# data[].attributes.body
5/10
pro: didn't stop when people interrupted her
con: repetitive and boring

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
pro: good use of evidence
con: to long and dragged

# data[].attributes.body
5/10

pro: loved how she was sticking up for women

con: way too long and zoned out a bit

# data[].attributes.body
9/10

Pro: Strong and persuasive words were used to solidify her point

Cons: Way too long + boring

# data[].attributes.body
pro: relatable to audience
con: to informal and. to much giggling wouldn't come across as important as it was

# data[].attributes.body
8/10
pro: got her point across
con: none

# data[].attributes.body
Jens
8/10
pro - her point was clear and used evidence well against them.
con - a bit long, stopped listening in the middle.

# data[].attributes.body
7/10

pro: relatable to the audience

con: quite boring as she was repetitive most of the times

# data[].attributes.body
8/10

Pros: good use of evidence

Cons: repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
4/10
pro: strong words used
con: never stopped talking

# data[].attributes.body
9/10
pro: powerful speech
con: got repetitive in the middle

# data[].attributes.body
Jen
9/10
pro - was casual so more intriguing and easier to listen to and understand.
con - nothing

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
pro: got her point across, didn't stop when she was getting interrupted.
con: boring and very repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
7/10
pro - worded and spoken well
con - boring

# data[].attributes.body
4/10
pro: she was good at stating her points
cons: talked too much

# data[].attributes.body
8/10
Pro: good use of words and use of conveying issue
con: repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
7/10

Pro: engages a lot with the audience

Cons: nothing

# data[].attributes.body
8/10
pro: engaging
con: weak information

# data[].attributes.body
7/10

pro: didnt make it so formal and made good impact on people
con: nothing

# data[].attributes.body
6/10
pro - has good intentions behind it
con - zoned out

# data[].attributes.body
9.5/10
pro: very entertaining and glued me in
cons: people kept applauding her through her speech

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
pro: words he was using
con: to long

# data[].attributes.body
8/10
pro - was engaging
con - boring some parts

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
pro: good reason to be spoken about
cons: a bit too serious

# data[].attributes.body
Jen
9/10
pro - worded well and confronting.
con - not intriguing the whole time.

# data[].attributes.body
8/10
Powerful
Too repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
pro: Powerful information
con: Too long and can zone out easily.

# data[].attributes.body
7/10
pros: made it fun and not boring
con:   no negatives

# data[].attributes.body
9/10

# data[].attributes.body
6/10
pros: important topic

cons: boring

# data[].attributes.body
7/10

# data[].attributes.body
7/10
pro: diction
con: monotonous repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
7/10
pros: looks good, great language
cons:words, boring
10/10
pros:its the queen rhianna, she says things that can be related to
cons: none its rhianna cmon now
0/10
pros:rasing sexism awareness ig
cons: so so so boring tomato tomato i fell asleep

# data[].attributes.body
9/10
Pros: A important discussion
Cons: Boring

# data[].attributes.body
8/10

Pro: An important topic to discuss

Con: a bit long

# data[].attributes.body
1. 5/10
2. 8/10
3. 1/10 DH

# data[].attributes.body
1. she was formal as she was in a court room with opponents.
2.  the audience is talking back to her and trying to argue with her but she ignores them
3. the repetition is used when she repeats how she is offended by the opposition's actions and words.
4. her call to action is to make them less sexist and realise all the stuff they have  caused
5. I stopped listening when she kept repeating herself as it was boring and had already heard her say this

# data[].attributes.body
1. She was loud, clear, and persuasive in her speech which was formal
2. She made the male audience feel intimidated which caused them to make say some rude remarks
3. When she was listing dates of election, "then the".
4. The parliament needs to take liability for their actions both in and out of the room
5. I zoned out near the end because I wanted to go to sleep.

# data[].attributes.body
1) her speech was formal
2) her speech was more toward the males to be confronting causing them to have a defensive reaction when fighting back
3)she had used repetition when repeating how she was offered some comments being made
4)the call to action was making them take accountability for the words and action they make
5) I had zoned out towards the end as it was too long and didn't stop talking

# data[].attributes.body
1. her and her speech is formal.
2. she is making the opposition mad as her speech is towards the men.
3. she uses repetition all throughout her speech sating many things.
4. the call of action is too stop sexism outside and inside the parliament.
5. i zoned out on the middle part as she was just  being very repetitive.

# data[].attributes.body
1. she was formal
2. It was serious which made me take it more serious
3.  said every year when some dude was pre-selected
4. To change sexist behaviour in parliament
5. couple minutes in lost interest because i didn't care + boring

# data[].attributes.body
1. I noticed how Julia Gillard presented herself formally and very upfront when stating her points.
2. Her presentation manner appeared to be bothered by the sexism and misogyny and it was vital for her to get her points across.
3. she employs the word "offended" to describe how she was positioned when the position did certain actions
4. The call to action was to cease mistreating women and not allow sexism to be a problem.
5. I believe I zoned out when she just started talking too much.

