# data[].attributes.body
Stalin wanted to develop the Soviet Union from a "small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming." his reason to implement the collectivisation policy is to modernise the Soviet Union, in order to put the country on par with the other western countries, which Stalin once mentioned that he wanted to achieve what the westerns took 100 years, in only 10 years. To do so, Stalin needed all the farms to collectivise, give them tractors to increase the production and sell the grains to supply money to the growing process of industrialisation. Thus he implemented the collectivisation policy.

Another reason Stalin wanted to implement the collectivisation policy is to show the capitalist nations that communism is just as good, or better, than capitalism. this can be seen when Stalin writes "let the capitalist who boast about their 'civilisation' try to overtake us", strengthening his belief that the correct way to govern is through communism. to show it, Stalin gathered all the farms through the collectivisation policy and made sure that all of the grains produced in the harvests gets sold and earn profit for the country, meaning that all the things that the peasants produced were meant for the USSR's development. Thus he implemented the collectivisation policy.

With this, Stalin published the Pravda article to convince the peasants of the Soviet Union that the collectivisation policy is for the good of the country, and hope that the people will do their part to contribute in the modernisation of the USSR.

-amadia

# data[].attributes.body
Source A tells me that Stalin’s reasons for collectivisation in 1929 is to improve the economy during collectivisation. This is evident from source A which states ‘progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming’ and ‘becoming a country of matal; an automobilised coumtry, a tractorised country’ This suggests that Stalin wanted to have more bigger plots of land to put modern farming machinery in the lands to have greater productivity of crops. He would sell the crops for money to invest in industrialisation. Therefore, Stalin wanted to improve the economy during collectivisation to have better weaponary.

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer from source A that stalin’s reasons for collectivisation in 1929 was for economic benefits. this is evident from ‘ we have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming.’ this means that stalin wanted to boost Soviet union’s economy by modernising the state through collectisation (GOOD. ONE INFERENCE HERE. )where from individual farms they became kolkhozy’s . this allows for more efficient farming leading to more grains being grown and collected efficiently and effectively. as grains were collected in large numbers, the state collected them to be sold overseas to make profits to make new weapons and tractors for the state. hence, stalin had th e best inter

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer from the source that stalin wanted to have collectivisation so that the conditions of country will improve to become better than other countries. stalin’s motive was to move away from what was a backward country and level it up to a morden country with better industralisations. stalin wanted to make procedures (??? MEANING??) of how things work to be more effective by using machinery. this is supported by source A, “becoming w country of metal” shows that stalin wants the country to be strong powerful and armed by better industralisation. this converys that the country is becoming better and stronger benefitting the country through collectivisation. (Ok BUT MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED)

# data[].attributes.body
From Source A, I can infer that Stalin's reason for collectivisation is to modernise the USSR to be on par with the other Western countries that are more advanced than the USSR and to show that Communism is more superior than capitalism. This is evident in Source A which states that "let the capitalists who boast about their 'civilisation' try to overtake us!". This shows that collectivisation was aimed to modernise the USSR.
Another reason for Collectivisation was to secure a sufficient food supply in the USSR. This is evident from Source A which says that "peasants are joining the collective farm not in separate groups,but in whole villages,whole regions , whole districts and even, whole provinces.By collective farming, more grain can be collected to feed the population.

# data[].attributes.body
from source a, i can infer that stalin’s reason for collectivisation was to improve soviet union’s economy (INCOMPLETE. IT'S NOT JUST THE ECONOMY). this is supported by, “we have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale advanced, collective farming”. this meant that collectivisation was helping to gather crops on a larger scale, improving the agriculture of soviet union. with the improvement of agriculture, economy in soviet union will flourish, and will help soviet union to be a “country of metal; an automobilised country, a tractorised country” or modernised country. thus, stalin wanted collectivisation to improve the economy of soviet union. (YOU NEED TO USE THE WORDS MODERNISE, STRENGTHEN, TO BE MORE SPECIFIC. YOU SHOULD ALSO MENTION THAT SU MUST LEVEL UP TO THE WESTERN COUNTRIES BECAUSE THAT WAS ONE OF THE AIMS OF STALIN ):) :(

