# data[].attributes.body
Fausto-Sterling, Anne (2000) Chapter 1 Dueling Dualisms in Sexing the Body, Basic Books, New York
Fink, P (2016) The Kinsey scale is so 1948 in the Huffington Post.com.inc. Edition US

# data[].attributes.body
In a blog by Patrick Fink he claims the Kinsey scale is a measurement that people use to label themselves — and to mislabel others. It may be a perfectly accurate measurement of behavior, and it may have worked when the model of psychology was pure behaviorism. But these days, behavior and sexual orientation are seen much more correctly as related but different things. It was a valuable and useful thing when it first came out, because it was one of the first attempts to show that there are plenty of ways to be human other than strict heterosexuality. He argues that it’s time to file it away with Freud’s id/ego/superego as a first, fumbling attempt at quantification that has led to more useful things. It’s a paradigm emeritus, still entitled to audit classes and invited to comment on papers, but its days of teaching classrooms full of freshmen are behind it.  Is he right? \

# data[].attributes.body
Is this prejudicial as its advertising for lesbians only? Would it be acceptable if the sign said Homosexual women only???

# data[].attributes.body
There is many test online to "help you" find out where you are on the Kinsey scale. The validity of these is very questionable. I completed two separate online test to see where I stood on the kinsey scale and one put me at "1" and the other at "4". This indicated to me that one was more inclined to rate a person homosexual than the other.
These test are a concern because if a vulnerable straight person completed this test and it said they were rated a 5, then this might convince them to try homosexuality and the same if the reverse happens. A person with homosexual tendencies scores a one, then they feel they need to deny their gayness leading to social and emotional confusion.

# data[].attributes.body
Will I be Kinsey 1 today or kinsey 5?
Society is becoming more open and fluid in accepting any relationship

# data[].attributes.body
There will always be critics for any theory published, whether true or false.

# data[].attributes.body
This is an interesting portrayal of the Kinsey scale as it only portrays men. In searching I couldn't locate one like this that portrayed women

# data[].attributes.body
I am 100% homosexual

# data[].attributes.body
"I bat both ways". The Kinsey scale is more widely known in the gay/lesbian community. A large majority of Heterosexuals would not understand this scale rating. I know I had no idea until I did some academic reading.

# data[].attributes.body
If it is lies then why does the Kinsley scale still reign supreme in scholarly work?

# data[].attributes.body
This collection pad looks at what  Anne Fausto-Sterling (2000) talks about in Dueling Dualisms  on the Kinsey Scale.
The work of Alfred C. Kinsey was marked as the start of modern scientific studies of human homosexuality. He first published in 1948. Kinsey used a rating scale for both men and women (0 - 6 with O being 100% heterosexual and 6 being 100% homosexual). This rating scale was used to measure and analyze sexual behaviours. He offered new categories defined in terms of sexual arousal (especially orgasm) rather than terms of affection, marriage or relationship. Kinsey introduced an eighth category - "X" which was for individuals who experienced no erotic attractions or activities.

Fausto-Sterling notes that today Kinsey's scale has taken on a life of its own.  Gays and Lesbians are known to refer to themselves by the Kinsey scale.
In this collection I want to try and find reference to the Kinsey scale in relation to homo and hetero sexuals.