# data[].attributes.body
1) She approaches her speech with a formal attitude.
2) The audience occasionally reacts displeased when not agreeing with what she says, specifically when she quotes their sexist remarks targeting them.
3) She uses repetition when talking about how she has been offended.
4) Her call to action was her explaining the men need to take responsibility and action for their sexist remarks and views.
5) In the middle, as the speech was getting dull, but picked up again when she used repetition, and her tone became more aggressive to assert authority and demand change.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Julias presentation style was very formal and she spoke very loud and confident when other people would talk over her or try to interrupt her
2) her presentation styles impact on her audience was that she got her point across
3) in the opening of her speech she used a-lot of repetition and anaphora is when she says she is offended by the leader of opposition because he is sexist
4) her call of action was to make sure that they take responsibility for their actions and to apologies and change their misogynistic ways
5) i zoned out near the middle as it got very repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
1.She was formal in her speech.
2.Her presentation style was strong and
3.She uses repetition on how angry and offended she is by the leaders actions towards women.
4.Her call to action is to stop women being less appreciated in leaderships outside and inside court rooms.And this behaviour towards them should stop.
5.I zoned out through the middle of the speech because she was being repetitive.

# data[].attributes.body
1. She uses a presentation style that is a bit informal
2. the impact she had on her audience was from her presentation style was that some of them agreed with her but also some of them didn't and started to question her "Where did you get this quote from"
3. she uses "I'm Offended" and lists all the things that he has done/said that offended her
4. that the opposition leader should apologize for the statements he had said  and what he has done to offend her
5. I zoned out when she started to list all these dates which was too much to listen to and when she was talking about Mr. Slipper and him attending his wedding.

8/10
pro: she was very consistent in the words she was calling the opposition leader "misogyny" "sexism"
con: she made her speech lengthy and included bits that where hard to understand her point and what she was saying.

# data[].attributes.body
1. formal
2.  since she's the prime minister and the first female , she has a lot of respect and will be heard more. and the audience was mostly males
3. when she stated how she is offended.
4. the call to action in her speech was when she stated sexism and they need to take reasonability
5. i zoned out when she started listing past electrons years because it just got to repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
1. What do you notice about Julia Gillard's presentation style? Was she formal or informal?
2.What impact does her presenation style have on her audience?

3. Where does Julia Gillard use repetition/anaphora in the opening of her speech and what is the impact of it?

4. What is the call to action of this speech?
5. Where did you zone out during the speech? Why was that?

# data[].attributes.body
1. julia guillard was formal as she was in a court room
2. her presentation style seemed for the male audience to be confronting causing them to react in a defensive way
3. she uses repetition when she repeats how she is offended by the actions of the leader of the opposition
4.  the call of action is that they need to take accountability for their actions outside and inside of the court rooms
5. the section i zoned out was when she began speaking listing dates because she was speaking in a flat tone and it sounded repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
1. What do you notice about Rhianna's presentation style? Was she formal or informal?

2. Find an example of anaphora within Rhianna's speech and record the line.

3. What is the call to action of her speech? and her speech's purpose?
4. How does Rihanna appeal to her audience?
5. How is her presentation style different to DiCaprio’s?

# data[].attributes.body
1.informal
2. 'you don't have to'
3. she quoted her grandma "if you have a dollar, there is plenty to share"
4. she appeals to the audience by putting her at the same level referring to as we are all equal and human
5. leo style is more formal while rhienna is informal

# data[].attributes.body
1. informal speech
2. while she repeats "you don't have to" in her speech emphasising how easy it is to make change
3. her call to speech was her presenting her grandmother's morals hoping they inspire the audience
4. rihanna appeals to the audience by making herself relatable and equal
5. her presentation is different to leonardo since she was interactive with the audience

# data[].attributes.body
1. Her presentational style was informal

2. anaphora repetition of one one one

3. when she circles back to what her grandma used to say and quoted her grandma spiritually.

4. That she is a normal person as well because she watches tv.

5. Rihanna wasn't formal and DiCaprio was very formal

# data[].attributes.body
informal

# data[].attributes.body
1) Her presentation style was informal.
2) An example of anaphora in her speech was 'you don't have to' and 'one'
3) Her call to action in her speech was her referring back to her grandma and that you don't have to be rich or famous to help those in need. and her purpose of the speech was to help those in need.
4) Rihannas appeal to her audience was adding some jokes and being informal
5) her presentation is different to DiCaprio because her presentation style got through to us more because she was more relatable and not as informal as she was talking to collage students while DiCaprios was very formal and towards higher ups

# data[].attributes.body
1) Her speech is informal
2) "you don't have to"
3) She prompts people to show kindness and do simple things like donate as you don't need a high social status or wealth to do so, only humanity.
4) She uses an informal approach to her speech to sound more human proving you don't need to be above people to make an impact or do good.
5) DiCaprio is very formal while Rhianna contracts that in being informal with her presentation to the audience.
-Jen

# data[].attributes.body
1. informal
2. the anaphora is 'you don't have to' and 'one'
3. to take into consideration her grandmas morals. a dollar is a lot to share which is what her grandma used to say
4. she isn't too formal and makes jokes and laughs with her audience
5. because it isnt as formal as leo's

