# data[].attributes.headline
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.headline
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.headline
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.headline
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.headline
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.subject
What's "doctoring" in journalism? What do you think about the duck's actions? Are the duck's actions against the law? Why?

# data[].attributes.body
"Doctoring" in journalism refers to falsely editing and modifying information such that it  is not accurate and real

Hence the duck's actions were immoral because they do not show 100% truth and were edited beforehand.

The duck's actions are against the law because it was unethical of it to modify and change the original content and photos. It could result in the public being misled by the media they put out.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means to edit and change the content and/or appearance of the original piece of information and/or image in order to fabricate the photo/content and deceive the audience.

I think that the duck’s actions are extremely unethical since this would mean that the duck is trying to deceive his audience by fabricating the original photo and this will lead to serious consequences such as losing trust among the audience.

The duck’s actions are against the law since ‘doctoring’ is unethical and distorts the original information being conveyed to the audience and this becomes a very irresponsible and dishonest action.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means to change certain factual information of the article with no concrete evidence that it is true/real, as evidenced by the duck stating that Lindsay Lohan and JFK rode a unicorn which is not true as Lindsay Lohan and JFK existed in different timelines and a unicorn doesn't exist.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring means manipulating a piece of media such as news images or text.

I think that the duck’s actions are unethical as we turn to news for reliable sources of information and the news that he is sharing is untrue and the pictures are edited.

Yes the duck’s actions are against the law because he is telling a story that is not true by editing the image and faking a piece of news.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism is some sort of fabrication/exaggeration or anything similar in the published journalism story to create a false implication to the audience.

The duck brought forward that, "Lindsay Lohan and JFK flew on a unicorn together," a factually inaccurate statement which is unethical in professional journalism to pass off fabrications as though they are true.

Depending on what media laws govern the world that the duck works in, it is generally against the law to act in such a manner. In certain instances where the journalism is so obviously satire or being done in a comedic fashion, maybe the duck's actions could be justified but without additional context, it is fair to say that the duck's actions are against the law.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that ‘doctoring’ means editing or fabricating.

I believe that it is the wrong thing to do/ unethical as the image will then not be as it actually is, which means it is being fabricated which deceives audiences from the truth.

The duck’s act is against the law as his actions write an untruthful narration.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that doctoring refers to editing images or media in order to perpetuate a storyline that is untrue. In the case of the duck, jfk and lindsay lohan flying on a uniucorn together. This is then used to perpetuate the idea that lindsay 'gets around' etc.

I believe the ducks actions are unethical as they are trying to perpetuate a false narrative to society which can cause harm to the reputation of others, and also just overall be a non credible source and lose the trust of the viewers in the future.

Yes, it is against the law as in media, we have an unspoken rule to remain ethical and not spread false narratives. The media plays an important role in society and has remarkable influence, therefore it is necessary that such laws be in place to avoid any harm to any parties.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means to edit a story or image to exaggerate it.

I think the duck's action is unethical as it exaggerated the images by adding clouds and changing the colour of the sky, as well as writing that lindsay lohan and JFK rode a unicorn with no evidence and only using its own words, "trust me".

The duck's actions are against the law as it is publishing fake news that could damage ones reputation as well as allowing audience to believe in its lies.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Doctoring refers to the unethical action of altering visual media like photographs, videos, etc. that misleads the audience.
2. The Duck's action was definitely unethical considering that he had photoshopped not only the clouds but also a unicorn (which does not exist). It is fantastical but definitely not realistic nor credible, making it not journalism appropriate.
3. Against the law of journalism, definitely. The Duck's actions supports a particular narrative that he believes, showing that he has included his personal feelings in this visual media. Along with that, his actions undermines the fact that journalism values honesty and objectivity, ensuring that every piece of news is devoid of personal agenda//biases. His action compromises the truth and has the potential to mislead the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring is editing and tweaking the contents of media from what it originally was to something entirely new.

Duck's action is unethical as it is altering the reality of the original work that it has taken; the perceived content and messages might differ. Some people may be misled by the genuineness and the credibility of the media.

I do not believe it is against the law as long as it does not spread fake news and misinformation and is solely for the purpose of entertainment. Heavy editing such as the duck case is unethical but not against the law, the journalist might suffer consequences from the society but not the government.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism is editing images or words to change the truth, hence causing it to be false and an unreliable source of information.

I think that the duck's actions are not ethical because what will be reported becomes untrue since it does not accurately real events that took place.

The duck's actions are against the law because journalism reports should contain the truth and shouldn't be changed. The news reports are no longer credible and transparent for the public.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in Journalism refers to the act of changing the content in order to deceive the audience.

In my opinion, the duck's action is unethical as he changed the contents of the image such as enhancing the sky and making Lindsay Lohan and President JFK ride a unicorn. I feel that Duck's action was against the law as he fabricated the event and wanted to mislead the public = Fake news

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring is to present information for the media in a biased way. For the duck, it edited the image it submitted in such a way to be favorable for itself.

I believe the ducks actions are unethical as it is giving unreliable information to the public as the photo has been manipulated which may cause confusion among the public.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring is the changing/altering of information/photos/videos.
The action's made by the duck is wrong and is against the law. It's against the law as the news being reported is of partial truth and not the entire truth which may cause harm and will diminish credibility of the ducks.

