# data[].attributes.headline
Ask to ChatGPT : What kind of question do you consider best?

# data[].attributes.subject
Ask to ChatGPT : What kind of question do you consider best?

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : To improve homo-prompting skills, we’ll need to become good at asking questions to AI platforms like you. As one of those AI platforms, what kind of question do you consider the best?

ChatGPT's Answer :

That's a brilliant perspective, Jaeeun. I completely agree that the ability to craft effective prompts—especially for interacting with AI—is going to become an increasingly vital skill in the future.
The fact that you're reflecting on the act of asking questions itself already shows strong metacognitive thinking.

💡 What Makes a "Great Question" for AI?

The best questions are clear in purpose, specific in detail, and open-ended enough to allow the AI to generate helpful, accurate, and even creative responses.

✅ 1. Purpose-Driven Questions

The reason for asking is clear and stated.

Examples:

❌ “Hey GPT, tell me this.”

✅ “I need to give a university seminar presentation on ‘Prototype Theory.’ Could you explain the core concepts in a way that's easy for the audience to understand?”

→ When your purpose is clear, the AI can adjust the tone, format, and depth accordingly.

✅ 2. Specific Yet Open Questions

Provide enough details, but don't lock it down completely—leave room for smart suggestions.

Examples:

❌ “Write an essay for me.”

✅ “I’m writing an essay on the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Could you suggest a compelling quote or interesting fact to use in the introduction?”

→ These kinds of collaborative prompts lead to more creative outcomes.

✅ 3. Context-Rich Questions

The more background or context you give, the better the response.

Examples:

❌ “What do you think of this sentence?”

✅ “I’m preparing an email writing lesson for high school students. Here’s an example sentence I’d like to use—do you think it sounds natural and clear to them?”

✅ 4. Intent + Format Questions

Clarify what you want and how you want it.

Examples:

✅ “I’m designing a speaking class in English. I want to create a jigsaw activity on the topic of ‘AI in education.’ Can you divide it into four subtopics and provide guiding questions for each?”

→ When you give intention + format + any constraints, AI can generate very targeted and useful outputs.

# data[].attributes.body
Provide an overview of Bloom’s Taxonomy, including its structure (Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating). Discuss how it aids in framing questions relevant to learning objectives.

# data[].attributes.headline
Self-Study lll : Why do I get confused when making Bloom’s Taxonomy-based questions?

# data[].attributes.subject
Self-Study lll : Why do I get confused when making Bloom’s Taxonomy-based questions?

# data[].attributes.body
My Question :

"Why do I get confused when making Bloom's Taxonomy-based questions? The person creating the questions is the teacher (or me), but the person answering the questions is the learner (or a hypothetical reader). When these two roles overlap in my mind, it becomes confusing. So, when I create questions, who exactly is the 'subject' of the action? Who is the target of the cognitive activity in the question?"

ChatGPT's Answer :

🧠 Why the Confusion Happens:

The confusion arises because you're thinking about both roles at once — the person creating the questions (you, the teacher) and the person answering the questions (the learner). But when making Bloom's Taxonomy-based questions, you need to focus on what the learner is going to do cognitively.

🎯 How to Simplify the Thought Process When Creating Bloom’s Questions:

When you're making a question, think about what cognitive action you are asking the learner to do. Here’s a simplified approach to distinguish between the stages:

🧩 How to Self-Check Your Question Creation:

❓ What cognitive action will the learner perform in their mind?

Just recall information? → Remembering

Understand and explain it? → Understanding

Apply it to a real-world situation? → Applying

Break it down and analyze it? → Analyzing

Make a judgment and support it? → Evaluating

Create something new? → Creating

# data[].attributes.body
Provide sample questions for each cognitive stage (e.g., 'What is AI?' for Remembering; 'How does AI assist humans?' for Understanding).

# data[].attributes.headline
Remembering Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.subject
Remembering Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.body
Generate questions based on factual recall about Renewable Energy. Students use ChatGPT to answer and refine their prompts.

“What are the main types of renewable energy sources?”

“Can you list three advantages of solar power?”

“What is the definition of wind energy?”

“Who first discovered the use of hydroelectric power?”

Professor's Feedback : 'Fact-Based Questions; Based on what students have learned and listened', are included in Level 1 questions. (Remembering & Understanding)

# data[].attributes.headline
Understanding Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.subject
Understanding Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.body
-Question Practices

My Questions : <Now you are the professor who is teaching Bloom's Taxonomy> Can you explain the relationship between hot weather and solar energy? -> Is this question included in understanding stage? Answer and give me some feedback for my question.

->Give ChatGPT a specific role to assess my question and provide detailed feedback.

ChatGPT's Answer :

Bloom's Taxonomy Stage:

Yes, this question does belong in the Understanding stage of Bloom's Taxonomy.

" Why?

﻿﻿You're asking students to explain a relationship between two concepts: hot weather and solar
energy.

﻿﻿This goes beyond simply recalling a definition (which would be the Remembering stage).

﻿﻿The verb "explain" is a classic Understanding-level cognitive task.
The question asks for interpretation and cause-effect explanation, which fits right into the second level.

# data[].attributes.headline
Applying Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.subject
Applying Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.body
My question : There must be a cost factor involved in producing renewable energy, so how could it be applied in rural areas, such as farming and fishing villages?

ChatGPT's Answer : Evaluation:

Strengths:

This question is on the right track for the Applying stage because it focuses on real-world application.

It addresses a specific context (rural areas) and asks about the practical use of renewable energy, which is relevant and meaningful.

Weaknesses:

To make it stronger, you could add more specific context regarding the cost of renewable energy. For example, you could mention which types of renewable energy (e.g., solar, wind) might be more cost-effective in rural areas, or discuss government support or policies that could aid in implementation.

Improved Example:

"Given the high upfront costs of renewable energy production, how could these technologies be implemented cost-effectively in rural areas, considering factors like local resources, government subsidies, and long-term energy savings?"

