family as a innocent and Christian family, but one slight difference between the two would be that in the novel they seem to put a bit less background detail into the Clutter family. This could probably be because Capote wanted to give less bias to the Clutter family, so as the audience can better appeal to pathos because the book mostly aim towards the mystery . On the other hand in "Cold Blooded" uses more commentary or background information in other to give more credibility. This is due to influence the audience to believe it more.

# data[].attributes.body
The novel 'In Cold Blood,' eases the audience into the actual murders, unlike it's film counterpart. Capote first gives some background on the family and how normal they were. He makes them out to be innocent, and undeserving of such killings while taking his time to finally describe the murders. The documentary isn't as patient as it, very quickly, paints a picture of what went on on that november night. The film lightly skims over the family's past and dives into the scene of the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
In the novel In Cold Blood the book started off with introduction of the family; such as: age, height, illnesses, occupation, and achievements. In the book the family was described as normal, ordinary and that there life was simple perfect (to me) and happy family. The documentary, give details from other perspectives like the family, neighbors, and officers who took part in helping with the case. The documentary also give pictures to visualize the scenery and it gives off the emotion of which people who were there have felt. Both the documentary and the novel gave the perspective of  🤬 and Perry, who were the convicted murders of the Clutters.

# data[].attributes.body
Both the documentary and novel use different perspectives from people that are close to the Clutters to give the audience a perspective of the murder and victims. The documentary differs though by starting with perspectives of people talking about the impact the murder had on them while the novel was started and written in chronological order. Through those perspectives, the documentary builds the characters stories and personalities from the testimonies and personal experiences friends or community members that were close to the Clutters had while the novel tells the story from a third person point of view that described the daily life of the Clutters.

# data[].attributes.body
In the novel"in cold blood",the author tells the Story without necessarily going much into detail,while in the documentary,alone of personal views are used and the audiance is able to visualize the crime scene.

# data[].attributes.body
in the novel and the documentary, the clutters are shown as an innocent christian family who has done nothing wrong. another comparison to highlight was the documentary had perspectives from multiple different people who were either family and friend or from detectives, while the book didn't cover much of the members. lastly, just like most documentaries, some of the information was taken out and the context was shifted a bit, but still it keeps almost the general setting and smooth transition.
rate this a 1 star. ;P

# data[].attributes.headline
Stephanie R- In the novel "In Cold Blood" and the documentary "Cold Blooded", the story about the murder of the Clutter family is told differently. While in the book we get a brief description about who the members of the family were as individuals, in the documentary we get multiple perspectives from multiple people. To add on, the book gives us more detail about the dialogue and time line between characters in the story, while the documentary mainly focuses on the murder itself and how the deaths of the Clutter family affected everyone

# data[].attributes.subject
Stephanie R- In the novel "In Cold Blood" and the documentary "Cold Blooded", the story about the murder of the Clutter family is told differently. While in the book we get a brief description about who the members of the family were as individuals, in the documentary we get multiple perspectives from multiple people. To add on, the book gives us more detail about the dialogue and time line between characters in the story, while the documentary mainly focuses on the murder itself and how the deaths of the Clutter family affected everyone

# data[].attributes.headline
Joseph F- in the documentary there is a lot more of commentary from the family and friends than the novel does. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Joseph F- in the documentary there is a lot more of commentary from the family and friends than the novel does. 

# data[].attributes.body
Both the novel and the documentary tell the story differently. In the documentary it starts off by describing the family and using the perspectives of relatives and friends. They also describe the crime and how and where the bodies where found. In the novel it has a some fictional details and having different perspectives, but both describe them as good people.

# data[].attributes.body
In both the novel and the documentary, the Clutter family is described as a very good and respected family that did no harm to anyone. Also in both sources, we get to know a bit about the killers. In the documentary though, there are many other perspectives included, such as from family members, neighbors, and friends used to describe the Clutters and the events that happened after the murder, while in the novel, these other perspectives aren't taken into consideration, but it does include a bit more details about the Clutter family. The novel also describes what the Clutters did on their last day, while the documentary doesn't state this.

