# data[].attributes.body
At the crime scene, we found Anna's Garcia's body. Afterwards, we needed to find the time in which Anna died. Using the glacier equation, we subtracted the measured temp, which was 92.4, from 98.4 and found that the difference was 6 Degrees Celsius. Then this must be divided by 1.5 to get the results that the body was approximately dead for four hours and the body was found at 11 AM. This shows that Anna Garcia died at 7 AM.

98.4 - 92.4                 6               4
/                                     /                 /
1.5                               1.5              1

4 Hours

# data[].attributes.body
At the crime scene, a footprint was found. Then the bottom of the shoes of all of the possible suspects were also pictured. When determining whose shoe print it was, I noticed that the shoe print had a shape imprint that was also found on one of the possible suspects shoes. Along with this, if the picture of the person's shoe was rotated 90 degrees clockwise or counterclockwise, the height toward the center of the shoe was higher off the ground while the rest of the shoe was on the ground. This would make the footprint have a missing gap in between the sole of the shoe and the front part of the shoe. The person whose shoes matched the footprint was Anna Garcia, which was determined using all the evidence above.

# data[].attributes.body
To identify fingerprints, we had to use information such as ridge patterns and minutiae.

Ridge Patterns:
-The ridge pattern category for Alex Garcia was a radial loop

-The ridge pattern category for Doug Greene was a plain arch

-The ridge pattern category for Eric Piedmont was a whorl

-The ridge pattern category for Lucy Effington was a radial loop

-The ridge pattern category for Anna Garcia was a whorl

-The ridge pattern category of the fingerprint found at the crime scene  was a radial loop

In conclusion, the fingerprints had to belong to either Alex Garcia or Lucy Effington as both of them had a ridge pattern category of a radial loop. This could relate to the case, but could also just be a "red herring" where this evidence is not essential in the death of Anna Garcia. But then again, the evidence can be used to form a strong idea or theory.

Now from this, we can start using minutiae to identify the fingerprint using special marks only specific toward a particular person such as forks, double forks, dots, short ridges and etc.

Results: After comparing all the people on the suspect list, the person who seemed to have the exact fingerprint along with minutiae was Alex Garcia. This was because several features could be seen in both of the fingerprints; the one at the crime scene and Alex Garcia's fingerprint. Even though Lucy Effington had a radial loop, she did not have the same minutiae as the crime scene.

# data[].attributes.body
The hair found at the crime scene matches the hair of Anna Garcia as when we look at the pictures of the hairs magnified, we find special features to compare and contrast. Anna's hair probably the same hair found at the crime scene as the fragmentary medullas are basically identical in both of the magnified hair particles.

# data[].attributes.body
Who did the blood belong to?
I think the blood belonged to Alex or Anna. This is there are 4 blood types. There is Type A, which has a particular protein in it, Type B, which has a different particular protein, Type AB, which has both of the proteins in Type A and Type B, and last but not least, there is Type O, which does not have any proteins.

So after recieving this information, we needed to test all of the possible suspects' blood for a similar match. We tested the blood samples by using anti-A and anti-B serums which detected the particular protein in whatever type they correspond to.

Results:

Blood found at crime scene (type B)
-Clumping with type A serum - negative
-Clumping with type B serum- positive

Anna Garcia (type B)
-Clumping with type A serum- negative
-Clumping with type B serum- positive

Alex Garcia (type B)
-Clumping with type A serum- negative
-Clumping with type B serum- positive

Doug Greene (type AB)
-Clumping with type A serum- positive
-Clumping with type B serum- positive

Erica Piedmont (type O)
-Clumping with type A serum- negative
-Clumping with type B serum- negative

Lucy Effington (type O)
-Clumping with type A serum- negative
-Clumping with type B serum- negative

In conclusion, since Anna Garcia and Alex Garcia are the only ones out of the possible victims that have type B blood, the blood had to belong to either one of them , or someone not even on the possible suspect list, which probably is not what happened. From this point, we need to get more evidence, as blood cannot be the sole evidence to convict a suspect.