This revision prompts the consideration of specific renewable energy technologies, as well as cost factorsand support mechanisms like government policies and subsidies.

Conclusion:

While your original question is certainly aligned with the Applying stage, making it more specific and practical by considering additional factors like government policies or resource availability would make it an even stronger question.

--------------------------------------------------------------

After the feedback, I revised my question based on the evaluation of ChatGPT ->

Revised Question : Given the significant costs involved in installing and maintaining renewable energy systems in rural areas, is it realistically possible for the government to provide support for environmental purposes? If so, what specific support mechanisms could be implemented?

ChatGPT's Answer :

My Evaluation:

Strengths:

The question focuses on a realistic and practical issue related to the costs of renewable energy and the feasibility of government support. It considers the financial aspect of implementing renewable energy in rural areas, which is a crucial factor for real-world application.

It emphasizes government intervention in the context of environmental sustainability, encouraging a deeper exploration of practical solutions and support mechanisms.

Weaknesses:

The focus on government support alone might limit the scope of the question. It could be more robust if it also considered other possible solutions, such as the role of the private sector or technological innovations that could reduce costs.

While the question is well-formed, it could benefit from mentioning specific types of support like subsidies, tax incentives, or low-interest loans, to give the question more direction.

Revised Example:

"Given the significant costs involved in installing and maintaining renewable energy systems in rural areas, is it realistically possible for the government to provide support for environmental purposes? If so, what specific support mechanisms could be implemented, such as subsidies, tax incentives, or low-interest loans?"

This revision encourages a more detailed consideration of government support and specific solutions like tax incentives, subsidies, or loans, helping to direct the response toward practical measures.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyzing Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyzing Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.body
(At first, I was confused to distinguish Level 1 questions and Level 2 questions, as fact-based questions are included in Level 1. Wondering the fact-based questions boundary between Level 1, and Level 2, I asked ChatGPT. This content is included in the 'Self-Study : Do Fact-Based Questions only belong to Remembering and Understanding?' section.)

I checked through GPT that my questions are included in Analyzing Stage.

My questions : There is a lot of analysis showing that renewable energy has a positive impact on the environment. If that's the case, why is it that although technology has been introduced, people are not using renewable energy on a larger scale? Is it because the cost-effectiveness of renewable energy is lower compared to fossil fuels?

ChatGPT's Answer :

1. Does this question belong to the Remembering stage?

The Remembering stage involves recalling or remembering information. For example, "What is renewable energy?" or "What are the benefits of renewable energy?" would fall under this stage.

This question does not belong to the Remembering stage. It goes beyond simply recalling information and requires analyzing reasons and cause and effect, which makes it more advanced than simple recall. Therefore, this is not a Remembering-level question.

2. Does this question belong to the Understanding stage?

The Understanding stage involves explaining or comprehending information. For example, "Explain the benefits of renewable energy" or "What does renewable energy mean?" would be questions from this stage.

This question does not belong to the Understanding stage either. The question goes beyond explaining factsand asks for an analysis of why something is happening, specifically exploring the gap between technology adoption and actual usage. This is a critical thinking question, not simply one that requires understanding. So, it doesn't fit the Understanding stage.

3. Does this question belong to the Analyzing stage?

The Analyzing stage involves breaking down information and examining relationships or patterns between elements. Questions like "Compare the advantages and disadvantages of renewable energy vs. fossil fuels" or "Analyze the barriers to adopting renewable energy" fit this stage.

This question fits perfectly within the Analyzing stage. The question requires analyzing cause and effect and exploring the relationship between technological advancement and actual usage. It goes beyond simple explanation and asks for a deeper analysis, which aligns well with the Analyzing stage.

Conclusion:

This question does not belong to the Understanding or Remembering stages but is more appropriate for the Analyzing stage.

The question requires higher-level thinking, specifically cause-and-effect analysis, and evaluating the relationship between technology and adoption, which makes it a good example of the Analyzing stage.

So, the question you’ve created fits well in the Analyzing stage and does not belong to the Understanding or Remembering stages! 👏

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluating Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluating Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : Given the renewable energy case studies and policies implemented in the last 10 years (2015-2025), how does South Korea compare to other countries in terms of environmental improvement index and renewable energy utilization?

ChatGPT's Answer :

My Evaluation:

Strengths:

The question is based on real-world examples and policies, which requires an evaluation of actual data. This aligns well with the Evaluation stage of Bloom's Taxonomy.

The focus on comparative analysis of South Korea with other countries brings a critical perspective, encouraging deeper evaluation.

The time frame of the last 10 years (2015-2025) helps ensure that the analysis is up-to-date and relevant.

The question allows for an evaluation of both environmental improvement and renewable energy usage, making it broad yet focused enough to analyze several factors.

Weaknesses:

The comparison with other countries lacks clarity on which countries are being compared. It could be beneficial to either specify certain countries or clarify the criteria for selecting countries for comparison.

The evaluation criteria, such as environmental improvement index and renewable energy utilization, are mentioned but not clearly defined. It's important to specify what metrics or factors will be considered, such as CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic impact.

Suggested Revision:

"Based on renewable energy case studies and policies implemented from 2015 to 2025, how does South Korea compare to other countries in terms of environmental improvement index and renewable energy utilization? Consider factors like CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic impact in your evaluation."

This revision provides more specific evaluation criteria, including CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic impact, helping to focus the analysis and ensure that the evaluation is comprehensive and actionable.

--------------------------------------------------------------

I thought my question assigned quite detailed situation and real-world examples, the feedback, however, just comparison without standard can make the question lack clarity. Moreover, 'Environmental Improvement index or Renewable Energy Utilization' are not clearly defined. So I reviesed the question again.

Revised Question : Given the renewable energy case studies and policies implemented from 2015 to 2025, how does South Korea compare to three other East Asian countries (e.g., China, Japan, Taiwan) in terms of environmental improvement index and renewable energy utilization? Please evaluate using CO2 emissions and economic efficiency as the key criteria.