# data[].attributes.headline
Source A tells me that Stalin implemented collectivisation to modernize the country. This is evident from source A "we have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to a large-scale, advanced, collective farming. " this showed that due to collectivisation, the country was able to progress towards from a poor country to an "advanced, collective farming" therefore, this shows that Stalin started collectivisation to modernize the country (YES, BUT WHY? DID HE WANT TO STOP THERE OR DID HE HAVE A DEEPER MOTIVE TO MODERNISE THE COUNTRY? THINK AGAIN). 

# data[].attributes.subject
Source A tells me that Stalin implemented collectivisation to modernize the country. This is evident from source A "we have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to a large-scale, advanced, collective farming. " this showed that due to collectivisation, the country was able to progress towards from a poor country to an "advanced, collective farming" therefore, this shows that Stalin started collectivisation to modernize the country (YES, BUT WHY? DID HE WANT TO STOP THERE OR DID HE HAVE A DEEPER MOTIVE TO MODERNISE THE COUNTRY? THINK AGAIN). 

# data[].attributes.headline
Source A tells me the reasons for Stalin’s reasons for collectivisation in 1929 is to improve the economy. This is evident in source A in “We have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming.” and “We are becoming a country of metal; an automobilsed country, a tractorised country.” This suggest that Stalin wanted amplify the economy to be able to afford more tractors to increase his agricultural yield to thus modernise the USSR. Therefore, Stalin’s reasons for collectivisation was for economic benefits (

# data[].attributes.subject
Source A tells me the reasons for Stalin’s reasons for collectivisation in 1929 is to improve the economy. This is evident in source A in “We have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming.” and “We are becoming a country of metal; an automobilsed country, a tractorised country.” This suggest that Stalin wanted amplify the economy to be able to afford more tractors to increase his agricultural yield to thus modernise the USSR. Therefore, Stalin’s reasons for collectivisation was for economic benefits (

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from source A that the soviet union benefitted from collectivisation policies. This is seen from “we progressed from small,backward,individual farming to large-scale advanced,collective farming.” This shows that the soviet union is able to farm more efficiently due to the use of tractors in collective farms made by the collectivisation policies thus increasing grain production. Increase in grain production would benefit the USSR as it would allow the USSR to be able to feed its factory workers to produce more goods and sell the grain to acquire machines.

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from source A that stalin used collectivisation to support mordernisation and rapid industrialisation.the evidence is"we have progressed from small ,backward,individual farming to large scale advanced,collective farming."this shows that stalin collectivisation policies is for economic benefits to fund the production of weapons and factories.
Stalin also used collectivisation to further develop the country so that their country could be on par with other mordernised country the evident is "we are becoming a country of metal an automobilisee country" and "let the capitalist who boast about their civilisation try to over take us!" this shows that Stalin wanted to use collectivisatiom for peasants to work together to increase production so that stalin could sell the crops and use the money for the cities

# data[].attributes.body
Source A tells me that one of Stalin's reasons for collectivisation is to modernise USSR such that it can be on par with the rest of the western powers. This is supported by"becoming a country of metal;an automobilised country, a tactorised country". Stalin wanted to achieve what the other western powers acheived in 100 years in 10 years. Stalin wanted to show that communism is a much more superior system than capitalism.

