# data[].attributes.body
Liu Yuhan,Zhao Xinnan,Qi Jing

Fox and Moreland (2015) argue that offline and online conflict is caused by Facebook interactions which can be divided into the following three aspects. Firstly, offline conflict is a consequence of incompatible expectations when people using Facebook. Secondly, owing to the lack of face-to-face interaction on Facebook, uncivil debates continue offline. Thirdly, Facebook users who engage comments strengthen the public argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Facebook interaction may cause face-to-face arguments and online conflicts .On the one hand, communicating on Facebook may intensify offline arguments, such as in romantic and family relationships, on the other hand, comments on Facebook might lead to huge offline debates, in terms of " comment wars".

# data[].attributes.body
Facebook interactions cause both online and offline conflict In terms of Romantic relationships, incompatible expectations about Facebook use cause interpersonal conflict. Another result of interpersonal conflict caused by Facebook is the maintenance of family ties. Participants don’t friend their relatives on Facebook which leads  to their face-to-face fight. Regarding comment wars, the lack of face-to-face conversation gives rise to the impolite online debates which would even continues offline. Owing to the comments of individuals on Facebook, the private fight becomes public arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
Dong Lixian， Sun Biyang， Guo Xiangmei
There are three usage scenarios which can present the conflict.

In terms of Facebook’s affordances , such as visibility and the ability to link users’ profiles， romantic relationships may occur. These incompatible expectations caused by the features of Facebook may give rise to interpersonal conflict.

As for the maintenance of family ties, Facebook may affect it by friending or de-friending family members.

What’s more, invisible interaction can lead to uncivil debates that can give rise to offline debates or intensify online arguments, which can also be caused by other users’ comments.

All these above could all produce conflict.

# data[].attributes.body
summary----You Jia, Zhang Yicong

# data[].attributes.body
Facebook simulates offline networks, which results in transference between Facebook and offline interaction. This can create conflicts in various relationships. In terms of romantic relationships, Facebook affordances, such as visibility and linked profiles may cause conflicts if partners’ expectations are not equal. Facebook interaction could also break family ties due to friending/de-friending function. Furthermore, Facebook is a source of comment wars. On the one hand, non-face online interplay is likely to produce impolite debates which may continue offline; on the other hand, unreservedly expressing opinions of other online users probably reinforces relevant argument (Fox and Moreland,2015).

# data[].attributes.body
Yu a

# data[].attributes.body
Yuan Huanqing, Liu Xinchen and Li Meilan

# data[].attributes.body
Facebook emulates offline networks because facebook interactions transfer into offline interaction and vice versa.

There are three phenomena to show interactions between them. The first phenomenon is romantic relationships. Facebook affordance is a source of expectations when there are not compatible. The effect of expectation creates conflict. The second is maintaining family ties. Family conflict is due to friending or defriending family members. The last is comment wars. Because interaction on facebook is not face to face, online debates can become uncivil. Owing to it, debates continue offline. Other members of network can add their comments which intensify argument online as a result comment wars happened.

Facebook interaction results in offline and online conflict.

# data[].attributes.headline
Summaries of Seaman and Tinti-Kane (2013) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Summaries of Seaman and Tinti-Kane (2013) 

# data[].attributes.body
Liu Yuhan,Hu Miaomiao,Zhao Xinnan Social media may have negative effects when academic teaching staff use it for teaching in higher education. Over a half of teaching staff believe that academic electronic products and the Internet make students concentrate less on academic work (Seaman and Titin-Kane, 2013). This phenomenon should be treated more seriously because social media could lead to a decline in the quality of higher education. Therefore, students need to learn how to use social media efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
Men Jingyu Lan Juan Yuan Huanqing Social media has a negative effect on academics’working life. According to Seaman and Tinti-Kane (2013), there are nearly 50 percent of teaching staffs who strongly agree that social media distracts student rather than help them in study. Furthermore, social media not only cause problems for students but also influence teachers’normal life. Research shows that 48 percent of teaching staffs announced digital communication has an increase in their level of stress (Seaman and Tinti-Kane, 2013). This is a serious problem because digital communication increases academics’workload. We should set a standard for using social media in education.

# data[].attributes.body
Li Lingyu Liu Xinchen Although the use of social media is increasing quickly among academics in high education, it also has some negative impacts. Over the half of teaching staff agree that social media will distract students rather than help them learn(Seaman and Tinti, 2013). Moreover, as Seaman and Tinti(2013) found, the level of stress among teaching staff has climbed by nearly 90% since a considerable number of academics use social media. Therefore, it is critical for teachers and students as it increases the hours of work and distracts the attention of students from learning. Hence, they both need to learn how to use social media effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
Liu Yuhan,Hu Miaomiao,Zhao Xinnan

Social media may has negative effects when academic teaching staff ues it for teaching in higher education. Over a half of teaching staff believe that electronic products and Internet make students concentrate less on academic work(Seaman and Titin-Kane,2013). This phenomenon should be treated more seriously because social media could leads to a decline in quality of higher education. Therefore, students need to learn how to use social media efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
Xie Yi,Jin Qing,Qiu Yu

Social media help teaching staff to communicate with their students. As Seaman and Tinti-Kane (2013) report, more than 75 percent of academics believe their communication with students has risen because of using digital communication. It seems that social media play a significant role in the process of building relationship between teachers and students. Social media should, therefore, be popularized as an effective communication facilitator in higher education.

# data[].attributes.body
Social media has negative effect on academics’ working life. According to Seaman and Tinti-Kane (2013), there are nearly 50 percent of teacher staff strongly agree with that social media is more distracting student rather than help them in study. Furthermore, social media not only causes problem for student but also influences teachers’ normal life, 48 percent of teaching staff announced digital communication gives an increase in their level of stress (Seaman and Tinti-Kane, 2013). This is a serious problem because digital communicate increases academic’s work load. we should set a standard of using social media in education. Men Jingyu Lan Juan Yuan Huanqing