ChatGPT's Answer :

Your revised question is excellent for the Evaluation stage of Bloom's Taxonomy. It is specific, clearly defined, and encourages critical analysis. With a slight refinement in the definition of economic efficiency and the selection of comparison countries, this question would be even stronger.

# data[].attributes.body
Divide participants into small groups to review and improve each other’s AI-related questions across Bloom’s levels. Share the improved prompts on the shared padlet for collective feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
Students take turns acting as ChatGPT to answer questions created for different levels, emphasizing how AI would interpret and respond.

# data[].attributes.body
Conclude by reflecting on the process of question-generation and discussing strategies for continuous improvement as a 'Homo-Prompt.'

# data[].attributes.headline
Creating Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.subject
Creating Stage _ Topic : Renewable Energy

# data[].attributes.body
My question : Compare renewable energy case studies and their corresponding CO₂ reduction rates, then analyze the limitations of environmental policies and propose alternatives.

ChatGPT's Answer : Evaluation:

Strengths:

This question is creative and problem-solving-oriented, which fits well with the Creating Stage. It requires not only the comparison and analysis of existing information but also the proposing of new alternatives, which is the key feature of the Creating Stage.

The part that asks for alternative proposals is particularly important. This requires students to move beyond just applying existing knowledge or analyzing data, and instead generate new solutions or innovative ideas, encouraging creative thinking.

Suggestions for Improvement:

The question could be made a bit more specific. For example, specifying which types of renewable energywill be discussed or which environmental policies will be compared can help narrow the scope and make the analysis more focused. This would allow students to think about concrete solutions.

The phrase "propose alternatives" could be further clarified. For instance, specifying "propose new technologies, policies, or systems" would make it clearer what kind of alternatives are expected, guiding the students to offer more innovative and concrete solutions.

--------------------------------------------------------------

After getting feedback, I revised my question with clarity and specifications.

Revised Question : Compare case studies and CO₂ reduction rates of the most commonly used types of renewable energy—solar, hydro, and wind power. Then, analyze the limitations of current environmental policies and propose a realistic new policy that could effectively address those issues.

ChatGPT's Answer : 📊 Objective Evaluation (Based on the Creating Stage in Bloom’s Taxonomy):

🌟 Strengths:

High Specificity: By clearly stating the focus on solar, hydro, and wind energy, the question becomes more structured and allows for deeper, more focused analysis.

Combines Analysis and Creation: It doesn't stop at comparing facts; it requires students to identify policy limitations and generate original, practical solutions, which clearly aligns with the Creating stage.

Emphasis on Practicality: The phrase “realistic new policy” encourages creative thinking within real-world constraints, making this a more grounded and thoughtful task than simply imagining ideal solutions.

🔧 Optional Improvement Tip:

To make it even more focused, you could add a brief guideline on what kind of criteria students should consider when analyzing policy limitations—such as economic feasibility, social acceptance, or implementation challenges.

📌 Conclusion:

This question is an excellent example of a Creating-level task. It effectively combines critical analysis and innovative thinking while grounding the task in realistic concerns. It would work perfectly for essays, presentations, or class debates! 👏🌱⚙️

# data[].attributes.headline
Self-Study : Do Fact-Based Questions Only Belong to Remembering and Understanding?

# data[].attributes.subject
Self-Study : Do Fact-Based Questions Only Belong to Remembering and Understanding?

# data[].attributes.body
My question was, "I’m practicing how to ask questions based on the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. According to what I’ve learned, my professor grouped the levels into three categories—for example, Level 1 includes Remembering and Understanding—and told us that fact-based questions are mostly used in those lower levels.
But I’m still confused. Isn’t it true that fact-based thinking also has to happen in the Applying or Analyzing stages, at least to some extent?
I feel like I might not fully understand the difference. Could you explain this in a simple way?"

I was confused the boundary of Fact-Based questions, so I asked Chat GPT.

ChatGPT's Answer :

✅ Answer 1: Do Applying and Analyzing Also Involve Fact-Based Thinking?

Yes — but in a different way than in Remembering and Understanding.

Fact-based knowledge is used in Applying and Analyzing, but it’s not the main focus.

In Remembering, you're simply recalling facts. Example: “What is the formula for photosynthesis?”

In Understanding, you explain or describe those facts. Example: “Explain how photosynthesis works.”

But when you get to Applying, you're using the facts in a real-world or new situation:

“Given this environment, how would this plant carry out photosynthesis?”

In Analyzing, you’re breaking down the facts to find patterns or relationships:

“Why does this plant photosynthesize more efficiently than another one in the same light?”

So yes, facts are still involved, but the mental process becomes more active and complex.
Think of it like this:

Lower levels = “What do you know?”

Higher levels = “What can you do with what you know?”

Next, I also felt confused the difference between Remembering Stange and Understanding Stage.

ChatGPT's Answer :

✅ Answer 2: What’s the Difference Between Remembering and Understanding?

You're right — the line between them can feel vague.
Here’s a simple way to think about it:

AspectRememberingUnderstandingGoalRecall infoExplain or show meaningKeywordsdefine, list, nameexplain, summarize, interpret

Example Question“What is a simile?”“Explain the difference between a simile and a metaphor.”

🍎 Analogy:

Remembering is like reciting a recipe from memory.

Understanding is like explaining why each step matters in the recipe.

So, while both deal with facts, Remembering asks “What is it?”
Understanding asks “What does it mean?” or “Why is it important?”

# data[].attributes.headline
Self-Study ll : Difference between Applying Stage and Creating Stage

# data[].attributes.subject
Self-Study ll : Difference between Applying Stage and Creating Stage

# data[].attributes.body
I was curious about the difference between the Applying Stage and the Creating Stage. While making questions, it seems like both involve the concept of application or adaptation. So aren't they somewhat interchangeable?

I asked ChatGPT and here's the following answer.