# data[].attributes.body
1) informal
2) rihanna anaphora is  "you dont have to"
3)she promotes people to show kindness and do simple things for example when you donate you don't need to be rich or high in power to make a difference and help those in need.
4) her speech appeal to the audience as she was using jokes and being informal
5) it was different because her style it was presented in and she was more reliable to the situation as she has been through it

# data[].attributes.body
1. Her presentation style was informal.
2. Her anaphoras are: "You don't have to." ; "One person. One organization. "
3. She said, "If you have a dollar there is plenty to share." her speech is so that the audience or people donate to organisations
4. She appears approachable and human to her audience like she is one of them and also sees the avitisments
5. It is different from DiCaprio's speech because she involved the audience and she felt more casual and easier to listen to. The speeches are also different not just in the style but the different audience.

9/10
pro: she engaged with the audience and was easy to follow along
con: she broke in between her speech

# data[].attributes.body
1.informal
2.'you don't have to ' and 'one'
3. The call to action  is that a dollar is alot to share
4. she's jokes in between and laughs with her audience.
5.  Rihanna speech  is very different because she's not up serious whilst Leonardo was very serious

# data[].attributes.body
1. Is this speech formal or informal?
2. What impact does his presentation style have on the audience?
3. Where does Dicaprio use enumeration to persuade his audience? Find and record an example.

4.Why does Dicaprio quote experts? Who are they and what impact do they have on the audience?

5. What is the call to action of this speech?

# data[].attributes.body
During the call to action he states that it's a you problem towards the audience. He also states "we beg" meaning, humanity wants a change.

# data[].attributes.body
he quoted something from the navy because not everyone believes the scientists but when army or navy get involved people start to take it seriously because their word and dignity means alot to us

# data[].attributes.body
This is formal by the way he is speaking and the way he presented himself to the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
yes because the way he spoke dressed and where he was

# data[].attributes.body
Leonardo DiCaprio's speech is formal because he delivered it in a structured and professional manner.

# data[].attributes.body
1. formal we see this through the way he presents himself
2. he has a persuasive impact to
3. to emphasis the importance of the global issue
4.the expert he does quote is a well respected army general, where people are willing to listen and understand it is a real issue
5.to convince the audience to make a change towards climate change

# data[].attributes.body
1. yes this speech is formal because of the way he was dressed, the way he spoke and the environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. formal - the way he spoke and was dressed.
2. shows how professional he is and wants his point heard
3. he lists the negative outcomes that climate change has on the world
4. he quotes a leader in the Navy, this is because people trust the Navy and take them seriously because their words mean something to us so he is hoping the audience takes the topic seriously as well.
5. the call to action is to stop climate change and save the world.

# data[].attributes.headline
Leonardo DiCaprio Speech- Olivia, Taylah 

# data[].attributes.subject
Leonardo DiCaprio Speech- Olivia, Taylah 

# data[].attributes.body
1) formal- well dressed
2) He is professional and wants to make his point stand out.
3) he uses enumeration while listing the negatives of climate change.
4) the exert quote he used is this leader in the navy quoted" Climate change is our biggest threat" he has used that to make it stand out and make people stop and think as it involves the navy.
5) he is trying to humanize himself and trying make himself like one of us as the general public

# data[].attributes.body
1) Formal, because of his overall presentation and his vocabulary.
2) They seem to listen and acknowledge what he is saying.
3) He uses enumeration to emphasize his point.
4) Because they are very knowledgeable, and an audience tends to listen to them because they are confident and reliable in what they say.
5) He reminds the audience that this is not only his problem, but also everyone's. He positions himself as an average citizen as climate change will affect everyone regardless of their social status or wealth.
-Jen

# data[].attributes.body
1. formal
2. it has the leaders think deeper about the topic and focus towards action rather than choosing to ignore it
3. he uses enumeration while he lists the negative outcomes climate change has had on the world
4. he quotes a leader in the navy rather than a scientist due to mistrust and the idea that people take the military more seriously
5. the call to action is to take action to making change in climate change

# data[].attributes.body
1.formal (the way he dresses, the way he spoke and the environment).
2.He informs the audience of a on going issue and suggest we should take action instead of ignoring the issue.
5.The call to action is to save the earth

# data[].attributes.body
2.he looks professional and very determine
3. he uses enumeration when he states
4. a leader in navy , how military people are mistreated
5. the call to action is to save the earth.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This was a formal speech
2. His impact with the persuasive presentation style he uses had the audience thinking about what he is saying
3. He uses enumeration to persuade the audience, "Droughts are more common oceans are solidifying, Greenlands ice and Antarctic ice is melting"
4. He quotes Admon from the Navy that Climate Change is our biggest threat
5. The call to action, "Now it is your turn that time to answer... and I encourage you to answer it with." he uses this at the end of his speech.

7/10
pros: list all the things that are happing eg the ice caps melting
cons: he was to lengthening with explaining why