# data[].attributes.body
2025/05/29

12:00 P.M.

# data[].attributes.body
NOORELAHI HASSAN SIDDIQ M

수로브체바 마리나

KANTEMIR

아프살리아오바아니야

우디타 나여르

# data[].attributes.body
Finance Team 2

# data[].attributes.body
As per future calculations it is essential to compare and contrast the Present Value (yearly) and Present Value (sum) as well as the FCF. These values will help deepen understanding and reach a conclusion that is not only viable but also backed up by mathematical evidence.

First we will calculate the base scenario followed by the optimistic and finally the pessimistic.

# data[].attributes.body
We used FCF to calculate the Present value for each scenario.

# data[].attributes.body
Basic Scenario

Present Value (Yearly)

2023: 0.61

2024: 0.62

2025: 0.60

2026: 0.54

2027: 0.62

Present Value (Sum) = 2.99

Optimistic Scenario

Present Value (Yearly)

2023: 0.681

2024: 0.689

2025: 0.693

2026:0.613

2027: 0.716

Present Value (Sum) = 3.392

Pessimistic Scenario

Present Value (Yearly)

2023: 0.63

2024: 0.55

2025:0.48

2026:0.42

2027: 0.55

Present Value (Sum) = 2.63

# data[].attributes.headline
Comparison of WACC & Terminal Growth Rate

# data[].attributes.subject
Comparison of WACC & Terminal Growth Rate

# data[].attributes.body
Basic Scenario

Present Value (Yearly)

2023: 0.87

2024: 0.85

2025: 0.80

2026: 0.74

2027: 0.70

Present Value (Sum) = 3.96

Optimistic Scenario

Present Value (Yearly)

2023: 0.52

2024: 0.85

2025: 0.69

2026: 0.69

2027: 0.61

Present Value (Sum) = 3.36

Pessimistic Scenrio

Present Value (Yearly)

2023: 0.70

2024: 0.69

2025: 0.64

2026:0.59

2027: 0.56

Present Value (Sum) = 3.18

# data[].attributes.headline
Brazil and Chile analysis according to WACC and Terminal growth rate. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Brazil and Chile analysis according to WACC and Terminal growth rate. 

# data[].attributes.body
By analyzing only the comparison table between WACC and Terminal growth rate, we can propose that the Chile case is going to be more appealing and productive for Anam Electronics in the process of future acquisition, as WACC is the minimum return a company needs to earn to satisfy its investors. Lower WACC is generally better, as it indicates a lower cost of financing. Terminal Growth Rate: This is the assumed rate at which a company’s free cash flows are expected to grow perpetually into the future. A higher terminal growth rate generally increases the valuation of a company.

Base Scenario: Brazil has a lower weighted average cost of capital (WACC) (14.02%) than Chile (15.00%).

Optimistic Scenario: Brazil has a lower WACC (13.02%) and a higher terminal growth rate (1.20%) than Chile (WACC 14.00% and terminal growth rate 1.15%).

Pessimistic Scenario: Brazil has a lower WACC (15.02%) than Chile (16.00%). Based solely on the limited data in the image, Brazil appears more attractive due to its lower WACC across all scenarios. However, this is not a sufficient basis for an investment decision.

# data[].attributes.headline
Present value and Future Cash Flow analysis. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Present value and Future Cash Flow analysis. 

# data[].attributes.body
Since present value tells us what a future amount of money is worth today, a higher PV means that we're getting more value today from the future cash flows.

In our particular case, the bigger numbers that Chile possesses can tell us that the country is more valuable in terms of financial decisions. Calculated numbers of Brazil's financial analysis are much less than those from Chile. So it is easy to say that the Present Value is a more critical benchmark that WACC and Terminal growth rate in our case, as the difference in numbers in the latter benchmarks is not significant enough. Therefore, Chile is a better option for market penetration.