ChatGPT's Answer :

Great question! Applying Stage and Creating Stage both involve the concept of application, but there is a significant difference between them. Here's a simple breakdown:

Applying Stage:

Goal: To apply learned knowledge to real-life situations.

Characteristics: This stage is about using the knowledge learned to solve given problems or situationspractically. It usually involves applying existing theories, methods, or tools to find solutions.

Example:

Using a learned formula to solve a specific problem.

Applying knowledge to a real-world scenario, such as designing a renewable energy system using the principles you've studied.

Key Point: The focus is on implementing or executing a solution based on the existing knowledge and rules.

Creating Stage:

Goal: To innovate or create something new.

Characteristics: This stage is about building new outcomes or ideas based on existing knowledge. It involves generating new systems, models, theories, or ideas.

Example:

Creating a new policy for renewable energy.

Reinventing or innovating an existing system or method, like proposing new technologies for renewable energy.

Key Point: The focus is on generating new concepts or systems, pushing boundaries beyond the existing knowledge.

Key Difference:

Applying focuses on using existing knowledge to solve given problems or situations. The goal is to provide practical and actionable solutions.

Creating, on the other hand, is about transforming existing knowledge into new ideas or products, requiring innovative and creative thinking.

Example to Compare:

Applying: "Analyze survey data and propose a solution to the problem using your analytical methods."
→ This involves applying known methods to solve the issue.

Creating: "Using this data, develop a new research method or approach."
→ This requires creating a new methodology or approach based on the existing information.

In short, Applying is about executing existing knowledge in real-world situations, while Creating is about inventing or developing something new based on what you already know.

# data[].attributes.headline
Remembering Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Remembering Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My question : Can you give me some examples which represent AI-integrated education application?

ChatGPT's Answer :

🔍 Evaluation (Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy – Remembering Stage)

🔹 Key Point:

The Remembering stage focuses on recalling and reproducing factual information without interpretation or deeper understanding.
Typical verbs: define, list, name, identify, recall, recognize.

🟡 Your question is... close but slightly leans toward the Understanding stage.

Asking someone to “give examples” requires them to recall information, yes, but also to select and match appropriate examples — which may involve a basic level of comprehension.

Therefore, this question could be considered low-level Understanding rather than pure Remembering.

🔄 Suggestion to revise it for Remembering level:

To better align with the Remembering stage, you could rephrase the question like:

"List three examples of AI applications used in education."

"Name two educational tools that use Artificial Intelligence."

These versions require the respondent to recall facts directly, without needing to explain or interpret — which fits the Remembering level precisely.

--------------------------------------------

My mistake was that I focused on the 'FACT-BASED' too much. I couldn't consider the difference between the Remembering stage and Understanding stage.

Revised Version : Name 2 AI-Integrated Eduaction Flatforms.

ChatGPT's Answer : 🔍 Evaluation (Bloom’s Taxonomy – Remembering Stage)

🔹 Target Skill:

This question prompts the learner to recall specific facts — in this case, the names of platforms.

It uses the verb "Name", which is directly aligned with the Remembering stage in Bloom’s Taxonomy.

🟢 Conclusion:

✔️ This is a textbook example of a Remembering-level question.

There is no requirement to explain, analyze, or apply — only to recall.

# data[].attributes.headline
Understanding Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Understanding Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : What AI features could be applied in educational settings? Compare these with traditional educational methods that do not use AI.

ChatGPT's Answer :

eedback on Your Question:

Your question is suitable for the Understanding Stage, but it could be refined for clarity and specificity.

The question asks for an understanding of AI’s role in education, which is great. However, it could be more specific about which "AI features" you want the students to focus on and how they apply in the classroom.

When asking for a comparison, providing more concrete examples (such as personalized learning, automated assessment systems, or progress tracking) could help the students focus on specific points.

Revised Example Question:

"Explain how AI features such as personalized learning and automated assessment systems can be applied in educational settings. Compare these applications with traditional teaching methods that do not use AI, and discuss the differences."

--------------------------------------------------------------

Revised Question : One of the features of AI-integrated Education is Personalized Learning. Compare the AI-Integrated Education and Traditioal Education with respect to the Personalized Learning.

ChatGPT's Answer :

Strengths:

The question is now more specific by focusing on Personalized Learning, which is a core AI feature in education.

The comparison is clear: you are asking to compare AI-integrated education with traditional education in terms of Personalized Learning.

Suggestions for Improvement:

To make it a bit more detailed, you could ask students to explain or discuss the specific differences in how personalized learning works in AI-integrated settings vs traditional settings.

Consider adding a follow-up question asking students to reflect on the benefits or challenges of personalized learning in each approach.

Revised Version:

"Explain how Personalized Learning is implemented in AI-integrated education. Compare this with how personalized learning is approached in traditional education methods, and discuss the advantages and challenges of each."

# data[].attributes.headline
Applying Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Applying Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : When AI and education are integrated, the role of teachers may be reduced. So, in what direction should the educational method change after AI is integrated?

ChatGPT's Answer :

Strengths:

The question is appropriate for the Applying Stage as it requires students to apply their understanding of AI and its impact on teaching roles.

It asks for a shift in the direction of education, encouraging students to think critically about how education systems might change with AI integration.

Suggestions for Improvement:

To make it clearer, you could explicitly ask students to apply specific AI technologies in the classroom context (e.g., AI-based assessments, automated tutoring).

It would also help to focus the question on how the teaching process or environment might change (e.g., more student-centered, individualized learning paths).

Adding an example or two of AI tools might make the question more concrete.

Revised Version:

"With the integration of AI in education, the role of the teacher may change. How should teaching methods adapt to this shift? Consider specific AI technologies like personalized learning systems or automated assessments, and explain how they would transform the classroom environment."

--------------------------------------------------------------

(Everytime I get feedback about specific direction... from GPT... I'll try my best LOL...)

