# data[].attributes.body
Constructivism, I don't agree with the idea that something can't be proven with the use of contradiction

~Angel

# data[].attributes.body
Platonism : Only because as you are born, you grow up learning all the mathematical basics, such as playing with shapes, counting numbers, learning the alphabet (symbols), etc..

-Karime (:

# data[].attributes.body
Formalism/Finitism because sometimes i ask myself how do they create all this formulas and definitions. I believe math is invented and not discover depending on what the mathematicians/philosphers want to create -Lili

# data[].attributes.body
Constructivism because we cannot properly describe what "true mathematical objects" are or whether they exist independent of our inventions. Everyone could have a different interpretation of what fits the definition of a "true mathematical object". View point of "inventions" differ.

- Noemi

# data[].attributes.body
Formalism, as I agree with the statement that formulas "they are just strings of ordered symbols"

But I cant agree that they are topics dealing with infinity to be "meaningless nonsense"

~Angel

# data[].attributes.body
Finitism because I believe there are applications for infinities in mathematics and I see no issue with mathematical figures or concepts that don't exist in the real world

-Miguel Abrego

# data[].attributes.body
Platonism because I believe the math is there in plain sight and still we have a lot to discover.

# data[].attributes.body
Carlos Reyna

Formalism is the view I agree with the most since mathematics is consisted from symbols, theorems, axioms which are each used with various contexts. Mathematics is a tool we use in order to understand the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Formalism : Mathematical objects do exist, there are symbols and formulas, there are theorems as well. "Math is not discovered, it is invented" is a false statement, because numbers were discovered, time was discovered, gravity formula was discovered, shapes were in fact discovered, not made up.

-Karime (:

# data[].attributes.body
Constructivism - Kevin Valverde

I agree with the part that says that mathematical objects exists independent of us. I don't agree that math objects cannot be inferred because that is how you discover things. It's okay to infer that something's there because, as said in Platonism, mathematical objects are discovered.

# data[].attributes.body
Naïve Physicalism because our world is more complex than and I don't think we still have all the calculations to understand it.

# data[].attributes.body
Formalism because I think mathematics is constructed. There are things like other geometries, numeral systems, issues with infinity and zero that are inconsistent with the view of discovered mathematics

-Miguel Abrego

# data[].attributes.body
Jennnifer Bazan

Constructivism because it can use peior knowledge, but you also need to remember previous terms.

# data[].attributes.body
Platonism

My views align with Platonism because I believe mathematical objectives already exist independently of anything else. I believe we just grown more in knowledge about them.

Felicia

# data[].attributes.body
Platonism : Objects and everything in our surroundings are known for and are still being discovered. Math has everything to do with it, physics, gravity, etc... Numbers exists, and shapes, and formulas.

-Karime (:

# data[].attributes.body
Formalism because mathematical objects do exist. If we are able to visualize an object, then we can create a formula, theorems, etc. For example, if we can see a circle, then we would we use the formula for a circle.

-Noemi

# data[].attributes.body
Finitism because over all math was and is an invention using numbers and symbols created through the age of time.

# data[].attributes.body
Formalism/ Bryan Vidal

I only agree with how they say that mathematics is invented and is applied but i doesnt excists.

But i dont agree with this statement "They believe that talk about infinity is all meaningless nonsense, all a misapprehension, disposable and unnecessary, improper to use in proofs."

# data[].attributes.body
Naive Physicalism

My views do not align with it because i do not believe in "perfect" figures. For example how they say a pebble thrown in a lake making a perfect circle.

Felicia

# data[].attributes.body
Constructivism because I agree we can't infer the existence of something if it's opposite is false.

-Miguel Abrego

# data[].attributes.body
Platonism, I believe the same that everything we have discovered already exists we are just connecting dots to find them.

~Angel

# data[].attributes.body
platonism because I think these things already exist we just add more to them. We do not create them. Everything is just evolving.

Aaliyah

# data[].attributes.body
Platonism because they are unchangeable and eternal, they do not evolve. We are the ones that discover and evolve.

-Noemi

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer Bazan

Formalism because numbers do have a meaning outside if the mathematical world.

# data[].attributes.body
formalism, because I do believe that mathematical objects exists and that math is discovered, not invented as formalism suggests.

# data[].attributes.body
Naïve Physicalism/ Bryan Vidal

I dont agree with ripples and planets or etc being perfect shapes. To the eye maybe they look perfect but if we were to look into them i dont think they are perfect shapes.

# data[].attributes.body
platonism because I agree that everything math related already exists, we're just discovering them.

# data[].attributes.body
Jennifer Bazan

Platonism because the objects used are discovered and made by nature rather than being created by humans.

# data[].attributes.body
constructivism because i can relate to it a bit. i can relate to it because although yes most math has been there and we are just re-discovering it maybe for the first time. It is through the experience of whether or not we have seen this math before or not that we can say this at all.

natali

# data[].attributes.body
Aaliyah

# data[].attributes.body
Constructivism because XX