# data[].attributes.body
Great start-- Love the "imagine this.."

# data[].attributes.body
Starting off defining a key term is helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm unfamiliar with CI. This framing was helpful, especially how you contextualized this theory as a practitioner.

# data[].attributes.body
The connection between theories are clear. Consider labeling the name of the theory instead of the theorist (Bourdieu) in the first bubble of your conceptual framework .

# data[].attributes.body
OF COURSE, I love the connection to belonging. Couldn't agree more that this operates within CI

# data[].attributes.body
1. Learned that belonging can be framed in a different way, such that feeling like there is a sense of being a part of the math classroom rather than just a student in a building.

2. Interesting how CI and Equity can be related through belonging

3. What is a PWI?

# data[].attributes.body
Which tool do you plan to use for measuring students' sense of belonging?

# data[].attributes.body
3-CI used to create equal status in students to level the playing field in learning; social hierachies mirror academic engagement; CI challenges "whiteness"norms for smartness in classes.

# data[].attributes.body
Liked the mention of focusing on teacher learning of CI, not just their implementation of CI

# data[].attributes.body
The buckets for your literature review are clear.

# data[].attributes.body
I like how you organized your current study overview chart to provide us with a map of how you are conducting the study

# data[].attributes.body
2- Embedded positionality in purpose for research significance; visual to explain framework alignment with CI as the connective tissue for equity.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I liked the way you started us off with an imagination exercise and placed us in the mind of a struggling student in math. It helped ground the presentation for us.

2. Looks like you have a good grasp of what frameworks you are interested in exploring for your study.

# data[].attributes.body
I appreciate how you connected your positionality to your study

# data[].attributes.body
-the slides clearly identified which aspects of the study you were discussing (lit review, RQs, etc) so it was easy to follow

-starting with the scenario was engaging and made it clear what the problem is

# data[].attributes.body
Similar to Jeneca, have you had a chance to explore any measurement tools for belonging, CI, and survey's you plan to administer to students for the quant portion?

# data[].attributes.body
1- Is there an existing tool you can borrow from to glean the findings of your RQs?

# data[].attributes.body
Beliefs on status play a role in how CI is implemented

# data[].attributes.body
Starting with defining CI after the scenario was a bit confusing. Maybe place CI into a bit more context and relate it to the scenario a bit more clearly

# data[].attributes.body
I learned about cultural inclusive pedagogy. I'm wondering about its lineage to culturally responsive and culturally sustaining. It might be helpful to show a visual of the nuance and where this term sits within the literature

# data[].attributes.body
Very well organized and like the fluidity of your presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
May be interesting to see which educator are offered or given opportunities to learn CI

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that you are using belonging. I learned about cultural inclusive theory, and I was wondering if that can serve my research.

# data[].attributes.body
What will inform your professional learning design?

# data[].attributes.body
I hadn't known about CI before. I got an introduction to that. I also appreciated the definitions in the beginning.

# data[].attributes.body
-CI is an interesting concept that I would like to explore further

-pointing out flaws in group work is unique as it seems like its constantly being praised as a "required" practice