# data[].attributes.body
The story of the Clutter family and the documentary both use different strategies to tell the tragic story. The documentary uses different perspectives of relatives and close friends of the Clutter Family to describe how good people they were, as well as provides the after affects of the crime and how it affected the town itself. This provides a different perspective from the novel which uses more fictional-storytelling strategies to display a inside point of view of the family and the events that happened before the crime. While both novel and documentary use different strategies, both use emotional appeal to evoke sympathy in the audience and help them feel connected to the victims who did not deserve to be so brutally killed.

# data[].attributes.body
The Story of the clutter Family and the documentary had different points of use and ways of explaining the timeline in which the family was murdered. In the novel the family’s Point of you was that they were a good family and was viewed as a perfect family to the community while in the documentary it was a different scenario. The family in the documentaries were explaining their point of use of about the murder.

# data[].attributes.body
In the novel of Cold Blood and documentary Cold blooded both assimilate points where the viewer wouldn't be consumed by every detail explain in the novel and the documentary which would provided less details but pointed on first point of view to demonstrate their thoughts providing easy flowing connections which would suspect every one little bit of info, but unlike the documentary the suspects provided their details in first point where the suspect is heavily under pressure.

# data[].attributes.body
Both the novel and documentary describes the Clutter family as a relatively good family. They would help others and wouldn't cause trouble. The movie differs from the novel by having it in a different perspective/showing it in a different way to make it more easier for the viewer. This change had taken out information from the book, concluding that the novel is more detailed then the movie. This concludes that the novel has more originality then the documentary.

# data[].attributes.body
The Clutter family murders in the documentary Cold Blooded and In Cold Blood are similar by both sources giving information about how great and what type of family the Clutter family was. In both this sources the family is describe as very active in the community and love by all, they were a very wholesome and happy family. The documentary starts with friends and family members of the Clutters giving their perspective and reaction on what happen in Kansas when the murder occur and how that impacted the community. Then in the novel In Cold Blood it begins with the Clutters themselves and their daily lives and it was view of their own life's through their own eyes. Another similarity that i notice is that in both sources it also gives a view of the two criminals of what they were talking about or thinking but i do believe the novel does this more then the documentary. As a result the novel seems more realistic then the documentary because it breaks down every single aspect of the life of the criminals and the Clutters.

# data[].attributes.body
Exemplar
The story of the Clutter family murders has touched many people over the decades, so it is fitting that it is told through a mosaic of perspectives. Both in the documentary Cold Blooded and the nonfiction novel In Cold Blood, the audience encounters the events through the eyes of those who were present and affected. They differ, however, in that Cold Blooded is framed from our present moment, looking back through the lens of surviving family and witness testimony, while In Cold Blood begins with the victims themselves and is told in tandem through the perspectives of the victims, investigators, AND the perpetrators. As a result, Capote's book seems far more psychological from the outset.

# data[].attributes.body
In both the novel Cold blood and the documentary lots of different perspectives and points of views are utilized to put together a timeline of the crime and the views that people close to the family shared. The Clutter family was viewed as a very happy and beloved by all by their community. The documentary starts with taking into account the different testimonies from friends and family members reacting to the gruesome murder and how they feel as it has now impacted their previous perspective of the family and their lives. In comparison in the novel there are short snippets written by the family themselves in the different points of view, this helps show the family's life from an insider POV.

# data[].attributes.body
In the novel of Cold Blood and the documentary both successfully make the reader feel connected to the Clutter family. They describe the families as perfect, and to hear about their cruel death causes the viewer to feel close to this lose of the family. A difference between the documentary and the novel would be the jumping between present and past of the crime. The documentary focuses on both the investigation and the people who knew the clutters, but the book focuses primarily on the Clutter family and how they were seen by the community.

# data[].attributes.body
Although both the documentary and novel depict the incident as terrifying the novel does it more effectively because it provides insight into first person point of views which allow the reader to actually see and feel the feelings that the victims are experiencing along with those who knew the Clutter family. The novel creates more empathy in the reader.

