# data[].attributes.headline
Group 1 (Kelley, Emmanuel, Zhaoqi, Katie, Angee)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 1 (Kelley, Emmanuel, Zhaoqi, Katie, Angee)

# data[].attributes.body
Q1- Aims/Objectives
setting ground rules; establishing a steering committee; identify stakeholders (developers, community members, potential organizations within the building (NPOs), city govt); identify potential health/social/economic impacts of the development on the existing area; identify resources available (funding, buy-in); account for community input and feedback

Q2. Pathways/Determinants of Health
more traffic; access (public transportation); noise; neighborhood safety (both to people already there and people coming in); over-policing of original residents; potential for gentrification; increase air pollution (more long term); access to social services/healthcare; stress/depression/anxiety/trauma

Q3. Methodologies
community input on HIA draft (feedback to make changes—surveys/interviews); literature reviews of past similar HIAs;  data collection/analysis with funded software

Framework:

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 2 (Clair, Cass, Kieandra, Micah, Ellen)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 2 (Clair, Cass, Kieandra, Micah, Ellen)

# data[].attributes.body
Q.1
-- Improving health outcomes through development
-- Measuring developments impact the surrounding residents (?)
-- Improving walkability infrastructures (local geographic built environment i.e. green space, sidewalks etc.)

Q2.
-- Traffic increase
-- noise pollution
-- mental health
-- increased police “Public safety measure”
-- social health (increasing social connections, local activities)

Q3.
-- building aesthetics improving mental health
-- patterns/ presence of people walking
-- types of job opportunties available for local residents
-- community input/feedback on development — building committee of residents guiding the process of development
-- Focus groups and audits of local business development
-- Shifting economics of rent and it’s impact of low income residents

-measure M/WOB contractors
-measure percent of units that are affordable for income in the area

Framework

# data[].attributes.body
Q.1
Increase capacity of local service providers - education, healthcare, child welfare and community building
Reduce vacancy and spark residual development
Workforce housing
Addressing “Delmar Divide” – racial and economic segregation – But how?

Q2.
Increase to service provider capacity
Accessibility to service providers
Access to green space, transit, walk/bike infrastructure
Property and sales taxes
Increase of social support and belongingness
Increase in employment opportunities
Residual economic development
Increased neighborhood cost of living
Risks
Displacement of current residents and small businesses
Increase traffic and accidents

Q3.
Community participatory practices to integrate community voice in planning, implementation, and evaluation; qualitative and quantitative methods; Review of formal and informal literature; surveying and polling

Framework

# data[].attributes.body
Q.1 To assess the impact of access to affordable housing, environmental impacts, economic development, mental health impacts

Q2. Housing insecurity, mental health impacts of displacement and gentrification, long-term physical impacts of chronic stress and anxiety, SES, safety

Q3. Mixed methods (if rapid HIA, quantitative data may be more accessible; cost benefit analysis/economic evaluation)

Framework

# data[].attributes.body
Q.1 Identify specific goals and objectives of Delmar Divine. Determine possible impacts on the community and surrounding community. Is this beneficial to the community in terms of housing, community space.

Q2. SES, social support, increases in foot and vehicle traffic, mental health impacts

Q3. community surveys and town halls to gauge community input and feedback

Framework