# data[].attributes.body
Source

# data[].attributes.body
From source A, I can't infer that Stalin wanted collectivisation to develop his country further and modernise it. And to do so, he needed the crops to feed workers in the cities, and funds from crops to hasten modernisation. This is evident from "We have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming." This shows that stalin wants to improve farming efficiency, which will benefit him as more crops would mean more food for workers in the cities, and more funds to support his hunger for modernisation.
From source A, I can also infer that Stalin introduced collectivisation to be on par with other European powers economically and technologically. This isn't evident from "And when we put the USSR on an automobile, and the peasant on a tractor, let the capitalists which boast about their 'civilisation' Try to overtake us." This shows that Stalin wanted to be superior to other capitalists and world powers through collectivisation.

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer from source a that stalin wanted to have collectivisatiom so that the conditions of the country will improve to become even better than other countries. it shoes that stalin’s motive was to move away from a “small ,backward , individual farming” and level it up to “large scale advanced collective farming” , a more MODERN better country. he also want the country to be stronger in terms of industralisation. as supported by source a “becoming a country of metal” tells that he wants the country to be stronger and better industralisation and better resources compared to other other western countries , or at least to be on par with them.  (OK, INFERENCE ACCEPTED) L3/4

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin wanted collectivisation so as to modernize and boost the economy of the Soviet union.This can be seen from"We have progressed from small,backward,individual farming to large scale advanced collective farming" and "we are becoming a country of metal; an automobilised country,a tractorised country.At that time,Stalin wanted to catch up to the (GOOD, ON THE RIGHT TRACK. ELABORATE)

# data[].attributes.headline
This source tells me that Stalin’s collectivisation policy benefits the USSR (INCORRECT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE REASONS FOR STALIN'S COLLECTIVISATION). The collectivisation policies is to increase production of grains which is a food source to the soviets. This is evident to “We have progressed from a small ,backward, individual farming to large-scale farming .” It has improved the economic conditions in Soviet Union and Stalin has the support of the peasants from “collective farm movement is that peasants are joining the collective farms not in separate groups , but in whole villages , whole regions...” To add on “And when we have put the USSR on an automobile , and peasants on tractors let the capitalists who boast about their ‘civilisation’ try to over take us!” Thus this shows that stalin’s collectivisation plans was to Build a stronger Soviet Union that suggest a more superior system and improve the economic conditions in Soviet Union.

# data[].attributes.subject
This source tells me that Stalin’s collectivisation policy benefits the USSR (INCORRECT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE REASONS FOR STALIN'S COLLECTIVISATION). The collectivisation policies is to increase production of grains which is a food source to the soviets. This is evident to “We have progressed from a small ,backward, individual farming to large-scale farming .” It has improved the economic conditions in Soviet Union and Stalin has the support of the peasants from “collective farm movement is that peasants are joining the collective farms not in separate groups , but in whole villages , whole regions...” To add on “And when we have put the USSR on an automobile , and peasants on tractors let the capitalists who boast about their ‘civilisation’ try to over take us!” Thus this shows that stalin’s collectivisation plans was to Build a stronger Soviet Union that suggest a more superior system and improve the economic conditions in Soviet Union.

# data[].attributes.body
From source A I can infer that stalin wanted to level up and modernise Soviet Union into a modern world power. (GOOD.) This is evidenT from "an automobile country a tractorised country " (EVIDENCE IS WEAK. EVIDENCE SHOULD SUPPORT YOUR INFERENCE) Stalin wanted to improve the living conditions of all Soviet citizens by being more efficient in farming. This means that In order to feed the population, He need Soviet union economy to be more self sufficient thus he hope that he can achieve this through the increase production of machinery like tractors which is one of his reason for collectivisation.