Revised Question : When AI-assessment function is integrated, the role of teachers as a evaluator may be reduced. So, in what direction should the assessment method change after AI is integrated?

ChatGPT's Answer : Strengths:

This question clearly addresses AI integration and its potential impact on the role of teachers, especially as evaluators. It is focused on the assessment aspect, making it more concrete.

The phrasing is clear, and it pushes students to think about how assessment methods should evolve, which is key in the Applying Stage.

The wording also guides students to think critically about the teacher's role and how AI could reshape the assessment process.

Suggestions for Improvement:

The question could benefit from examples of AI assessment functions (like automated grading systems, personalized feedback, etc.) to help students generate more specific responses.

It could be helpful to ask students to consider the pros and cons of AI-based assessments, as this could push them to think more critically.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyzing Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyzing Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : If AI can make more accurate and objective assessments than people, and if AI can access information much more easily than people, do we still need teachers in the classroom? If AI develops further, won’t it be able to replace teachers?

ChatGPT's Answer :

Your question is a great fit for the Analyzing Stage because it asks students to compare AI's abilities with those of human teachers and critically assess the role of teachers in the future of education. Here’s my feedback in English:

Strengths:

The question is thought-provoking and encourages deep analysis of the relationship between AI and human teachers.

It requires students to compare the strengths of AI (accuracy, objectivity, access to information) with the traditional role of teachers, which aligns with the Analyzing Stage.

The question pushes students to explore the future implications of AI in education, challenging them to consider whether AI could replace teachers in the long term.

Suggestions for Improvement:

To make the question a bit more focused, you might want to break it into two parts, emphasizing analysis of AI's current capabilities first and then considering its potential to replace teachers.

You could also ask students to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of having AI replace teachers, which would allow for a more comprehensive analysis.

Revised Version:

"Given that AI can provide more accurate and objective assessments, and has easier access to information compared to humans, is there still a need for human teachers in the classroom? If AI continues to develop, could it eventually replace teachers entirely? Analyze the potential benefits and limitations of AI replacing human teachers in education."

--------------------------------------------------------------

No revision -> Quite good-quality question.

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluating Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluating Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : There are many language education platforms related to AI (Speak, Duolingo, Chatgpt recording function, etc.). Do you think that these education platforms that integrate AI are having a good effect in terms of improving skills?

ChatGPT's Answer :

Your question is a solid fit for the Evaluating Stage because it asks students to form an opinion based on evidence and to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-integrated language learning platforms in improving language skills. Here's my feedback:

Strengths:

The question asks for a value judgment on the effectiveness of AI-based language learning platforms, which is exactly what the Evaluating Stage is all about.

It prompts students to consider multiple platforms (like Duolingo, ChatGPT, etc.) and evaluate their impact on language learning.

The question can lead to a thoughtful discussion where students must weigh the pros and cons of these platforms, potentially considering factors like usability, accessibility, and measurable outcomes.

Suggestions for Improvement:

To make the question more specific and clearer, you could ask students to base their evaluations on certain criteria(e.g., effectiveness in grammar learning, speaking practice, user engagement) or give a comparison between these platforms.

You might also want to clarify whether you're asking students to evaluate them theoretically (based on existing studies) or practically (based on their own experiences).

Revised Version:

"Do you believe AI-integrated language learning platforms, such as Speak, Duolingo, and ChatGPT's recording feature, are effective in improving language proficiency? Evaluate these platforms in terms of their strengths and weaknesses, and consider how they compare to traditional language learning methods."

This version guides students toward a more structured evaluation, considering both strengths and weaknesses and making a direct comparison. Overall, your original question is already great for the Evaluating Stage! 😊

--------------------------------------------------------------

Revised Question : In terms of Language Education, various AI-Integrated Platforms exist (ex. Duolingo, Speak, ChatGPT Voice Recording function, etc.). Do you think that these education platforms that integrate AI are having a good effect in terms of improving communicative competence in Language Education?

ChatGPT's Answer :

Strengths:

Clear focus on language education: The question is specific to communicative competence, which is an important aspect of language education. It provides a concrete concept to evaluate.

Use of specific examples: Mentioning platforms like Duolingo, Speak, and ChatGPT makes the question more relatable and focused. It encourages students to think about concrete platforms they may have used or heard about.

Critical evaluation: It asks students to consider the effectiveness of these platforms in terms of improving language skills, which is a direct evaluation task.

Suggestions for Improvement:

The question could benefit from further clarification on how to evaluate the effect of these platforms (e.g., by considering user engagement, learning outcomes, accessibility, or technological innovation).

To make it even more evaluative, you could ask students to compare AI platforms with traditional methods of language education in terms of their effectiveness.

Revised Version (if needed):

"In terms of Language Education, various AI-Integrated Platforms exist (e.g., Duolingo, Speak, ChatGPT Voice Recording function). Do you think these AI-powered platforms effectively improve communicative competence in language learners? Evaluate their effectiveness compared to traditional language learning methods."

# data[].attributes.headline
Creating Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Creating Stage _ Topic : Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : AI is developing more and more, and as time goes by, it will be able to replace more and more human areas. There is a situation where AI can replace the job of a teacher, but even if AI develops, teachers will not be replaced, so let's create a new teaching method that allows humans to use AI as a teaching assistant.

ChatGPT's Answer : Strengths:

Creativity and Innovation: It encourages students to think creatively about the future of education, asking them to come up with new methods to use AI in the classroom while keeping teachers in the loop.

Relevance: The question is highly relevant as it taps into a current debate about AI's role in education and the future of teaching jobs. It pushes students to think about the balance between AI’s capabilities and the irreplaceable human touch in education.

Future-Oriented: It focuses on future possibilities, asking students to imagine what AI might be able to do and how teachers might adapt.

Suggestions for Improvement:

Clarification of Scope: You could narrow down the "new teaching method" aspect a bit further to focus on particular subject areas or student needs (e.g., personalized learning, assessment, or creativity) to make the question more focused.

