# data[].attributes.body
I am part of work group 1 (Evidence-based models for truly and meaningfully integrating community into the design and implementation of community-level interventions) and our group struggled with the reality that all members sat in academia/research organizations. It challenging to balance how much we could move forward/plan while missing direct input from community organizations/stakeholders. Engagement may mean finding money to cover peoples time or identifying a deliverable to give back to community stakeholders/organizations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Rec 2: Examine and develop recommendations on how implementation frameworks could explicitly incorporate/evaluate racism and discrimination

# data[].attributes.subject
Rec 2: Examine and develop recommendations on how implementation frameworks could explicitly incorporate/evaluate racism and discrimination

# data[].attributes.body
Impact concern: Frameworks are like toothbrushes, everyone has their own and no one wants to use someone else's. How much would this really help and make an impact? Would it give folks a pub credit in the equity space or make a real difference in how people approach research questions? We are skeptical.

# data[].attributes.headline
Balancing tension between wanting accountability/measurable outcomes and slowing down, creating community, re-assessing how we assess outcomes

# data[].attributes.subject
Balancing tension between wanting accountability/measurable outcomes and slowing down, creating community, re-assessing how we assess outcomes

# data[].attributes.headline
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.subject
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.body
tension between products that matter in the academic sphere and actions that have meaningful change

# data[].attributes.headline
Rec 4: Develop anti-racism best practices for IS professional organizations (e.g., hiring practices; creating cultures of inclusion)

# data[].attributes.subject
Rec 4: Develop anti-racism best practices for IS professional organizations (e.g., hiring practices; creating cultures of inclusion)

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe IS research organizations though are the ones where we can impact change as those are often researcher-based where we can have some level of control

# data[].attributes.headline
To inform this question, perhaps we begin by consdiering the action items that are the most "measurable"/quaitifiable? (Matt Hudson, Prisma Health, Greenville, S.C.)

# data[].attributes.subject
To inform this question, perhaps we begin by consdiering the action items that are the most "measurable"/quaitifiable? (Matt Hudson, Prisma Health, Greenville, S.C.)

# data[].attributes.body
The "question" being "What groups should we sustain"? Also, we should distinguish retaining a "group" from retaining an "action item". I argue that we "need" all group members. We may need to "reassign".

# data[].attributes.headline
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.subject
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.body
practical actions that are for the purpose of accountable - tangible, impactful tasks

# data[].attributes.headline
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.subject
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.body
Desire to do things that make a true difference in promoting anti-racism practices. No desire to do tings that promote an ideology and really just result in a publication (i.e. no meaningful impact)

Desire to focus on impact, not products

# data[].attributes.headline
Rec 3: Identify anti-racist evidence-based practices and policies and support the dissemination/communication of these to policymakers

# data[].attributes.subject
Rec 3: Identify anti-racist evidence-based practices and policies and support the dissemination/communication of these to policymakers

# data[].attributes.body
Reframing: Not all communities value EBPs - need to also consider culturally appropriate practices, etc.

Feasibility concern: Sharing evidence with policymakers requires extensive tailoring to context. This is doable with lots of resources (e.g. a funded grant focused on this), but are there smaller (little p - org policies) we can target without resources?

# data[].attributes.headline
Rec 4:  Develop anti-racism best practices for IS professional organizations (e.g., hiring practices; creating cultures of inclusion)

# data[].attributes.subject
Rec 4:  Develop anti-racism best practices for IS professional organizations (e.g., hiring practices; creating cultures of inclusion)

# data[].attributes.body
Feasibility concern: Is this too beyond the scope of what our ground has time to do? Do we have the necessary access, resources to make this change?

# data[].attributes.headline
Rec 5: Make equity and anti-racism lens in our peer review /grants 

# data[].attributes.subject
Rec 5: Make equity and anti-racism lens in our peer review /grants 

# data[].attributes.body
Impact concern: Instead of creating recs for making peer review and grant awards more equitable, can we really evaluate what NIH is doing and hold them accountable to their initiatives around promoting scholarship from researchers from minority backgrounds?

# data[].attributes.headline
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.subject
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, using this space to build community around a specific topic is valuable.

# data[].attributes.headline
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.subject
Overarching Concerns with Existing Activities - things to keep in mind

# data[].attributes.body
Challenges with keeping momentum forward with initiatives without a concrete outcome to work on, but also knowing that engaging in the process is part of the work

# data[].attributes.headline
Observing that there are differences between what is realistic and what is aspirational in terms of sustaining these subgroups 

# data[].attributes.subject
Observing that there are differences between what is realistic and what is aspirational in terms of sustaining these subgroups 