I also can infer that stalin wanted collectivisation as he wanted to demonstrate the superiority of communism over capitalism by proving that modern USSR could out produce the leading capitalist nations (2ND INFERENCE ACCEPTED). This is evidence from " let the capitalists who boast about the civilisation try to take over us" stalin was competitive and wanted to prove the other country that Soviet Union was  much more superior through the usage of tractors. Therefore,
this was also one of the reason why he wanted collectivisation
L3/4 (BECAUSE FIRST INFERENCE DID NOT HAVE PROPER EVIDENCE)

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer based on source A that stalin's reason for collectivisation was to turn the soviet union into a country dependant of machinerY (VAGUE. IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT WOULD DEFINITELY MODERNISE THE COUNTRY) that would be more effICIent and productive than the capitalist. (SAME MISTAKE. YOU ARE INCLUDING 2 DIFFERENT IDEAS IN ONE SAME INFERENCE. SPLIT MODERNISATION AND RIVALRY BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND CAPITALISM) this is evidence from "we have put the USSR on a automobile,and the peasants on the tractor" and "let the capitalists who boast about thier civilisation try to overtake us" By stating that they will put the USSR on a automobile it means that they would make USSR progress automatic and fast based on the use of mahineries and by making a proud statement into challenging the capitalist to overtake them, it shows that they are positive that they will make the USSR more efficient based on their machinaries. Therefore we can infer that collectivisation was just to produce more funds for more machineries to be created making the soviet union into a machine based effecient country
L3/4

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that Stalin wanted to modernise the country(INCOMPLETE INFERENCE. NEED MORE SPECIFIC WORDS SUCH AS MODERNISE, INDUSTRIALISE, STRENGTHEN, ETC)  from "small, backward, individual farming" to an "automobilised country". This is evident from the source which states that "peasants are joining the collectivise farms not in separate groups, but in" " whole districts and even whole provinces." (THERE'S NO VALID INFERENCE. L1/2)

I can also infer that Stalin wanted to modernise the country (1) in order to catch up with the other European powers, proving that communism is equal or even better than capitalism (2). (YOU HAVE TWO DIFFERENT IDEAS IN ONE SENTENCE. IS IT TO MODERNISE THE COUNTRY OR IS TO PROVE THAT COMMUNISM WAS BETTER THAN CAPITALISM??? SPLIT UP THE SENTENCE INTO TWO. ELABORATE POINT BY POINT. DON'T LUMP 2 IDEAS IN ONE INFERENCE)

This is evident from the source which states that "when we have put the USSR and automobile, and the peasant on the tractor, let the capitalists who boast about their 'civilisation' try to overtake us!"

-_-

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from source A that stalin wanted to have collectivisation as he wanted to improve the country. This can be shown from "We have progressed from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming. " This shows that stalin had planned to improve Soviet Union.

# data[].attributes.body
The message is that the soldiers in South Korea are being held there without their consent but instead are forced to stay there by US. This is evident from how there are two sleeves with an American Flag holding a gun which shows that the US are preventing the soldiers from going back home to their families for an indefinite period of time by threatening them with guns and another with a dollar sign cufflink dropping soldiers into the South Korea. This means that US forcefully put soldiers into South Korea and keep them there by threatening them with violence. Thus, this shows that the soldiers

# data[].attributes.body
The message of source A which is from the soviet union,is that the USA was forcing their soldiers to fight at a foreign land (WHY DID THE US FORCE THEM TO FIGHT, BASED ON THIS SOURCE? THERE'S A REASON HINTED AT HERE ) even though the soldiers didnt want to fight for the US interest but wants to return home to their families. Source A shows that the US was holding a gun , forcing their soldiers to stay at South korea. Otherwise they will resort to physical.means , thus resulting them not able to return homes to their families who are waiting for them. Thus its to trigger the thoughts of the US soldiers on the reason of staying in the foregin land and helping US fight for her interest when US didnt bother about the soldier's interest. Thus its to make the US soldiers go against US and stop staying in South korea (BE MORE SPECIFIC) but return back to their families so that the North and the S.U can easily invade south korea without the presence of US soldiers to protect South korea. (DOESN'T MAKE SENSE)
L2/2
NO MOTIVE, NO INTENDED OUTCOME