Details on Teacher's Role: You might consider providing more context about the teacher’s unique role (e.g., emotional support, student motivation, ethical guidance) to give students a clearer framework for their creative solutions.

Revised Version (optional):

"As AI continues to evolve and may eventually replace certain jobs, including teaching, how can teachers use AI as a classroom aid rather than a replacement? Propose an innovative teaching method that combines the strengths of AI and the unique role of human teachers in enhancing student learning."

---------------------------------------------------------

Revised Question : AI is developing more and more, and as time goes by, it will be able to replace more and more human areas. In English Education, let's create a new teaching method to improve communicative competence, utilizing AI.

ChatGPT's Answer : Strengths:

Clear and Focused: The question is straightforward and clear, asking for a new teaching method that utilizes AI specifically for improving communicative competence in English education.

Practical Application: It encourages students to come up with something applicable to real-world teaching, rather than just abstract ideas.

Creativity: It taps into the creative potential of students, asking them to think about how AI can complement human teaching, not replace it, and improve a core aspect of language education (communication).

Suggestions for Improvement:

Teacher's Role: You might want to highlight the teacher’s role more explicitly in your question. Since the goal is to have AI aid rather than replace teachers, it could be helpful to add a little more about the teacher's involvement in the new method.

Broader Impact: Consider mentioning the long-term impact on students or educational systems, guiding students to think about the broader implications of their new teaching method.

Revised Version (optional):

"As AI continues to evolve, it will increasingly replace human tasks, but in the context of English education, how can we use AI to create a new teaching method that enhances communicative competence, while also ensuring that teachers play an active role in guiding the learning process?"

This version continues to focus on creativity and innovation but makes the teacher's role a bit more explicit. But overall, your revised question is clear and focused on the important goals of creating a new method in language education. Great job! 😊

# data[].attributes.headline
Remembering Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Remembering Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : Name 3 examples of Gamification app cases in Education (Subjects : English, Math, Science etc)

ChatGPT's Answer :

Strengths

Clarity: The question is clear and straightforward, asking for specific examples.

Focus: It directly targets the Remembering stage by requiring students to recall specific instances of gamification apps in education.

Appropriateness: The question is well-suited for the Remembering stage because it focuses on recalling facts and information.

Suggestions

Enhance specificity: You could specify the type of game or the feature of the app you want them to focus on. This would direct the learners' recall more clearly and could prevent them from listing just any app without connecting it to gamification.

Revised Version:
"Name 3 examples of educational gamification apps (e.g., English, Math, Science) and briefly describe the gamified features they use to engage learners."

This makes the question slightly more detailed and ensures students connect the apps to specific educational features.

# data[].attributes.headline
Understanding Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Understanding Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : Even in education, explain the effect of gamifying language education on students' language learning. -> How about this question?

ChatGPT's Answer : Strengths

Clear and Focused: The question is clear in asking about the effects of gamification on language learning, and it fits well within the Understanding stage by encouraging students to explain the effects.

Relevance: The question is directly related to the topic of gamification in education, making it contextually appropriate.

Analytical: It prompts students to explain and reflect on the effects, demonstrating understanding of the concept rather than simple recall.

Suggestions

Clarify "effects": It may be helpful to specify what types of effects you're asking about (e.g., cognitive, motivational, engagement). This can guide students to think more deeply about specific impacts.

Possible Adjustment: You could rephrase to make the focus more precise, like asking how specific gamified features (e.g., rewards, competition) affect language learning.

Revised Version:
"Explain how gamifying language education can impact students' learning outcomes, focusing on areas such as engagement, motivation, and language acquisition."

This revision keeps the core of the question intact but helps guide the student to think about particular aspects of the learning process. How do you feel about this?

--------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Question : Is it included in the Understanding stage? Is it not the Analyzing stage by any chance?

ChatGPT's Answer : Great point! You're right to question whether this fits into the Understanding stage or if it leans more towards the Analyzing stage.

Understanding Stage:
At this level, students are expected to explain concepts or describe relationships. The question you posed is about explaining the effects of gamification, which suggests that students need to recall and explain ideas, making it more about understanding than deep analysis.

Analyzing Stage:
In the Analyzing stage, students are expected to break down complex concepts and understand how parts of the concept relate to each other. If you were asking students to analyze specific effects or compare how different gamification strategies impact language learning, that would require more analysis than just explaining the general effects.

Verdict:
Your original question, "Explain how gamifying language education can impact students' learning outcomes," would more accurately fit in the Understanding stage because it asks for an explanation of a concept. However, if you want to go deeper into Analyzing, you could ask something like:

"Analyze how different gamification strategies (e.g., rewards, competition) specifically affect language learning outcomes, and compare their effectiveness."

This would require students to evaluate and compare, which is a more Analyzing task.

Does that distinction help clarify things?

# data[].attributes.headline
Applying Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Applying Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : Gamification in education helps to motivate students and reduce study stress, which indeed shows positive effects. However, if the educational aspect is overshadowed by the entertainment value of games, will it genuinely help in learning? What should be considered when developing educational programs to avoid this?

ChatGPT's Answer : Strengths:

1. Real-world application: The question encourages students to think concretely about the advantages and disadvantages of gamification, helping them consider what factors to focus on when developing educational programs.

2. Critical thinking: The question prompts students to go beyond just discussing the positive effects, urging them to think about potential negative impacts of gamification in education.

Areas for improvement:

1. Clarity: The question might feel a bit complex. The part, "if the educational purpose is overshadowed by the entertainment value of the game, will it truly help in learning?" could be simplified to ensure clearer communication with students.

2. Focus: The part "What should be considered?" is important but could be more specific. Instead of a general inquiry, it would help to ask more focused questions, such as how educational elements can be incorporated into the game design, making the development considerations more clear.

Revised Version:

"While it is true that gamification in education can help motivate students and reduce the burden of studying, is it possible that focusing only on the fun aspects of the game might hinder actual learning? What should be considered when developing educational gamification programs to prevent this issue?"