# data[].attributes.headline
Diana In the novel, "In Cold Blood" by Truman Capote, the novel seems to  switch perspectives  between the victims and the killers. The Clutter  family is just going about their day while their killers are getting ready to commit such a heinous crime. Nancy helps a neighbor bake cherry pies and Perry and 🤬 get ready for the drive to Holcomb.  Capote builds suspense through these simultaneous events because the Clutter family is not aware that their lives will soon come to an end.  In the documentary however the story is portrayed a completely different way. The story begins with accounts from people that lived in Holcomb during that time that talk about how great the Clutter family was and how each of them were special in their own way . With accounts from the people that personally knew the family people get a deeper understanding of who the Clutter family was and  they are portrayed as more than just the victims of a murder, they are portrayed as a beautiful family that cared for the community and  did not deserve what was done to them. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Diana In the novel, "In Cold Blood" by Truman Capote, the novel seems to  switch perspectives  between the victims and the killers. The Clutter  family is just going about their day while their killers are getting ready to commit such a heinous crime. Nancy helps a neighbor bake cherry pies and Perry and 🤬 get ready for the drive to Holcomb.  Capote builds suspense through these simultaneous events because the Clutter family is not aware that their lives will soon come to an end.  In the documentary however the story is portrayed a completely different way. The story begins with accounts from people that lived in Holcomb during that time that talk about how great the Clutter family was and how each of them were special in their own way . With accounts from the people that personally knew the family people get a deeper understanding of who the Clutter family was and  they are portrayed as more than just the victims of a murder, they are portrayed as a beautiful family that cared for the community and  did not deserve what was done to them. 

# data[].attributes.body
The novel and documentary of the murdering of the Clutter family are both similar in the fact that both properly describe the Clutter family and the kind of people they were. They both allow the audience to have a good understanding of the events. However they are also different due to their perspectives. The novel tells the story from a the perspective of the family, sort of a first person point of view. While the documentary tells the story from an outside point of view. Due to the first person perspective, the novel is more realistic because it puts the audience in the position that the Clutter family was in.

# data[].attributes.body
The story of the Clutter family murders has touched many people over the decades, so it is fitting that it is told through a mosaic of perspectives. Both in the documentary Cold Blooded and the nonfiction novel In Cold Blood, the audience encounters the events through the eyes of those who were present and affected. They differ, however, in that Cold Blooded is framed from our present moment, looking back through the lens of surviving family and witness testimony, while In Cold Blood begins with the victims themselves and is told in tandem through the perspectives of the victims, investigators, AND the perpetrators. As a result, Capote's book seems far more psychological from the outset.

# data[].attributes.body
The story of the Clutter family murders has touched many people over the decades, so it is fitting that it is told through a mosaic of perspectives. Both in the documentary Cold Blooded and the nonfiction novel In Cold Blood, the audience encounters the events through the eyes of those who were present and affected. They differ, however, in that Cold Blooded is framed from our present moment, looking back through the lens of surviving family and witness testimony, while In Cold Blood begins with the victims themselves and is told in tandem through the perspectives of the victims, investigators, AND the perpetrators. As a result, Capote's book seems far more psychological from the outset.

# data[].attributes.body
The story of the Clutter family murders has touched many people over the decades, so it is fitting that it is told through a mosaic of perspectives. Both in the documentary Cold Blooded and the nonfiction novel In Cold Blood, the audience encounters the events through the eyes of those who were present and affected. They differ, however, in that Cold Blooded is framed from our present moment, looking back through the lens of surviving family and witness testimony, while In Cold Blood begins with the victims themselves and is told in tandem through the perspectives of the victims, investigators, AND the perpetrators. As a result, Capote's book seems far more psychological from the outset. 

# data[].attributes.body
The Clutter family murders in the documentary Cold Blooded and In Cold Blood are similar by both sources giving information about how great and what type of family the Clutter family was. In both this sources the family is describe as very active in the community and love by all, they were a very wholesome and happy family. The documentary starts with friends and family members of the Clutters giving their perspective and reaction on what happen in Kansas when the murder occur and how that impacted the community. Then in the novel In Cold Blood it begins with the Clutters themselves and their daily lives and it was view of their own life's through their own eyes. Another similarity that i notice is that in both sources it also gives a view of the two criminals of what they were talking about or thinking but i do believe the novel does this more then the documentary. As a result the novel seems more realistic then the documentary because it breaks down every single aspect of the life of the criminals and the Clutters.