# data[].attributes.body
The message of the leaflet is that the american soldiers were forced into stay in South Korea to provide military aid despite the fact that they did not give their consent to do so. (ok BUT NO REASON GIVEN)
In the pictorial source A, american G.I. soldiers are depicted to being dropped of onto the fields of a warground, with more and more soldiers being deployed onto the battlegrounds. The soldiers in the pictorial source look rather lost and keen on heading towards the path that is captioned " The way, Leading to your home! ' , however as they approach the path, an arm with the sleeves of the american flag is holding a pistol which is aimed at the american G.I. soldiers that seek ' home sweet home '

This shows that U.S government was rather merciless towards it's own people as compared to its generosity in military aid towards South Korea as they forced the american GI soldiers into the warfields regardless of whether they wanted to or not, and furthermore prevented them from returning to their homes until the war has been fought as shown by the
L2/3
NO MOTIVE SHOWN SO FAR

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from Source A that the US are forcing their soldiers to fight for them. This is evident from the hand pointing the gun at the soldiers which is threatens them from going back to their families at home. Also, with the This tells me that the US soldiers were forced to fight the war against their will . Thus, this source tells me that the US soldiers were being forced to fight the war.

As the businessmen in US benefitted from the war by selling materials, the US government also forced the soldiers to fight as it would also benefit their country. This shows a negative view of the US , which must mean that the source came from someone that did not like US or wanted something bad to happen to them. Therefore, i can infer that the source came from the Soviet Union and North Korea. L2/3

Thus, the purpose of this source is to convince the US soldiers that US was the one that was forcing them to fight in a foreign country and making them unable to get back to their families, so that they would possibly rebel against the US government, which makes the South Korean Forces weaker and therefore, it would help the Soviet Union and North Korea win the war.(INTENDED OUTCOME. GOOD!) L3/5

# data[].attributes.body
This leaflet was dropped in South Korea to show that the US government is denying their soldiers their right to return to their families by forcing them to stay in South Korea to fight against the communist forces.This tells me that the Us soliders were forced to fight in the war (REASON?). This is evident from the source which shows a giant arm with a sleeve designed to look like the American Flag which is holding a gun. The arm also blocks the path that says "the way leading to your home" suggesting that the Us government is threatening their soldiers to make sure they stay in South Korea to fight against the North Korean and Soviet forces. This shows that there seems to be no form of agreement between the governement and their soldiers. L2/3

Thus, this leaflet was dropped to convince (VERB) the South Koreans (BE MORE SPECIFIC. SOUTH KOREAN SOLDIERS) that the US forces will not be effective in protecting them so as to demoralise them and make them lose their trust in the uS (YES, BUT THE MAIN MOTIVE OF THE US NOT GIVEN HERE) that they could protect South Korea which in turn makes the invasion by North Korea and Soviet Union easier.
NO INTENDED OUTCOME

# data[].attributes.body
This source tells me that Stalin reason for collectivisation is to progress from small, backward, individual farming to large-scale, advanced, collective farming his reason to implement that policy is to further develop the industry of the Soviet Union through using the money that he got by selling the crops (VAGUE. MENTION MODERNISATION, STRENGTHEN COUNTRY, ETC. BE MORE SPECIFIC). In order to earn more money for the development of the country industry, the farms need to expand by a large extend (COLLECTIVISATION WASN'T TO MAKE MONEY ONLY. NOT HIS MAIN AIM. HE WANTED TO MAKE COUNTRY SELF-SUFFICIENT). Thus, Stalin’s collectivisation plan was to further develop the Soviet Union industry.
L2/3 ANSWER NOT WELL-DEVELOPED