--------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Question :

But doesn't this overlap a little with Bloom's Texasonomy's Analyzing and Creating? Assume that you are a professor of Bloom's Texasonomy and evaluate it. Does this fit with Applying?

ChatGPT's Answer :

Feedback in Bloom's Taxonomy Terms:

1. Applying Stage:
This question is mostly appropriate for the Applying stage, as it requires students to think about how gamification can be practically implemented in education. Specifically, it asks what considerations need to be made to ensure that the educational goals are not overshadowed by the entertainment value of the game. This prompts learners to apply the concept of gamification to real educational contexts.

2. Analyzing Stage:
This question also overlaps slightly with the Analyzing stage, as it calls for the critical analysis of how gamification may affect the balance between entertainment and learning. To fully align with the Analyzing stage, the question could ask students to break down or compare the positive effects of gamification with the risks of it focusing only on entertainment. This would prompt learners to explore the pros and cons in more depth.

3. Creating Stage:
The question doesn't quite delve into Creating, as it isn't asking students to design or construct a new educational program. However, in the context of avoiding the entertainment-only focus, it could lead into the Creating stage if you asked students to create a program that effectively balances fun and educational value.

Revised Version for Clarity (Fitting the Applying stage):

"While gamification in education can help motivate students and reduce study stress, what considerations should be made when applying gamification in educational programs to ensure it remains focused on learning outcomes and not just entertainment?"

This revised version refines the focus on how to apply gamification in education without losing the educational value, staying more aligned with the Applying stage.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyzing Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyzing Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : A representative example of Gamification is Duolingo. Duolingo is an application that naturally helps learners learn foreign languages through various game activities. Then, when analyzing Duolingo, can foreign language learning be successfully achieved through games? What are the limitations?

ChatGPT's Answer :

Feedback:

Strengths:

1. In-depth analysis: The question requires students to break down the concept of gamification through Duolingo, looking at its strengths and limitations. It encourages them to evaluate the effectiveness of gamification in language learning, which fosters critical thinking.

2. Clear focus: It is clear that the question focuses on Duolingo and the use of games for language learning, making it easy for students to understand the context of the inquiry.

Areas for improvement:

1. Clarity and specificity: While the question is generally clear, it could be further refined for clarity. The phrasing, "Can gamification successfully help language learning through Duolingo?" could be more specific. For example, you could ask, "How does Duolingo's use of gamification impact language learning success, and what limitations might exist in this approach?"

2. Depth of analysis: The question could be further refined by guiding the students on the types of analysis to focus on, such as effectiveness, engagement, learning retention, and specific limitations (e.g., lack of depth, limited interaction with native speakers, etc.).

Revised Version:
"Duolingo is a popular example of gamification in language learning, using various game-like activities to support language acquisition. Analyze how effectively gamification through Duolingo aids language learning, and discuss the potential limitations of this approach."

Summary:

This question does fit well within the Analyzing stage, as it encourages students to critically assess the impact of a gamification-based platform (Duolingo) on language learning while identifying its potential limitations. With slight adjustments for clarity and specificity, it can prompt even deeper analysis.

# data[].attributes.headline
Evaluating Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Evaluating Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : Duolingo is a famous example of gamification, and Duolingo is a foreign language learning gamification platform. Can this application help improve Speaking Skills? Speaking is a means that requires the presence of speakers and listeners from person to person. Evaluate whether gamification can compensate for these shortcomings

ChatGPT's Answer :

Feedback:

Strengths:

1. Critical evaluation: The question encourages students to evaluate whether Duolingo’s gamification method can effectively improve speaking skills, a crucial part of language learning. It directly asks students to think critically about the platform’s ability to address the limitations of speaking practice.

2. Focus on a specific skill: By focusing on Speaking Skills, the question targets a key area of language learning that often presents challenges when using gamification. It’s a clear and relevant topic for discussion.

Areas for improvement:

1. Clarity of phrasing: The question could be slightly more specific in terms of what criteria students should use to evaluate Duolingo's effectiveness in improving speaking skills. Are they evaluating the app's technology, its design, or its impact on learning outcomes? Clarifying this would make the task more focused.

2. Depth of evaluation: While the question is clear, it could benefit from further specifying how students should support their evaluation. For example, you could guide them to consider empirical evidence, user reviews, or specific research on how well gamification can improve speaking skills.

Revised Version:
"Duolingo is a popular example of gamification in language learning, but as speaking requires interaction between a speaker and a listener, can gamification effectively improve speaking skills? Evaluate whether Duolingo’s approach is effective in enhancing speaking proficiency, considering its design and possible limitations."

Summary:

This question is appropriate for the Evaluating stage as it asks students to make a judgment about the effectiveness of Duolingo for improving speaking skills. With slight improvements for clarity and depth, it will lead to a more thorough evaluation. It also encourages students to think critically about how technology (in this case, gamification) can enhance or limit specific language skills.

# data[].attributes.headline
Creating Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.subject
Creating Stage _ Topic : 🎮 Gamification in Education

# data[].attributes.body
My Question : Students will be able to participate more actively in class if they bring games to classroom activities in the actual language education field. Currently, there are various learning sites on the Internet where you can study English with games, but there is no teaching method related to this case yet. As the IT era develops, teaching methods should be revised, so develop teaching methods using games

ChatGPT's Answer :

Feedback:

Strengths:

1. Creativity: The question challenges students to think creatively and design a new teaching method that integrates gamification. This is a high-level task that pushes students to come up with an innovative solution.

2. Real-world application: The question focuses on how to apply theoretical knowledge in a practical context. It asks students to consider the actual classroom environment and design something that could work in a real educational setting.

3. Encourages forward thinking: By asking students to think about how teaching methods should evolve in the digital age, the question encourages them to anticipate future trends in education and adapt accordingly.