# data[].attributes.body
Appearance: The appearance of the unknown substance was very white.
Texture: The texture of the unknown substance was powder-like or fine.
Reactor to Indicator 1 (Water): The reaction of the unknown substance to water was an appearance of bubbles.
Reactor to Indicator 2 (Iodine): The reaction of the unknown substance to the iodine was the production of bubbles.
Reactor to Indicator 3 (Vinegar): The reaction of the unknown substance to the vinegar resulted in lots and lots of bubbling.

# data[].attributes.body
The Unknown Substance was... Acetylsalicylic Acid (Aspirin)

My reasoning for the unknown substance being aspirin is that the reactions are the same for all of the reactors for both substances. For example, when substances were tested with Indicator 1 (Water), they both bubbled. When the substances were tested with Indicator 2 (Iodine), they both bubbled a lot. When both substances were tested with Indicator 3 (Vinegar), they both bubbled a very lot. These results were not as closely related to any other

# data[].attributes.body
Appearance: The appearance of the ecstasy looked as as if it was granulated as there were many tiny particles, almost like sugar.
Texture: The texture of the Ecstasy looked as if powder soft.
Reactor to Indicator 1 (Water): The reaction of the Ecstasy to the water was not visible, as there seemed to be no reaction.
Reactor to Indicator 2 (Iodine): The reaction of the Ecstasy to the iodine  was not existent, as there was not a visible reaction.
Reactor to Indicator 3 (Vinegar): The reaction of the Ecstasy to the vinegar was the appearance of the substance thickening.

# data[].attributes.headline
Methamphetamine (all substances are simulated)

# data[].attributes.subject
Methamphetamine (all substances are simulated)

# data[].attributes.body
Appearance: The appearance of the substance seems to be granulated like such as sugar.
Texture: The texture of the substance is salt like, hard granules.
Reactor to Indicator 1 (Water): The reaction of the substance to the water was not visible as there was no reaction.
Reactor to Indicator 2 (Iodine): The reaction of the substance to the iodine was not visible as there was no reaction.
Reactor to Indicator 3 (Vinegar): The reaction of the substance to the vinegar was also not visible due to there being no reaction.

# data[].attributes.body
Appearance: The appearance of the acid seems to be egg white and very powder like.
Texture: The texture feels very soft, almost like baby powder.
Reactor to Indicator 1 (Water): The reaction of the Acetylsalicylic Acid to the water was slight bubbling.
Reactor to Indicator 2 (Iodine): The reaction of the Acetylsalicylic Acid to the Iodine was the bubbling of the solution, which bubbled more than when reacting with water.
Reactor to Indicator 3 (Vinegar):The reaction of the Acetylsalicylic Acod to the vinegar was the bubbling of the substance, which was significantly more than any of the reactions associated with Aspirin.

# data[].attributes.body
Appearance: The appearance of the substance seems to be fine and powdery.
Texture: The texture of the acetaminophen seems to be clumpy almost like a starch type solution.
Reactor to Indicator 1 (Water): The reaction of the acetaminophen was at first the absorption of the water.
Reactor to Indicator 2 (Iodine): When iodine was added to the acetaminophen, the reaction consisted of bubbling.
Reactor to Indicator 3 (Vinegar): For the reaction of the vinegar being added to the acetaminophen, the reaction included bubbling, which had more bubbling than any of the other indicators previously for the acetaminophen.

# data[].attributes.body
Appearance: The appearance of the oxycodone was granulated and similar to sugar.
Texture: The texture of the oxycodone is clumpy but kind of powdery as well.
Reactor to Indicator 1 (Water): The reaction of the oxycodone when addition of water is used is the thickening of the oxycodone.
Reactor to Indicator 2 (Iodine): The reaction of the oxycodone when applied with iodine had no visible reaction.
Reactor to Indicator 3 (Vinegar): The reaction of the oxycodone with the vinegar was also not visible, which means there was most probably no reaction.