# data[].attributes.body
This leaflet was probably dropped by the North Korean forces to reveal the underlying method the United States are doing to force their troops to stay in South Korea. The message of the source is that the American GI soldiers are being forced to stay in South Korea to protect it from threats from the North Korea (MEANING?) This can be supported by an arm which suggest that it is from the US which has its flag on the sleeves and that it is pointing a gun at the soldiers, preventing them from going home. The pictorial source also shows an image of a mother and a child asking “when will papa be back”. These suggest that the united states are forcing their troops to station in South Korea (YES, BUT WHAT'S THE REASON FOR US GOVT FORCING THEM TO STAY AND FIGHT IN KOREA?) to prevent the spread of communism and the invasion by North Korea with support form the Soviet Union. This action highlights the intention of the united states to protect their own sphere of influence by sacrificing the normal human life of the soldiers and restricting them from being united with their family members. These soldiers were also forced against their will to go to war by the united states due to them wanting to eagerly protect their own interest. The North korean wants to convince the US soldiers that due to the United State prioritising their own interest in terms of economic benefits gained from sale of weapons , they will make use of the soldiers and restrict them from living their leisure life. The north koreans wants the US soldiers to go against the United states and not fight for them anymore. (OVERALL, GOOD TRY BUT YOU HAVE OVERLOOKED THE $ SIGN ALTOGETHER. THAT'S WHY THE MAIN POINT IS MISSED.)
L2/3

# data[].attributes.body
The message is that the soldiers in South Korea are being held there without their consent but instead are forced to stay there by US (YES, CORRECT INFERENCE). This is evident from how there are two sleeves with an American Flag holding a gun which shows that the US are preventing the soldiers from going back home to their families for an indefinite period of time by threatening them with guns and another with a dollar sign cufflink dropping soldiers into the South Korea. This means that US forcefully put soldiers into South Korea and keep them there by threatening them with violence. Thus, this shows that the soldiers are held against their will to fight for the South Koreans so as to ensure that Korea will not unify under communism according to their foriegn policy. Most importantly, american businessmen profitted from this war through the sales of weaponary thus this benefited US's economy. (CORRECT INFERENCE BUT WHAT'S THE REASON? WHY WERE THEY FORCED TO FIGHT IN KOREA BY THE US?)

North Korea (FROM WHOM?) wants to convince (VERB) the US soldiers (AUDIENCE) to rebel against the US government and not fight for South Korea as they are being held there against their will away from their family to fight for a country that isnt even theirs. Furthermore, North Korea did not want US to get richer through this war and by gaining the soldiers' support, it would mean that the americans would not be able to profit from this (FOCUS SHOULD BE ON THE SOLDIERS) causing US to retreat and allowing North Korea to unify Korea under communism and Soviet Union to gain some economic advantage on the US.
L3/4

# data[].attributes.body
The message of this source is that the us soldiers are being held against their will to stay in South Korean and fight (YES, CORRECT INFERENCE) and that they are being paid money for the price of Not being able to see their families for the duration of the war (???? NOT CORRECT). This is evident from seeing a gun being pointed at The american GI soldiers with them looking at a child and women who represents their family. This shows that they have a huge desire to return back to their families but are unable to due to the US government (COMPLETE IT!)
L2/2

# data[].attributes.body
This shows that U.S government was rather merciless towards it's own people as compared to its generosity in military aid towards South Korea as they forced the american GI soldiers into the warfields regardless of whether they wanted to or not, and furthermore prevented them from returning to their homes until the war has been fought as shown by the ruthless potential aggression 'the arm pointing the gun' towards those that give up the fight and not support the U.S G

# data[].attributes.body
The message of source A which is from the soviet union,is that the USA was forcing their soldiers to fight at a foreign land so that they can continue the war for both the country interest and the business man interest even though the soldiers didnt want to fight for the US interest but wants to return home to their families. Source A shows that the US was holding a gun , forcing their soldiers to stay at South korea. Otherwise they will resort to physical.means , thus resulting them not able to return homes to their families who are waiting for them. Thus its to trigger the thoughts of the US soldiers on the reason of staying in the foregin land and helping US fight for her interest when US didnt bother about the soldier's interest. Thus its to make the US soldiers go against US and stop staying in South korea so as to end the war ut return back to their families so that the North and the S.U can easily invade south korea without the presence of US soldiers to protect South korea.