# data[].attributes.body
-doctoring is changing important aspects of a piece of media such as an image so that it portrays a story that is entirely false or untruthful.
-the duck's actions are not ethical as it is telling an untrue and false story, which can lead to the public believing in a story that is not true.
-the duck's actions are against the law as telling an untrue story can lead to a spread of misinformation, which therefore affects society as a whole and may cause negative impacts. for example, if a media outlet is caught for spreading misinformation, this will cause the media outlet to no longer be reliable and the public will no longer trust them.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring means manipulating or altering photographs or videos to create a false or misleading representation of an event or situation. This means that journalists intentionally modify visual content to deceive the audience or advance a particular agenda.

I think that the duck's actions have a certain agenda to frame and compel people to think a certain way, which is wrong. Therefore, I think that the duck's actions are unethical because news are supposed to be accurate and relay true information, but the duck had edited the picture in such a way that the picture is not an actual representation.

Yes, the duck's actions are against the law as the duck had manipulated and edited the image, which makes it a piece of news that is untrue and fake.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means manipulating content through text and images. The ducks actions are unethical as it deceives the audience. I do think the ducks actions are against the law as the news that was put out is not true, and might ultimately affect the credibility of the news.

# data[].attributes.body
`What is doctoring in journalism? It is the altering of media presented to the mass public and is unethical most or all of the time. The duck's actions could be against because it is basically fake news yeah. I think the actions are wrong and unjust as it could lead people to think that some events really happened when they did not.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring means manipulating an image like the duck did, making it look like it’s fake and edited.

I think that the ducks actions are unacceptable in the media Industry simply because it is damaging the trust that people have in the media and it also portrays a false depiction of the actual story, also making it against the law.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism could be changing what is being told or found into something that is more interesting and will attract media users' attention.

I think Duck's actions are definitely unethical because he is giving something that isn't true and realistic like flying on a unicorn.

Duck's actions are against the law because it is giving something that is not very original that will affect the reliability of the media company he is working for etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring means to change/manipulate the information given, to change the source to fit the narrative that a journalist want.

From the comic, it is unethical as everyone goes to the news for factual information and news about what is going on in the world. People want to know what 'exactly' happened, and not to be misled hence journalist must adhere to certain laws and rules.

The duck isnt being credible as it has change the photo and made an untrue piece of story between Lindsay Lohan and JFK.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means to change certain information such as photos, statements etc. to other information which may or might not be backed by reliable sources and isn't based on factual based evidence. What the duck did was not legal as it is misleading and untrue

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism to me, refers to the act of falsifying an information to deceive the audience in order to push a certain narrative. I found the duck's actions to be unethical as the duck had altered the picture and hence, misrepresented the information it brought forth. Yes, I believe that the duck's actions are against the law as it has directly contributed to the spread of fake news, and depending on the medium it had published it on, its actions might negatively affect the public on a huge scale

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means to change the media to make it seem more interesting or unusual. This can be done through editing images, adding information that are false.

The duck's actions are unethical according to journalism as the image/news becomes false and people may lose trust and be misled by misinformation. It did not follow the journalism ethics. :(

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring refers to manipulating media either through the form of text or images. The duck's actions are incorrect as the duck edited the picture which is not the truth. However, I don't think that this is against the law as the edited pictures don't harm anyone or put anyone in danger, but it is unethical to do so

# data[].attributes.body
The term doctoring defines to something that was altered. Say, if a document is doctored, it means it could have been tampered with and by that, means could either be edited; in addition of elements or removing elements in the document or picture etc.

The duck's action is wrong as I personally feel that is imperative for him/her to uphold the truth, accuracy, and integrity, and to report responsibly and ethically. Doctoring goes against these principles.

# data[].attributes.body
"Doctoring" is the act of making untruth modifications to media.

The duck's actions are against the law because journalism should report accurate information and by doctoring the image, the audience is led to believe the incorrect information. When the audience finds out that the information is fake, the media outlet may no longer be trusted by the audience and also be punished by the relevant authorities in terms of fines and penalties.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring refers to the deliberate manipulation of content, particularly in the case of editing photographs.

In this specific example, the duck knowingly altered the photos to enhance the narrative. Such practices cross the boundary of ethical journalism, as they involve fabricating nonexistent elements and disseminating them to the general public at large.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism means to change certain factual information of the article with no concrete evidence that it is true/real, as evidenced by the duck stating that Lindsay Lohan and JFK rode a unicorn which is not true as Lindsay Lohan and JFK existed in different timelines and a unicorn doesn't exist.

Doctoring in journalism means to change certain information such as photos, statements etc. to other information which may or might not be backed by reliable sources and isn't based on factual based evidence. What the duck did was not legal as it is misleading and untrue

I think that the duck's actions is unethical as it affects the reputation of real people even though what was stated is not real or true.

# data[].attributes.body
Doctoring in journalism refers to editing or any form of altering the original piece of information with an intention to mislead the information.

I feel like the duck's action is unethical because he is editing the original picture but i don't think it is against the law based off what he edits, it's unethical but i don't think it is a big impact for it to be called a lawful offence.

It does not spread any fake information so I don't think it goes against the law since it is just changing the appearance by a small bit.