Areas for improvement:

1. Clarity and focus: The question is a bit long and could be more concise. Specifically, the reference to "the internet" and the "various learning sites" could be simplified to make the task more clear and focused. It’s important to ensure that students know exactly what they're being asked to do: design a new teaching method.

2. Guidance: While the question encourages creativity, it may help to offer more specific guidance on how students should approach this task. For example, asking them to consider the balance between game mechanics and educational outcomes could help focus their ideas. Additionally, suggesting that students base their methods on current research or case studies might make it more feasible to come up with a practical solution.

Revised Version:
"In the context of language education, gamification can increase student engagement. However, there are currently no established teaching methods that combine gaming with language education. Given the advancements in IT, propose a new teaching method that integrates games to enhance language learning. Consider how this method could be applied in a classroom setting."

Summary:

This question is appropriate for the Creating stage as it requires students to generate a new idea (a teaching method) based on existing knowledge. It also challenges students to think critically about how to innovate in an area where current practices are still evolving. By making the question a bit clearer and providing some additional guidance on how to structure their response, students will be better equipped to create a practical and effective teaching method.

# data[].attributes.body
If I were to describe IT-Based English Education in a single word, it would be “growth.” There were countless assignments that I completed without understanding their purpose and just filled in whatever conditions were required. There were also moments when I did them reluctantly, while complaining about it. However, when I look back at the semester, I realize this course was where I grew the most.

The most memorable assignment for me was the “ChatGPT Prompt Making Practicum.” To me, ChatGPT was nothing more than a convenient search engine — just a tool to find information quickly. Whenever I didn't know a concept, I would simply ask it to provide a definition or an example, which corresponds to Level 1 of Bloom's Taxonomy. I was aware that generative AIs like ChatGPT or Perplexity were developing rapidly, but I hadn’t really thought about how much we could do with them.

As I mentioned in the Introduction — “AI is the new electricity of our era”— I came to realize through this assignment that, if we know how to use it, AI can be a powerful tool for research, education, and creativity. While developing questions based on Bloom's Taxonomy, I recognized something profoundly important: AI is available to everyone, but the smarter you are at prompting it, the more you can benefit from it. Those who know how to ask sophisticated and insightful questions will extract more valuable information and functionality from it, while those who do not may become more dependent and less able to think for themselves.

I used to be someone who was easily satisfied with whatever information AI provided me and didn’t put much thought into framing my questions. But through this practice, I started to be more careful

and purposeful about the prompts I entered. I learned not to rely on whatever answers came back to me, but to reflect and critique their content.

Another assignment I remember well was the Children’s Day substitute assignment on May 5th. I clicked the link posted in the assignment, summarized the key concepts of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Homo-Prompt, and wrote a Reflection Paper after watching a video about the attitude we should have in the age of AI. It was a substitute assignment for attendance, so I put in a lot of effort to organize the information neatly and clear it up at a single view — after all, making things look nice and clear was something I was good at. But I was so busy organizing information that I treated the Reflection Paper — a piece meant to convey my own thoughts — as something less important. So I simply put whatever came to mind into it and handed it in. Naturally, I was expecting a compliment from the professor, but instead I received feedback that my writing was messy and illogical. It was embarrassing — I wished I could withdraw it — but afterwards, when I opened it up and read it carefully, I noticed how poor its structure and flow were. I felt ashamed and nervous about future writing assignments.

However, I think this fear turned into a powerful motivator for me. It made me more conscious about my writing and forced me to reflect and revise my thoughts. It may seem strange to say that writing was a key moment in a class about IT-Based English Education, but for me, it was a huge turning point. The course was tough and filled with numerous tasks, but in the end, it was the class I learned from the most — a class that profoundly influenced my attitude toward my future.

# data[].attributes.body
In My Learning Journey, I described the IT-Based English Teaching course as “growth.” To achieve that growth, I faced many obstacles along the way, and I’d like to reflect on how I overcame them.

1. Making Educational Reels

The first challenge I faced was making an educational reel. I had consumed countless reels on Instagram, but it was my first time creating a reel myself. Making a reel for educational purposes — instead of for entertainment — felt especially challenging. The instructor provided us with a topic, which helped me find a direction, but I hadn’t previously thought much about what makes a reel effective for education.

Determined to do a good job, I opened Instagram and researched by searching for “English phrasal verb reels.” After watching numerous video clips, I tried to identify key elements that made them effective. The points I noticed were “BGM, speed, flow, and use of images.” At the time, I hadn’t gotten more sophisticated in my analysis, but I applied these points to create a video-based educational reel that would be clear, engaging, and helpful for learners, using the Stampng application.

When I finished my first reel, I felt proud and satisfied. However, after receiving the instructor’s feedback, I realized it was more of a “guidance” video than a true educational reel. I learned that a good educational reel involves careful consideration of many elements — repetition, engagement, delivery speed, background music volume, and incentives to keep viewers coming back. Although this assignment is already finished, I plan to apply these lessons to produce a more polished video for my final project.

2. Difficulties in Writing and How I Overcame Them

The second challenge I faced was writing. As I mentioned in My Learning Journey, writing is one of my greatest weaknesses. The May 5th makeup assignment required me to summarize information and then reflect on it in a Reflection Paper. I enjoy reading and absorbing information, but putting my thoughts into writing has always been a struggle for me. Whenever I tried to write, I felt my vocabulary was weak and the process of writing and erasing seemed frustrating and cumbersome. At my previous school, I avoided classes that required extensive writing, which meant I hadn’t gotten much feedback on my writing skills.

During this course, the instructor’s feedback made me realize exactly what I was struggling with in my writing. When I went back and read my own writing, I noticed many awkward expressions and illogical leaps. To improve, I decided to apply the GPT prompting techniques we learned in class. Whenever I had a writing assignment, I first drafted it carefully and then reread it to find awkward

or illogical points. Next, I composed a specific prompt to GPT, asking it to critique and suggest improvements for my writing. I then incorporated this feedback into my revision. I’m still practicing this approach, but I can already feel my writing improving.